• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    29
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member

    Stein’s campaign manager, Jason Call, disavowed the endorsement and called Duke “trash.”

    That is how it is done. Unlike Harris. Who went on a parade with Liz Cheney, and praised Dick Cheney for his work after they endorsed her.

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        58 months ago

        You can also appeal to the disaffected Leftists jumping ship, or the non-voters. You don’t need to campaign to the right of your predecessor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        What? That’s never been the case in any election. The parties only get candidates to ~40% or so. And turnout is far more impactful than people crossing party lines.

        Even under the (completely unreal) philosophy that turnout is fixed and that every single voter has a default party, that still wouldn’t mean you need the other party’s voters. One of the parties will have >50%.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      288 months ago

      because if a gross white supremacist starts saying/doing things I agree with I need to evaluate if he’s changing or if I’m changing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        This. Actually this. This right here.

        There’s an argument to be made about broken clocks, but sometime the answer is simpler than that. “Have I become the asshole?” It’s not fun to run into that, and I have on multiple occasions. You have to be aware of your biases, and check them on occasion in case they’ve drifted while you’re not paying attention.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    58 months ago

    And Putin endorsed Harris. These people know that their endorsement is a vote against that candidate, not for them.

    Everyone’s so focused on putting Jill Stein down so that those votes go to Harris. Any ideas on how we can get tiered voting implemented so that third parties are viable choices instead of being the same as not voting at all?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      68 months ago

      If you want a third party, then vote for them for state government or something local. Green is not a serious party because they have no local elected politicians and cannot win the presidency. We’ve already been through this when Ross Perot successfully knocked out Bush in 92, Dole in 96, and Nader knocked out Gore in 2000. You can vote for whoever you want but when you see who’s behind her campaign, it’s clear she’s being promoted in order to hurt Harris.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Your link does not say it was a joke. It only suggests it was.

        And Harris is proud of her Dick Cheney endorsement. Which she worked hard to receive by appeasing the war crime blood lords.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          That’s not why dick chose her lol

          He clearly stated he chose her because he sees Trump as a dangerous dictator. And Trump is in no way denying that he won’t be.

          Trump couldnt even remain stable during his rally without threatening to sue everyone there because his mic cut out, and he told them all he wouldn’t pay (he fucks up constantly though, and people should hold him to the same standard as he holds his contractors)

          He’s literally doing dictator shit in front of an audience now

          He is no longer hiding it because he thinks the election is already decided

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        Dude endorses Trump back to back for past two election cycles and suddenly swings as far as he can in the opposite direction? Seems believable /s

  • Wren
    link
    fedilink
    298 months ago

    Aaaaand there ya go. This is all you need to know about Jill Stein right? Because if Harris is a conservative because of Cheney’s endorsement….

    Or are the rules different?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      218 months ago

      Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member.

      It’s one thing to be endorsed by an undesirable party, it’s another to accept it or even invite them to campaign with you.

      • Wren
        link
        fedilink
        13
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s one thing to be the type of person that a racist piece of shit would endorse, and another to be the type of person that a person who hates racist pieces of shit would endorse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Why do you think a literal Nazi would be honest in his public endorsements and not just doing it for tactical reasons?

          Think about it. Trump supporters gonna Trump. This “endorsement” is aimed at harming Steins campaign with moderate and progressive voters, as is evident with the reaction here.

          Now the question is, why he wants to do that, as it helps the Harris campaign. What does he think he gains from helping Harris?

          • Wren
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Wow. You didn’t even read the article, did you?

            Stein’s campaign seems to exists solely to harm the democratic nominee. This is pretty well known by many at this point. She doesn’t denounce Putin’s war crimes, uses Trumps lawyers….

            And now, a long-time Trump supporter is backing her, and you’re suggesting that it’s for the strategic purpose of hurting Jill’s chances? She never had a chance to begin with! She only exists to take votes like yours away from the only person capable of beating Trump.

            The Olympic-contending mental gymnast required to avoid the obvious here are impressive!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              28 months ago

              So you claim Steins goal is to siphon votes away from Harris in order to help Trump.

              So the target audience of Stein under that premise are center/progressive voters. The target audience clearly is not Trump voters.

              So even if Steins goal is solely to siphon votes from the Dems, any vote that goes to her is a “win” for her. And the opposite, any voter deciding to go back to Harris is a “loss” for her.

              Him endorsing Stein is clearly aimed at achieving the latter. You said it yourself,

              Stein’s campaign exists solely to harm the democratic nominee

              So her target audience are solely potential dem voters. And these are alienated by that endorsement, as is also very clear in this thread.

              So there is two options:

              A - the guy is a total moron
              B - he is achieving exactly what he wants

              A seems unlikely to me, as nazi leaders are despicable and evil, but smart and scheming.

              • Wren
                link
                fedilink
                68 months ago

                So you claim Steins goal is to siphon votes away from Harris in order to help Trump.

                Yes.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  So you agree that the nazi guy is helping Harris by him alienating progressive voters from Stein.

                  Then you have to conclude that he is just very very dumb, or you have to agree with my statement, that he wants to harm Stein and help Harris. Which brings the important question, what does the nazi guy gain from helping Harris?

