So a few months back I asked about you guys os in c/asklemmy, so this time I wanna ask about your desktops you use on this same account.
(I use kde but plan to move to cinnamon I find kde buggy and gnome tracker3 randomly broke for no reason + themeing so yh idk if these happened to anybody)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    48 months ago

    TDE. Functional, stays out of my way, but still reasonably full-featured. The development team is dedicated to adding useful features while keeping the original look and feel, so I don’t have to go hunting for settings that have inexplicably moved or changed defaults every time I update. It doesn’t support Wayland, but I’m Wayland-neutral (that is, I have nothing against it, but I have nothing against X either).

    • MwaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      I don’t see many distros,people use the at all often but it’s definitely for some people.

  • asudox
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    KDE Plasma.

    GNOME kind of looks nice but is too strict on customization.

    • MwaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      Yeah, I can agree gnome is strict I don’t really like this design philosophy which can be found here.

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28 months ago

    At the moment, my main machine is on KDE because it has very good Wayland support and isn’t Gnome. I prefer Cinnamon

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    Xfce. Partly because I’ve used it for a long time, but mostly because it does what I need it to do and little else.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    Enlightenment. It’s pretty and really fast. Of course you can’t complete with the speed of tile wm. But their development speed is so slow…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      I’ve been experimenting with DEs on a low end machine (celeron n3010, 2gb ram), and so far, I’m still on xfce, but I forgot to test Enlightenment. Gonna give it a try.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        I install enlightenment in a asus netbook. Still working. Haven’t updated for so long. ~10 yrs?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            Bodhi. I tried to compile by myself first. But it sometimes won’t work. Too much trouble. Bodhi is simply easy and allow me to stay in Ubuntu/Debian based, as long as you don’t need really new packages. But we have flatpak, right?

  • Frater Mus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    Traditionally I’ve been running lighter desktops like opebox, xfce, or lmde. Last couple of years I’ve been using MATE with good results.

  • Handles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    None. Openbox WM with Tint2 as a rudimentary system bar, Rofi as launcher.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    258 months ago

    these days Hyprland but previously i3.

    i basically live in the terminal unless i’m playing games or in the browser. these days i use most apps full screen and switch between desktops, and i launch apps using wofi/rofi. this has all become very specialized over the past decade, and it almost has a “security by obscurity” effect where it’s not obvious how to do anything on my machines unless you have my muscle memory.

    not that i necessarily recommend this approach generally, but i find value in mostly using a keyboard to control my machines and minimizing visual clutter. i don’t even have desktop icons or a wallpaper.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m still on i3 as it’s been convenient, but this:

      this has all become very specialized over the past decade

      resonates. I keep incrementally adding personal tweaks and hotkeys to my setup, and I have all my dotfiles in a repo so it’s persistent across installations.

      One example was I made my headphone button pause/play videos with i3’s config:

      bindsym XF86AudioPlay exec playerctl play-pause
      

      But then I adopted a script to toggle mic mute on work Zoom meetings, so I combined it with the above - if I’m in a meeting it toggles mute, otherwise it play-pauses any current video. The script, for now:

      #!/bin/bash
      #
      # Handler script for hitting mute on the headphone.
      #
      
      CURRENT_WINDOW=$(xdotool getwindowfocus)
      
      # convoluted command to find the intersection of two searches
      ZOOM_WINDOW=$(comm -12 \
        <(xdotool search --name  'Meeting' | sort) \
        <(xdotool search --class 'zoom'    | sort))
      
      if [[ -n "$ZOOM_WINDOW" ]]; then
          # if zoom is active, toggle mic mute
          xdotool windowactivate --sync ${ZOOM_WINDOW}
          xdotool key --clearmodifiers "alt+a"
          xdotool windowactivate --sync ${CURRENT_WINDOW}
      else
          # otherwise do play/pause
          playerctl play-pause # will fail if no player found
      fi
      

      and of course I altered the i3 config to launch that script rather than playerctl directly.

      [EDIT: Updated script as Zoom updated its window identities]

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Another i3 user here. I slowly transitioned from KDE when switching keyboard layout stopped working as well as some other DE related things.

      Ended up writing custom script for switching. Currently implemented with rofi in Perl, bc I like the syntax.

      I still like having a bit nice gui, so i have wallpapers, some icons, etc. But I fell in love with terminal along with neovim : ) , soo kinda looking for that middle ground between look, performance and functionality.

      Haven’t finished tweaking all the configs to my liking, but after that vanilla Arch is the direction I plan to go, since many things in my current install that I have as well as haven’t customized work a bit questionably or exist for no reason.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          What? I know it’s a bit chaotic, but can be more readable than bash sometimes imo. Originally chose it because writing stuff for sed was getting too complex at some point and saw suggestions to use Perl for complex regex instead.

  • Eugenia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    78 months ago

    Depends on the computer I run. On fast computers (more than 5,000 passmark cpu points), i use gnome on whatever distro. On mid-speed computers (1000 to 5000 points), I use linux mint with cinnamon. On very old computers (400-1000), I use debian with XFce.

    • Jiří Král
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I actually found Cinnamon to be more resource intensive than Gnome on most computers.

      • Eugenia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Not my experience here, especially if extensions are used on gnome, but I hear you. I find xfce to be lightest. Sure, there are other more light wms, but they’re not modern and suitable for daily use.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    I used enlightenment for something like a decade. When Gnome hit the big time I used Gnome because it looked Nice and was very flexible. I went back to Mac and Windows Land for a bit, when I came back I went Gnome again. I just screw around for a day looking and picking plugins and fighting with it to get it exactly how I wanted it. After fighting with one of the older plugins that mustn’t doing what I wanted to do I saw somebody mentioned using KDE. I tried KDE and sure enough every single thing I was plugging the hell out of Gnome for was a default setting in KDE. I’m currently running Plasma. I must say that Cinnamon’s not bad either.

    • MwaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      Oh yeah I was also running gnome with alot of plugins after a fedora update, boom tracker3 does not wanna work anymore, kde(fedora and cachyos) it’s in the desktop no relying on 3rd party plugins and cinnamon I can agree with you, I think of cinnamon gnome done right,with a windows 10 like ui.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      I already use the cosmic alpha and it works great. No crashes so far, the only thing that has happend twice in 2 Months of using it is the screen locker did not display after waking up from suspend which meant I needed to go to a VT and kill cosmic-session

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I tried it and mostly love it. It’s not quite polished enough yet for me and I have two main complaints. First, half of my keyboard shortcuts don’t work anymore, and I wasn’t able to fix that last I tried. Second, it wouldn’t let me lock my computer or suspend. Had to shutdown everytime. Other than that and random librecalc crashes, I’m excited to see where it is in the coming months. Really rooting for the pop team

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      Using it on my latest install. Not bad. I mostly picked it for the visual aspects but I’m in the fence about it’s functionality. It feels like it takes more clicks than it should to open stuff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28 months ago

        Perhaps, but it’s also good to remember that it’s still in Alpha. That could still change. I feel like it would be hard to give a good review before it’s at least RC1

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      I think that’s what popos comes with, never looked into what the differences are between them or why one would want to switch

  • nanook
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    I use Mate. When I first started using a Desktop in addition to terminals, it was with Redhat 6.1, Redhat came with Gnome-2, I got used to it. I didn’t like the changes made in Gnome-3, so I switched to Mate which retained, or at least had the option to be configured to look as I was used to it, save for more refined graphics. It also works well remotely so that’s another reason I use it as much of my work involves remote acess.