Man I miss my Zune 80
of course there’s a Wikipedia page for that
that is less than 45 degrees
source: eyeballs
Kinda forgot the sides being parallel part. Like missing a step in assembling IKEA furniture, its not gonna turn out right.
Those arc sides are parallel in polar coordinates.
Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
You don’t normally need to specify that the sides are parallel if you specify four right angles.
Is a corner with an angle of 180 degrees a corner? If yes, then all shapes have infinite corners and infinite edges.
free real estate
When you miss one important constraint in your CAD project.
Oh man I felt this.
A square? A square?! Wake up sheeple! That things not even a rombus! Don’t you see the lies? Look at the lines! Look! Not all rhombuses are squares, but all squares are rhombuses! All squares are rhombuses and look at this thing they try to call a square. Where are the parallel lines? There’s got to be parallel lines, don’t you see, or then it’s not a rombus and all squares are rhombuses. Don’t forget that, don’t let them take that fact from you and perpetuate their geometric lies. Does no one even remember what a rombus is? This is, this is basic geometry here that you should have learned in middle school or elementary school, but then you just forget it, and let people trick you with these misleading definitions and fancy diagrams but you have to remember that a Square. Is. A. Rombus.
This is why proper geometry is always well defined.
You have shown me the truth
And all rhombus are parallelograms. By definition opposing sides must be parallel.
YES. YES! A square is a rombus is a parallelogram! You see it too! There are no parallels in this diagram, only lies and trickery!
This has an infinite number of sides
270°≠90°
You could say a regular square has 4 270° exterior angles
It makes me want to be angry and laugh at the same time
Plato boutta flip the table.
This is what AI would give you after countless tries strating with a triangle and having gone up the Pentagon and down to two pairs of unconnected parallel lines…but what if all equally sized lines were connected? Bam! This
Fun Fact: It is very difficult to get any of the image generators to make a pentagon.
I thought this couldn’t be true, so using one of the newer models (4bit flux) I told it to make a 5 sided star, and then put lines around the outside
lol this is very weird, did they forbid it from looking at pentagons in the training data or something? it can’t do The Pentagon either, it gives it 8-12 sides instead
I don’t really know, but I think it’s mostly to do with pentagons being under-represented in the world in general. That and the specific way that a pentagon breaks symmetry. But it’s not completely impossible to get em to make one. After a lot of futzing around, o1 wrote this prompt, which seems to work 50% of the time with FLUX [pro]:
An illustration of a regular pentagon shape: a flat, two-dimensional geometric figure with five equal straight sides and five equal angles, drawn with black lines on a white background, centered in the image.
You’re testing me, yo. An I’m bout to fail.
IDIC!
It’s hip to be a…
Fancy exclamation point
That music is just too darn loud
Is that a raincoat?
tihi
Ik exactly what this means but every single time I read it it makes me do the Micheal Jackson thing…
TEE-HEE
“Thanks I hate it”
Aah, thanks. But I’ll keep reading it properly, as TEE-HEE.
Now I will always hear that expression in my head as Michael Jackson
