• @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    yeah ive found that a combo mix of rosemary oil and cinnamon oil works great as a gnat spray

    • @Shard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      95% Alcohol(any kind, ethanol, isopropyl, methanol) is a cheap, highly effective, contact killer. Spray any bug with it and it will die. Either the alcohol kills it from the toxicity or from dehydration because the alcohol cleaned off its protective wax surface.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    139 months ago

    Rhubarb: most of me is poison. The rest of me is kind of bitter.

    Humans: Hold my pie crust.

  • @Phineaz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    589 months ago

    Tbf, this has proven to be extremely effective: Just think of how many tobacco or chili plants are grown today! Domestication really is a two-way-street

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1049 months ago

    Nicotine, THC, and cocaine are also insecticides. And psilocybin might be an insect repellent.

    Thanks poison!

  • Björn Tantau
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1279 months ago

    Funnily enough we try to cultivate everything we like, so in a roundabout way they were successful.

    • @tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      329 months ago

      I think the book Sapiens makes the point that wheat has trained us into cultivating it for selfish needs.

      (Except that it’s wheat, and that we annihilated 99% of its brethren to pick out the one that we liked so we could effectively clone it. But yes, we are the slaves…)

      • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 months ago

        Sapiens and Homo Deus are both such good books. Lots of little anecdotes like that we’re just so fascinating.

    • @MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Doubtful. Look what will happen with our bred plants and animals, if humans aren’t around anymore.

        • Gloomy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Chickens are the most numerous bird on the planet

          And live their lives in fucking misery and suffering, at least most of em.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            59 months ago

            But they keep reproducing, which is really all that it takes to make a successful species. It’s really not about suffering when it comes to evolution. Alleles don’t care whether or not suffering is involved.

            I’m not advocating chicken farming, I’m just saying that in evolutionary terms, chickens are one of the most successful species on the planet.

            • Gloomy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I disagree.

              Evolution is not so much a numbers game. Otherwise Bacteria, Ants, Viruses and the like would have to be crowned winners. So the point op brings up is mute moot.

              The point you add, that they keep reproducing, is also not relevant in evelotionary terms. The short amount of time that we have domesticated chickens, let a side the very resent industalisation of animal farming (it started in the 1950s ish), is just not relevante in evelotionary terms.

              I’d say what makes a successfull species is resilience. 99 % of all species have gone extinct. The “winners” of evelotion are, in my opinion, those species that have lasted the longest. And in that regard, chicken ain’t looking to good. They are highly dependent upon humans. Most industrial chickens are genetic aborninatons, bred for beeing fat, fast growing, egg laying machines to the point where their own bones brake because they lack calcium. I’d argue that chickens in their current form would not last long in “the wild”. Hence once humans are gone their is a high chance chickens will follow.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                Otherwise Bacteria, Ants, Viruses and the like would have to be crowned winners.

                They are. And you mean ‘moot.’

                Also, you don’t know what evolution is. It’s a change in allele frequency over time. All that is needed for that is continued reproduction.

  • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    219 months ago

    TBF, life’s objective is to reproduce and keep its genetic materials continuing on. Even if humans propagate and consume said plant because they find it desirable, that is still a success for the plant. So even if it has toxic caffeine or fiery capsaicin to deter some pests and humans find it enjoyable, the plant wins.

  • @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Caffeine is poisonous to us too, so I think it’s more accurate to say that humans enjoy the side effects of that particular neurotoxin. It’s generally not possible for someone healthy to drink enough coffee to die, but they sell pure caffeine (for research) and even seemingly small amounts of that will kill a person.

    • @BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      You can buy 200mg pure anhydrous caffeine pills at Walmart for like $5. It’s abundant and as safe as coffee if you don’t go nuts. The max daily recommended dose is 400mg, anything past that could cause harm

      • @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What I had in mind is more like this 25kg bucket. That’s enough to kill about 2,000 people, which is actually a lot fewer people than I would have guessed before I looked up the LD50.

        I’ve never actually seen caffeine in a bucket myself, but I worked in a lab once that had a big plastic jar of it.

        • Liz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Isn’t the LD 50 just over a gram?

          • @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            What I read was that it’s about 200mg per kg, so for a 70kg human that works out to 14 grams. That actually sounds remarkably high (14 grams is a lot). Did I mess up somewhere?

            • Liz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              I didn’t bother to look it up, that was just my random vague understanding. I’d trust your numbers over mine.