• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8610 months ago

    Here’s the meat and potatoes of the article.

    In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the “O-5 level weatherdeck” of a US warship.

    They called the resulting Wi-Fi network “STINKY”—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower.

    Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Good. At a company, you get your ass fired if they catch you using non-approved equipment on company infrastructure. It can lead to leaks and infiltration, and lost of revenue.

      In the military, that’s people’s lives!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1810 months ago

      when officers on the ship heard rumors

      Lol not only is this an incredible violation of security, they couldn’t even keep their fucking mouths shut about it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      I feel like every military is full of technological babies acting out security theatre with each other while everything is totally hacked.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28410 months ago

      Probably not for the reason you think.

      Like, it wouldn’t be patched into anything official

      But it means Musk knew where that ship was 24/7, and I’m pretty sure that’s why Ukraine’s military stopped using it. Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1310 months ago

        Everybody knew were the ship was, because at that time star link usage by area was shown publicly. There was map online that showed all clients online.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements.

        I’m sorry, this made me laugh. Is that a widely accepted conspiracy theory in this community? That Elon Musk is a Russian spy?

        • Cadeillac
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1610 months ago

          Did you miss the part where he sent a militarized Cyber Truck to a Russian war criminal, or are you conveniently ignoring it?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1010 months ago

            The Russian war criminal stated he got it from musk but that hasn’t been confirmed and I don’t think we should be taking Kadyrov’s word as truth on anything he’s a literal war criminal.

            • Cadeillac
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1210 months ago

              What about the Russian oligarchs backing twitter?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                610 months ago

                If Musk isn’t a Russian asset, it’s only because he’s a Saudi asset. And there’s no reason he can’t be both.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6110 months ago

        Musk tipped off Putin to troop movements

        Wait he did? Can you provide a source for this? I can only find information about him stopping starlink service in crimea

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            Next up: somebody installs unauthorized Starlink on warship so they can play War Thunder on deployment.

            • The Quuuuuill
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              I’m not convinced that’s not exactly what this particular starlink device was for

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 months ago

            We need to insert egregiously wrong Russian hardware into War Thunder so the real specs will be leaked

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          910 months ago

          No it just wouldn’t.

          Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

          This was for porn and maybe streaming services and social media, but mostly porn.

          It wasn’t for any official use, because they have that covered.

          You’re acting like surface ships are submarines…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2610 months ago

            Like, are you imagining a modern US warship doesn’t have internet 24/7?

            last I checked, no, they don’t. they had shitty service while in port, and not much else.

            https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2023/12/29/new-in-2024-better-wi-fi-for-sailors/

            fuck mate they only recently started giving their people access ON SHORE.

            https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2024-01-25/navy-free-wi-fi-pilot-program-12796438.html

            so no, I don’t think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              That article is about wifi for personal use…

              And the second one is about it being free and you’re acting like they didn’t have Internet before then?

              so no, I don’t think for the average sailor a US warship provides internet access 24/7

              Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1010 months ago

                That article is about wifi for personal use…

                do you think the starlink terminal in the OP article was for military use?? bwahahaha

                Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about about.

                ok buddy, have a nice life.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  I said:

                  This was for porn and maybe streaming services and social media, but mostly porn.

                  And on your second reply you said:

                  do you think the starlink terminal in the OP article was for military use?? bwahahaha

                  I stand by my original assessment after your first comment:

                  Yeah man, you have zero idea what people are talking about

                  Because you literally don’t understand the conversation

          • vortic
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2010 months ago

            Whether they have wifi on ship or not isn’t the issue. Sometimes, when a ship goes into an operation, they will turn off all signals except passive or directed signals so that they can’t easily be detected. Having a communications signal that isn’t under the control of the ship’s officers is a huge security risk during operations.

            Someone is going to be court martialed over this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1610 months ago

        The reason I think is because any unofficial and potentially unsecured communications access point seems like a vulnerability. If some moron posts a picture using that unofficial access point I’d be worried it could be traced to the ship’s location.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4910 months ago

          What?

          Surface ships are in constant communication with stuff…

          You can’t just find a signal in the middle of the ocean. Musk can find a starlink signal tho, because he can see what Starlink connects to and it’s gps location.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            710 months ago

            No they actually do go dark sometimes for exactly this reason. Of course there’s always some signal source but it’s the difference between lighting up like a Christmas tree and running a single IR light.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1110 months ago

            Depends on where your sensors are and how much dispersion the dish has. If you are flying a surveillance plane into the “beam” then you can passively spot the ship.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1110 months ago

            You say that like Elon is personally looking at that information.

