• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      So if you communicate with someone you will specify the date in the year 2023 september 23rd we shall meet and not 23rd of september 🧐

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        That is not the point. When you print/document something, use ISO. In everday cases, it won’t matter much.

    • Brownian Motion
      link
      fedilink
      982 years ago

      This.

      I can handle DDMMYY[YY] it reads correctly. But YYYYMMDD is numerically correct, most signifcant to least significant digitwise.

      That thing only American’s do, is completely non-sensical.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        162 years ago

        For sorting or filing, I agree. I think in day to day life, though, Day and month are way more significant. So I actually prefer DDMMYYYY for that.

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I still prefer yyyymmdd for day to day. If year is irrelevant just skip it. If you only use a date format you get used to it and it becomes the most efficient one due to consistency. Sidenote, in my language the default date format is actually yyyymmdd.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          242 years ago

          DDMMYYYY would be great, if it weren’t for 95% of Americans that use MMDDYYYY. Is 07/02/2000 July 2nd or Feb 7th?

          Thus the only solution is to write out the month or start with the year, because no logical group of people currently use YYYYDDMM. Plus by using YYYYMMDD you get the added benefit of the dates all being sortable using dumber applications.

          • ibk
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            because no logical group of people currently use YYYYDDMM

            You are saying it like if MMDDYYYY made any sense. To someone who uses MMDDYYYY daily, they could think of YYYYMMDD as “Its like the usual but backwards” and now you have a group of people reading it as YYYYDDMM.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              You could convince a group of people to use YYYYDDMM, but what I mean is nobody currently uses it. So at this moment of time YYYYMMDD is intuitive, and has a miniscule chance of being mixed up like DDMMYYYY and MMDDYYYY (because a large number of people use these formats).

              Please don’t convince Americans to use YYYYDDMM lol. :-)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              English people say October 5th. Spanish people say 5 de Octubre. Same for other languages. That’s probably why Europeans prefer the other format.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Makes sense, I just mostly interact with Europeans, so I don’t encounter this problem a lot. I really don’t have a problem with YYYYMMDD though anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        I absolutely loath the American favorite: 8/9. Like fuck, is that August 9th, September 8th, or just a fraction??

      • Icalasari
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It is sensical for one use:

        “So when is the event?”
        “May 20th, 2024”

        It’s such a niche use, though

        • stebo
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          In what way is it sensible?

          I get that you prefer saying it like that, just because you’re used to it. It is conventional but definitely in no way sensible.

          • Icalasari
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            In that it at least has a use that one can go, “Alright I guess that technically works”

        • nevial
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          I know you’ve been bashed already by others, but could you elaborate on why this is sensical?

          • Icalasari
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            In a, “Alright I guess that technically works and at least can follow the logic”. It’s pretty damn niche, however (who is going to ask for two or more years in advanced for a date and not go, “Just text/email it”? Heck, even this is pushing it, but I can at least follow the logic)

            Could be that I’m slightly fucking up definitions in my head, it was a long day yesterday

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          542 years ago

          I think that’s because you’re used to hearing dates said that way? Over here in DDMMYY-land, we often would say “20th of May, 2024” and that sounds equally sensical to me tbh

          • IWantToFuckSpez
            link
            fedilink
            112 years ago

            And in a lot of countries they just say 20 May, 2024. So no ordinal numbers for the day.

      • lukini
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        No, YYYY-MM-DD is fine for real life. Just drop the year when it doesn’t matter. Billions of people use this format.

  • squiblet
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    my best idea is a give my gf a white claw and she isn’t mean to me

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 years ago

    I like DDMMYY but for some reason when I include the time as ss:mm:hh nobody shows up to the event on time.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    Easiest is dd/mmm/yyyy. Use it for literally everything. Doesn’t work great on the computer but well enough.

  • kkard2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    to make things as not confusing as possible, my rule of thumb is:

    • yyyy-mm-dd (yyyy instead of yy ensures that it’s not mistaken for dd-mm-yy) (hyphens can be replaced with underscores)
    • dd.mm.yyyy (yyyy same as above) (really dislike using for filenames, sorting doesn’t work)
    • mm/dd/yyyy (only if there is no other choice) edit: mm/dd/yyyy vs mm/dd/yy doesn’t matter because both make 0 sense already edit2: i forgor to say that yyyy also avoids y2.1k and subsequent issues
  • CIWS-30
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Going day to day, dd/mm/yyyy works, but for archival purposes and looking up stuff in the past, mm/dd/yyyy works better, imo. Like when you need to go through a physical file cabinet, or an electronic database.

    Or you’re the type of person who’s zoned out all the time and don’t even know what month it is until you look at a clock or calendar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      for archival purposes yyyymmdd is best. that way you can just sort lexicographically and it’ll also be sorted chronologically

    • png
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I just dont see why the hell you would switch? dd/mm works fibe in all situations and has some advantages sometimes, while mm/dd is fine sometimes, but generally worse or equal.

      • pjhenry1216
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Except it doesn’t sort well in any fashion and it requires two different types of contexts to interpret. It’s easier to screw up the order of a month by name than it is to screw up the order of a number. Not saying we should play to least common denominator, but we should be making it as easy as possible. I’d prefer sorting speed over needing to learn how to interpret the date correctly if every single date is stored the same way.

  • nevial
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    Date aside, what’s going on with that " blank character " bullshit in the " question " ?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I believe this is still valid according to ISO 8601 so have an upvote. It also works fine in URLs after the host part.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        If I had a forint for something matching order in Hungary and Japan, I would have 2 forints, which isn’t a lot but its weird it happened twice. (Its the order of names and dates)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      But we read left to right and the most important part is furthest right hardest to read. It’s convenient for computers sorting alphabetically, but bad for people reading it.

      • geogle
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I tried reading your comment right to left and was left even more confused.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Why? The year changes least quickly, (especially the decade) so you can often infer without needing it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Because it’s the most significant. If it’s wrong or missing you’re off by much more than if the day or month is wrong.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              But that’s good, like a parity check. Because your wrong by much more, it’s easier to tell from context clues. That’s why people abbreviated the year to ‘in 98’ or something like that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Okay, hear me out.

        With other numbers, non-date numbers, we put the numbers representing the most quantity to the left, and numbers representing the last quantity to the right, eg 1 hundred, ten and 1 would be 111, where the number representing 100 qty comes first from the left, and each position moving to the right, represents a smaller and smaller amount.

        Since years are longer than months, which are longer than days, the YYYY-MM-DD format actually follows the same convention that we commonly use for all other numbering systems, big on the left, small on the right.

        So why would the date be the exception?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      For history, sure, but for day to day stuff I think I can remember what year it is and don’t need it right at the front lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 years ago

        I use this for notes, and generally everything written; mainly for reference when looking back on old information. Today, whether I say Wednesday the 9th, or 2023-08-09, it’s fairly inconsequential, but in 2-3 years if I have to reference a note, email or something else where I said today’s date, I won’t have to compare the date of the note to the calendar for that time period to see which 9th was on a Wednesday.

        Everything you do now becomes history, so adapting to this format makes it easier when today becomes your history.