• Bappity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    why is it always the worst laws proposed under the guise of protecting children

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Because you can’t argue that. Any other ground reason for policy can be challenged or counterargued or relies on values which are arguable.

      No one is going to plainly argue “ok but how about we do not protect children?”. And if someone tries a different angle such as “this law is not really going to protect anyone and will bring a lot of problems for children and adults alike” it will be easily dismissed as “you insidious snake, why do you want to hurt children?! Don’t sabotage child protection!”. Which autokills conversation.

  • GreenBottles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    it has nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with destroying privacy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Why take a principled stand against those who are pushing this when you can just say “government” and leave everyone thinking this is a bipartisan problem?

    • vlad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Because it is a bipartisan problem.

  • mPony
    link
    fedilink
    292 years ago

    every time they say it’s to “protect the children” or “protect freedom” it is invariably neither.

  • QubaXR
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 years ago

    Somehow it never crossed their minds to stop selling firearms to teens, but vendor Internet in the name of protecting kids? Sign us up. Fuck that.

    Pretty much any bill, worldwide, that includes the phrase “project kids” is always about pushing censorship, government surveillance and other forms of oppression on everyone. And guess what: zero actual benefit to kids.

  • karrbs
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    Isn’t this also the bill that could screw up encryption too?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Good luck with that. They can’t even stop child abuse online and that’s an actual problem that should be solved.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Isn’t it something that China has been doing for a while? In their version, it’s called ‘spreading positive energy’.

    • NormalC
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      It’s almost like everything the US said about China was just a projection of their own insecurities.

      It might get to a point where China actually is relatively more liberating than “stable democracies” in internet access.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    Perhaps politicians should concentrate on making it so there’s less depressing stuff in the world for anyone to see and hear, and not creating more of it with things like this rubbish bill. 🤷‍♀️