• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    426 months ago

    How do they not get people don’t fucking want this. It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

    • sp3ctr4l
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      They are monopolists/oligopolists, operating like a cartel.

      They create new paradigms as they please, because there is no alternative.

      Consumer preferences don’t mean dick in a highly uncompetetive market with absurd costs to entry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Shareholders are the customers now. People are livestock to be milked dry, worked to the bone, and chopped up and served to corporations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      Because people are the product, and these anti-features improve the extortability of that product.

    • Bezier
      link
      fedilink
      English
      146 months ago

      AI is so hot right now and these incompetent doorknobs have FOMO.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      It’s like they’re in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

      Because it is. That’s why it is called enshittification.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      556 months ago

      They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.

      Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.

      Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.

      You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.

      Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.

      You just aren’t the target audience.

  • dindonmasker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    I’m just waiting for someone to make someting like this but runs locally and doesn’t feed a never ending data black hole. It doesn’t need to be that powerful to be useful too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    196 months ago

    Instead, you can directly give it commands in your browser and it should automatically do everything you need, including filling out forms and clicking buttons. AI-tasked examples include opening pertinent web pages, compiling search data into easily readable tables, purchasing products, or booking flights.

    This sounds like it would be great for people with accessibility needs—if only Google was trustworthy and had a fiduciary duty to humanity…

    Alas.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      Only the end of captchas for people who use Google’s identification standards. With device IDs and accounts they already usher many users past Captcha and I think the more who do that, the worse captchas can get for us who don’t

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 months ago

    i guess it’s just puppeteer + ai prompting

    unless AI gets significantly better in the next year or so I doubt it’s gonna be any better than someone spending an hour writing a puppeteer scraping script

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    186 months ago

    Prefect. It can click buttons and complete tasks.

    No sir, I did not accept your terms and conditions, my browser did.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 months ago

    Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 months ago

    Google doesn’t have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can’t even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

  • YeetPics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    Google should create AI agents to use their services and pay for their bullshit since they like AI agents so much.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    306 months ago

    This whole AI thing is starting to feel less like focused research and more like Free Jazz jam night at the local dive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      76 months ago

      It could be used for amazing things, but it’s currently in that phase where it’s a rapid frenzy to make anything, regardless of moral and ethical implications, just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

      • DarkThoughts
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Imagine it was actually more open source and privacy focused. Yes, it would likely learn at a slower pace but at least it would be something more for the people rather than the big corpos.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        regardless of moral and ethical implications

        You are pointing on capitalism, not AI.

        just to cash in before it inevitably gets monopolised.

        Yep, capitalism.