For me “How long could I get away with driving like an ABSOLUTE ASSHOLE all the time before I lost my licence or had an accident.” Speed limits, red lights, stop signs… forget them all. Every day I have to drive sensibly and obey the law because without my licence I dont have a job, and every day I see at least one person driving like an absolute moron and I wonder…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    537 months ago

    Isolate a bunch of babies together, with food etc, and see how they develop their own language and society.

  • Maxnmy's
    link
    fedilink
    English
    467 months ago

    It may not be possible, but I want to gradually replace a person’s brain piece-by-piece with the same areas from other brains and see if they retain their sense of self when none of the original brain remains.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      How would you know if your sense of self is changing? Surely you always feel like yourself else you wouldn’t be you…?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      We can satisfy this curiosity with a fair amount of scientific evidence.

      Of course, most regions of the brain are so densely and variably interconnected that the technical difficulty of “replacing parts” precedes the ethical consideration by many, many years. But we do have a great deal of evidence for how our subjective sense of self is affected by “losing/removing parts” of the brain. Patients are often unaware of change unless evidence for it is overwhelming, and even then are adept at healing/reconciling instinctively. It appears that this is just something brains have evolved to do.

      So while the technology (and sheer artistry) required to match and “stitch” these networks is quite staggering, basically magic, it is theoretically possible that a patient could have every part replaced without recognizing any continuity errors in the chimeric stages, until one day they wake up as a completely different person.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      And keep the old pieces, in the end assemble them back together and see what the differences are

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    27 months ago

    I’d want to know how many people would continue eating meat if they had to kill the animal themselves after getting trained how to do it. Or as an alternative instead of doing the killing yourself being physically present while someone else does it for you and you have to watch, smell, and hear them prepare it for you.

    Is it really unethical though?

  • konalt
    link
    fedilink
    407 months ago

    Raise a kid in a sensory deprivation chamber, with one exception: a monitor that only shows gen alpha brainrot videos. When they’re like 14 drop them off in a populated area and see what happens

    • atro_city
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      They wouldn’t be able to walk at all because of floating in water for their entire life.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      307 months ago

      Realistically would just end up a developmentally stunted invalid. There was an example from some book, I don’t remember which, where there was a SE Asian woman who lived with her family and had a baby.

      The family was ashamed, so they forced the girl to keep the baby by itself in the attic. She would go to work most of the day, and come back to take care of it when home. That was the total extent of interaction and stimulation the baby got. It ended up being severely stunted and never learned to talk.

      Essentially young children need human interaction which includes warmth and constant validation, caring for, etc

      If you interrupt that in any way, you end up with a feral child who is permanently stunted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Developing a wireless brain-electronic interface. I believe it will be not so bad if the development is non intrusive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        I’m pretty sure an experiment that kills everyone would be considered immoral but we’d have to ask the IRB to be sure ;)

    • Quazatron
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      I’m fairly certain that there’s a What If video on this by the XKCD guy, Randall Munroe.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Eugenics. Not the racist BS that was done in the past, but really pushing the limit to see if we can breed super humans. Genetic editing to make humans immune to cancer or disease. Increased lifespan. Resistance to radiation. Smarter. Stronger. Better.

    Arguably, this kind of thing is actually somewhat of a necessity if we ever want to explore the stars. We are far too fragile in our current bodies to survive the difficulties and vastness of space.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Honestly, I’d be super stoked if we could just get rid of all the actual serious defects, just, whack a few moles that really super suck for anyone who gets the short end of the genealogical stick.

      And by that I mean like

      • Huntington’s Disease
      • Early onset and regular non early onset Arthritis
      • My entire family bloodline is prone to heart issues/cancer type beat
      • Crohn’s
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    37 months ago

    Cloning is the first one that comes to mind for me. If you could somehow avoid the horrors of the process of learning a reliable methodology the result wouldn’t necessarily be unethical.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    How far can you strip down the human body until it can’t survive anymore. Assisted feeding and breathing is okay. Adjustable room temperature too.

    Arms, Legs? Gone. Can we get rid of the skin? Probably, if the room is the right temperature? Bones? Most of them aren’t needed, are they? Some organs surely can go too.

    Basically, what is the bare minimum needed so the body and the mind still more or less work.

    • BlueKey
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Yo, same what I was gonna to comment.

      It would be fascinating to see if we could archive a “brain in a jar” by this.
      Even more when considering that a big bunch of non-brain neurons are in the belly-area. So would it affect how we think?

    • bizarroland
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Hey! Somebody figured out the plot of the seminal sci-fi novel, “Don’t create the torment Nexus”!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      177 months ago

      For this you don’t need a human, Can start with monkeys.

      Disclaimer: I don’t want this experiment to happen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      You should watch Johnny Got His Gun if you haven’t. Not quite as extreme but kind of similar theme.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            “Landmine has taken my sight, taken my speech, taken my hearing…”

            I guess someone forgot to tell Metallica when they were writing the song that it wasn’t about a landmine.

            And I guess someone previously forgot to tell Dalton Trumbo when he wrote Johnny Got His Gun that it wasn’t an anti-war novel.

            And then they forgot to tell him again thirty-two years later when he directed the movie adaptation, Johnny Got His Gun.

            And then, worst of all, they forgot to tell the directors of the music video that “One” was anti-war and Johnny Got His Gun was about a landmine and that using scenes from the film in the music video wouldn’t be thematically appropriate.

            Damn, there were a lot of missteps! Good thing you set it all straight!

    • sp3ctr4l
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      So, firstly, may I suggest you check youtube for one of the now many ‘Adventures of Torso’ type videos done in Kenshi.

