• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    CentOS. We were stuck on an old version at work. The OS is already designed to use old packages for security/stability, so imagine how outdated they are on an old version. It was a nightmare getting new software running on it. That coupled with the other news surrounding CentOS and RHEL, I’m not touching those anymore w a 10 foot pole. I wish it just crumbles and Debian takes over. I have had amazing success with like 20 years on Debian and it just gets better and better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Not sure you can really blame an OS that is out of support and that you should have upgraded to the new version years prior. I used CentOS in an enterprise environment for close to 10 years and really had no problems, except when we tried to shoehorn new software onto old versions it had no business being on instead of just upgrading.

      I remember the upgrade from CentOS 6 to 7. It changed a bunch of stuff including making systemd the default init system. I’m assuming your company just wanted to avoid doing that work? But at the same time most other distros were switching to systemd so you would have had to do that work regardless.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    No longer using Ubuntu at all because they force snaps down your throat. While I do like snaps on the server environment, (I think a lot of the haters out there don’t see how nice they are on servers), I prefer to use Debian and then to just install snapd on my terms.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    Well, scrolling through every comment, it looks like very few people hate Fedora. I’ve always been using Debian and Debian based distros but recently moved to Fedora, and I’m not surprised people like it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ubuntu because of forced Snaps

    SUSE because of Yast and the (german) company’s rumored? stance on antisemitism (google banned Jewish holidays)

    Fedora for it’s update mechanism with the forced reboot

    Arch as the necessary evil

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    Manjaro feels like a bit of a mess to me and always ends up with problems.

    Ubuntu releases too many buggy updates and dumps their idiosyncratic tastes in software on everyone whether people like it or not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    122 years ago

    Arch and any arch based distro. It’s overused, deb is better and the absolute chads will always be distros like NixOS or Guix System. There is no use for an unstable, beginner-unfriendly, distro where you constantly encounter dependency hell.

    Of course I’m just being edgy, every Linux Distro is good for the sole fact of it not being Windows.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    OpenSUSE, mostly because they differ too much from other distros, often even without any (obvious) advantages.

    For example a lot of file paths (config files and such) are different, and when being used to other distros (or just following a guide from the internet) it takes longer to find it (I know there is Yast but I’m not a huge fan of that tool either)

    Also, Manjaro

    • NaN
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      My only real gripe is their default sudoers config.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    which linux distro do you NOT like, and why?

    The one with the most elitist gatekeeping users.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I was using Manjaro until the day my install started giving me problems.with dependencies and duplicated packages (?), so I went with Fedora and it’s been smooth so far.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    58
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Manjaro, for its incompetence.

    I don’t hate Gentoo, but will never use it. I hate compiling.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    The only one that really pissed me off was a distro called biglinux. It’s arch based and very popular in Brazil. It’s actually very stable. Everything works great. It’s got some nice features.

    Butttt, it uses latte dock or panel (kde). They have built in presets for how to arrange the panels and what not. It’s nice, however, I was trying to move some panels around from the base options and broke kde. I wasn’t doing anything more than changing GUI settings and the whole desktop broke. I seriously don’t understand.

  • hitagi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ubuntu. Snaps are a buggy mess. I know you can remove them but I like sane defaults. Snap drives me insane. Mint, PopOS, Debian are better choices for a stable distro.

    edit: I also don’t like Fedora and CentOS. The installers tend to be very buggy for me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      When I learned that snap has a hardcoded requirement for a snap directory polluting your home directory, and that the devs answer is basically to shrug their shoulders, that was enough to turn me into an anti-snap zealot.