*Musk has spent days beefing with politicians over the far-right unrest sweeping the UK. *

Elon Musk could be summoned for a grilling by British MPs over X’s role in race riots that have rocked the U.K. over the last week, as well as his own incendiary comments about the violence.

Labour MPs Chi Onwurah and Dawn Butler, who are competing to chair parliament’s science, innovation and technology committee, both told POLITICO they’d press the billionaire X owner and other technology executives to answer questions about the role of social media platforms amid mounting unrest in the U.K.

Musk has spent days beefing with British politicians over the riots, and is locked in a war of words with Prime Minister Keir Starmer over the U.K’s handling of them. Musk on Sunday wrote “civil war is inevitable” in the U.K. and claimed that the response by U.K. police has been “one-sided."

  • @frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    351 year ago

    Love how this guy’s one of the richest people in the world yet he’s got nothin better to do than fuck with the common folk. Guess he doesn’t get enough attention at home, so here we are watching him stoke racism and stupidity to entertain his pathetic insecure self

    • ✺roguetrick✺
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s actually so much simpler than that. He’s tweaked the Twitter algorithm to serve more right wing brain rot for engagement and, being a habitual user, rotted his own fucking brain more and more. He’s indirectly self radicalizing. He’s getting high on his own supply.

      At least zuck doesn’t actually use that shithole called Facebook.

    • @TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      Love how this guy’s one of the richest people in the world yet he’s got nothin better to do than fuck with the common folk.

      to entertain his pathetic insecure self

      To those who have finished watching the first season of Squid Game, this observation is prescient.

      Capitalism replaced feudalism; and the new aristocrats are the billionaires.

  • mrmule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    451 year ago

    Why not just block that whole dumpster fire

  • @Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeeeeah no. As much as I despise musk, the UK doesn’t get to call a US citizen into parliment, we fought a war about that one.

    (So uh, just as an aside, go after his business interests. You’ll nail that fucker to the wall if you snag his UK investments. We haven’t gotten around to fighting the war against capitalism…)

    • @NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Can’t they call him in due to him being the owner of the company and stoking racist riots via that companies only product in attempt to destabilize their government?

      Tho I guess you really only could request it. Unless Twitter is doing actual business in the UK, which for adverts and now with the pay outs for tweeting, they probably are. But even then, one would probably only get the bootlicking CEO Yackinasackarino.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        They can call him in for having a K in his name. They could summon Vladimir Putin if they wanted. There’s no restrictions on who they can summon as far as I know.

    • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      You do realize that Musk is a citizen of two commonwealth countries (in addition to the fact that parliament can demand whatever the fuck they want - and that doesn’t necessarily mean it will happen).

    • @Will420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      As a businessman with major companies operating in the UK. Who is inciting racial hatred and riots. Parliament has a right to request him to appear. I don’t believe that they can even order a UK private citizen to appear before them. Unless they’re a civil servant.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      There’s a difference between a request and a subpoena. Right now They’re discussing basically politely asking. If they want to subpoena him they’ll have to make an extradition request, at which point America will look over the details of the case and decide if they want to cooperate. It happens literally all the time. Sometimes we cooperate. Sometimes we don’t. Usually because Britain is our ally, we cooperate.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      971 year ago

      the UK doesn’t get to call a US citizen into parliment, we fought a war about that one.

      I know American history classes suck, but I didn’t realize they sucked this badly.

      Parliament can call summon anyone they like anywhere in the world. Whether or not the person they summon is required to go depends on local laws.

      Believe it or not, even if the U.S. had a “you can’t summon us to parliament, so there” clause in the Constitution, the British could say “fuck your constitution” and do the summoning anyway.

      • @Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah hell, you make one deeply drunken joke and suddenly you’re at -25…

        FWIW, the US does have a whole host of laws and various treaty clauses that dictate US citzens cant be held to account by a foreign power without either US government consent or consent of the party. Our extradition and criminal parity treaties mean that, in criminal cases, we might let a citizen be tried outside of the US, but calling a US citizen is really really difficult to pull off. Thats what I was referring to when I said “we fought a war”. The UK government cannot compel him to testify, by hundred-year-old-treaty, without US consent.

        But calling a US citizen to testify in front of a foreign legislative power is 100%, by both treaty and hegemony, entirely consensual on the part of the called party. Musk can just say no, and there’s nothing that can be done without getting the buy-off from the state dpt, which… we’re an oligopoly, we’re not going to hand over a billionare.

        HOWEVER the UK is entirely able to hold his business interests and investments ransom, which would be highly effective. If parliment is serious about this they’ll do that, but since I have no more faith in the UK government than my own (okay a little more, the US is in a bad place, the tories would honestly be a step up in most states) I absolutely do not expect them to go after musk in a way that even slightly might work. Which I would love to be proven wrong about, please, some government hold this asshole to account.

      • @unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dude has rot in his brain like damn. Yes he can always just run away, but that wont improve his situation. If you dont answer when you are accused, the sentencing will happen without you. If the UK and EU ban twitter, he wont like that, so its in his own best interest to show up.

