• @Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    6110 months ago

    In the aughts, pirates bay felt like the library of Congress. If a single commenter on a B tier forum saw it in a guy’s basement in the mid 80’s there was a sure bet at least 3 people were seeding it and one of them had great upload. If it wasn’t there, you had a dozen different sites with their own dedicated fans posting everything you could ever want.

    Now it’s maybe 6 sites, they all have the exact same listings, and the only things with seeds came out in the last year of two. It’s like seeing your local library after a fire.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      Private trackers.

      Cinemageddon, for example, has lots of seeds on almost any worthless shitty B-movie you can think of going back to the early days of film.

      Source: 16 years on CG

      • @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        810 months ago

        I can never get a CG invite, personally, I’ve basically given up except for that offer in my bio to eternally curse your enemies for one (still standing btw).

        Unfortunately they never do sign ups, open or interviewed, and even if they did interview I’m only on IPT, which nobody takes as proof lmao. I mostly use usenet these days unfortunately, but at least it does have it’s benefits, DrunkenSlug accts are easier to come by and it is faster, and they have many things, but unfortunately lack B movies and other stuff I’m really into, but at least there’s IPT, slsk, yt-dl and internetarchive for some of those.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    Having to wait a day or more to download something. Today you can download a movie in seconds.

  • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    2510 months ago

    If I had the power today I’d bring back services that were shamed into actually providing a reasonably priced service that offers good value.

    I don’t like pirating, I’d rather pay a fair price for services since I want those services to continue but I’m not fucking paying 15/month to watch a single show I’d enjoy.

    • @dtrain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      What’s funny is that the source those *arrs are downloading from is largely unchanged from the 90’s &aughts by still being newsgroup based

      • @astanix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve been using newsgroups since the 90s back when I was also using xdcc on irc. Times were quite different.

      • @sorghum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Funny thing, I tried using newsgroups for their intended purpose after rediscovering that Thunderbird is also a newsreader. The amount of topics is large (and really old), but the ones I checked out haven’t had many updates. Though i admit I haven’t been brave enough to dive into the alt. group yet. It reminds me of the internet before the web.

    • aard
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      Funny thing is that the only reason I’ve found *arrs a few years ago was Netflix deciding to be stupid, making me look at how I can manage my local library better nowadays.

  • Kalkaline
    link
    fedilink
    910 months ago

    I really miss the original Napster. I got so many good songs off of there. Now I really don’t know where to find new music that I’m going to like. I feel like I’ve listed to most of the stuff out there (even though I know that’s impossible), or it’s just not a unique sound. Everything just seems to blend together even on a “discovery” mix seeded with artists I don’t listen to much.

    • @sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      yeah, I’d really like a thing like jellyseerr that’s easy to hook into the *arrs for browsing for suggested/popular/new music.

  • @paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    How much easier it’s gotten and most of what you download nowadays is usually exactly what you’re looking for. In the 90’s/00’s, alot of what was pirated had the potential to just be total BS or mislabeled, so you were never entirely certain what it was you were getting. I think Madonna had even gotten into it and released a one of her own albums as a fake download with her telling the listener “What the fuck are you doing?” At the time I mostly got music, though the Dreamcast pirating scene was pretty big for me for awhile. I think anymore though I’m probably more interested in obscure RPG books now.

    I think with torrenting, there’s a certain amount of trust that’s inherent with some torrents by virtue of the number of downloads/seeders there are on a torrent. At least for me, I can assume, ok, there’s 100 people seeding this thing, chances are this is exactly what it says it is, otherwise this many people wouldn’t be still seeding it (you can fool some people some of the time, or something like that). I don’t pirate nearly as often as I did when I was younger, but now I feel the need to use protection (via a VPN) because you just don’t know who might be watching. In my entire time having pirated stuff over multiple decades, I had only ever gotten a single letter from my ISP, so it’s not something that I ever felt particularly afraid of, but you never know and it’s better to be safe about that stuff.

    • @Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      We torrented so many movies, so so many movies. It quit being a question of what we wanted to watch and just became a game of how much can I get today. Then I just wandered away from it one day. I never received any letters. I do have a friend who got a letter from Lucas.