      But as far as keeping a ‘minimum viable’ human actually alive?

      You could remove limbs, but you would still have to have a method for them to eat and urinate and deficate.

      You… almost certainly could not remove all skin and keep someone alive for very long.

      For starters, they’d bleed to death. Secondly, the pain of existing without skin would probably literally kill them or drive them to try to kill themselves. Thirdly: Skin prevents infections, you’d have to keep them in basically a totally hermetically sealed room or container.

      Bones? A de-boned human?

      Well there’s almost certainly not a way to remove all of your spinal bones and skull without causing death or immensely serious paralysis and/or brain damage.

      Sure you could remain alive without all your limbs if you have caretakers, you can survive without your lower jaw as well… You can maybe? survive with the loss of a certain high percentage of your ribcage, but probably not with the entirety of it and your sternum removed.

      Organs? Well, brain, heart and liver are almost certainly mandatory.

      Though you can remove portions of your liver and it can still function and regrow to some extent…

      …and portions of your brain… though you’ll lose cognitive abilities, memories and basically become braindead but still technically alive at some point.

      Assuming we are just removing things and maybe hooking you up to various kinds if life support tubes and not replacing organs with some kind of mechanical or genetically engineered equivalent:

      I think you can survive without any kidneys if you are constantly on dialysis, but its far better to have at least one.

      Similarly: Lungs, you need at least one.

      You can have your stomach and intestines and bladder partially removed or reshaped, but not entirely.

      You can survive without eyes… and a gallbladder and a thymus and a spleen and an appendix and your tonsils… and your adenoids, and your sex organs, but you’re gonna need a great deal of monitoring and bloodwork and hormone balancing and what not.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    147 months ago

    I’ve broken traffic laws most of my life, and I still have a driver’s license. So, you can drive like a partially reasonable asshole indefinitely if you have the skill to pull it off.

    I’d like to see GMO humans. I want to see how far we can elevate our species using science. It’s completely unethical, but there it is.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Oh I’m no saint. I set my cruise control at 10km/h over the speed limit, I punch it through orange lights and I sometimes roll through stop signs.

      I’m talking about full blown fast and furious wannabe swerving lanes, running reds and racing literally everywhere.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        This describes my brother in law. Granted, he’s better than he used to be about 10 years ago, but he grew up in a small town, got to know all the cops pretty quickly, did a little jail time here and there but still has his license. He’s totalled many vehicles, spent some time in ICU and still drives like a bat out of hell.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      The movie gattaca does this well. No murder or cleansing. But you can have a natural birth or IVF with the Impurities stripped out. “The best of you.”

      “Dirty” people were limited to shit like janitors and all high paying jobs would sneak a test in to filter out anyone “un-pure”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      How is that unethical? If anything i say it’s unethical to let us languish in these horrible bodies when we can work towards something better.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        Most people are very opposed to eugenics and genetic modification of humans. There is infinite opportunity for unexpected disasters along the way to perfection, and it’s extremely apathetic to be okay with subjecting a sentient creature to the possible ramifications of unexpected outcomes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Most people are only opposed to eugenics (as you’re using the word) because of a very narrow application. A rare few get genetic engineering and capitalism mixed up, which at least makes sense, i wouldn’t want musk choosing who gets a generic upgrade or how an augmentation is implemented.

          And i find it abhorrent that people are just fine with letting our entire species suffer the nightmare of random chance that is our bodies. Sure it’s surprisingly good for a system that only selects for whatever fucks the most, but we can and should eventually do better.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Cyborg-like implants. I want titanium joints and UV vision and magnetic field sensors and charging my phone by laying it on my belly. Uncap each finger to reveal a small tool: screwdriver, USB key, cutting blade, etc.

    Note that none of that includes or requires a constant connection to a network/internet. I want to augment my interactions with the real world, not replace them with a virtual world.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    97 months ago

    Eugenics taken to their logical conclusion.

    As the parent of a child on the spectrum that is very aware of what such practices would mean for him, I would never agree with it in real life. But I do have a fascination with what we could do if we just said the hell with ethics and started trying to breed “perfect” people.

    • Lemminary
      link
      fedilink
      57 months ago

      Like, ok, let’s try to breed the perfect person–fine. But do we have to kill everyone else? Why is genocide seemingly always on the agenda? Lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        Eugenics doesn’t mean killing anyone, just improve the genetic qualities of humans.

        You could do selective breeding, incentivized breeding (entice the right candidates with whatever) ,gene manipulations, etc…

        But I understand that proponents of eugenics usually have extreme right wing views, and why you would come to that conclusion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      87 months ago

      The movie gattaca does this well. No murder or cleansing. But you can have a natural birth or IVF with the Impurities stripped out. “The best of you.”

      “Dirty” people were limited to shit like janitors and all high paying jobs would sneak a test in to filter out anyone “un-pure”

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      87 months ago

      Oh, I like this one.

      Mind you Ive seen a cranky Silverback at the zoo, one with an extra gram of test and tren a day would be utterly fucking terrifying, also the roadrage would be something to behold… dibs not being the poor fucker giving it its shots.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        Roid rage comes from excess estrogen production, not from testosterone. I’d assume that a managed steroid treatment for a gorilla would include estrogen blockers.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          Yeah, and if you want to climb in there and take his bloods and administer the androgen blockers you are welcome to.

  • sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    147 months ago

    I’d like an extensive dietary breakdown of the potential benefits or harms of eating the flesh and organs of humans with net worths of over 10 million, 100 million, 1 billion, 10 billion, 100 billion dollars.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      That would need to be a wide ranging study with a very large sample size, just to be sure we get the most robust dataset we can. Better to use all of them than just a small sample.