YouTube is changing the homepage experience for users who have their watch history turned off. They will now see an almost blank homepage with just a search bar and buttons for Shorts, Subscriptions and Library. This is intended to make it clear that personalized recommendations rely on watch history data. The new design aims to avoid extreme thumbnails and instead focus search. Some users have already started seeing this change, though it may not be fully rolled out yet. The goal is to both help those who prefer searching over recommendations, and potentially encourage users to turn their history back on. Overall this represents a major interface change focused on watch history preferences.


What’s been your experience with youtube recommendations? For me they are consistently hot garbage.

  • Poggervania
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    I like how Google thinks it’s going to encourage people turning it on when it’s probably going to do the opposite.

  • thingsiplay
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    @trashhalo I have the watch history disabled for years now. And the results for the home feed recommendations was more or less of content from the subscriptions I had, with a sprinkle of other content when scrolling down. Wasn’t too bad, at least better than what can be seen when logged off. But overall I don’t care if the home feed recommendations get disabled for me. Not worth trading off the watch history to Google. It’s fine for me.

    There is still recommendation on the video itself, for related content. Also you can discover other channels by searching or with third party sites sites (where it gets shared). There is plenty of opportunities to discover new content. I personally rely and use mostly the Subscriptions feed view with my 137 subscriptions.

    Edit: https://myaccount.google.com/u/0/yourdata/youtube

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      IKR? Like, this is a feature, not a downgrade. TBH, my recommendations are pretty good when I see the sidebar, but I’d be 100% okay to never see them since I generally only go to youtube for specific content, not for entertainment.

  • iAmTheTot
    link
    fedilink
    302 years ago

    In some circles on the internet I really feel like the only person who actually likes YouTube.

    • TwilightVulpine
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      I used to like YouTube, but between the constant increase in number and length of ads, as well as how they keep stifling creators by restricting the language they can use and the topics they can cover, it seems like anything good there exists in spite of the company rather than because of it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      172 years ago

      Youtube is very hard on the people that provide content and don’t have a corporation backing their play.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Only the people who provide content for profit tbh. For the original focus of YouTube, which was simply to provide the ability for the collective “you” to post videos and share them with the world, it’s fine. The problem was, like every platform that provides a financial incentive to do anything, it gets gamed by those seeking to profit off of it and devolves into a corporate hellscape.

        Ignore the monetization aspect and, other than the ads (which can be blocked by uBlock at least for the time being), it’s still a fine platform.

    • Geometric7792
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      It’s funny because I agree with you - out of everything that collects my data I get the most out of YouTube, it often recommends things I like quite a bit and it’s the primary way I discover new music

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        152 years ago

        I take steps to prevent algorithms from dictating what I listen to and watch. Algorithmically-decided culture feels utterly wrong to me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          What is the alternative? There is so many videos and creators I am not sure their is any other way to do it. Besides some form of an algorithm.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            How about not making suggestions? Just show me what I’m subbed to. I don’t need nor want a massive billion dollar company doing anything for me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              But you have already found what you subscribed to. One of the reasons why Youtube is so popular is the discoverability aspect of it. That is my question how does discoverability work without some kind of algorithm recommending people videos.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Music-wise: Radio stations “oh but the radio sucks” yeah but online radio stations don’t. They don’t have any ads. Start with NTS 1 and 2 and go from there. Last.fm browsing USER pages. RYM user pages. Online music guides written by real people. Recommendations from friends- real people.

            Video-wise: I honestly don’t watch youtubers. Their output and quality isn’t up to snuff. No I don’t care about speedruns, about “internet rabbit holes” about any of that. About people restoring old gear. About basically anything. So I watch actual TV shows and actual movies, and you guessed it, I get those recommendations from REAL PEOPLE.

            I deleted my original comment cos I felt it was a little negative but somehow that didn’t propagate across the fediverse… weird!

          • GolGolarion
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            human interaction, mostly. I get a lot of my new music from a guy who scours bandcamp for stuff he likes as a hobby.

    • Riker_Maneuver
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 years ago

      I love the content/creators, but hate the company that runs it. Sadly, unless you are willing to give up the channels you love there isn’t much in the way of alternatives.