  • @Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    1710 months ago

    The whole political discussion about Internet media licensing, like a 10-15€ tax to finance artists while making piracy global. In the end we have the same except it’s financing Internet millionaires over artists

    • bizarroland
      link
      fedilink
      1310 months ago

      Is it weird that I don’t want to pay for any streaming media, I don’t have a cable package, but if some reasonable system were created such as that I could have access to digital copies of media for a flat monthly rate I would pay it?

      Like if someone would come and just say you pay $80 a month and you can watch listen to or read anything you can find and save them all locally for future reuse, no problems, I would probably pony up.

      • @usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        710 months ago

        Yes I’m also the same way with ads. I’d happily spend more for internet if there was somehow an “ad surcharge” that would mean I’d never see ads or be tracked. Let me pay whatever the advertisers pay.

        • FiveMacs
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          I’d rather pay the same then use knowledge online to learn how to circumvent their bullshit. I will never pay companies to remove bullshit ‘features and items’ that make services inherently worse. It only enables them to continue molesting and raping you

        • SaltySalamander
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Adblock exists, and as such, I never see ads. You could do the exact same, for the low low price of $0.

          • @usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            I already do. I also want to pay my way.

            The problem is what I’d like doesn’t exist (I’m not going to subscribe you a million different websites and still not even be ad free) and probably can’t. How much do all the ads I’m blocking cost? It’d be ripe for abuse but I’d essentially like a taxi meter, but it would charge me for website use from just one central account that I top up or is part of my internet bill or whatever.

            I want the whole business model of using ads and tracking to pay for the internet to not exist.

  • @zoostation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1310 months ago

    It’s largely the same because we started out with mostly enthusiasts doing it in semi hidden places. Then it was mainstreamed and became too easy for casuals to do out in the open. So laws and enforcement caught up and now it’s most effective again if you know your way around, which most casuals won’t if they can afford a few streaming services.

    One big change is no longer having to burn any media, you download something then it’s on plex and you can watch it instantly.

    If I could bring anything back from the 90s it would be a big selection of games, movies, tv, music, and books that I actually care enough to consume. There’s hardly anything worth downloading anymore.

    • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Plex is likely spying on you. It’s a binary blob with financial aspirations. It takes less than a few MB to upload your entire database to their servers.

  • @superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    106
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    In the late 90s and very early 00’s you could google yahoo song names and get a downloadable mp3 link as one of the first results.
    Cause search engines simply showed websites that contained your search terms, without filtering and AI algorithms.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2910 months ago

      Yep, too much of search engines today is people pushing SEO crap to rise in rankings and the businesses “protecting” users by delisting tons of sites that Google/Yahoo or who-the-fuck-ever has decided are “bad.” The number of times legitimate sites get swept up in that bullshit is too damn high.

    • @Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      Having no filtering certainly had its pros and cons, considering how much traumatizing shit google would throw at me as a child lol

  • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1010 months ago

    [off topic]

    I remember the golden age of the DVD Man. That noble soul who had all the latest movies on DVD a day after they opened. Quality ranged from someone recording the movie in the theater with a camcorder to perfect copies taken directly from the source.

        • SaltySalamander
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          Same! He got lucky and just lost his shit though, didn’t get put in prison. He had a pretty big operation going, with distributors and everything. I typically downloaded the content for him, luckily for me he kept his trap shut.

  • @deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    2410 months ago

    I used to pirate games because there was no legal digital distribution. The pirate version I could get faster and wouldn’t hassle me to put the right disk in the drive before I could play.

    Then digital distribution got good, DRM got less obnoxious, and malware got meaner.

    I used to pirate music for similar reasons.

    I didn’t pirate video because the files were too large, and around the time bandwidth caught up, Netflix got good. Now digital video distribution is awful so I pirate video until they solve the fractured storefront problem.

  • @SauceBossSmokin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    710 months ago

    Usenet Newsgroups were a big part of my life back then. Games, MP3s, Software, Movies, TV shows. So many Xbox games that I burned to DVD and loaded onto my modded Xbox. Those were the days. Now I only torrent some movies and TV shows thru a VPN and pay for everything else. My time is worth a lot more to me now than back in the late 90s/early 2000s.

  • Davel23
    link
    fedilink
    910 months ago

    What about those of us who pirated in the early '80s?

    The computer lab at my junior high was basically one big floppy copying/trading center. It was great.