As title, if you have post or link any useful resource you have

  • @sweng@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    3811 months ago

    Whether it’s a good thing or not depends entirely on your philosophical views. There is no objectively correct answer, and which arguments may convince someone very much depends on the values and perspectives of the person you are trying to convince.

      • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        Classically, you’d discuss their views with them and find the logical conclusions. Then you’d talk though if those ideas contradict with other ideas they hold. That sort of discussion/dialogue is basically all of Plato.

        • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1311 months ago

          First you set up a news agency. You tune into their fear of inadequacy. You craft stories and spin truths to Make sure that they’re good and scared of the future of them and their family. You keep slowly chipping away until they have no problem with suspension of disbelief. You make sure that day and their friends all have the right tools to indoctrinate each other. Then you get small and big business on board by offering them tons of money to help keep everybody good and scared. You craft laws and put people in the right places in police organizations to make sure that the people you’re trying to scare them with are seen as the Boogeyman. Sure, it’s not technically forcing but it’s forcing…

      • Vanth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3311 months ago

        How could one convince you that your philosophical views are bad?

          • Vanth
            link
            fedilink
            English
            711 months ago

            So have you tried that with the people who agree with the draft? Did you find it was convincing to them?

          • Carighan Maconar
            link
            fedilink
            1811 months ago

            What kind of resources are we talking about here? Clearly it doesn’t help to make you talk to 1 person that holds contrasting views, as that seems to be your starting point. A study of 1000? A study of 100000? An empirical research over 100 years? 500? A meta analysis? 5 people talking to you about it? 10? 100?

        • Todd Bonzalez
          link
          fedilink
          911 months ago

          Sorry, I’m completely immovable on the stance that war is bad. Never once has mass human slaughter made the world a better place.

          I understand that, like everything, there are those who disagree. Moral relativism aside, those people are wrong, in the sense that I have zero tolerance for supporting campaigns of mass death.

          • Vanth
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1011 months ago

            So if you have an immoveable stance against war, isn’t it just as likely someone out there believes they have a similarly immovable stance in favor of the draft?

            • Todd Bonzalez
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              Yeah, and that person, unlike me, is evil, because they are able to see human lives as pawns in a political game.

              • Vanth
                link
                fedilink
                English
                811 months ago

                Uh, just to be clear, I’m not actually trying to sway you. Just pointing out to OP, and to you I guess since you’re engaging, that when someone holds an “immoveable stance” as they themselves say, and aren’t open to changing their views, it is highly unlikely one can convince them to change. Like, someone could up to you and say you’re wrong and evil for your views but that probably isn’t going to convince you, right?

            • @SLfgb@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              Quite a few nations capitulated against the Nazis within days or even without a fight to avoid war. It saved a lot of lives. Does that make it the right choice? Who is to say…

              What’s for sure is that Boris shouldn’t have vetoed the peace agreement in 2022.

      • @aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        711 months ago

        We don’t have a way to do this. I don’t think we ever will. Wish the answer was different.

        The one thing I will say is that logical argument is extremely ineffective for changing people’s views. Personal, emotional stories are best. The issue is that war and the draft is already highly emotionally charged, so it’s gonna be hard to find something that will strike a nerve with someone who hasn’t already come around on it.

    • @Fosheze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Wait, selective service wasn’t automated? When I turned 18 my card just showed up in the mail. I didn’t have to do anything to get it.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 months ago

    Draft them into playing chess with you. Then say “imagine if this was a real army”.

  • @john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Personally, I’ve come to the conclusion that anyone who has the capacity and wisdom to know why wars are waged in the first place would never voluntarily fight in one.

    It’s reinforced my philosophical idea that wars are just a way for humanity to purge the worst of itself.

    • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      1611 months ago

      Eh. Overseas? Definitely not. If my home is invaded? You bet your ass I’m fighting the invaders.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Defending Your hoke is poorly the only way a human can cooe with horrors of war and not come out completely broken.

        Being on the invading side is essentially signing for life time of ment issues since there is no good way to cope besides openly saying yeah I like going to other countries to kill people for money…

  • @Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    9011 months ago

    So, veteran here. I’ve tried to talk people out of joining the military or at least trying to avoid jobs with high probability of seeing combat. Usually the result is they just start prying about what combat is like and make statements about how much they want to experience it.

    Another tack I haven’t tried but it might be more effective, is to describe how miserable it is to have the stench of a burn pit wafting over you, always wondering if the distant gunfire will move in your direction, being stuck manning a 24/7 watch where if even one person who can do that job dies or is otherwise incapacitated you will be stuck doing 12hr shifts instead of 8. Then you get back home and have to fight tooth and nail for benefits from the country that fucked your life up in the first place.

