Even though this would be a win for all Americans – and humanity – it apparently did not outweigh the politics of making a Democrat look good. This is the definition of party over country.

I’m a doctor.So is my mother. When she got cancer, I realized how little that mattered.

Republicans have stated budget cuts need to be made with an ever-growing debt. But where was this attitude when tax cuts for the wealthy were on the table in 2017? They don’t have to look at patients in the eye and break the devastating news that they have cancer. They don’t have to treat cancers that block intestines or drown a patient’s lungs in fluid.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3911 months ago

    How very on-brand for these Republican jerks.

    Also, ever notice how often things are attributed to “Congress” in headlines like this? I mean, given the mention of Biden you could infer that it’s most likely the REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS, not “Congress”, from the headline since it mentions blocking a win for Biden, but…still. Seems to happen a lot. It must be more about that “objective journalism” and the “balance”, etc…

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      And it stands to benefit those Republican congressmen who run back to their jurisdictions and say “Washington isn’t doing anything about your needs. Send me back and I’ll obstruct them from doing the things that aren’t helping you”

      Its a huge fucking scam

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    Unless you’re spending all your money on cancer research, you can always spend more on it. At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line. It’s plausible to me that the line should be where the Democrats rather than the Republicans want it, and it’s even plausible that Republicans are acting in bad faith. However, this article presents no evidence for either claim.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      At some point, you have to draw a line and someone will accuse you of deliberately refusing to cure cancer no matter where you draw that line.

      I’m sorry, I can’t hear you over the $1T we spend on national security annually. Somehow, we’re always able to justify more than the year before.

      But $2.8B over ten years on an effort to improve health care treatments for one of the most deadly maladies in the US? My god! That’s over 3% of our Ukraine military aid budget! We need to draw a line somewhere!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      I think that’s a pretty reasonable response. Maybe not so much that cancer in general is over funded but I’d be willing to bet a breast cancer cure probably isn’t any closer now than it would be with another billion. It’s definitely a bad look for the GOP though. I see a lot of We the people… bs bumper stickers with the f*** cancer! stickers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Spending one billion on breast cancer drug discovery/ development would probably lead to one more drug which increases survival by 10-20%. Or if spend on fundamental research it would lead to a lot of additional knowledge. Which might lead in about 10 years (and a few billions more) to a few drugs which increase survival a further 30-40 %.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1911 months ago

    So what needs to happen, since we seem to let heads of state address Congress, is to have a mandatory session where cancer patients all come out, addressing their concerns directly.
    Since it’s apparently no longer enough to speak at the ballot box, thinking that the person you’re voting for might actually have your good will in mind.

    Let the patients speak. Show the room their pic lines. Let them explain about how shitty they feel most days and read names of those in their families who have died from the same cancer they’re carrying now.
    Let them say directly to those who put bias and politics first how disgusted they are with the men and women who are supposed to be the ones fighting for them. Not against them like it’s some highschool pissing match.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      It would work if these politicians had empathy, but they don’t. Otherwise, the world wouldn’t become the shithole that it is now and massive efforts would be put towards greenhouse gases reduction.

      Thoughts and prayers as they say.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        It’ll work like the 9/11 Responder’s Bill (eventually) worked: Representatives got shamed into voting for it. Maybe Jon Stewart can do it again…

        But no, it won’t be because they actually give a shit, they will only act when they realize not acting will make it worse.

  • cabbage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1511 months ago

    Not surprising they’d block it considering the Republican party is cancer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    Apparently no one has told Republicans about how many innocent unborn babies get cancer. That seems to motivate them, let’s get some billboards going.

    • Media Sensationalism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      I wouldn’t bother. If it’s legitimate cancer, the body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      congressional swimming retreat on the Cuyahoga River?

      Hold on I got more:

      free housing for congress members on Love Canal?

      Go sight seeing in East Palestine?

      bikini atoll beach day?

      Spa day in Centralia, PA?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        711 months ago

        You could send them to northst Louis. It’s heavily irradiated from all the uranium refinement that Mallinkrodt did for the government in the 40s. They just poured it out in a big hole that they then turned into a garbage heap and set on fire.

        Its conveniently where all the poor people live.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5211 months ago

    Why an American went to Cuba for cancer care

    Cuba has faced more than 50 years of US sanctions. Now, for the first time, a unique drug developed on the communist island is being tested in New York state. But some American cancer patients are already taking it - by defying the embargo and flying to Havana for treatment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Really shows how ass backwards the US really is.

      Cuba, a country that the US has tried to destroy for over 60 years now with economic sanctions, has better healthcare than the US, aka the richest nation on the planet.

      There is no excuse for the state of healthcare in the US. We really have some evil, greedy people deciding to let people die so they can have more money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1411 months ago

        Cuba has three sides of the coin: one for foreigners, another for citizens and finally for politicians.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1411 months ago

        Also Cuba didn’t really do anything? They only truly alligned themselves with the communist block after the united states decided to start being shitty to them out of nothing but paranoia. Classic tyrant looking everywhere for conspiracies and causing some to appear moment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        Cymraeg
        9
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The stuff passed during Nixon’s presidency was mostly not bad, because he had a progressive congress and knew it was good for his public image if he went along with their stuff (and took credit for their successes), but Nixon realized Southern Strategy, and his presidency perhaps marked the start of descent into incivility and absurdity in politics. He was a piece of shit in every regard imaginable, but he wasn’t an obstructionist afaik.

        Reagan is where policy took a SHARP dive, straight into the ground. He was the next step which was allowed by Nixon turning national politics into a rapid-fire shit-spewing competition.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          I won’t necessarily speaking on policy, but more-so as a time-frame of when certain lines were crossed.

