U.S. moves to de-risk from China with a new investment ban suggest that Western allies may be learning from national security failings in Russia, according to analysts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Gotta get in that preemptive tankie mention in order to score that employee of the month award, huh?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    This article is assuming mistakes were made with Russia instead of things going exactly as planned.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    562 years ago

    If we’re really learning from mistakes in Ukraine then Taiwan should be recognised as an independent country and admitted into a formal alliance. Not admitting Ukraine into NATO was the mistake we made there and it’s being repeated in Taiwan.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      272 years ago

      Hey, I 100% support Ukraine and financial aid for them, but I feel like this conflict runs the risk of distorting history. Ukraine has a very corrupt recent past and admitting them before they clean up their own house might well have just been a different kind of mistake. Hopefully we can be formal allies some day.

      I don’t have an agenda here other than being kind to people who made decisions without the benefit of the hindsight we use to second guess them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        Sure I agree when it comes to admitting them to the EU. NATO is only a military defence alliance though. If they’d been in NATO this war would never have happened.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 years ago

          I’m wearing a St. Javelin tshirt as I write this, but NATO can’t have member countries with the levels of endemic corruption that have existed in Ukraine and are still being rooted out. Shit, Resnikov himself was seen to be only one step away from it in the past year.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Yeah it would require congressional approval. But that’s not beyond the realm of possibility as there is bipartisan support for Taiwan in the Congress.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I’m doubtful that it would trigger a major conflict. More likely China would express public outrage but not do anything about it. But it has to be done swiftly so they don’t have time to react before it’s in force.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      But the US is doing something called “stragetic ambiguity,” where they neither ally with Taiwan nor ally with China. China has repeatedly stated that the day Taiwan declares independence is the day they attack. However, if the US ever feels confident enough to actually establish diplomatic relationships with Taiwan, maybe that’s not a bad thing either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I think we should start calling these bluffs. Can’t let countries bully the world forever. Stop helping north Korea, add tawain to nato. Give them the finger.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Yeah indeed strategic ambiguity has been the approach they’ve taken so far. If they decided to they could change the approach though. I think it’s unlikely China would carry out the threat if a formal alliance was actually announced since in that case they’d be starting a world war. I think it’s more likely they’d express outrage, protest and perhaps fly some fighter jets over Taiwan, take some steps short of actual war. My worry is that if the situation remains ambiguous China might conclude that the security guarantees are not real and that US would not respond. Having strong credibility there is essential for maintaining peace I think, especially if the intention is to actually respond.