            Presumably, there would be a large number of people at the company with access to that information, all of whom could be bribed or otherwise persuaded to share it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10210 months ago

            Yeah but if they go on mission and “go dark” then you still have this starlink thing that may or may not be disabled by the person smuggling it on board. It may also be connected to official things if the owner has bad intentions, or if someone else who does finds it and co-opts it.

            There is a lot that could go wrong with unauthorized radio transmission equipment on a warship, and not all of it is obvious.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              610 months ago

              You can’t connect a star link to siprnet.

              The worst a bad actor could do is constantly transmitting location and other combat data.

              • ggppjj
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                You can’t connect a star link to siprnet.

                Can you connect a computer? Because if so, that same computer can then be connected to the starlink, no?

                I know absolutely nothing about secure government networking, I’m just kind of assuming that something has to be able to connect to both individually and also simultaneously.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  9
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  sipr is very strict about what it is letting connect to it. Which is why you rarely hear about breaches. Notable incidents like Manning or Snowden both involved usage of physical media, which has been severely restricted since. Plus Snowden was an admin, and not on SIPRNet, but some NSA systems.

                  To add, SIPRNet is entirely isolated from NIPRNet or the Internet.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            910 months ago

            You can’t just find a signal in the middle of the ocean.

            Uh, this was the primary way the Allies defeated the U-Boats in WWII.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20210 months ago

    And I’m sure whoever put it there faced way more harsher penalties than a certain someone who willfully hid highly classified documents in his bathroom for months and lied about it to investigators.

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      Just like a certain someone who had classified documents that they weren’t even supposed to have without a handler!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 months ago

      According to Navy Times, reduction in rank. According to my experience, likely going to be told they can’t re-enlist after the end of their current term. Likely shipped stateside and in charge of mowing the lawn somewhere.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2910 months ago

    i was wondering why would you choose such a stupid WiFi access point name, then I read that it was Elon musk that decided that the default starlink AP name has to be that stupid so people would change it

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      My ISP gave me an access point called CSP218891F Which I’m rather worried about.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    #1 African scammer who would sell out “his country” for the price of X premium has a backdoor to all military infra, Xi is getting a chubby

  • Maeve
    link
    fedilink
    2310 months ago

    Still, the ambassador had nothing on senior enlisted crew members of the littoral combat ship USS Manchester, who didn’t like the Navy’s restriction of onboard Internet access. In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the “O-5 level weatherdeck” of a US warship. They called the resulting Wi-Fi network “STINKY”—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower. Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial. Still, for half a year, life aboard the Manchester must have been one hell of a ride.

    But wait! There’s more!

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6110 months ago

    Between Trump stealing national security secrets and shit like this, it’s honestly shocking the USA hasn’t already become a full-fledged fascist hell-hole. It’s currently only half-fledged.

    But seriously, it must be fucking child’s play for other nations to spy on us with dumb fucking shit like this happening.

    • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      The weakest link is always the lowest common denominator. I’m pretty sure that the other armies around the world have their fair share of idiots too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      Ya mean like ppl using classified information in World of Tanks forums to prove a point… more than once?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2210 months ago

      Hey, give us a chance. We have another election right around the corner and things are really looking good for a solid commitment to fully flegged hell-holism.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        810 months ago

        Vote for my guy, trust me bro!

        crux of the US politics

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1010 months ago

      Oh it’s the same with other countries too. We all regularly have breaches due to the dumbest shit. Just ask the War Thunder community. It’s about time for them to have another one.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7210 months ago

    Sailors on the ship then began finding the STINKY network and asking questions about it.

    Oh, c’mon. it is trivial to make an SSID “hidden” for any networking tech that you have administrative control over. That way, only those “in the know” will know the SSID name to type in, in order to access said wireless network. It would not be “discoverable” by standard wireless-connectivity gear such as the default wifi interface in mobile phones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8610 months ago

      Hidden WiFi networks are not actually hidden in the literal sense. They still broadcast beacons that your wifi chip will see as basically “hidden network beacon lives here”. Your network connect interface just decides not to show you a list with a bunch of useless “(hidden)” entries you can’t do anything with.

      Also, when a new client wants to connect to the hidden network, the first thing it does is broadcast an unencrypted message saying “HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]” so it’s completely trivial to unveil the name of hidden networks given enough time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2210 months ago

        That’s why I put that term in quotes, and was specific about default networking interfaces. I didn’t go into detail because that confuses a lot of people.

