• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    389 months ago

    Oh shit. Either he’s trolling Harris’s campaign or they really are a cult. Very popular decision joe, sure people will forget till november.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I got to believe Bibi has him by the balls somehow. It’s the only thing that makes sense.

      Can we article 25 this fool? Harris might have a better chance if she’s already been president for a bit anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 months ago

        It’s quite obvious the Israelis have many US politicians either in their payroll, or have dirt on them. That-s pretty much standard operating procedure for the Israeli intelligence services. They are masters at those things. All you have to see is their depth of infiltration in Muslim countries.

        I hate that, but I must admit they are impressive.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          109 months ago

          Or, old fucks who were born around the time of the holocaust still think of all Jewish people as victims of the holocaust and can’t wrap their head around the fact that some Jewish people can be just as horrible as anyone else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        You think it’s just Biden that has hands in this? Israel would never have been so bold if the USA didn’t move it’s embassy to Jerusalem and that choice was not Bidens.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        Governments and rulers had every peasant below them by the balls for centuries. What are you going to do about troops being deployed to aid israel?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        119 months ago

        But Harris will most likely just send more troops. She did confirm she „supports” israel.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 months ago

      cult

      I have only heard this used in referring to Republicans. How did you come up with that description, especially in this context?

  • abff08f4813c
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19 months ago

    “the Israelis are clearly planning something for Iran that is going to cause a retaliation they know their own systems are unable to take.”

    This has me very worried. What the heck are they planning that the US would send its troops to operate a THAAD? What are they going to do that would cause that severe of a response from Iranian forces?

    “Nothing in current law authorizes the United States to conduct offensive military action against Iran.”

    Alas, that’s technically wrong, because of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_of_2001#Efforts_for_repeal

    The 2001 AUMF has been widely perceived as a bill that grants the President powers to unilaterally wage perpetual “worldwide wars”

    Vance is right about one thing - the 2001 AUMF has got to be repealed.

  • Andy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2079 months ago

    There is a lot about this that is nuts, but one thing that really jumps out at me.

    It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

    But with this I have to ask: are Biden and Harris assisting with a plan that is clearly intended to cost Harris the election?

    I want to say that they surely must’ve told Israel not to launch anything before election day. But based in their actions so far, it doesn’t seem like they’re imposing a “no election interference against us personally” requirement as a condition of their assistance.

    I guess we’ll see.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 months ago

      If Harris is in on a plan to strike Iran it wouldn’t cost her the election in the US. All they have to do is say, “We received credible intelligence that Iran had decided to sprint for a nuclear warhead. We had to act in a timely manner.”

      What would cost her the election is if an American soldier dies to an Iranian missile and Biden/Harris doesn’t immediately go hard on Iran. Which makes this a ridiculously irresponsible move by Biden.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      This is one of those times we should remind ourselves that if we as Redditors can plainly see something so out in the open and obvious, then almost certainly the executive branch can see it too. The odds of them knowing something we don’t know are overwhelmingly greater than the reverse.

      • Andy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I see this often, and it’s frequently, consistently not the case.

        I understand the sense in this belief, but if you review history over just the last five years you can consistently see this not being true over and over. Going all the way back to the Iraq War: it was obvious at the time that the Bush administration was lying about their claimed evidence that there was an active program creating weapons of mass destruction. And at the time, there was a deafening movement of regular voters who loudly protested that we were absolutely convinced that it was complete and obvious bullshit.

        And people like JOE BIDEN loudly expressed exactly what you’re saying: they know things we don’t know. They know what they’re doing.

        And they didn’t! They did not have any meaningful information we didn’t have!

        Sadly, it’s debatable whether they knew what they were doing. Did they expect it would be such a historic clusterfuck? That it would create decades of worsening outcomes for us? Probably not. But did they know they were making up a fake case for war because they wanted to let off some anger over 9/11 by killing hundreds and hundreds of THOUSANDS uninvolved Muslims, and build some new military bases near oil in the process? Yes. Obviously yes.

        And after the fact, the people who claimed that they knew things that we didn’t became president and Secretary of State.

        They do not know something we don’t know. They are doing exactly what this looks like. Biden would absolutely go to war with Iran just to serve the cause of Zionism even though he knows that Benjamin Netanyahu is a fascist. That is exactly what this is. There’s not chess logic behind this, you can absolutely know everything you need to if you read newspapers regularly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          The WMD were always a false pretext.

