• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10811 months ago

    Dude isn’t American. More money than a sovereign nation. Space level ballistic capabilities. Openly aligned with our enemies and their values.

    How the fuck does he have a penny of my federal fucking tax dollars? We’re funding fucking terrorists that don’t even need the subsidies.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          No it isn’t because Elon Musk has nothing to do with this receiver so having to go at him for this is stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4010 months ago

      What dude are you referring to? I’m confused how your comment relates to the article.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2310 months ago

        Lemmy, where you get downvoted for being confused and asking for clarification. Good job everyone.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s baffling how people on Lemmy hate Musk so much and yet can’t stop mentioning him in every random, unrelated thread.

          The starlink was privately bought as per the article, it wasn’t officially procured using federal funds. So the comment I responded to doesn’t really make any sense in the context of this post.

          But it gets 50 upvotes because Musk is very bad man. I guess that answers my own question about why people can’t stop mentioning him on Lemmy: it’s free upvotes to shit on him. That’s fine I guess, but it can be annoying when it clogs up the discussion in unrelated threads.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            you rage against people like musk because he is an evil person with a lot of power who gladly uses that power to push bad shit.

            I mean, I guess we could do the whole not speak about bad people bit, but then we end up back at praising literal Nazi collaborators caugh caugh ford

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              810 months ago

              Rage against him when he does evil things, by all means. But when you start raging against him 24/7 for no particular reason, it serves no purpose. In fact, it lessens your ability to actually call him out when he does bad stuff, because you sound like the boy who cried wolf.

              And more importantly, it also affects the quality of discussion on Lemmy. One major advantage we have over reddit is that people tend to actually read the articles and make insightful comments that add to the discussion. “Hurr Durr Muskrat bad” is the opposite of that, it’s a reddit style pandering comment that ultimately has no substance or meaning. When these circlejerky comments become more common than good comments, the value of this site as a forum for legitimate discussion falls off a cliff.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            You got me. I don’t have a problem with him being given the security liabilities of a defense contractor and control over people’s Internet access. I posted for upvotes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          I still use Lemmy and Reddit side by side. I find a lot of submissions and comments on Reddit downvoted, where they’re nothing burger contributions; some of the most non-divisive, non-offensive, and opinionless contributions I’ve come across.

          I don’t recall this behaviour when I first started using Reddit about 10 years ago. It makes me wonder if the world has become a lot more bitter in recent years since this type of behaviour is seen across platforms.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            710 months ago

            I just feel like people are just too quick to assume the question is asked with bad intentions nowadays. It might be more bitterness, as you said, and it could also be more cynicism from most people. All I know is that it makes a lot of platforms more unpleasant to participate in.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            610 months ago

            We live in troubled times, the planet is overheating at a rate that it might affect my life more than being more uncomfortable in the summer. And that’s Texas summers at that.

            There is an island of plastic refuse in the ocean bigger than some countries.

            I saw the home computer come to the living room and the internet be birthed.

            If you were to ask if I was jaded as a kid, already? Yeah. Around 7 years old.

            It isn’t getting better. Corporations claw for more and more at the expense of the people and the planet.

            I hope the younger generations can lead the charge of change, but for me… I don’t have the time or energy to play games most days, let alone change the planet.

            And for those who will say, “Aren’t you just part of the problem then?” Sadly yes, I am. I try to make changes when I can, but I fear changing the small environment of my home will not be enough.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s because no one ever reads the article they just read the headline and make up their own story.

          In this guy’s head Elon Musk personally did this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3110 months ago

      I mean, u know that SpaceXs main income is flying shit around for NASA? If that was unexpected for you, I have bad news.

  • Maeve
    link
    fedilink
    2411 months ago

    Still, the ambassador had nothing on senior enlisted crew members of the littoral combat ship USS Manchester, who didn’t like the Navy’s restriction of onboard Internet access. In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the “O-5 level weatherdeck” of a US warship. They called the resulting Wi-Fi network “STINKY”—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower. Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial. Still, for half a year, life aboard the Manchester must have been one hell of a ride.

    But wait! There’s more!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3111 months ago

    can we just fucking all take a break for a month? just have things go to being boring?

    I attended a fucking ethics of ai talk at my work, only to run into a fucking knockoff nazi complaining about the founding fathers images being generated with black people, and talking about how silicon valley is too left wing.

    either you’re so stupid that you don’t understand it’s a fucking alt-right dog whistle, or you’re a fucking nazi who gets very, very upset if you see a black person in any context. Either way, just shut the fuck up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    #1 African scammer who would sell out “his country” for the price of X premium has a backdoor to all military infra, Xi is getting a chubby

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 months ago

    must’ve been a Russian psyops. USA isn’t that incompetent in itself. oh wait…

    It doesn’t stop wanks from blaming it on Putin, still. LMAO

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11011 months ago

    To make matters even worse…

    The chiefs found that the Wi-Fi signal coming off the Starlink satellite transceiver couldn’t cover the entire ship, so during a stop in Pearl Harbor, they bought “signal repeaters and cable” to extend coverage.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1811 months ago

      This many chiefs (not rank-and-file, chiefs), putting this much effort into breaking Navy protocol, together, is crazy. And for what? Memes?