        Source: working with wireless networks professionally for pretty much the last quarter century.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          610 months ago

          Yea, that was a good editorial choice on your part. I did pick up on your scare quotes, I just thought it would be good to tack on the additional info “below the fold” because it’s just baffling to me that 20 years later the majority of people still think they’re hackerman when they make WiFi “hidden”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3010 months ago

        I think it’d be more for obfuscation than completely hiding it. As long as there are other hidden networks on the ship you just name it something generic that blends in. I mean this whole thing is a really stupid idea, but naming it something like “COM.NAB_ISO:4133” would draw less attention.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          30
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s absolutely mind-boggling that the existing WiFi infrastructure on the military ship didn’t trigger any alarms. This is the kind of thing that you can get from “pro-sumer” grade hardware/software like Ubiquiti, let alone corporate-grade or military-grade stuff. The feature is called “Rogue Access Point Detection” and it’s built into literally every WiFi solution on the market. Like, your local library is analyzing this stuff it’s that basic.

          Edit: To more directly address your point, the name shouldn’t matter at all. Rogue AP detection doesn’t give a shit about the display names of things, it looks at the actual hardware addresses and compares them to known things that are owned by your network.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yup, I did some on-campus IT work while I was in college and it was super trivial to detect when people would have their own networks in the dorms

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                310 months ago

                At mine it was not. Hotspots and the like that stayed up for too long were flagged and action was taken to have them disabled and the student reprimanded.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  Well, I can understand that APs wouldn’t be allowed since having lots of APs in one space makes it worse for everyone.

                  Wired should be allowed though.

      • InEnduringGrowStrong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        “HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]”

        Client devices can also do this all the time even when not in range, which basically broadcasts they’re looking for that network everywhere they go. That’s just asking for someone to setup a rogue access point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10810 months ago

    Dude isn’t American. More money than a sovereign nation. Space level ballistic capabilities. Openly aligned with our enemies and their values.

    How the fuck does he have a penny of my federal fucking tax dollars? We’re funding fucking terrorists that don’t even need the subsidies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4010 months ago

      What dude are you referring to? I’m confused how your comment relates to the article.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2310 months ago

        Lemmy, where you get downvoted for being confused and asking for clarification. Good job everyone.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s because no one ever reads the article they just read the headline and make up their own story.

          In this guy’s head Elon Musk personally did this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s baffling how people on Lemmy hate Musk so much and yet can’t stop mentioning him in every random, unrelated thread.

          The starlink was privately bought as per the article, it wasn’t officially procured using federal funds. So the comment I responded to doesn’t really make any sense in the context of this post.

          But it gets 50 upvotes because Musk is very bad man. I guess that answers my own question about why people can’t stop mentioning him on Lemmy: it’s free upvotes to shit on him. That’s fine I guess, but it can be annoying when it clogs up the discussion in unrelated threads.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            you rage against people like musk because he is an evil person with a lot of power who gladly uses that power to push bad shit.

            I mean, I guess we could do the whole not speak about bad people bit, but then we end up back at praising literal Nazi collaborators caugh caugh ford

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              810 months ago

              Rage against him when he does evil things, by all means. But when you start raging against him 24/7 for no particular reason, it serves no purpose. In fact, it lessens your ability to actually call him out when he does bad stuff, because you sound like the boy who cried wolf.

              And more importantly, it also affects the quality of discussion on Lemmy. One major advantage we have over reddit is that people tend to actually read the articles and make insightful comments that add to the discussion. “Hurr Durr Muskrat bad” is the opposite of that, it’s a reddit style pandering comment that ultimately has no substance or meaning. When these circlejerky comments become more common than good comments, the value of this site as a forum for legitimate discussion falls off a cliff.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            You got me. I don’t have a problem with him being given the security liabilities of a defense contractor and control over people’s Internet access. I posted for upvotes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          I still use Lemmy and Reddit side by side. I find a lot of submissions and comments on Reddit downvoted, where they’re nothing burger contributions; some of the most non-divisive, non-offensive, and opinionless contributions I’ve come across.

          I don’t recall this behaviour when I first started using Reddit about 10 years ago. It makes me wonder if the world has become a lot more bitter in recent years since this type of behaviour is seen across platforms.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            610 months ago

            We live in troubled times, the planet is overheating at a rate that it might affect my life more than being more uncomfortable in the summer. And that’s Texas summers at that.

            There is an island of plastic refuse in the ocean bigger than some countries.