          And anyway, you can’t cherry pick any one episode or even several from history where the heads of state were wrong or stupid and say that they don’t know more than we do. They literally have everything we have in the public media and enormous intelligence operations working for them. This doesn’t make them honest or infallible, but anyone who sits in their armchair tut tutting about how “gee I hope this president can see it’s an obvious trap” is, in a word, a fool.

          • Andy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I think you’re arguing a strawman version of my point. I’m not claiming that it’s impossible for them to know something we don’t. I’m just saying that the assumption that there is secret information that makes his actions sensible is not well founded.

            There are numerous examples of leaders claiming expertise that wasn’t borne out. And if this were the case, I think it would be reasonable to expect them to at least claim this to be the case.

            As it stands, this behavior can be fully explained with the information available to us and Biden’s foreign policy stance. So there is no reason when you see him doing something that can be easily explained by the observation that he has poor judgement and priorities that are wildly different than most Americans to believe that there is a reason outside of the public facts and our existing knowledge of his poor judgement and unpopular priorities.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              If you want to narrow your point that’s fine but I never said that there must be some reason their actions make sense. I said they can be wrong or duplicitous but they necessarily have more access to information than we do and that’s a plain fact you can’t talk your way past with all the hindsight in the world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 months ago

      if they money you get from AIPAC is more than the money you get as US presidency and without the headache of being president, I wounder if Kamala care enough to be a president.

    • Avid Amoeba
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      Perhaps if he does that, then Joe and Harris will be forced to materially change their tune and take some real action in an attempt to save the elction.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      119 months ago

      It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

      Do you realize that israel government is waging war only because they are backed by USA?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel–Hamas_war

      • Andy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        I’m not sure what your point is.

        I understand that this is in a real sense the US’s war, and that Biden is not being dragged into it, he’s fully committed to it. I’m not sure what that changes about my observation that it’s weird that Harris appears to be facilitating an electoral hit job on herself.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes, and zios will be even more backed by Trump (supposedly).

        It’s not even a hidden thing. Yahoo wants Trump. Grift recognize grift.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      159 months ago

      It feels like they are totally beholden to Israel.

      If they push back hard, they alienate swing voters who like Israel from the old days, aka apocalypse.

      • John Richard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        A majority of Americans are against the action in Gaza. It is a popular opinion not to support it, unless you’re a major donor.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          A majority of those who actually turn out to vote are pro Israel (and no, people under 35 don’t vote in other countries where they have more options, so cut the “they don’t vote because of the support for Israel” bullshit, they don’t vote because they’re young and don’t care)

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            169 months ago

            Okay, well the Harris campaign can continue claiming that the reason she’s down in the polls in Michigan has nothing to do with Gaza.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          So in the last few weeks, Biden can pull support as much as possible basically giving Bibi the finger. Any funding that dries up is unlikely to have more of an effect than pulling support. This helps Harris win. Then she can re-woo them over the next 4 years.

      • Andy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        449 months ago

        This is actually a persistent myth: there is no evidence that they are beholden to a constituency that would punish them for any actions that curtail Israel.

        Israel’s actions are wildly unpopular across the electorate. They are unpopular with nearly all Democrats as well as most independents and a very large plurally of Republicans. I have seen numerous polls that show that there is a very significant number of voters that Harris is losing over this, and I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate that there is any measurable cost to her speaking out against Israel at all. Which is really sad. Because it means that this is absolutely a moral choice on her part. This is not an electoral choice at all.

        https://truthout.org/articles/poll-endorsing-israel-arms-embargo-would-boost-harriss-support-to-49-percent/

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I am not religious so I don’t know the details but I have a friend who is very religious and refuses to vote for Trump again. He hates Harris but won’t give me a reason. When I have brought up the Israel stuff he immediately jumps to a very, holy land, must support and defend at any cost mentality. He would never vote Democrat but it makes me wonder how pervasive this weird fairy tale attachment exists throughout the voting base.

          • Andy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            That’s a good question. Is your friend an evangelical Christian? A lot of people don’t know this, but the actual biggest plurality of political Zionists in the US are not Jews, but Evangelical Christians who support Israel because they believe it is a chess piece in bringing about the end of the world (which is a good thing in their dogma).