  • StarServal
    link
    fedilink
    692 years ago

    This is great!

    Could you also not show a link to shorts? I could also do without those.

  • Riker_Maneuver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Cool, now make the search useful again by letting me do -thingIdon’twant or “thing I do want” in quotes. Why did that functionality even go away? Search is such garbage now that tries to get you to click on shit you didn’t search for.

    • Xperr7
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      That, and remove the 3 vids of what I searched for, then 3 vids of whatever the fuck, then shorts thay may or may not be related.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        And also how if you’re looking at a creator’s page and you start scrolling to see their old stuff it starts putting in random videos from other people in the feed.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The change is all part of a “new viewer experience” Google announced on Tuesday.

    That means you’ll only see the search bar on the homepage, along with the Shorts, Subscriptions, and Library buttons.

    This could come as a welcome change for people who hate sifting through increasingly extreme thumbnails to find the play button, but it could also be a way to annoy users into turning the history back on.

    Google says it’s going to roll out this feature “over the next few months,” but several users across the web are already seeing the change.

    In place of YouTube’s recommended videos is a notice that reads, “Your watch history is off.

    “We are launching this new experience to make it more clear which YouTube features rely on watch history to provide video recommendations and make it more streamlined for those of you who prefer to search rather than browse recommendations,” Google writes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I already leave it on as the watch history can be pretty handy especially when I accidentally close a video

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    I never open youtube to watch what’s on the homepage, so that’s a plus for me. I also don’t watch using an account so it doesn’t matter either way.

  • Big P
    link
    fedilink
    1292 years ago

    Is this not a privacy win though? Isn’t this what people want?

    • thingsiplay
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      @peter I’m not actually sure if this is a privacy win at all. I use Google for years with disabled history (and other stuff disabled) and this new change does not make any difference to my privacy. At the moment, still, the home feed recommendations is mostly about videos from my subscriptions, past videos and the newest one. All it does is take away that view, which does not improve privacy. What actually improves privacy is to disable the history, which you could do since years.

      Edit: I totally forgot the link I wanted to provide: https://myaccount.google.com/u/0/yourdata/youtube

      • Big P
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        But if you disabled the history and they still had recommendations then they were still storing your history in some capacity. Now they’re probably not doing that.

        • thingsiplay
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          @peter No. As said, the recommendations was based on my subscriptions and mostly old videos from the subscriptions.

    • Otter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Same

      I used to use an extension to do something similar, but disabled it when I went and cleared out a bunch

      The trend across different interfaces seems to be to crowd it with more junk. Cleaning it up seems like a win, as long as the content is still accessible through other means.

    • circuitfarmer
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      Yes. This is the functionality I want if Watch History is off. Chalk one up.

      *chalk one very, very minor win up

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      782 years ago

      lol right? I call this an absolute win! Less garbage on the homepage and more privacy! Should be a search bar and that’s about it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        272 years ago

        I agree, it should look like the Google home page. I’m actually surprised google has never gone the way of Yahoo, MSN, etc and crammed their home page full of shit “news” articles & videos.

        • Scrubbles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          232 years ago

          That’s what makes them different and they know it, the simple search page. They learned a long time ago to fill the results page with shit instead

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Yesterday, for the first time, I got google search results that were entirely useless. I don’t remember what I searched, but it was a relatively simple question and I was kind of in a hurry. The only results I got were video thumbnails and sponsored products… Also presented as thumbnails. Barely any text anywhere to tell me what the thumbnails were supposed to be. They even removed the choices across the top so I couldn’t select “all”.

            It’s been getting worse for years, but that was the last straw for me. I don’t want to search the web on “large thumbnails”, I want “detail view”. Sometimes I’m searching for a product, but mostly I need information in the form of text written by a real human. If a search engine can’t give me that, then it’s not useful anymore.

            Really frustrating. I guess I better get around to using duckduckgo everywhere.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    532 years ago

    Man, I can get a cleaner homepage at the cost of not showing me my history? Seems worth it to me.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    It seems people are now discovering that they can turn off watch history and think this is a new feature.