Why would they stop? That’s been the most effective attack they’ve had in a long time! Especially because it’s true, and I think the Republicans know it on some level.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78 months ago

    How was it “effective?” While it did make some Cons mad, name calling isn’t a viable strategy to winning, and it really just makes Libs look like that’s the best strategy they have

    • TomBombadil [he/him, she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They were up in the polls and now they are dead tied. Was stopping weird the only thing to do that? No probably not but their swing to the opposite of just trying to convince people they are themselves Republicans doesn’t seem to be working effectively.

      Except at losing

        • TomBombadil [he/him, she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          148 months ago

          There’s like 10 guys in the country who want to vote Republican but dislike Trump enough not to vote for him. These are the 10 guys the final months of the election are spent trying to win.

          Every other Republican wants the name brand uncut trump power. Why go for Kamala when you can just have trump.

          Of course Kamala could still and could have spent her time trying to convince those left of her to vote by highlighting how different she is from Trump and Biden. Unfortunately she doesn’t actually have many notable policy differences I suppose.

    • SerLava [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      268 months ago

      It was effective because Republicans get a lot of mileage out of pretending to be the “everyman” - and since they can’t claim it on economic grounds, they claim it based on pure vibes. But really anyone who’s at all involved in Republican politics is actually a freak far beyond either your average republican voter, or even a center to left political freak. Their policies are incredibly unpopular to the point where if you even tell a conservative voter what the policies are, they think they’re so outlandish that you’re literally lying to make your opponents sound insane. It made cons mad because it was working. Then the Clinton people broke down the door and put a stop to it

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      198 months ago

      shrug-outta-hecks They don’t have policy. They don’t have a charismatic figure. They don’t have a cool slogan. The only things they have are name calling and promising to be more ghoulish than the opposition; I can’t imagine the electorate is more likely to be swooned by the current Dick Cheney strategy than the previous name calling strategy.

    • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 months ago

      You’re right on every count but i preferred it to their current right-wing pandering. This shit feels like stalking an ex on Facebook and watching them get radicalized by their new blue-line beau

  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    658 months ago

    Why would they stop?

    Dems started doing bipartisant shit again so they couldnt keep doing the attacks anymore

    But hey, now you have Dick Cheney

    • Gucci_Minh [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      398 months ago

      Meanwhile all the libs are cheering as if this was a good thing because unity or something. Yeah nah if Dick Cheney likes you you’ve done something wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          88 months ago

          waiting for the day that democrats look upon cheney’s as democratic heros like they do with obama; or clinton; or carter; or roosevelt; etc.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              58 months ago

              i was alive an active during the reagan years and i think this one’s worse because the bad stuff that didn’t come from the top in that period originated from a place of genuine ignorance. the internet makes genuine ignorance impossible so now all the bad stuff comes from a place of intention through willful ignorance and it think that’s worse.

              afterall believing that a group show be looked down upon because that how you’re taught to be behave is one thing and fixable with a little bit of knowledge; but believing that those people should be denigrated because they deserve it is both an entirely different scenario and also unfixable w/o them letting you into their psyche.

  • Andrzej3K [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    268 months ago

    It only really worked until voters got to know Harris and Walz, who are both incredibly weird in their own right

  • EllenKelly [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18 months ago

    Im sure we’re not far away from ‘progressive’ libs pulling out the old trump and magas are narcissistic demons with black eyes, I really wasnt enjoying them throwing around ‘weird’ as they have been

  • JohnBrownsBussy2 [she/her, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    228 months ago

    They brought in UK Labor party strategists who have encourage the campaign to follow Starmer’s example of trying to bring in conservatives, non withstanding that Starmer got less votes than Corbyn and only won because of Tory/Reform party vote splitting.

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    298 months ago

    They got “lol tumblr SJW” PTSD from the last time they ever fought back against racists and went back to ring-kissing republicans…who still call them tumblr SJWs.

  • Darth_Reagan [they/them, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    They did, apparently new conservative advisors advised them to stop using it because it might alienate white suburbanites. Its why we’ve seen the vibe shift after the Walz pick. They decided to court white suburbanites and never trump republicans rather than their natural base. The Democrats love to lose folks.

    • REgon [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 months ago

      “Wow everything is going great, tell you what let’s bring on some new advisors and completely change course” - Rational, sane, smart thing to do
      “Wow everything is going to shit, tell you what let’s continue to listen to these new advisors we brought on and not listen to the people we listened to when everything was going great.” - Also rational sane and a very smart move.

      Dems have the best political instincts!

    • combat_brandonism [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      248 months ago

      new conservative advisors

      The UK Labor Party narrowly won an election they should’ve taken in a landslide and sent over all their consultants to ‘help’ Kamabla, and they’re the ones who got them off the weird shit.

      Which the ‘weird’ thing had annoying ableist undertones but it was also working a lot better than whatever they’re doing now.

      Oh well, death to amerikkka, nice to see them eating shit with the new strat, the genocidal pain pigs they are.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      298 months ago

      Now some of the “bipartisanship” makes sense. Republicans just want to ditch Trump for that more competent fascist and then abandon Harris in 2028. Dems narrowly squeeze out a win and then the more competent fascist and other fash cronies win big time in 2028 as democrats completely let their guard down.

      • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Do they have one of those in the pressure cooker? They all seem out of touch. I would expect someone who read Kapital, said “fantastic!”, and was a natural public speaker to fill that role and act as an insidious ratchet turner. Instead they’re like if Holsten Bloodfeast used ChatGPT to say the most average talking points of a Google search for being an asshole

      • thelastaxolotl [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        258 months ago

        They should just declare the democratic-republican party and end this 2 party farce they have been running for over a century now

    • GlueBear [they/them, comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      158 months ago

      After trump, the Republicans will find someone more palatable to run. Those white suburbanites they’ve been working so hard to court will go right back.

      In the end they’ll only alienate more POC.

  • happybadger [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    368 months ago

    I remember hearing about it on some podcast around a week ago. They brought on a strategist from either Biden 2020 or Clinton 2016 who thought that “weird” was running a negative attack campaign. It doesn’t match the vibes of Joy Reich where you can only do wholesome things like advocate for genocide.

  • REgon [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    348 months ago

    Democratic party guide to campaigning

    When your polls are stonks-up get rid of whoever it is that’s advising you and bring in some new people from failed campaigns
    When your polls are stonks-down don’t change what you’re doing! That will make you look weak! Especially now that you just changed advisors!

    Remember 99% of politicians stop supporting genocide right as it becomes popular sopranos-poker

  • StalinStan [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It was too effective. If they raised thr bar that much the GOP could poke one of their obvious weak spots. They can both only stand up because they agree not to fight too hard

  • SpiderFarmer [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    228 months ago

    Liz Cheney got a standing ovation at the Copmala FireSSide Chat. They know their ideal audience.