          With Nixon, the Nixon Goes to China moment could be argued was the point in time which ultimately lead to massive off-shoring/out-sourcing that gutted America’s manufacturing industries and set the middle-class on its downward spiral.

          Then there was his prolonging of the Vietnam War for his political benefit, at the cost of needless soldiers lives.

          Then there’s the whole Watergate fiasco, which directly led to the founding of Fox News.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Calling opening relations with China as a negative is a bad take.

            The companies that sold out the skeleton of the USA, by screwing the employees to pay shareholders and executives, are to blame for the current situation.

            Was the EPA also a negative move to you?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1511 months ago

        This. Reagan in particular just lovedb nothing more than knocking the supports out from under bridges. Fucking old bastard.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        I think the JFK assasination pretty clearly shows the MIC/CIA et al has been firmly in control since the 50s.

      • Stern
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        Reagan led the charge but there was also folks like Gingrich and Armey doing stuff like the Contract with America (Heritage Foundation endorsed) and pushing to never let the dems have a win, and always oppose whatever they do.

        I’m of the opinion that sunshine laws also fucked things up but that’s a whole other discussion.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          I’m of the opinion that sunshine laws also fucked things up but that’s a whole other discussion.

          I apologize for steering the conversation toward another discussion, but I’m unfamiliar with the Sunshine Laws so I did a quick search:

          “Sunshine laws are regulations requiring transparency and disclosure in government or business. Sunshine laws make meetings, records, votes, deliberations, and other official actions available for public observation, participation, and/or inspection. Sunshine laws also require government meetings to be held with sufficient advance notice and at times and places that are convenient and accessible to the public, with exceptions for emergency meetings.” (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sunshinelaws.asp, Sept. 2023)

          Again, I’m not familiar but, I’m not seeing a problem with transparency and advance notice to ensure transparency. What particular issues do you have with Sunshine Laws?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          WW2 was all about bombing civilian cities.

          London, Dresden, they were all targets. Bombs and war were much less precise then. Taking out manufacturing capability was a valid tactic and part of that meant killing workers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2911 months ago

      We fought ourselves over slaves. Think stuff like this has always been in our blood. The world wars just made us look good for a while.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        711 months ago

        And when you FUCKING WON you did the thing I would never do. The South would have been a smoldering pit of cinders in my timeline. I’d have decorated the halls of the white house with the hides of the plantation owners.

        You’ve learned nothing in all these years except how to be polite to the scum you beat until they inched their way back on top of you. It’s truly one of the most vile tales in human history.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          This is why I celebrate the legacy of John Brown. One of the greatest American heroes of all time, considered a terrorist by our government for murdering slave owners freeing their slaves and then arming those slaves to go free more.

          John Brown is my hero. We need more of him today.

      • Enkrod
        link
        fedilink
        1311 months ago

        Is this what happens when Germany stays out of trouble for a couple of decades?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1011 months ago

        I think this hits the nail right on the head.

        For a while now I’ve been pondering this very thing. I can’t prove it conclusively, but I honestly think this goes all the way back.

        $0.02: The USA was started as a bunch of colonies, and we’re co-cohabiting with lunatics that think this still is one. Over time, territory expanded westward up to and through the Civil War. This was done by the kind of people that came to a foreign land, saw it was full of people already, and decided to completely upend that whole situation for their own benefit. You know, the whole “screw them, got mine” world outlook. This is also an ethos that is completely compatible (if not required) with owning people (slavery), secession to maintain that ability, spilling blood over it, and continuing to punch down on “people not like us” for a 150 years since losing that fight. In a sense, we’re up against colonists, the values they espoused, their great-great-great-offspring, and people in their community that keep those values alive.

  • Ænima
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    From now on, anyone who loses someone to cancer will not have to wonder what happened or how it could have been prevented. Death to cancer no longer has anonymity. The mask will forever be removed. We can now lay future loses and pain due to this horrible fate at the feet of Republicans and their partisan horseshit.

    Fuck, I hate those fuckers, now as much as I hate cancer!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      Since they’ve aligned themselves with cancer, I submit that transitive property is a thing. Ergo, they now are cancer.

      And you know what we do to cancer, right kids? Fire, lasers, poison and radiation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      USA wants everyone else blind so they can use their technology tosee and be the only one that can.

      They will absolutely not exploit or bully anyone this time.

      They double pinky promised.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    25711 months ago

    Republicans have a lot of blood on their hands and we should stop treating them as reasonable adults.

    • OptionalOP
      link
      fedilink
      12811 months ago

      We said that in 1992 and 2000, and 2004, and 2008, and 2020, and

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1811 months ago

        And we’ll say it again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and…

        As long as there is a population of ultra wealthy individuals there will always be an asshole party entirely dedicated to those people… :(

      • El Barto
        link
        fedilink
        5911 months ago

        2012 too, man. Congress shut down the government under Obama because “fuck you, that’s why!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        Failing to ruin your life by going first at a revolution with zero coordination is basically the same thing as voting for cancer.

      • BigFig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2611 months ago

        Where are you from, let’s analyze the horors of your nations past and why you should be ashamed of it even though you had nothing to do with it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1011 months ago

          I think the big difference for some countries is their atrocities are in the past while the United States is committing them right now and has been doing so consistently for the last few decades.

          But yeah, totally the same.

          • BigFig
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2011 months ago

            the stupidity in both of these statements, mine (rhetorical) and OPs is regardless of the atrocities, its not the average person’s fault. To imply that ALL Americans have blood on their hands, and ALL Americans should be ashamed of their nation’s atrocities is just stupid. The average person has no connection to or ability to stop said atrocities. We were just born here man, sins of the father and all that shit.