            They also happen to often like the idea of ethnofascism, which is a very sad state of affairs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              He is evangelical Christian yes. I don’t have much exposure to religion. I have gone to his church a couple times when he has asked me to in the decade or so we’ve been friends. I’m in my forties. I’ve never felt pressured but I also keep my religion or lack of to myself. I just never really understood the position on Israel and it really stuck out to me. Even though he will freely admit how crazy and hateful things are out of the MAGA crowd, I get the feeling anytime the topic gets close to coming up with me he fends it off by essentially communicating to me that he has unwavering and unquestioned support of Israel and I haven’t been willing to push it since he is otherwise a great person in my life that has helped me through a number of difficulties.

              • Andy
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                That’s a shame. For what it’s worth, his position isn’t a mystery to me. I believe that he’s been convinced by his church that unquestioningly supporting Israel’s expansionary goals, regardless of any other moral question is an absolute necessity for anyone who truly loves Jesus and believes strongly in his rebirth and in the promise of everlasting life in heaven.

                It is – with all due respect – as crazy as anything you’d hear in a Texas cult bunker. But I’m guessing that it’s real as a wildfire to your friend. It makes me sad to think about.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  29 months ago

                  I appreciate the insight and time you have taken to respond. Also your understanding. I have a really difficult time processing the situation. It does feel very cult like and matter of fact. I don’t understand how someone that seems so good can know something so bad is going on, who is so obviously able to recognize the bad in other related areas, and blindly vehemently support them unquestionably. He’s intelligent and successful…yet so lost, the most caring and compassionate person I know; it can’t be ok.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1529 months ago

      Their messaging so far to Israel has been “do whatever the fuck you want, 💰💰”

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        169 months ago

        Trump would tell Netanyahu to nuke the place and he’d fucking do it. It would be a catastrophe the likes of which we haven’t seen since WWII.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        149 months ago

        She most likely was in the room when Biden authorized the troops you know. She is very much on the same page as Biden on this.

        Sucks you guys don’t have any other option.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            Didn’t she just say the other week there’s nothing she wouldn’t do differently from Biden?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Which to this point has been attempts at a cease fire and offshore missile defense help. Putting troops under Iranian missiles is a massive departure from the past year.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                No, up to this point it has been billions of dollars and weapons to Israel with the occasional finger wag to them. Troops on the ground is the natural next step of his policy up to now, and congruent with Kamala’s statements that “Iran is the number one enemy”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            79 months ago

            She did say she supports Bidens stance on Israel and that israel has the right to murder innocent children protect itself.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Of the two she’s the one whose had statements about Israel needing to respect international law. So there’s no evidence she believes Israel should be allowed to conduct a genocide.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              To be fair I think most people think it (and other countries) should be able to defend itself… it’s just that they went from defense to all out genocide like a year ago.

              The current party doesn’t know where that line is while the other party wants them to “finish the job”.

      • Andy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        859 months ago

        This is a weird thing to say, but I actually don’t think that there’s any indication that Harris or Trump would do anything substantially different with regard to Israel, but the biggest change is that if Trump wins, I suspect that coverage of this will disappear behind all the coverage of his domestic chaos. At least if Harris is president I think there is a chance we see the press maintain a modicrum of interest in covering this.

        Either way, words can’t describe my anger that Harris appears to be prepared to throw the election over her support for genocide. It is an unreal situation to watch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          Its also weird that Trump rallies are full of Nazi flags but Israel still sends them similar bribes anyway.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            59 months ago

            Zionism is an anti-semitic ideology. It was concocted by atheist colonizers, not religious leaders. The goals are colonial, not religious. Most importantly zios commit these crimes while claiming to be the only true jews. This is extremely anti-semitic.

            So it’s no surprise that they’ve collaborated with literal nazis before WW2. And it’s no surprise that they continue to collaborate with racists and fascists all over the planet. In the usa the vast majority of zionists are christians that are generally very anti-semitic. They want jews to take over palestine so doomsday will come and kill the jews! These are the allies of zionism smh.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Zionism is an anti-semitic ideology.

              A significant number of jews across the globe say otherwise. The very foundation of your argument is self serving propoganda. And I didnt read past that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            349 months ago

            So the one says it out loud, the other just keeps the intention quiet.

            Both are equally sending weapons.

