…to a reasonable degree, at least.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    510 months ago

    Sandwich baggies. They’re dispose anyway, no need to go for the name brand when there’s usually a cromulent generic at the store.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4110 months ago

    Clothes and housewares. Buying secondhand is vastly cheaper, better for the environment, and can get you surprisingly high quality sometimes.

    Over the counter medications. If the active ingredient is the same, delivered in the same way and in the same dosage, the effects will be the same.

    Games. There’s no good reason to not wait for a price drop and/or sale unless it’s some multiplayer thing and you want to play with friends. In the modern day, you’ll even usually get an improved product after more time has passed for patches and updates.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10710 months ago

    Video games. Unless it’s a game I play with friends I typically wait for it to drop in price significantly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      Also good to wait until all the bugs are worked out. Been playing Cyberpunk recently and it performs really well!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Nintendo’s stuff is free on day 1, or a few years after release if it’s their Wii U stuff. I think the first Wii took a year before the Twilight Hack happened.

        Let’s hope they fuck up again on the Switch 2!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1810 months ago

      Yup. My strategy has long been:

      1. Put game in wishlist.
      2. Wait for it to drop to under 20$ (or close)
      3. Profit. Well maybe not profit, but save money.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3010 months ago

      Also, if you’re not going to play it this week, think twice! And, if you’re not going to play it this month, think a third time!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    35
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Wine - it is full of marketing gimmick and usually the mid range is best. The same is with whisky, rums and other alcohol.

    On the other hand, at least here, is better to pay premium for craft beer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        For wine it is universal, but yes I can’t get decent cider without paying premium, I think that in UK it is different.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          I’m in the UK and there’s definitely better cider if you’re willing to pay £5+ for a single bottle but there used to be a really cheap South African cider that was way better than the big UK brands. IDK what happened but you only seem to be able to get it online at a way higher cost now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        I think there are some really good Bourbons in the USA, but idk how they compare to expensive whiskeys.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          More expensive bourbon tends to be more interesting but not necessarily more pleasant to drink. In my case it quickly becomes too fancy for my taste buds around 2-3x the price of the cheapest one. Whiskey is a bit more complicated.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2510 months ago

    Newborn diapers.

    Get the cheapest Walmart special you can find. Newborns don’t poop or pee enough to warrant fussing over fancy diapers.

    Once they get bigger and the contents start getting…bigger, then spend more on better diapers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      I actually had the opposite experience with my son. When he was a newborn and wasn’t eating solid food yet he didn’t have any solid poos and was blowing out the Pampers at least once a day.

      Once he was size 2 we started buying store brand but it was also the same time he started eating real food so he would blow out far less often. Now he’s 11 months old and hasn’t had a blowout in probably a couple months and we’ve been using store brand diapers with great success

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      Plus buy only one pack ahead of time since you don’t know if they will even fit. None of my newborns came out small enough for newborn size anything.

  • mechoman444
    link
    fedilink
    1010 months ago

    Saline nasal spray. Just get the generic. It’s just freaking salt water.

  • Stephen G. Tallentyre
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    People are gonna pillory me for this, but flashlights.

    First off, you want something that runs off two AAAs, regardless of price. If you can’t walk into any gas station, or any grocery store, or what have you, and buy batteries for your flashlight when it dies, it’s not gonna matter how bright it was before it died. You also don’t want anything brighter than ~200 lumens at the very most, unless you actually need one brighter, for some reason; they drain batteries way faster. You want something thin enough that you’re able to clip it inside your pocket and forget it’s there. You also want one that has an end switch that toggles between two modes: “full power” and “turned off.” If you have one that toggles between low and high settings, you will only use the high setting. If you have one that toggles between low and high settings, and strobe and SoS, you will only use the high setting. Every additional step in between “all the way off” and “all the way on” is just friction you don’t need, that will do nothing but piss you off every time you use the damned thing.

    The features that make big, fancy flashlights expensive, are anti-features.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    43
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Power tools. If you are not a professional and need to buy a tool (if you can’t borrow one), buy the cheap one.