    War is hell, coming home is hell, forcing that on someone can only be justified if they are literally at home fighting off an invading force.

  • Random Dent
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1311 months ago

    I’m not part of the typical group that gets drafted (presumably young men) but my argument has always been that my country doesn’t own me, I’m not its property. If I want to fight for/serve my country I will, but IMO it has no right to just use me at will like a resource.

    This especially goes for times like these, when everything is unaffordable, nobody can get a house, you can barely see a doctor, the police don’t even bother solving most low-level crime and the rich are lining their pockets with our money. The system is not upholding its end of the social contract at all, so why should it expect any extraordinary measures from us?

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      The 13th amendment protects us from forced labor. No matter what the supreme court might bring up bullshit about how other countries do it.

      Hey Dipshit’s, maybe needless wars wouldn’t start if it wasn’t fucking possible to force people to fight in them.

  • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    Hunter Thompson opined that the US draft was better than the alternative.

    Under the draft everyone, rich and poor, was expected to serve. With a ‘volunteer army’ only the poor need to go.

    Another drafted vet said that draftees are more likely to speak up if civilians are targeted because the soldiers know that they are eventually going home. Lifers will obey all orders.

    • @Mathazzar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      Systemic racism in the US ment an inproportionate number of drafted service personnel were black as white draftees were able to get college deferments in higher numbers.

      This boiled back down to the poorer economic situation of black peoples in the Civil rights era fighting for basic equality.

      The draft also caused friction that increased fraggings as this racist treatment by educated white officers or NCOs were dealt with locally. Fragging was furthered by a disconnect between draftees who wanted to just survive and glory hounds who saw military service and War as some great adventure.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      Under the draft everyone, rich and poor, was expected to serve.

      You can’t expect shit from the parasitic rich… In practice poors went anyway.

      Bone spurs bitch

      And when they went, they chilled at some air force base like Bush Jr

      Good point on war crimes but if war crimes are part of the order, peasants will have to do it and that’s how these things happens mostly anyway IMHO ie it was the order, then once they are caught it is always the “intern’s” fault

  • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    In most cases, The people have been indoctrinated by propaganda and it’s been reinforced by their friends family neighbors local government officials. They’re seeing this as good versus evil. Be it forced draft or abortion bans. You can’t talk somebody out of brainwashing. In most cases they will never change their minds until they find themselves on the s***** end of the stick. When their children get drafted or die in the military, or the wife gets raped and impregnated, they say this is horrible and you go wait weren’t you telling us you felt the other way? And they go I just didn’t know. But they did know people told them they just refused to believe it. You’re basically trying to fight religion with reason, and you can’t do that.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    Its a tough one. A pro draft stance I have only seen with the extremes. Usually with the right its nationalism related, real x should be eager beavers when their time comes to serve. On the left its hey the sons of the leaders and the leaders themselves should have representation in the ware zones. I sorta get the last one as we have an all “volunteer” force that has benefits for signup akin to if you coutry had somewhat decent social safety nets along with training and decent pay. So it has no real draw for the well to do. Thing is that when there was a draft the kept their cowardly progency out with things like bone spurs or such. So they had docs make up medical excuses while they called the ones who were plucked to go die suckers and losers.

  • Bobr
    link
    fedilink
    1111 months ago

    Being drafted (which is forced labour where you additionally have a high chance of being killed or wounded) is always not okay, not just when it is done to invade another country.

  • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    Same reason you cant make them understand that making and holding onto billions in profits is also not a good thing

  • @MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    2511 months ago

    You can’t make a person understand anything. If the very simple explanation of “draft the unwilling and send them to die” doesn’t convince them, they don’t want to be convinced. I couldn’t name a single person who thinks that’s good, just maybe some folks who would say it’s sometimes a grim necessity. And I guess I’m in the latter camp, but shit would have to be dire.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      Yeah like somebody else said, you’d have to challenge their philosophical believes that leads them to hold this opinion first.

      And that in turn requires argueing them from a position not based on “I disagree, and my opinion is the correct one”, but on philosophical, logical and argumentative flaws in their believe system. Which is not easy to do. At all. It’s in fact very hard, made harder by the fact that our brains can see information, actively realize this information is correct and contradicts something we thought of earlier, and yet also discard said information and stick to the existing mental model instead. Meaning that even if you do everything correct, they might go “Yes, that’s true” and then nothing happens, out of no ill will.

  • @That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    I don’t have anything specific, but generally speaking those who idolize war have never seen the horrors of war. Speaking with veterans who have actually seen real combat is a good place to start.