Biologically male procedures only. EDIT: If the two people who downvoted this question could explain their reasoning, I would be super interested. No judgements. This is a safe space!

  • wuphysics87
    link
    fedilink
    137 months ago

    Shop around if you don’t like your GP. Tell them your situation and ask them for a referal to every specialist under the sun. Get tested and innoculated for absolutely everything they suggest.

      • wuphysics87
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Yea that’s a good point. I guess I’m living in fairy tale land considering meeting mandatory minimum and deductible 🤣 A boy can dream

      • DominusOfMegadeusOP
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        Fortunately i do not need referrals on my plan. So I can definitely get to the specialists. Ortho and Gastro are first up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          That’s awesome man! I’m sorry for whatever made you hit your out of pocket max but I’m glad you’re planning to take full advantage of this gravy train.

          • DominusOfMegadeusOP
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            Don’t be sorry at all. It was Inspire surgery, for sleep apnea. Absolutely worth it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    457 months ago

    To your “edit” point: Don’t take a handful of downvotes personally; it’s pretty easy to do accidentally on mobile so they may have been unintentional

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      I downvote anyone that whines about or asks why they’re getting downvotes. Otherwise I don’t up/downvote anything at all (except that guy that is posting triangles for upvotes)

      Seriously, who cares?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      197 months ago

      To add to that downvotes have no serious negative effect on this platform

      In reddit as soon as a few people downloaded you, you disappeared

      Here people can brigade you and unless you’re reading top, who cares, your stuff still gets seen.

      • DominusOfMegadeusOP
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        Oh I know. I am genuinely curious what anyone found so objectionable. They are welcome to their opinion, I’m just very eager to know what it is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          57 months ago

          They skimmed your post, read the words “biologically”, “male” and “only” in that order, and it triggered their this-sounds-transphobic reflex.
          Don’t worry about it.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            I mean I won’t say it didn’t, but I didn’t downvote for it because I still have more than one braincell

    • wuphysics87
      link
      fedilink
      187 months ago

      Some people also use downvotes as way to say they dislike something. Unlikely, but some people might be down voting to indicate they don’t like the insurance industry.

  • krellor
    link
    fedilink
    47 months ago

    Physical therapy if you have any physical issues at all, massage therapy if you have any chronic pain, occupational therapy if you have specific life skills or mobility needs.

    Any preventative screening or vaccines. There are various generic cancer screenings, etc. Get a referral to a dermatologist to do a once over your skin and document any spots of concern.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1217 months ago

    Do you snore? Get a sleep study and a CPAP - thats pricy! Need a colonoscopy? Gel shots in your knees? Any family histories that would warrant testing for cancer markers?

    • Ioughttamow
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      +1 for cpap. You might not like it at first but seriously try out different options. There’s different mask types. My wife’s blood pressure dropped to normal very quickly once she started using it. Mood and energy levels improved by a lot. Sleep is super important

    • DominusOfMegadeusOP
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Just had Inspire surgery. How do you think I hit my maxes lol! What I do think I have also is arthritis.

        • DominusOfMegadeusOP
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I only made it to the 0:28 mark. That may have been the worst “acting” I have ever seen.

            • DominusOfMegadeusOP
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I’m still in the “ramp up” period, so I’m not getting the full effect yet. I need to get used to having my tongue muscle electrically stimulated, with increasing intensity, forcing me to stick my tongue out. It’s a very odd sensation at first. And it’s been rough going, not gonna lie. But I think with some timing adjustments it will do its thing. I have only heard good things from everyone else who has done it, so I’m honestly not concerned at this point. Also, I am a cyborg now, and I have my own remote control, so that’s freakin’ sweet!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    197 months ago

    Any minor physical pains? Could see a physical therapist. If you use a computer a lot, your posture might be bad and it helps a lot!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This is the perfect opportunity to recreationally infect yourself with rare short term diseases. Try breaking your arm or nose so you have a story. Self harm has never been so cheap.