    I used a $30 Ryobi drill for over a decade and it was fine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2310 months ago

      This is solid advice. If you buy a cheap one and use it so much it breaks, you’ll know you use it enough to warrant a nicer one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        Ironically, it didn’t break, but when I was on the road and needed a power drill to fix something, I didn’t feel bad about dropping $500 on a new Milwaukee from Ace hardware.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      But don’t cheap out on drill bits, nor should you try and use the same drill bit for like a decade without sharpening it.

      Think of drill bits like a good, sharp knife. Knives cut far better and far easier when they sharp, exactly the same with drill bits. If you trying to cut something you would normally pick the right type of knife to do the job, exactly the same with drill bits.

      If you driving screws or other fasteners with your drill consider better quality driver bits if you have a lot of them to drive, such as building a deck. Good quality driver bits cam out far far less and will take more torque so be faster/go in better. Using cheap driver bits is probably worse than using cheap drill bits.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Never tried sharpening them myself, always used a service as standard jobber bits are less than a pound to get done for you. I normally save up a bunch of stuff including saw blades and get them done at once to save on shipping at hit the low volume discounts.

          However, its only worth doing on quality components, I wouldn’t pay a pound or waste my own time to get a cheap ass drill bit sharpened, I would just replace it.

          My saw blades start at like £70 so paying £12 to get it sharpened is good value, but a £30 blade is not really worth it, not least for which it won’t cut anywhere near as much material before getting blunt between sharpens. Same logic for drill bills, some of my SDS ones are over £30 each, my augur bits can be over £50 each, so those are worth looking after, not going to bother for a set of 10 bits for £20.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      I wouldn’t even call Ryobi the cheap one, they are good quality and cost more than many others. Harbor Freight is what I’d call cheap - my rule of thumb is that very simple hand tools from HF are OK but anything complex is probably not

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        We needed a router for one job. My boss got a router from Harbor Freight. Burned through the brushes halfway through (same day). Swapped brushes. Finished the job.

        His alternate plan (if we burned through the second set): return it as dysfunctional. As it would be same day, replacement would be natural.

        I think he ended up taking it back for a refund after the job was done.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          I bought a cylinder head pressure gauge from HF and took it home, didn’t work at all. When I looked at it closely I could see that it was completely missing the core valve that is supposed to be in the bottom. It was just a hole instead of a valve. Took it back for a refund next day.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5710 months ago

    Cell phones and plans. Any phone is good enough for regular use these days. And any carrier uses the towers of all the other carriers, it’s not like the old days where there was CDMA vs GSM.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2710 months ago

      The most expensive and cheapest phones are not worth it. Anything in between is good enough. For me at least prepaid phone plans are better than contract plans.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      There is at least ONE exception in the US: Firstnet. They primarily use AT&T’s towers, but they have some additional resources that other carriers don’t have - they have additional towers and entire network bands that other carriers don’t have access to. This allows us to still have coverage in natural disasters or network congestion times. In addition, if there’s a natural disaster that knocks out coverage, they have satellite-based trucks that stage DURING the disaster, then come online as soon as it’s over.

      A few years ago, I had to ride out hurricane Ida in New Orleans (long story). The western eyewall passed directly over the house we were in, and the primary trunk lines coming into the city got destroyed by a cable tower that collapsed into the Mississippi. The next morning I had cell phone coverage when none of the other carriers had come back online yet. We didn’t even have power, but my phone worked perfectly.