      I know deployment at sea can be boring but Jesus fucking Christ, read a damn book or something.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7211 months ago

    Sailors on the ship then began finding the STINKY network and asking questions about it.

    Oh, c’mon. it is trivial to make an SSID “hidden” for any networking tech that you have administrative control over. That way, only those “in the know” will know the SSID name to type in, in order to access said wireless network. It would not be “discoverable” by standard wireless-connectivity gear such as the default wifi interface in mobile phones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8611 months ago

      Hidden WiFi networks are not actually hidden in the literal sense. They still broadcast beacons that your wifi chip will see as basically “hidden network beacon lives here”. Your network connect interface just decides not to show you a list with a bunch of useless “(hidden)” entries you can’t do anything with.

      Also, when a new client wants to connect to the hidden network, the first thing it does is broadcast an unencrypted message saying “HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]” so it’s completely trivial to unveil the name of hidden networks given enough time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3011 months ago

        I think it’d be more for obfuscation than completely hiding it. As long as there are other hidden networks on the ship you just name it something generic that blends in. I mean this whole thing is a really stupid idea, but naming it something like “COM.NAB_ISO:4133” would draw less attention.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          30
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s absolutely mind-boggling that the existing WiFi infrastructure on the military ship didn’t trigger any alarms. This is the kind of thing that you can get from “pro-sumer” grade hardware/software like Ubiquiti, let alone corporate-grade or military-grade stuff. The feature is called “Rogue Access Point Detection” and it’s built into literally every WiFi solution on the market. Like, your local library is analyzing this stuff it’s that basic.

          Edit: To more directly address your point, the name shouldn’t matter at all. Rogue AP detection doesn’t give a shit about the display names of things, it looks at the actual hardware addresses and compares them to known things that are owned by your network.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yup, I did some on-campus IT work while I was in college and it was super trivial to detect when people would have their own networks in the dorms

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                310 months ago

                At mine it was not. Hotspots and the like that stayed up for too long were flagged and action was taken to have them disabled and the student reprimanded.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  Well, I can understand that APs wouldn’t be allowed since having lots of APs in one space makes it worse for everyone.

                  Wired should be allowed though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2211 months ago

        That’s why I put that term in quotes, and was specific about default networking interfaces. I didn’t go into detail because that confuses a lot of people.

        Source: working with wireless networks professionally for pretty much the last quarter century.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          611 months ago

          Yea, that was a good editorial choice on your part. I did pick up on your scare quotes, I just thought it would be good to tack on the additional info “below the fold” because it’s just baffling to me that 20 years later the majority of people still think they’re hackerman when they make WiFi “hidden”.

      • InEnduringGrowStrong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        “HEY, I’M LOOKING FOR [hidden network name]”

        Client devices can also do this all the time even when not in range, which basically broadcasts they’re looking for that network everywhere they go. That’s just asking for someone to setup a rogue access point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8711 months ago

    Here’s the meat and potatoes of the article.

    In 2023, they decided that the best way to deal with the problem was to secretly bolt a Starlink terminal to the “O-5 level weatherdeck” of a US warship.

    They called the resulting Wi-Fi network “STINKY”—and when officers on the ship heard rumors and began asking questions, the leader of the scheme brazenly lied about it. Then, when exposed, she went so far as to make up fake Starlink usage reports suggesting that the system had only been accessed while in port, where cybersecurity and espionage concerns were lower.

    Rather unsurprisingly, the story ends badly, with a full-on Navy investigation and court-martial.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Good. At a company, you get your ass fired if they catch you using non-approved equipment on company infrastructure. It can lead to leaks and infiltration, and lost of revenue.

      In the military, that’s people’s lives!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1810 months ago

      when officers on the ship heard rumors

      Lol not only is this an incredible violation of security, they couldn’t even keep their fucking mouths shut about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20211 months ago

    And I’m sure whoever put it there faced way more harsher penalties than a certain someone who willfully hid highly classified documents in his bathroom for months and lied about it to investigators.

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2311 months ago

      Just like a certain someone who had classified documents that they weren’t even supposed to have without a handler!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      911 months ago

      According to Navy Times, reduction in rank. According to my experience, likely going to be told they can’t re-enlist after the end of their current term. Likely shipped stateside and in charge of mowing the lawn somewhere.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6111 months ago

    Between Trump stealing national security secrets and shit like this, it’s honestly shocking the USA hasn’t already become a full-fledged fascist hell-hole. It’s currently only half-fledged.

    But seriously, it must be fucking child’s play for other nations to spy on us with dumb fucking shit like this happening.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2211 months ago

      Hey, give us a chance. We have another election right around the corner and things are really looking good for a solid commitment to fully flegged hell-holism.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        Vote for my guy, trust me bro!

        crux of the US politics

    • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      The weakest link is always the lowest common denominator. I’m pretty sure that the other armies around the world have their fair share of idiots too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      Oh it’s the same with other countries too. We all regularly have breaches due to the dumbest shit. Just ask the War Thunder community. It’s about time for them to have another one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      Ya mean like ppl using classified information in World of Tanks forums to prove a point… more than once?