• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2211 months ago

    Turns out making everything into a subscription service doesn’t make it better, it just makes it worse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 months ago

    Uber was always more expensive then a taxi, at least in NYC/London. It was originally marketed as a “luxury” transportation option. The cloud was always ~2x more Operation Expenses with the value proposition that you didn’t have any Capital Expenses so if you were a startup it was easier to sell-out and get started with lower risk. Streaming is still cheaper then cable, but it is getting shittier.

    • Ghoelian
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      Streaming is still cheaper than cable

      That really depends on where you live. With my current provider here in the Netherlands, I would be paying 12.50 euros extra for TV.

      Netflix standard is already more expensive than that at 13.99.

  • zout
    link
    fedilink
    4411 months ago

    They’ve missed AirBNB and the likes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    Clowd was never cheap; it was versatile, and it still is.

    Just, please, get over this ‘cheap’ fallacy. It’s expensive as shit, either in direct costs or the labour required to min-max for savings. If you’re not regularly bulldozing a massive portion of your stuff or running in two regions for resilience, then you should just look at another idea – and Don’t say Azure, as there’s a reason we call that cheap hot-garbage ‘unsure’.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 months ago

      thank you. came to the comments to say exactly this.

      cloud could be cheap, but it’s a lot of work, or at least attention. people get disappointed with the costs, paradoxically, because cloud is easy and, as you put, versatile. and often between any two options allowing to do the same thing, the easier one will be more expensive.

      the biggest irony of the cloud is that many companies it seems, just like different species evolved into crabs, discover that all they need is a couple of own servers in a managed hosting environment, a CDN and outlook.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Indeed.

      Cloud is useful for things like flexibility - you need massive dynamic expansion/contraction of resources? Cloud can do it… But at a cost.

      Or for a startup - you need resources quickly, but don’t want to invest in physical hardware because that’s a risky investment if the business doesn’t survive. But again, it’s not cheap.

      Worst of all, each cloud provider has a convoluted system of features, by design, intended to lock you in to their system once you learn it. So you still have staff dedicated to that.

      The problem with cloud is much better explained here (I have no idea who this person is, just found their blog to be well written).

      • kindenough
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Realdebrid serves torrents instantly from torrentio at 3 bucks a month. Nvidia shieldtv Pro is the best media steamer (*in my opinion which is probably worthless). I had Apple TV’s running Stremio, but it was a pain in the butt syncing, so I gave those away.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    A primary purpose of technology under capitalism is the violent control of people and the planet. Any actual progress is an unwanted side effect.

  • Dessalines
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    I’ve been adding a bunch of torrent-focused features to both lemmy-ui and jerboa this week, the next releases of both should have them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    Is there a reasonable explanation for this or is it plain greed? In my book, technology gets always cheaper, but scalability is also always a concern.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      1111 months ago

      It’s just greed. Companies exist to create profit for their shareholders, any social value they produce in the process is strictly incidental.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Sure, capitalism is a system that rewards greed and egoism ensuring that psychopaths rise to the top of the society.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              Yeah, I think people who rise to the top are products of selection pressures they’re exposed to, and capitalism selects for the entirely wrong things. You’re just another victim of capitalist realism bud.

  • Hannes
    link
    fedilink
    3111 months ago

    Isn’t that how silicon valley worked for years even within itself? Run a loss for long enough until you’ve overtaken the market and then raise prices when the competition has lost their edge.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s what China is trying to do with their EVs in other markets right now too as another example.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        Yet you still see people grumbling about how restrictions on chinese EV imports are just “American/Western Imperialism”, since people apparently don’t understand how valueable domestic production is

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1111 months ago

          It’s because the USA floods countries with cheap goods all the time and then cries foul when someone else does it. It’s pure hypocrisy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            611 months ago

            What cheap goods does the US produce and flood other countries with? Even in the US, most of our products are made in China.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              Well, Facebook, google spring to mind. They are both cheap for the consumer and undermine local competition. Digital goods can be dumped too.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              911 months ago

              US Agricultural goods are heavily subsidized and, thanks to NAFTA, flooded Mexico’s markets and destroyed farmers’ livelihoods.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 months ago

    Yaaar matey! The good ol’ days when all the streaming services we had, combined, was $65/mo give or take. That nearly doubled in the last year almost two. Finally cut off all streaming services.