    Edit: See evasive_chimpanzee’s comment here, as the following seems to be incorrect information

    Seriously though get checked for prostate cancer. Especially if you’re over 25 it’s very possible and catching it early will be a massive difference.

    Same for everyone reading this. I doubt it’s that expensive so please look into it and get checked if affordable where you are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Huh, I’m always happy to proven wrong. thank you for bringing this up.

        Is this still relevant however with blood testing becoming more prevelant? The main reasons listed are due to harms caused by probing both physical and psychological along with false positives which out-weigh the positives of a 0.128% life saving outcome. It’s been 6, nearly 7 years now and prostate testing is both more accurate and non-invasive

        Either way, this body is currently in the final research plan stage of updating the recommendation.
        https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-update-summary/prostate-cancer-screening-adults
        I’d agree we should stand by the current assessment though until it changes. Thank you for the correction

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          I have no clue, it’s just something I’ve read about a little. It’s definitely not my area of expertise, so take this with a grain of salt.

          From what I understand, prostate cancer is usually very slow, and it’s possible to have a little spot of it for years that doesn’t affect you. For some people, the right answer to finding a prostate tumor is to just monitor it, but obviously, people freak out when they have cancer, and want treatment. Cancer treatments are all no joke, so it seems that you could sacrifice a lot to treat something that would have just chilled there not hurting you.

          I have no clue about the blood tests. If it’s like a “yes or no” for prostate cancer, it might have that same disadvantage. If it tells the Dr something more like type of prostate cancer or growth, it’s a different story.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            Not sure if your link is the same as I’ve read, but yes, the thing with prostate cancer is that treatment doesn’t seem to change the outcome.

            This is most likely because it usually doesn’t develop until mid-50’s or later, and grows so slowly that it doesn’t have time to kill you.

            I think the concern would be it occurring in younger ages, or it growing faster than typical.

            So test and monitor is likely a good thing, treatment shouldn’t be a given, unless there are clear signs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          There are primarily 2 stool tests available today, one has significant false positives, the other doesn’t.

          I forget the names, or I’d send you a link. It’s been about a year since I looked it up. I know my insurance uses the more accurate one, fortunately.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      I was actually told by my doctor that unless you have a history of colon or prostate cancers in the family, advisory boards are pushing testing to past 40.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Idk. When I worked oncology all our prostate patients were very young men way before 40.

        But thats anecdotal. I don’t have any numbers. But whats the worst thing that can happen when you get a prostate check? That they don’t find anything?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I mean the downsides are basically cost, another stick/blood draw, potential for false positive and further anxiety/testing. No weigh-in on whether or not any individual should at any specific time, but even less-invasive screenings are not zero risk.

          Excerpt from the US Preventative Task Force about prostate cancer screening:

          “An elevated PSA level may be caused by prostate cancer but can also be caused by other conditions, including an enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia) and inflammation of the prostate (prostatitis). Some men without prostate cancer may therefore have positive screening results (ie, “false-positive” results). Men with a positive PSA test result may undergo a transrectal ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of the prostate to diagnose prostate cancer.”

      • Cadeillac
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        Yeah, as an early 30s AMAB having to go in for annual checkups for insurance, two different doctors told me there really isn’t shit to do for someone my age

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      297 months ago

      Checking for prostate cancer is super easy now and doesn’t even require a finger in your bum. It’s a simple blood test that is far more accurate than the traditional manual method. I get one done every time I have a physical since they just add it on to the other stuff they check my blood for.

      • Sam, The Man
        link
        fedilink
        English
        387 months ago

        -doesn’t even require a finger in your bum

        Then what the heck am I paying these deductibles for?? >:(

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87 months ago

    Is anything cracking or sore more than it should be? Time to go get that treated.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    207 months ago

    Get prohibitive dental work. My teeth are fucked from no fluoride in the water when I was a kid, so I always have more work needed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    347 months ago

    Do you have any persistent pain or discomfort when doing things? Get that checked out.

