The rule could be anything, as funny or as serious as you want. The universe will progress in a similar way that it has up until this point, unless your changed rule prevented it from doing so.

Some examples might be:

  • The invention of currency is not allowed.
  • Iron is slightly less stable.
  • The Ancient Greeks are able to cultivate Silphium, which does not go extinct now.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 months ago

    Fell asleep thinking of a question similar last night. No colonialism. Colonizing other lands outside of your own established borders would be forbidden.

    How different the world would be.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        I thought on this also, and I suppose in my “rule” to adhere by I would have to choose a time in human history. I’d likely choose a time from year 0-1000 but would need to research and get input from folks smarter than I before choosing the time that rule would be implemented.

        Of course, it only bans colonization. This is specifically the act of taking over lands from those who are indigenous to said lands, usually by force. If the governments of two lands what to trade or sell their lands in agreement without force, this would not be illegal.

        I’m certain humans would still find a way to be horrible in some other new fun way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 months ago

    There is a normal integer between 4 and 5 but sapient beings are completely incapable of percieving it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Sentient dinosaurs that destroy their planet in a ecological catastrophe like in downer finale of the eponymous series?

  • Rhynoplaz
    link
    fedilink
    6111 months ago

    Greed is removed from the list of possible emotions/personality traits.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          I always use Chess boards to describe non-Euclidean spaces when I “need” to (aka when I get even a narrow chance to)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            By all means, explain it to me! My best way so far was siting the chase in call of Cthulhu and really it’s not a great example.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              511 months ago

              Heck yeah, I’ll try my best!

              So on a euclidian chess board, moving your king one space left would be 1 space, one space up would be 1 space, and one space diagonally would be √2 spaces (some simple trig gets us there).

              Chess however, does not obey the laws of Euclidian geometry nor does its physical representation show us things to scale. A king’s move diagonally is the same amount of space as a move side to side, 1 space.

              It’s silly, because spaces weren’t directly supposed to represent distance or anything, but it’s funny that it works out this way

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                411 months ago

                This is a problem I’ve always had with Square grids in D&D and it never occured to me that from character perspective a character is warping space to move slightly further for the same amount of movement.

      • bizarroland
        link
        fedilink
        911 months ago

        It would change the topographical nature of the universe. We would probably have to exist in like the 3.1415th dimension or something to make it work.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Cats speak french, except in any situation where they can be recorded or transcribed, or when a french speaker can hear them. They also aren’t very good at speaking french, but it’s impossible for anyone to know that.

  • bizarroland
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    Silphium was recently rediscovered so it’s no longer considered extinct just highly endangered.

    Aside from that, I would make it so that instead of having mental illness you would have magical powers.

    Schizophrenic? Nope you just talk to the Dead. Adhd? Nope, you’re an elemental wizard. Bipolar? Nope, you’re either a healer or a necromancer. Depressed? Nope, you’re just low on mana. (Major depression means that you’re suffering from a curse) Psychotic? Nope, you’re suffering a mana storm Narcissistic? Nope, you are an illusionist. Autistic? Nope, you’re an enchanter.

    • Rhynoplaz
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      I mean, it’s just a theory so, it kind of already is!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          Yes, gravity is a theory. In scientific terms, theories are proven, repeatable, and accepted. It’s the most robust and strongest form of scientific “fact” we have (since new discoveries can change our understanding, we can’t honestly declare it indisputably factual).

          When people say “I have a theory…” they usually mean “I have a hypothesis…” which is some idea or problem statement that is unproven, untested, unverified.

          OP was playing off the conflation of those two things.

          • RachelRodent
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I think we are in the same page, I am just so sick of people confusing theory with hypothesis. Mostly because of christomaniac creationists saying “uhm actually evolution is a theory not a law” and shit like thar. That’s the reason why I rejected OP’s statement