            However with Trump we saw that he pulled American soldiers out of the region and he is much more unstable. So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              269 months ago

              So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

              That would require him to give a shit about the soldiers dying to make a change. His history says the exact opposite of that. Soldiers dying would do absolutely nothing towards whether he changes anything.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                129 months ago

                Trump pulled most troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sure he doesnt care about the soldiers life, but he isnt committed to being a war hawk. He just does random stuff.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  309 months ago

                  The troop withdrawal was already being worked before Trump even started campaigning. He just decided to speed it up dramatically so he could say he achieved something, and promised a deadline that was unattainable while doing it well. It’s not random, it’s narcissism at the expense of everything else, including the country.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            119 months ago

            No intelligent person should vote for a party supporting a genocide either. Israel government is finishing the job already.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              69 months ago

              Ok. But either Harris or Trump WILL be our next president with how fucked up our election system is.

              Who would you rather fight on this? A run of the mill democrat, or a literal nazi? We’re choosing our opponent, it’s the only choice we get.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                59 months ago

                Don’t support any of them and use your energies somewhere else, you said yourself that the system is fucked up

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  59 months ago

                  Okay black pill bro. When you grow up and understand how things actually work, let us know.

                  Maybe those of us who are actively trying (while also understanding how our choices work) will acquire Ranked Choice voting before you become mature enough to join in on this non-black-or-white conversation.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  Sure. And then trump wins and i completely lose my reproductive rights and my trans wife loses her healthcare.

                  There’s more at stake here.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          It’ll disappear by him shutting down all news organizations and outlawing any dissenting opinions. He’s straight up said it. There is no functional difference on this issues between them. It’s the ancillary consequences trump will impose on everyone that is why he should be fired into the sun as an example.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          Trump in charge tends to highlight problems not burry them. Like how immigration and the border camps were a huge story, then Biden got elected, kept all the same staff and same facilities and suddenly the border camps weren’t a problem and we went further rightward on immigration. People stop paying attention when Democrats win, that’s how they burry stories, and that’s why the media loves Trump, because hes the one who generates the clicks and engagement they track.

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      469 months ago

      The insanity is not that it is Republicans or Democrats

      The insane part is that America is just sleep walking straight into a war that will probably escalate into something much bigger and no one wants to do anything about it.

      God help us all

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        Make me homelander and I’d shut this shit down in a heartbeat. Until such time best I got is a pencil check in a box on paper.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            69 months ago

            Maybe you can.
            All the money I’d earmarked for kung fu lessons and a collection of random lethal weapons wound up going into pet care and hobbies. Besides, I definitely don’t have plot armor. I’d get popped by some junior security mail cop. They probably wouldn’t even have to shoot me. They’d run me over with their Segway, I’d fall, crack my head open, and they’d put a little skull and crossbones sticker on their scooter, like a WWII fighter pilot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      It wouldnt even need to be much of a shanking for her to lose. A simple paper cut might be enough.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    199 months ago

    Well time to find out if Iran has a nuke and if we get to solve climate change by inducing a nuclear winter(yes I know nuclear winter isn’t real).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      yes I know nuclear winter isn’t real

      That’s not a consensus view.

      According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal Nature Food in August 2022, a full-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia, which together hold more than 90% of the world’s nuclear weapons, would kill 360 million people directly and more than 5 billion indirectly by starvation during a nuclear winter.

      Another paper published that year, from the Tohoku University Earth science scholar Kunio Kaiho, compared the impact of nuclear winter scenarios on marine and terrestrial animal life with that of historical extinction events. Kaiho estimated that a minor nuclear war (which he defined as a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan or an event of equivalent magnitude) would cause extinctions of 10–20% of species on its own, while a major nuclear war (defined as a nuclear exchange between United States and Russia) would cause the extinctions of 40–50% of animal species…

      Wikipedia

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There isn’t currently a scientific consensus, as wikipedia should be pointing out, with studies differing massively depending mostly on what model of soil uptake and preservation in atmosphere is used.

        We know that the majority of in air debris would not come from the explosion, which is designed to minimize fallout in all modern weapons and deployment models, but from the resulting fires. We also know from previous tests the resulting fires don’t actually last long as they tend to burn through areas quickly.

        In short it’s not a sure thing, and if any cooling effect does occur it wouldn’t start to touch the average heating we’ve introduced through climate change.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          That long Wikipedia article conveys quite well how there isn’t consensus. We don’t know how bad it would be, because our various best models give different results. But to say it’s not a sure thing is different from saying “nuclear winter isn’t real,” which suggests a consensus that it won’t happen.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    699 months ago

    Biden is really trying to start a whole new war and make the Democrats lose this election.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      579 months ago

      Honestly, I think Biden supports this unwaveringly because it aligns with US policy to keep the region destabilized.