    Another +1 for colonoscopy.

    Also if there’s a family history of anything nasty, see if there’s a test for it my maybe? (E.g. heart attacks, get blood work done for cholesterol).

    Get a full physical including blood work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      247 months ago

      Fun fact: for people over 45, colonoscopy screening for cancer is always free. If your insurance tries to make you pay for it, report them to your state insurance commissioner or the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight. ACA made a lot of preventative medicine & screenings free.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        This is great, except in my case, where I have regional insurance that no one takes where I live. Everyone is out of network.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          107 months ago

          Yeah, it’s the screening that’s free. If that turns something up, then it transitions to “care.”

          I’ve had the same experience with “wellness” check-ups: if I mention some complaint to the doc during the visit, it suddenly becomes “visit with complaint” and costs me $120.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    74
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Do every test available for prevention and prophylaxis.
    Get your general practitioner to do a full health check, ECG, EEG, cardiac ultrasound, a full blood panel, bloodpressure, pulmonary function, skin cancer prevention ect.
    Schedule a gastroscopy and colonoscopy.
    Check in with an urologist to get your prostate and urinary tract checked.
    If you can, get a full body scan. Either PET or MRI.

    Nearly every serious disease or health issue is easier prevented or treated when caught before it casues real issues.
    Every cancer there is, has a better outcome and is easier treated when found early. Most of them are silent until very late in the game.

    This is something I would recommend to anyone: Take advantage of every preventative messure or examination that is available to you!
    There is no illness that you can detect too early.

    • DominusOfMegadeusOP
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The kicker is that I just moved here and don’t have a PCP (primary care physician) yet. AND my company is switching health plans next year, so I basically need to find someone who takes BOTH health plans.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      227 months ago

      Until the insurance decides they’re not covering it for some reason and OP is stuck with the bill.

    • K[r]ukenberg
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      Omfg, don’t get a PET-scan ‘just because’. You would literally have to be injected with radioactive particles. The other stuff, while not necessary, will atleast not kill you faster.

      Last paragraph is also massively oversimplified. Getting a ‘you have cancer’-speech and treatment for a superslow growing prostatecancer will fuck with your mind and body more than the cancer itself. That’s why most health care systems advise against general PSA screening.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Just to provide some data on the radiation dose. It’s everyone’s own decision whether a ‘willy-nilly’ PET scan is worth it.

        From the English Wikipedia:

        FDG, which is now the standard radiotracer used for PET neuroimaging and cancer patient management, has an effective radiation dose of 14 mSv.

        The amount of radiation in FDG is similar to the effective dose of spending one year in the American city of Denver, Colorado (12.4 mSv/year). […T]he whole body occupational dose limit for nuclear energy workers in the US is 50 mSv/year.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography#Safety

        From the German Wikipedia:

        Es ist bei einer Strahlendosis von 1 Sievert (Sv), der 100 Menschen ausgesetzt sind, mit 5 Todesfällen durch Strahlenkrebs zu rechnen […]. Man müsste also 100.000 PET-Untersuchungen durchführen, um 35 Todesfälle an Strahlenkrebs (nach einer mittleren Latenzzeit von etwa 15 Jahren für Leukämie und etwa 40 Jahren für solide Tumoren) zu verursachen, das heißt etwa eine auf 3000 Untersuchungen

        If 100 people received a radiation dose of 1 Sievert (Sv), one would expect 5 deaths due to radiation-induced cancer […]. One would need 100,000 PET scans in order to cause 35 cancer deaths (after a median wait duration of 15 years for leucemia and 40 years for solid tumors), which is about 1 in 3000 scans.

        https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie#Strahlenexposition

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    147 months ago

    Get your ears cleaned at an ent. Go to a dermatologist and get a facial. Go to a pediatrist and get a mani/pedi.

    Really sucks that dental doesn’t count as medical.