      You have to be a first responder to join - you have to be added by your department’s communications coordinator.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      if with cell phones you mean the non-smart, dumb phones then I can agree. however if you buy the cheapest of smartphones, what you’ll get is even more datamining than usual, which you may be even unable go remove because it’s bootloader cannot be unlocked.
      but I would say don’t cheap out on tech generally, because you’ll get extremely weak security and nonexistent respect towards you as a customer.

      smartphones is a dirty business. don’t support the bad actors with your many, and then long term with your data

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        I mean beside the fairphone and pixel with calyxos and graphenos or the librem 5 (and THATs a niche user that’ll like that one) the rest all seem equally malicious towords us users.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          that’s true, but at least try to buy one that’s not extremely locked down, or unnecessarily convoluted to unlock. that instantly rules out all samsungs, for both of these reasons and for destroying phones when sent for repair to an official service

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Nah, cheap phones often have their bootloader unlocked/unlockable. Really happy with my POCO M5 running modified AOSP. Also, unlike every expensive phone nowadays, it has 3.5mm jack, SD card slot, and exceptional battery life for hiking/trekking (it survives 5-6 days as just a camera+map phone with all power saving on, in comparison people with flagships typically only last 2-3 days with the same usage and power-saving techniques).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          I have a very low value lenovo tablet that my provider was giving away essentially for free (for worthless loyalty points I think). its BL cannot be unlocked, it has a special bootloader that does not implement the standard unlock commands.

          Other than that, I have to admit I don’t often deal with cheap phones, because my experience was that not even LOS supports a lot them. Maybe that’s changed though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Yes, that can happen sometimes, but I find that there are plenty of cheap options with unlocked bootloaders if you look for them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      I believe what you say about networks using each other’s towers is incorrect for a large portion of the world. Where do you live?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12310 months ago

    Unpopular opinion but wine.

    From my experience majority of people can’t distinguish between 5€ wine and 500€ wine. And even if they do, they say it tastes “a bit better”, not worth the 495€ difference. Pick one that tastes good to you and don’t be ashamed if it’s cheap.

    • edric
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      I’m far from a wine connoisseur and my favorite is an $8 rosé wine you can find at your local grocery store.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      I somewhat disagree, 5€ is too low to get a decent wine imo. Buy a wine for 10-15€ and there is no longer any difference from the 500€ one.

      The last point however is the key, and I agree wholeheartedly. If you can find one for 5€ then that is good enough

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      I highly disagree. I always walk in and say. “Vitner! Your finest box of wine, on the double”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      There are so many great tasting cheap wines! My favorite is about $16-18 or so but I’m perfectly happy with $4-8 wine too. I will agree though that there are some extremely interesting and complex flavors to be found in the high end stuff that I find very compelling, and can understand the appeal of, but I ain’t paying for it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3310 months ago

      I will disagree with a caveat. Basically yes there is a difference between wines, and it’s not BS.

      There is a world of a difference between a $5 and a $500 wine. But there isn’t a world of a difference between a $5 and a $30 wine, nor is there a world of difference between a $500 and a $1000. It’s about a class structure of the product as with so many things. There’s cheap and simple and there’s more sophisticated and expensive. But once you’re comparing within the same class, it’s really just a matter of varying subtleties. There’s certain distinctions that are absolutely distinguishable such as dry, sweet etc. and there are undertones. This stuff is absolutely real so if someone says it’s all nonsense that someone has not really had the experience needed to make that kind of judgment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1110 months ago

        I drink between $5 and $500 bottles, and while I will agree there is a distinct difference at the higher end, it doesn’t mean the $500 bottle will be better than a $20 bottle to the person drinking it. I humor the people that care about the price, but distinct notes of so-so music doesn’t spin my wheels.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah, no it’s all a question of the person’s relationship with wine, as with other things. If you are perfectly fine with a cheap wine then yeah, plenty of them are delicious. But a connoisseur can and will appreciate what a $500 wine offers them, and it’s not qualities you can find in any $5 bottle.

          Like with many things, if you appreciate the higher-end selections among them, then you’re getting something you can’t at the low end. The question is, even with those qualities, is it really worth $500? And that’s just a matter of economics.

          When my son was born I got a $100 bottle of Glenlivet 18 year French Oak Finish. That’s a rather sophisticated single malt; by no means is it the best because I know people who have bourbon or scotch that costs like 5x that. However, you will not anywhere or anytime find a cheap scotch that even comes close to that Glenlivet. It was some of the smoothest and most delicious single malt I’ve ever had. Lasted me nearly a year.

