Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months ago

Chrome’s Manifest V3, and its changes for ad blocking, are coming real soon

arstechnica.com

external-link
message-square
27
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
109
external-link

Chrome’s Manifest V3, and its changes for ad blocking, are coming real soon

arstechnica.com

@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months ago
message-square
27
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
Chrome is warning users that their extension makers need to update soon.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4•
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This can be problem for Firefox and Chromium based Browsers, too. If the Website decides that Manifest v3 is mandatory to visit their site, they can block any access from Browsers with v2 running in the background easier than before.

    • mihor
      link
      fedilink
      7•11 months ago

      Then I guess I simply won’t frequent those sites.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10•11 months ago

      Websites don’t get to see what addons are you running

      • The Doctor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4•11 months ago

        https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Navigator/plugins

        https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/reference/api/management#method-getAll

        https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/management/getAll

        • Mel A
          link
          fedilink
          7•11 months ago

          Luckily the first link is for a deprecated property that returns a hard coded list for compatability reasons, and the other two are extension apis that random websites can’t access.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6•11 months ago

            Besides, with uBO (or a custom addon or userscript) you can replace the value of that list, for all sites or selectively

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3•11 months ago

      A site that does this is a site I’ll never visit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1•11 months ago

        The other 95% of all visitors will still want to see this page. If the most visited websites use such a blocking method, then most visitors will use Chrome.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1•11 months ago

          I mean. 95% of people uses, likes and tolerates shit I don’t tolerate. I don’t use said shit. My life has been shockingly fine that way.

        • ms.lane
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3•11 months ago

          This is why Google is a monopoly and needs to be broken up.

  • Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8•11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39•11 months ago

      Wait what? LOL

      Firefox is compromised because Mozilla bought an AD Company but Brave, an AD Company is not? Brilliant.

      • ms.lane
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•11 months ago

        You’re both right, Brave has been compromised since the beginning, but Mozilla is also compromised.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17•11 months ago

      All Chromium based browsers are implicitly accepting money from an ad company because Google makes Chromium.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5•11 months ago

        Plus having any rendering engine have a monopoly is terrible for the web long term.

        • JackbyDev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2•11 months ago

          Yep. Hey, maybe Ladybird will develop into a nice fourth option long term. As far as I know it’s just Chromium, Mozilla, and Safari being actively developed. (I forget the names of their internal rendering images, I think blink, gecko, and webkit but I’m not sure.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6•11 months ago

      I highly recommend waterfox

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9•
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The only silver lining was they were also going to disable third party cookies, but they nixed that idea and kept this one. I’m done rooting for chrome.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1•11 months ago

      They were gonna axe the cookies in return for a generalized profile in your browser or something.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10•11 months ago

    Hopefully Firefox won’t follow.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29•11 months ago

      Firefox currently has no plans to drop support for manifest V2. It also supports the WebRequest API in V3, so ad blocking would continue to work if they do discontinue V2.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7•11 months ago

        Awesome!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55•11 months ago

    Reminder #891,814 to stop using Chrome and Chromium browsers and to stop supporting Google’s web monopoly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1•11 months ago

      Why Chromium based browsers? I understand using Chrome might help Google, but how does using other browsers based on Chromium help them? By increasing market share?

      • DonWito
        link
        fedilink
        14•11 months ago

        Yes. It gives them leverage when working on standard specs. And it can lead to stagnation. The latter didn’t happen yet, but they already tried to push their agenda multiple times already.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          10•11 months ago

          And it can lead to stagnation. The latter didn’t happen yet

          I could argue that it already did when Google abandoned JPEG XL.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1•11 months ago

            That is a solid argument. I second this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5•11 months ago

      3 more will do it! :p

[email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

  • 33 users / day
  • 60 users / week
  • 394 users / month
  • 1.59K users / 6 months
  • 3 subscribers
  • 3.45K Posts
  • 45.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org