• 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Fallout was so on point, only a lot of distance and humour makes it not outright painful or scary knowing the damn nukes will be popping sooner or later one just doesn’t know if tomorrow or in 80 years. The question is not if but when

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1511 months ago

    They just don’t get it. Once everyone will use AI toilet and AI toothbrush they will sing a different tune.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 months ago

    I was at the optometrist recently and saw a poser for some lenses (transitions) that somehow had “AI”…I was like WTF how / why / do you need to carry a small supercomputer around with you as well.

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5711 months ago

    “AI” is certainly a turn-off for me, I would ask a salesman “do you have one that doesn’t have that?” and I will now enumerate why:

    1. LLMs are wrongness machines. They do have an almost miraculous ability to string words together to form coherent sentences but when they have no basis at all in truth it’s nothing but an extremely elaborate and expensive party trick. I don’t want actual services like web searches replaced with elaborate party tricks.

    2. In a lot of cases it’s being used as a buzzword to mean basically anything computer controlled or networked. Last time I looked up they were using the word “smart” to mean that. A clothes dryer that can sense the humidity of the exhaust air to know when the clothes are dry isn’t any more “AI” than my 90’s microwave that can sense the puff of steam from a bag of popcorn. This is the kind of outright dishonest marketing I’d like to see fail so spectacularly that people in the advertising business go missing over it.

    3. I already avoided “smart” appliances and will avoid “AI” appliances for the same reasons: The “smart” functionality doesn’t actually run locally, it has to connect to a server out on the internet to work, which means that while that server is still up and offering support to my device, I have a hole in my firewall. And then they’ll stop support ten minutes after the warranty expires and the device will no longer work. For many of these devices there’s no reason the “smart” functionality couldn’t run locally on some embedded ARM chip or talk to some application running on a PC that I own inside my firewall, other than “then we don’t get your data.”

    4. AI is apparently consuming more electricity than air conditioning. In fact, I’m not convinced that power consumption isn’t the selling point they’re pushing at board meetings. “It’ll keep our friends in the pollution industry in business.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4911 months ago

    I’ve found ChatGPT somewhat useful, but not amazingly so. The thing about ChatGPT is, I understand what the tool is, and our interactions are well defined. When I get a bullshit answer, I have the context to realize it’s not working for me in this case and to go look elsewhere. When AI is built in to products in ways that you don’t clearly understand what parts are AI and how your interactions are fed to it; that’s absolutely and incurably horrible. You just have to reject the whole application; there is no other reasonable choice.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 months ago

    To be honest, I lost all interest in the new AMD CPUs because they fucking named the thing “AI” (with zero real-world application).

    I’m in the market for a new PC next month and I’m gonna get the 7800X3D for my VR gaming needs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3211 months ago

    Lets see if this finally kills the AI hype. Big tech is pushing for AI because it is the ultimate spyware, nothing more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11411 months ago

    LLM based AI was a fun toy when it first broke. Everyone was curious and wanted to play with it, which made it seem super popular. Now that the novelty has worn off, most people are bored and unimpressed with it. The problem is that the tech bros invested so much money in it and they are unwilling to take the loss. They are trying to force it so that they can say they didn’t waste their money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5511 months ago

      Honestly they’re still impressive and useful it’s just the hype train overload and trying to implement them in areas they either don’t fit or don’t work well enough yet.

      • GratefullyGodless
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1911 months ago

        AI does a good job of generating character portraits for my TTRPG games. But, really, beyond that I haven’t found a good use for it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          One place where I found AI usefull is in generating search queries in JIRA. Not having to deal with their query language every time I have to change a search filter, but being able to just use the built in AI to query in natural language has already saved me like two or three minutes in total in the last two months.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          …also TTRPH, TTRPI, TTRPJ, TTRPK, TTRPL, TTRPM, TTRPN, TTRPO, TTRPP, TTRPQ, TTRPR, TTRPS, TTRPT, TTRPU, TTRPV, TTRPW, TTRPX, TTRPY and TTRPZ games.

          But beyond that, no good use, no siree.

          PS: spoiler

          that was WAY harder to type than I expected.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          911 months ago

          So far that’s been the best use of AI for me too. I’ve also used it to help flesh out character backgrounds, and then I just go through and edit it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1111 months ago

            Yeah exactly, as a tool that doesn’t need to be perfect to give you a starting point it’s excellent. But companies sort of forgot the “as a tool” part and are just implementing ai outright in places it’s not ready yet like drive-thru windows or voice only interface devices…it’s not ready for that shit currently (if it ever truly will be).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 months ago

              They are all completely half-baked products being rolled out before they’re ready because none of these billion dollar tech companies will allow a product to not immediately generate revenue.

              I’m really enjoying seeing the backlash of everyone unanimously being sick of having this unfinished tech shoved down our throats.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1311 months ago

        Even in areas where they would fit it’s really annoying how some companies are trying to push it down our throats.

        It’s always some obnoxious UI element, screaming at me their 3 example questions, and I always sigh and think, “I have to assume you can only answer these 3 particular questions, and why would I ask those questions, and when I ask UI questions I expect precise answers so would I want to use AI for that.”