          Sigh. Due to a medical condition I don’t consume alcohol anymore, and haven’t for a long time. But goddamn do I miss good scotch, bourbon, beer… sigh.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Oh god, right there with you on scotch, all whiskeys (and whiskys) in fact. But wine can be hit or miss, even at the high dollars. Years ago I found an amazing cabernet with a full body and heavy chocolate notes for $2.12, and dank it for a year. But I agree that as you get up to $20-100, the likelihood of something terrible is less, and over $90 very rare.

            I’ll have a glass of something with Glen in the title in your honor tonight.

            If you’re reading this and curious about wine, a couple of things.

            1 - Drink what you like. If you want red wine with fish, fine. The people who care, care more about rules than enjoyment.

            2 - Drink what you like. I opened a $500 red for my dad’s birthday, it was so-so to my palate. I love $12 NW pinot noirs. Don’t fixate on a price.

            3 - When you find something you like, take the bottle to a wine store and ask for a description of the notes of that wine. Ask them to suggest similar wines, and learn to pick out the notes that matter to you. People who don’t know wine talk price, but your sommelier really wants to hear “I’d like something full-bodied, no acid, heavy tannins, smooth finish with some fruit notes.”

            4 - Your waiter is rarely a sommelier and just wants a region and type of wine. West Coast pinot noir generally makes a table happy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              Awesome.

              I agree about the wine; I was just going on like the broadest scenarios because of course when it comes down to it, there’s nothing objective about it. And I agree with the pairing if I see someone bring up the issue of this wine with that protein I take pity on someone who is so stuck to these absurd notions they don’t know what enjoyment actually is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Also very cheap wine seems to give worse hangovers. I’m guessing due to lower quality ingredients, less filtration, and less aging.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Seems something like [Proportion of People OK w/the Wine] - [Price] might be:

      50% - $5
      75% - $10
      90% - $20
      95% - $30
      99% - $50

      I made all of this up. Who actually drinks wine? Did I come close to your made-up numbers?

      Also assume some of the highest-rated wines at each price point for consumers who appreciate that style in general.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      There have been so many studies showing that everyone from average joes to top-tier judges can’t tell the difference between cheap and expensive wines.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      I’m not much of wine drinker myself, but I once did a chef menu with the wine pairing. Every two dishes, they’d bring out a new glass of wine. It was kind blowing how the would taste one way with the first dish and a completely different way with the second dish. I’m not sure I can tell the difference between a $12 bottle and $40 bottle, but in that one meal i understood two things: first, if you know what your doing, wine and food pairings can be magical and, second, I don’t know what I’m doing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1710 months ago

      Wine is a huge scam.

      Sommeliers are just salespeople making shit up.

      It’s bullshit, you don’t detect notes of 15 different things all mixed together.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        It’s actually not really that hard, any cook worth their salt can make a good shot at reverse-engineering a sauce from tasting it. It just takes a lot of practice at tasting things.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      110 months ago

      Depending on the country, and where you shop. You should spend more if you can tell the difference, but not more than that.

      On the expensive end you are paying for the famous canteen+region, and if you go to a wine shop you could find something from a less known vineyard that is as good for less.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24210 months ago

    Weddings.

    Yes, It IS a big day. It’s not such a big day that you spend your entire life savings, and have no future.

    Get a DJ, get a cake, get a hall, get a photographer…forget the doves, forget the ice sculptures, forget the wedding planner, forget the genocidial mimes, forget the big limo, keep it small. Do you really need to invite your great aunt, who you’ve seen 3 times in your life?

    You should NOT be spending like $20,000 on a wedding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      We bought a house, had the wedding in backyard for $10K, we put it all on credit cards for the sign up bonuses and had a 2 week honeymoon to Europe staying in 5 star hotels and first class flights all for $1,300 in signup fees.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1710 months ago

      My brother’s father-in-law had offered to pay up to $15,000 for his daughter’s wedding. He gave them the option of taking it all in cash and then getting a courthouse wedding so they could have a nest egg to grow, or spend it all on the wedding of his fiancée’s dreams, or anywhere in between.