                  As the guy was leading a large organization, him being dumb is unlikely. Him being good at scheming and manipulating on the other hand is very much on brand.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          118 months ago

          Harris has her own share of problematic endorsements (Cheney, Gonzalez,…). Sure, they’re not explicitly racist, ‘just’ war criminals, but she accepted them and is actually bragging about getting them.

          • Wren
            link
            fedilink
            16
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Right. Because Harris needs the support to keep a criminally charged rapist from being a dictator for a day and calling the military against his own people. Having the support of a Republican in this environment is a pretty big deal. That is reaching FAR across the aisle in an almost unheard of show of support- and it sends a message of solidarity against a fascist.

            Having a dirt bag irrelevant racist support a sketchy spoiler candidate?

            Well, that’s just damn easy to “deny,” isn’t it? I mean… there’s no downside. And it sure looks good to the press to turn him down, doesn’t it? But then again, it doesn’t look good to have him up her ass to begin with…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              48 months ago

              Why can’t she reach far to the left to get their support instead? If potential Jill Stein voters can lose her the election, she could see what those people care about and reach out to them?

              They would’ve probably been fine with a stop on sending offensive weapons while keeping iron dome stocked or something like that.

              Instead they’re trying to find the mythical voter that gives a shit about what Dick Cheney thinks.

              • Wren
                link
                fedilink
                9
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Because sadly, FAR more people seem to give a shit about what Cheney says than there are those that seem to give a shit about what Stein says. And not only that, but I’d wager that no matter what she does- a large percentage of the far left and socialists probably aren’t going to vote for Harris anyway. Even if Stein endorsed her.

                (Remember a guy named Bernie back in 2016? Yeah. A lot of the “Bros” voted for Trump to spite the DNC)

                Their minds are made up and are locked in every bit as tight as their folded arms are.

                And I’d wager that she is ACUTELY aware of this. Between her, and all of her advisers- do you think there is no one that understands what she must do to get the votes she needs? Do you seriously think she hasn’t thought of courting the far left vote? She’s not an idiot.

                She knows the far left exists.

                And she knows many of them have a track record of not showing up regardless. Over 100,000,000 people didn’t vote in 2016. And we got trump- with warning signs of what he would do.

                We don’t have warning signs now. We know EXACTLY what he will do, and the far left are all holding their vote hostage over shit many of them didn’t even care about a year ago.

                So I’m sorry, but their demands are going to fall on willfully deaf ears. The far left vote is not something Harris is going to risk losing an election over. And historically, candidates that lean too far left…

                Lose.

                And now, at this point, I’m going to say that we’re far too late in the game for me to care about how you feel about this. This is what it is. This is where we are. You can help us keep America breathing by voting for the one person that has a chance to win, or you can pull the plug because of a single-issue that most of you don’t even really understand.

                Either way. Someone is getting elected. Whether you like it or not- with or without your help.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The rules are the same. They’re both trash.

      Cornel West 2024. Zero endorsements from republicans and other white supremacists.

      • Wren
        link
        fedilink
        128 months ago

        To counter your little edit there:

        No endorsements, eh?

      • Wren
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Hey look everyone!

        It’s yet another “third party candidate supporter” that seemingly never says anything at all to ever support their candidate aside from just trashing Harris and Harris alone.

        Trump who? Amirite?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Source on Harris accepting a David duke endorsement? Else willful misinformation/trolling

        Edit though it can be confused because the article is about duke, this thread is not, and my assumption of commie’s correlation was wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          You should read the comment chain before making non sequitur requests. It was literally two comments long. You couldn’t help but have read it before getting here.

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          You know what? I respect your edit and you admitting what happened. Rare on Lemmy these days. Have my upvote, friend. :)

      • Wren
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Whatever you say…. Commie.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          98 months ago

          I was about to say that that isnt really much of an insult these days, given that its not really much different from insulting a republican by calling them “conservative” in some shortened manner and the cold war ended awhile go, but then I saw the username of the person you were replying to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      418 months ago

      She won’t. She’s a Dem spoiler. That’s her purpose. RFK was supposed to be that, too, but he wasn’t pulling enough Dems and was pulling too many Rs. So, he dropped and they tried to pull back those Rs with an endorsement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    458 months ago

    If you think this reflects badly on stein ask yourself 2 questions, did he endorse her because she’s also a white supremacist? Did she accept the endorsement?

    The answer to the first is probably no since stein is a Jewish women so I don’t think she’d get along well with all the other white supremacists who think she’s sub-human. The reason he endorsed her was because she’s the only one who would end the war in Gaza and fight the “Jewish lobby”. If your a Zionist and believe that any action against Israel is anti-Semitic then yeah stein and Duke are the same. If you live outside that delusional world then you’d recognize dukes dislike for Israel and steins, (and most of the worlds) dislike for Israel come from two completely different values systems and world views.

    The answer to the second is easier, No, her campaign rejected it and called him trash as soon as they heard about it.

    So does this actually reflect badly on stein, or is this just the ravings of an insane person who’s trying to elect a Jewish woman to take out his imagined grand Jewish conspiracy? Critique stein if you want but this is nothing.