      I mean they helped overthrow the Shah, aided the Taliban in fighting the soviets, invaded Iraq and Kuwait (which led directly to the creation of jihadist state – ISIS), aided a US-aligned faction in the Syrian civil war, helped put down the 2011 democratic revolutions… there is so much more.

      And for what? To keep them from realizing they are all arabs and are sitting on the largest collective reserves of oil in the world…

      Evil Empire.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        139 months ago

        helped put down the 2011 democratic revolutions…

        Holy shit tell me more. I’m an Arab and this is my first time hearing of this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 months ago

          I found a paper on this here: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/arabstudquar.35.3.0255

          Seems like they were actually on the side of the dictators in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen until they realized that they’d collapse. I think Libya is very well remembered, they just completely ruined what was formerly a stable, wealthy country (although a dictatorship of course).

          Also especially in Egypt when the elections didn’t turn out the way they wanted it because the Muslim Brotherhood candidate won, they backed the regime change and since then Egypt has a new dictator loyal to the US and Israel.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The MIC has more control over US foreign policy than the US political class (including the president) because America is a shadow plutocracy — controlled by the near-circular venn-diagram of its wealthiest individuals and corporations — masquerading as a “democracy”. Americans are able to vote in free elections, but 90% of the politicians on state and federal ballots are pre-approved, pre-positioned, and directly financed by the plutocracy. Most of the laws passed by congress are directly written by corporate legal teams, packed with unrelated provisions to allocate public money to corporations; they don’t even read or understand exactly what they’re voting on most of the time… This is ultimately the case in every “democracy”, just with varying degrees of gratuity and success.

            The proof is honestly in most of the US’s present and past actions, both domestically and internationally (including the undying support for Israel). They’ve been allied with, and militarily supported, countless dictators all around the world for centuries, because dictatorships are more profitable for American plutocrats than democracy. Democracy poses a direct threat to corporate power and profits, and is literally why they overthrew the Shah in Iran. I genuinely believe that MAGA is more a power play by the plutocracy to formally end American democracy once and for all (with thunderous applause) and solidify the corporate dictatorship through a fascist theocracy… Otherwise they will continue to face the threat of left leaning movements like Bernie Sanders actually coming to fruition.

    • goferking (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      189 months ago

      He is petty enough to do that. We’ll and doesn’t seem to give a shit about what terrible things Israel does

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Biden has always been a narcissist. And many 80 year olds do get pretty petty and selfish, from what I’ve seen. We really need an age cap on government service so we dont have to go through this again. On supreme court justices and congressman too. Dying on the bench or in office of old age is wildly unacceptable for such important roles. GTFO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 months ago

        Either he’s making too much money from AIPAC to stop now. Or he’s bitter about being pushed out of the race for president this election. Or both.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          189 months ago

          Or he’s a true believer. He’s admitted to being a Zionist. The man has a history of being as Pro Israeli as humanly possible to the detriment of everyone else.

          This is just who Biden is. His lack of morals make him believe Israel is doing the right thing.

          • vvvvan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            59 months ago

            Agreed. It seems Biden decided at some point that he must side with Israel, no matter the cost. (I’m sure Iran intel is not helping.) Netanyahu sees no downside to ruthlessly using this against him, with a bonus of helping elect a more useful idiot.

            I’m not sure if Biden has jelly for brains these days. The poor fool has been getting increasingly humiliated by Israel for a year. It’s painful to watch, along with the devastation it’s caused.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah, the “explanation” is so dumb and misleading that it’s not worth quoting. Just say that it exists. That’s good enough for the imperial core.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1339 months ago

    Oh come on, the header is a clickbait. There is a US military base in Israel already, it’s been there for years. The article is about an announcement that they are sending another missile defense battery with personnel alongside

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There are 100 more US soldiers deployed, aren’t there? I’m not a US citizen, but I still wonder why more troops are needed to help Israel in an war of aggression that violates international law.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        209 months ago

        Lol,maybe because Hezbollah rockets are getting launched and we’d like to shoot them down before US personnel are killed potentially escalating this even further?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          179 months ago

          Let the rockets rain down and stop this madness before the fascist state of Israel kills us all.

          Do Americans really believe they’ll be able to get their pet monster under control once they genocide the entire Middle East?

          “Greater Israel” is just going to keep expanding unless they’re stopped now. Do you think Nazi Germany would just say “ok we have enough land for the master race / chosen people let’s stop now”.

          Do you really think America will have any power once it gets to that point?