        I have no doubt that LLM’s have more uses than I can think of, but come on…

        I’m happy for studies like this. People who are trying to smear their AI all over our faces need to calm, the f…k, down.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      I agree with this, my sentiments exactly as well. Getting AI pushed towards us from every direction & really never asked for it. Like to use it for certain things but go to it when needed. Don’t want it in everything, at least personally.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2011 months ago

      Many of us who are old enough saw it as an advanced version of ELIZA and used it with the same level of amusement until that amusement faded (pretty quick) because it got old.

      If anything, they are less impressive because tricking people into thinking a computer is actually having a conversation with them has been around for a long time.

      • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So you want to tell me they all spent billions and made huge data centres that suck more power than small country so we can all play with it, generate some cringy smut and then toss it away?

        This is kinda insane if that’s how it will play out

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          Not the first time this has happened. Even recently. See NFTs. Venture capitalists hear “tech buzzword” and throw money at it because if they’re lucky, it’s the next Google. Or at least it gets an IPO and they can cash out.

          • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah but the scale is bigger and we could be doing something worthwhile with all these finite resources it makes me a bit dizzy

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              English
              311 months ago

              We could, but they don’t care about making the world a better place. They care about getting rich. And then if everything collapses, they can go to their private island or their doomsday vault or whatever and enjoy the apocalypse.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2311 months ago

          No, 47. Believe it or not, the first PCs came out when I was a young whippersnapper.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 months ago

            Fuck yea man, Dr Sbaitso was the one for me. I loved that shit. It still fucks with people when I bust that out on Dosbox.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              English
              911 months ago

              Mine was an Apple ][+.

              (And yes, that’s how you write it properly. I’m a pedant.)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                411 months ago

                When I was a kid my folks bought the TI 99/4A for some ridiculous reason. It’s interesting to look back at the weird hardware that never made it, like the cartridges that thing used instead of 5¼" floppies that were also out at the time. Maybe it reminded them of inserting 8 tracks.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            Oh OK cause the article you sent mentioned ELIZA being developed between 1964-67 so I had to ask.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m actively turned off because they suck up my data to use it.

    I love the idea of local only AI and would use those products, and do play with local LLM/Image products.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6911 months ago

    I can attest this is true for me. I was shopping for a new clothes washer, and was strongly considering an LG until I saw it had “AI wash”. I can see relevance for AI in some places, but washing clothes is NOT one of them. It gave me the feeling LG clothes washer division is full of shit.

    Bought a SpeedQueen instead and been super happy with it. No AI bullshit anywhere in their product info.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    They’ve overhyped the hell out of it and slapped those letters on everything including a lot of half baked ideas. Of course people are tired of it and beginning to associate ai with bad marketing.

    This whole situation really does feel dotcommish. I suspect we will soon see an ai crash, then a decade or so later it will be ubiquitous but far less hyped.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      What did they even expect, calling something “AI” when it’s no more “AI” than a Perl script determining whether a picture contains more red color than green or vice versa.

      Anything making some kind of determination via technical means, including MCs and control systems, has been called AI.

      When people start using the abbreviation as if it were “the” AI, naturally first there’ll be a hype of clueless people, and then everybody will understand that this is no different from what was before. Just lots of data and computing power to make a show.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4811 months ago

      Thing is, it already was ubiquitous before the AI “boom”. That’s why everything got an AI label added so quickly, because everything was already using machine learning! LLMs are new, but they’re just one form of AI and tbh they don’t do 90% of the stuff they’re marketed as and most things would be better off without them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I keep thinking about how Google has implemented it. It sums up my broader feelings pretty well. They jammed this half-baked “AI” product into the very fucking top of their search results. I can’t not see it there - its huge and takes up most of my phone’s screen after the search, but I always have to scroll down past it because it is wrong, like, pretty often, or misses important details. Even if it sounds right, because I’ve had it be wrong before I have to just check the other links anyway. All it has succeed at doing in practice is make me scroll down further before I get to my results (not unlike their ads, I might add). Like, if that’s “AI” it’s no fucking wonder people avoid it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1411 months ago

    I’ve been applying similar thinking to my job search. When I see AI listed in a job description, I immediately put the company into one of 3 categories:

    1. It is an AI company that may go out of business suddenly within the next few years leaving me unemployed and possibly without any severance.
    2. Management has drank the Kool-Aid and is hoping AI will drive their profit growth, which makes me question management competence. This also has a high likelihood of future job loss, but at least they might pay severance.
    3. The buzzword was tossed in to make the company look good to investors, but it is not highly relevant to their business. These companies get a partial pass for me.

    A company in the first two categories would need to pay a lot to entice me and I would not value their equity offering. The third category is understandable, especially if the success of AI would threaten their business.

  • NidoranDuran
    link
    fedilink
    5511 months ago

    Every company that has been trying to push their shiny, new AI feature (which definitely isn’t part of a rush to try and capitalize on the prevalence of AI), my instant response is: “Yeah, no, I’m finding a way to turn this shit off.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1311 months ago

      My response is even harsher…“Yeah, no, I’m finding a way to never use this company’s services ever again.” Easier said than done, but I don’t even want to associate with places that shove this in my face.