      She opted to spend it all on the wedding. 😒 My gawd did that piss me off.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Absolutely! Making it memorable and fun does not mean making it expensive. Cut whatever you can’t afford, do not take out a loan to cover anything. Then cut anything that isn’t meaningful to you and your partner.

      A wedding planner is helpful if you don’t have a trusted and naturally organized friend who volunteers to handle details for you.

      I’d also recommend taking a local honeymoon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Here’s my pro tip.

      You want a unique picturesque wedding on a budget?

      National Parks in the US. If you keep your guest list under 50 people, you can get married anywhere in the park, provided you don’t block access, put up decorations, or damage the park, and it’s free! If you have more than 50 people, you need a permit, and those are raffled off per day, and almost no one uses them.

      I got married on the bluffs overlooking Little Hunter’s Beach in Acadia National Park. The drive, food, and lodging for my wedding there cost less than the first payment for the venue of my “local” ceremony in my home city, which we ended up canceling anyway.

    • Sir Arthur V Quackington
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      Go, and preach this gospel to SE asian families, I beg you.

      Getting away with a wedding for under 80k sometimes is considered “cheap” by those standards. And you absolutely must invite your third cousin once removed and your nextdoor neighbor who you hate. You see him every day afterall!

    • ElectricMachman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      We spent less than 10k on our wedding and only invited close family. Did most of it ourselves. It was the best day ever!

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      3710 months ago

      A friend of mine donned his nicest clothes and went down to the courthouse with his fiance and a couple of witnesses. I mentioned this to my sister, and she mentioned that in retrospect, she wished she’d done something similar when she got married.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      My wife and I spent $350 altogether for the paperwork and an officiant. We eloped beneath a tree in a park with her family present, and afterward I returned my dress shirt to Walmart for a refund. I will never regret how low-class that was.

      We’ve been married now for ten years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1610 months ago

      I laugh when I hear some couple spent $20k on their wedding but can’t buy a house. Dude, that could have been your down payment wtf.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I mean…yes and no. A down payment for a single family home in today’s market is many orders of magnitude more expensive than $20k. But I agree that weddings are too expensive. Just have a small party and use that money elsewhere.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1710 months ago

      I’m in agreement except for the wedding planner. Whether they help with the planning from day one or are just the day-of coordinator, a good wedding planner is worth their weight in gold. I’d rather plug an old mp3 player into a portable speaker and skip the DJ before I recommend skipping out on the planner.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        Oh, by DJ, yeah, thats all he’d be doing is controlling the winamp playlist basically.

        And a wedding planner I don’t see as being needed.

        Step 1) rent local venue.

        Step 2) ask cousin to be DJ.

        Step 3) pick up cake from dairy queen.

        Step 4) Flowers??? I’m sure the florist can figure something out.

        Thats about it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          eh, as a photographer that works weddings, any wedding without a planner is hell for me. i might actually just say no if that’s the case.

          if you hire people to work it you should have a person who can be their go to while you are getting married.

          if you go for an event like you describe people will be unhappy at the lack of food and leave after not long. if that’s what you want, good for you. go for it. if you want people to stick around and have a good time, you need to feed them. that’s expensive, even if you somehow make it all yourself with food from the farmers market, it’s still going to be over a thousand dollars for most people. again, unless you only invite like five people, but most people care about more than 5 people. throwing a big party of any kind isn’t cheap unless you throw a terrible party.

          you don’t have to have a traditional wedding at all though. my sister got married during COVID in her backyard on video call. it was lovely. a big beautiful wedding with lots of people is also lovely and uniquely fun. just don’t let you relatives pressure you into things you don’t want. there’s where it always goes wrong.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3610 months ago

      Spent less than 1k, no real honeymoon…but we bought our first house with the money we saved. 0 regrets.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5310 months ago

      $20k?

      Damn dude, all my friends getting married are spending a minimum of $50k. $15k gets you the venue for the night without anything else included or factored in (food, music, fucking chairs or tables or lights, etc)

      Weddings are a predatory business.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It varies a LOT regionally.