          The world let Zionists get away with the Nakba at the time because of the Holocaust, but now the Zionists and the United States are the ones doing a Holocaust.

          Israel is a failure of humanity and an affront to Jewish people everywhere, hijacking the religion in order to build a white supremacist, genocidal, settler-colonial apartheid ethnostate with a Star of David slapped on it.

          Israel must now be dismantled, land back to the Palestinians, the architects of this Holocaust brought to justice, and the people deprogrammed out of their genocidal cult.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            69 months ago

            Do Americans really believe they’ll be able to get their pet monster under control once they genocide the entire Middle East?

            I don’t think any Americans who truly support this think further than the next quarter of Raytheon profits.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          we’d like to shoot them down before US personnel are killed potentially escalating this even further?

          So we’re sending more personal instead of getting them out of the situation? Gymnastics.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Who is “we”?

          Maybe I’d have some sympathy for you if y’all stop with the genocide, terrorism, ethnic cleansing, land theft, invasions, etc.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’ve got an idea to prevent this from escelating further: Depose Netan-fucking-Yahu.

          The UN and the US Citizens would praise it if anything. China and Russia would say shit about it but they also say shit about us doing nothing. We can literally only gain from destroying the Israel current administration.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Absolutely. However, there is no need to destroy anyone. It would be enough for the US to give up its unconditional support for the Netanyahu regime. Then Netanyahu would be voted out and would go to prison for corruption in his own country.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Ok but that does nothing to stop genocide, land theft, terrorism, invasions, etc.

              It’s a joke to pretend like yahoo is the root problem.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I’m just trying to suggest a somewhat reasonable solution. I don’t think Israel could afford to keep this inhumane war going if they didn’t have the support of the US. Let us also not forget that it was radical right-wing Zionists who assassinated Yitzchak Rabin, the Israeli politician who first credibly promised peace in the region. What I want to say is this: Violence and hatred cannot be a solution - this only leads to more violence and more hatred, more misery and more suffering.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            You’re both right. We want to protect our servicemen there from Hezzbollah rockets and they shouldn’t be there in the first place.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Yeah, USA would rather participate in a genocide in palestine than prevent one in ukraine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        Yes it’s an anti-missle battery and a crew of 100 to operate it. Presumably this includes 7-day around the clock shift coverage so it sounds like a reasonable number for a large missle array.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      It’s only a huge deal if we talk about doing the same for actual allies like Ukraine instead of Netanyahu’s rogue regime

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        Yeah, I see someone already told you that American soldiers have been there already, long ago this new deployment. But they didn’t bother to prove it to you, and you didn’t believe them.

        Well, let me Google it for you. Very quick search reveals this article from 2017:

        https://apnews.com/general-news-2ccf317f293d4be59b92cec5554c3db4

        Back then it was “dozens of soldiers”, nothing close to thousands another person claimed, though. But I think it’s safe to assume the numbers grew since then.

        • Andy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          I’m not disputing this, I’m just asking for clarity so I can understand key facts. Are there soldiers actively serving in Israel? How many? Since when?

          That article didn’t actually provide much clarity. I tried searching for more, and found a bit in this article:

          https://theintercept.com/2023/10/27/secret-military-base-israel-gaza-site-512/

          The main thing this says is that US military presence in Israel is deliberately ambiguous. For instance, the day after the commemoration in the article you shared, US European Command actually denied that this was a us military base, insisting that it was actually a “living facility”.

          I don’t doubt that we have troops there. But historically the army doesn’t seem to acknowledge them. So announcing sending people does seem significant.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    So, a couple weeks ago Biden was “feeling comfortable” with a ceasefire, but now it seems that he’s comfortable with escalating it by sending american troops. Very cool!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    259 months ago

    In an alternative timeline, Biden finally grows a pair, cancels this and other weapon shipments and the election ends with a landslide.

    It’s right there Joe, it would be a bigger power move than him stepping down.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      In the alternate universe where that could happen, we wouldn’t have gotten anywhere close to the Israel situation, or a string of conservative Democrats in office.

      Our best hope is to pull a multiverse switcheroo and swap our Biden (and our Harris) with doppelgangers from the universe where the Democrats are the party of the left.

    • pachrist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      He needed 2 or 3 years to explore student loans. Maybe this is more complicated, so it will take infinitely longer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I feel so bad for the people being deployed and their families. These people are being positioned to be triggers for a war against Iran. They believe it will be easier to manufacture consent for that war if the administration (whichever one we have) can point to dead Americans. Sick shit.