            I saw the home computer come to the living room and the internet be birthed.

            If you were to ask if I was jaded as a kid, already? Yeah. Around 7 years old.

            It isn’t getting better. Corporations claw for more and more at the expense of the people and the planet.

            I hope the younger generations can lead the charge of change, but for me… I don’t have the time or energy to play games most days, let alone change the planet.

            And for those who will say, “Aren’t you just part of the problem then?” Sadly yes, I am. I try to make changes when I can, but I fear changing the small environment of my home will not be enough.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            710 months ago

            I just feel like people are just too quick to assume the question is asked with bad intentions nowadays. It might be more bitterness, as you said, and it could also be more cynicism from most people. All I know is that it makes a lot of platforms more unpleasant to participate in.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          No it isn’t because Elon Musk has nothing to do with this receiver so having to go at him for this is stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3110 months ago

      I mean, u know that SpaceXs main income is flying shit around for NASA? If that was unexpected for you, I have bad news.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1910 months ago

      Can’t speak to starlink specifically, but I know some shittier router brands would often reset to factory defaults every time you updated the firmware. Can easily see starlink doing that with a pushed firmware with the expectation some additional cell phone app would restore the correct settings.

      So they very well might have turned off broadcasting but it got popped back on while they were on shift and it was detected.

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        Nah, Starlink doesn’t reset the Wi-Fi SSID for a firmware update.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4210 months ago

      Don’t worry! I’m sure the default username and password didn’t get changed either.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Hmm I got Starlink earlier this year and I don’t remember it having a default. I think it asked me to set the ssid immediately.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    What really surprises me is that the ships equipment never picked up on those unauthorized signals. Hell they can pick up pavarotti in pearl harbour on their sonar. (Red oktober reference) . but they cant pick up multiple unknown signals in the 2.4 and 5 GHz band

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1010 months ago

        You’re telling me that Sean Connery isn’t Russian? He was so convincing in the role.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          If only they didn’t make them speak broken Russian (I suppose they used a dictionary with simplified transcriptions and maybe even a phrasebook). All the effort to do it with the less than satisfactory result could have been avoided. Even SG-1 aliens speak English.

          As a Russian speaker, I wonder if there’s a version with only those parts dubbed to Russian.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Even SG-1 aliens speak English.

            Yeah and then they had counselor troi pretend to be a Russian.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          It’s a very subjective question. Arguably some people do. That’s why we make bullets and the devices for sending them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        Wow just wow. Mind is blown. If thats your response you probably have no idea what my point was

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4210 months ago

      Command Senior Chief

      The person who came up with the scheme is also the most senior NCO on the ship. All the enlisted people in charge of monitoring that activity knew, they just knew not to ask questions.You would be surprised how much pull an E-8 or E-9 has in the military.

      • Rob T Firefly
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        And this situation shows an inherent weakness of a military culture which demands one pretend a dumbass isn’t a dumbass just because of their badge collection.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Can confirm was an O-3 to O-5 and if an E-5 or above was talking, I shut up and listened. Those guys get shit done.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          910 months ago

          Yeah, my dad eventually found himself as an E-9 in the USAF. He spent the latter portion of his career, which was jet engine mechanic, originally, going to different NATO countries and training people on equipment they were buying from the US, consulting them on opening, and operating, engine rooms, and hangars, and implementation of these roles in bases on foreign land, and in FOB situations. He said it was hard not to suffer imposter syndrome when you are routinely in board rooms filled with top brass, from around the world, and they are listening TO YOU. It stressed him out, a lot.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Believe me, being an officer from the ages of 20-24 there was a fuckton of imposter syndrome. I’m still shocked that they gave me the job they did. The stress was one of the reasons I left.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              410 months ago

              Yeah, same with my dad. Since he had enlisted he had gotten a masters, so they wanted to make him an officer, starting at some decent rank. However they wanted him to continue on with the types of locations he was being stationed at. He did a lot of work on test, and spy, aircraft, and did all that consulting travel. So they kept putting him in basically the middle of nowhere, but locations that either had a lot of traffic for things like spy aircraft, or they were geographically kinda centered, to travel between a number of locations, to work at, with that place being home base. He said he would do it if they sent him back to Vegas, or put him in Hawaii, or Edwards in southern California, or one of the major spots in Virginia, something other than arctic outposts, and a super rural areas. At the time we were stationed at Mountain Home AFB in Idaho… He hated it. But no, they wanted him to stay there for a few years, then get moved a rather remote location in the midwest. So he retired after 22 years.