        Look for a venue in Maryland, you know, with DC right there.

        I have a friend who’s entire wedding was the same price as a venue in Maryland.

        • drphungky
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          We got married in DC and saved so much money on locations. We booked the Jefferson memorial 6 months in advance for like $50 (saved a couple thousand), and a boathouse on the Potomac for $800 (saved 8-20 grand) because we knew someone - wedding still cost like 33k. We were so cognizant of cost too - no flowers at all, DJ instead of a band, bought our own booze, etc.

          I think people don’t realize how much more expensive cities are, and also do a terrible job accounting for all the true costs of things. Food was obviously the bulk of it and other big things like booze, rings… But I kept impeccable records, and what really added up was the little $100 here, $300 there things. Hotel and plane tickets for destitute father-in-law, all the meals at restaurants you’re taste testing to see if you wanna have the rehearsal dinner there, tips, food while the bridal party is getting ready, gifts for bridal party, the officiant, etc etc.

          I wouldn’t trade it for the money back because I’m notoriously cheap, so I pinched and saved and was super proud of our wedding’s price to quality ratio, but I’d be lying if I said the final tally wasn’t super painful and didn’t delay our house a bit. It worked out in the end, though. Thanks interest rates!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            Yeah, people definitely don’t understand that you can cut so much and bargain hunt the whole thing and still spend 15-20k. That’s a"cheap" wedding. The average in my area is 33k. That’s not because people are just spending frivolously and don’t budget, that’s because every single aspect of a wedding is expensive. Hell, tipping out the bar staff and photographer alone is expensive.

            Skip it if you want, but even as a very frugal person, I’m very happy we had a huge party with lots of food and an open bar. It’s worth it to spend money on life rites. Life rites are like half the point of being human!

            If you don’t care about celebrating with friends and family, don’t spend the money, but for us sharing the day with the people we love and merging our families was important.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2210 months ago

          Venues (and other services) usually jack the prices way up when the word Wedding is involved. Which makes sense since weddings typically don’t have a lot of room for errors.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        We got out cheap at about $25… we had a smaller (100 person) wedding, went budget on the food, had a DJ, cake, etc. (basically just what the OP said), and we were still hand crafting stuff to reduce the cost. Shit is fucking expensive.

        • burgersc12
          link
          fedilink
          510 months ago

          $25 is cheap, imagine one that costs a whole fifty dollars /s

    • WFH
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      Our wedding was under 5k, excluding dress and suit. Immediate family and close friends only, less than 40 people. Major expenses were the photographer, food and booze. We rented a cheap, small place in the countryside, we planned and did everything else ourselves, having a kanban board in the kitchen for a year was fun! My wife even did the cakes herself because she’s an amazing amateur pastry chef. No DJ, but I spent months on and off curating a playlist with a good flow and steadily increasing intensity.

      It was the perfect wedding. Huge amount of work but 100% worth it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        810 months ago

        I’m sure JP stands for something reasonable, and that makes sense, but my mind struggles against itself, and all I can imagine is it stands for “Japanese” and also my brain things “Jurassic Park”.

        So even though I’m 100% confident that this DIDN’T happen, I’m just imagining your wedding, with people sitting down, waiting for the bride to walk the isle…meanwhile, over by the other side of the room are bunch of Japanese cosplayers all recreating scenes from Jurassic Park. Complete with inflatable dinosaurs and .wav files of dinosaur sounds.

        All the while your guest list is like “WTF is even happening over there???”

        I’m sorry. I don’t know what ACTUALLY happened at your wedding, but it would have been a HUGE upgrade if you had dinosaur fights, and Japanese cosplayers.

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2510 months ago

    My default is to buy the grocery store’s house brand unless I can tell the difference.

    A 26 ounce can of Morton’s iodized salt at my local grocery store costs $2.19. The Food Lion brand costs $0.79. Explain to me why I would pay more than twice the price for name brand salt?

    Especially in goods where I know the complete chemical formula of the product like salt and sugar, until I encounter a serious problem with quality or unethical sourcing I’m not going to pay for the brand name.