        If you wanna do business somewhere, you will answer to the laws of that place or deal with the consequences.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          Sure, I was speaking in more general terms about the bizarre claim that we fought a war to stop the UK Parliament from summoning Americans.

          • The Quuuuuill
            link
            fedilink
            English
            141 year ago

            I mean… That was one of our formal complaints that all criminal trials in colonial American times happened in England instead of locally before a jury of peers, but to ignore the entire legal tradition of jurisdiction and extradition to focus entirely on that is… Dumb. Even then I’m pretty sure Patrick Henry would agree if Elon Musk committed a crime in London, where he should be tried is London. The argument the thread starter is making requires ignoring what the actual formal complaints was and instead flattening it into a simplified version that basically translates to “lol england bad”

        • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Musk is a narcissist, so he’s probably thining the UK wouldn’t dare ban Twitter, now that he’s made it so awesome.

  • BrightCandle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1701 year ago

    He has clearly been inciting the riots online. Treat him like all the other instigators of this and put out an arrest warrant for terrorism. He should stand in a court room and answer for his actions like everyone else, the billions shouldn’t mean he gets to talk to parliament first.

  • jprice
    link
    fedilink
    521 year ago

    If there’s any group that needs to be taken out, it’s the PayPal mafia of Theil and Musk.

  • @SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    Promise the protesters you’ll squeeze rich people like Musk and his companies for all they’re worth to solve the issues with housing and NHS to start with.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    I was hoping they meant “keel-haul Musk” because I approve this message.

    • @Will420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Added to the false narrative that the killer of three little girls at a Taylor Swift themed party at a holiday daycare center. Was a migrant who had just gotten off a small boat and was on an MI5/MI6 watchlist. Which has ledt to a few relatively sporadic race riots from the far right. And now saying that Civil War in the UK is inevitable.

  • @sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    Musk is really upping his asshole game. He’s alienated 50% of the US, a good bit of Norway and now Britain.

  • @Novman@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not from uk, but do you really believe that one person comment or a single criminal event can cause such a mess? It is like saying the troubles were caused by a speech of ian paisley. In uk you have huge examples of revolts/wars between different populations ( irish/english/welsh/scottish ) but this time is a comment the cause… seeing from outside it seems … weird

    • @fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Thanks for your uninformed opinion/question thing. I’ll assume that you are asking in good faith and simply don’t know… much about the UK.

      He isn’t the root cause, but he chose to insert himself by encouraging violence when he hasn’t a fucking clue what he’s talking about either

      • @Novman@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I don’t think that uk political class too ( as other european countries ) know much about Uk. I have direct experience about “communities” in other european countries, but when the problems erupt, the ruling class flee. I don’t think about a civil war, the situation is more complex than it happears and i think that is very difficult that labour starting seriously to wage war to their voter base. Musk is part of the capitalist globalist elite that is causing all this mess ( like tories ).

    • @Lorela@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I’m not understanding your comparison to the Troubles, because Paisley was the lead figure who fuelled the fires of religious hate through his influence, having founded a number of the groups involved in the incidents that kicked off the Troubles.

      Maybe it wasn’t a single speech that caused it, but he was very much the face of the loyalist movement for most of his life.

      • @Novman@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        The one of the reasons of the irish hate against the english were the plantations of ulster. Not a single speech. I suppose that you know a little bit of ulster history.

        • @Lorela@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Paisley of course being instrumental in those ‘plantations’ - i just thought it weird to suggest he didn’t start the Troubles, when he pretty much did.

          Not to say Musk is comparable - he’s not even close to the main actor here. But he is a public figure who has been using the social media platform he owns to stir up hatred against particular groups of people in the UK. And not just on this occasion, he’s been chiming in for years.

          • @Novman@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Plantations were far older than paisley and the troubles. The timeline of historical events is numbered in centuries or millenia. Jewish diaspora started 2000 years ago, mediterranean division between religions 1400 years ago. The changes due to mass migration in europe will continue for centuries, changing the shape and the ideology of the nations for a very long time. Some nations will be born, some other will die.

    • @symthetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      You seems surprised and yet Trump has been charged with almost the same thing for inciting the Jan 6th riots.

      • @Novman@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Any media spread hate against other groups/spread lies. Or you have even read any newspaper in the past 100 years. I read reddit and i read the worst things about adversarial groups any day. Sometime even war crimes apologies, a post was so terrible that could be used as a war crimes proff ( a drone targeting and killing a medical unit doing their work during wartime ). But it is very rare that this kind of speech cause some riots. Ex: never heard of democrats targeting republicans with riots in USA. The strange thing is that russians tell that usa and uk are using the social to promote colored revolutions ( and is x is between them ). So X is an instrument of CIA / MI5 or a russian asset? When the troubles erupted were more simple time.

  • @LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    They should. It’s nuts this motherfucker has the influence he does. He’s an actual dipshit who’s only able to do this because he was born into money and failed upwards. He’s a moron with outsized influence. Hold him to account, please.