• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Depends on the implant. I have to imagine the only way this kind of thing could be adopted mainstream is for it to be open source, the risks are just too high to let some random company put obfuscated proprietary tech in your brain

  • Throwaway
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    Its a good thing? Prosthetics really help disabled people.

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    I’m all for it, things like cochlear implants have already been improving lives for decades.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel; I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine.

    Your kind cling to your flesh, as if it will not decay and fail you. One day, that crude biomass you call a temple will wither, and you will beg my kind to save you.

    But I am already saved.

    For the machine is immortal.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    Wearable > implantation

    Just a security concern. Augmenting is great but we don’t want the augmentations to become a liability. Obviously there are exceptions to every rule, if we invent a robotic arm replacement for someone who’s lost one, the security concerns are generally lower than the quality of life improvement of having a functioning arm 99% of the time, and there’s an argument for the potential ability for rapid detachment in case of emergency, but once we get into subdermal and brain implants, we’re in a territory where these things can’t be easily removed in case of emergency, and the risks get immense.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    472 years ago

    Not against it on principle, but there’s no way I’d get it knowing about the way the corporations that have the resources to make it happen operate.

  • 5ublimation [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    I am not looking forward to having my eyes scooped out for a second time because the company providing bionic vision went out of business.

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Cool for people with disabilities or medical needs. But otherwise I’m not a fan of purely cosmetic/cyberpunk/silicon valley style augmentation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    902 years ago

    Conceptually? I’m all for it. Why wouldn’t I be.

    In practice, we live in a capitalist society and I don’t want an arm that makes me watch an advertisement before I open a bag of chips.