OpenAI’s history as a nonprofit research institute that also sells commercial products like ChatGPT may be coming to an end as the San Francisco company looks to more fully convert itself into a for-profit corporation accountable to shareholders.

The company’s board is considering a decision that would change the company into a public benefit corporation, according to a source familiar with the discussions who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about them.

While OpenAI already has a for-profit division, where most of its staff works, it is controlled by a nonprofit board of directors whose mission is to help humanity. That would change if the company converts the core of its structure to a public benefit corporation, which is a type of corporate entity that is supposed to help society as well as turn a profit.

  • Beemo Dachboden
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    189 months ago

    How can it be a thing to just make a non profit organization into a for profit organization?

    I thought non profits have benefits when it comes to taxation and regulations.
    Why can it be allowed that the new for profit organization can just reap the rewards from those benefits that it used to grow into what it is now?

    That seems to me like it should be plainly illegal.

  • enkers
    link
    fedilink
    199 months ago

    Shocking. Absolutely shocking, I say. It’s almost like we’ve seen this exact pattern a hundred times before.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    79 months ago

    AI is going to save the world, but we need to maximize profit for our shareholders to do it!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    199 months ago

    Capitalism is already a superintelligence, and its goals are misaligned with those of humanity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Corporations are driven by people — they aren’t completely autonomous agents. Yet if you shot the CEO of Exxon or any of the others, what effect would it have? Another person of much the same ilk would swiftly move into place, much as stepping on a few ants hardly effects an anthill at all.

        I’ve never understood why people feel compelled to share this take.

        Edit, clarity: The quoted common rhetorical statement, not the overall essay’s conclusions about AI.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      Every time I’ve heard anything about this guy, it’s always made me think “oh, that guy is a total piece of shit.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Yea his “funny story” about carrying around a briefcase to explode his data center is just an asshat wanting to play James Bond.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    79 months ago

    Well yeah. They’re selling snake oil, and they better get as much money as they can now. That cash is going to dry up in a couple of years, and then where will they be. They’ll have to do real work again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1169 months ago

    This was so predictable. It seems they only care about profits now, and also positioning themselves to be a monopoly, so they really haven’t been compatible with the non-profit model for a while. Especially since they just raised more than $6 billion.

    It’s truly amazing to me that a “non-profit” that has disingenuously represented itself from day one, and is based almost entirely on the theft of intellectual property that would get normal individuals prosecuted out the ass, can continue to rake in absurd amounts of cash. I really dislike this company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        I would tend to agree. I feel the same way about Amazon Logistics. The whole packaging and delivery side of Amazon should be brought under the USPS so every driver gets a fair wage and job protections. USPS already delivers so much of their stuff anyway, and Amazon shouldn’t be in control of the marketplace and the whole shipping process and infrastructure.

        OpenAI is relying on all of human knowledge to build their product, regardless of whether or not it falls under copyright protection, so while the government doesn’t need more power, it’s still probably the best positioned to regulate this stuff, and that’d be much easier if they had direct control.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    PSA: There is a super easy to use app called “GPT4ALL” which lets literally any idiot run an open source LLM on their local machine. (As long as you don’t go fucking crazy and try to run a huuuuge model, that is)

    Smaller models run at pretty good speeds on my RX 5700 XT. Yes, you heard that right, you can use Vulkan to run them on an AMD GPU

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    Member when the daily show (or was it Last Week Tonight) would show clips of Jared Kushner and have Gilbert Gottfried voice him?

    That’s what needs to happen for this bro.

    (RIP Gilbert)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      That’d be season 3-4 of last week tonight. They have been gradually posting all of the full length episodes on the LWT YouTube account for the last few months if you’d like to watch John Oliver slowly descend into madness. It’s amazing how similar the early stories are, despite the show being out for so long.