• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86 months ago

    Well, they are kind of solitary animals. No one will warn them about something big getting close from behind.

  • BLAMM67
    link
    fedilink
    English
    306 months ago

    Tigers are only CR4. There’s lots of stuff more dangerous that that.

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 months ago

      Yeah, you think you’re hot shit as a tiger and then here comes a Hellwasp…

    • BarqsHasBite
      link
      fedilink
      English
      176 months ago

      in the Ganges Delta in India, where tigers living under protection in a reserve had been killing about 60 people a year.

      Geez that’s a lot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        266 months ago

        I mean, deer kill about 400 people a year in the US and they aren’t even trying. 280 million people live in the Delta alongside a predator that is actually trying to kill them, so it mkaes sense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          I’ve read somewhere that tigers usually aren’t trying to kill people, humans are not their natural prey and they normally ignore them. The ones that do kill people seem to have a bad experience with humans, like being shot at. Fuck humans.

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          English
          96 months ago

          There’s also a fuckton of deer and they’re dumb as fuck.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’ve seen people get out of vehicles to try to take selfies with grizzly bear cubs. I could kinda see black bears but like wtf. But yeah you get slapped once by either and you’re pretty much dead if you aren’t within 10 minutes to a hospital.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      That makes sense. Tigers are just big cats - they’re all kinda jerks to each other (let alone other animals), but I suppose that comes with being an apex predator.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        Tigers are territorial and solitary but quite social, they don’t usually get into fights when they meet, that only happens when they have an actual territorial conflict because there’s too many tigers on too little land. They’re perfectly fine with others visiting their prowling grounds, they might even hunt together, just don’t overstay your welcome. Actually not that terribly different from how humans treat their houses.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    316 months ago

    No living thing has a feature “to” do anything. That implies decision making, which is intelligent design.

    Tigers have spots on their ears, which can confuse attackers.

    Tigers did not develop those spots “to” confuse attackers.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I hear what you’re saying, and you’re 100% correct, but I think most people will realize it’s a figure of speech, and easier to say than “Via the process of gene mutation trial and error over many, many generations of tigers, spots have developed on their ears that look like eyes, resulting in predation from behind being discourged.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        One way of thinking of it could be that since all of our intention and decision making originates in such a process, the line between them isn’t that clear.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yes, they did though. That’s the purpose of this evolutionary trait. I see what you’re getting at, but you seem to be implying this was a concidence

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        Every evolutionary trait is coincidence. If it was adaptation we’d be able to regrow vital organs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 months ago

          that’s not how that works, we cant regrow (most) vital organs (liver says hi) because of “engineering problems” not because evolution is random. we personify adaptations to understand them, it can lead to issues but yours is a massive overcorrection.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      306 months ago

      All models are wrong, but some are useful. Thinking of evolved features as having a purpose is wrong, but it is also incredibly useful.

      Why do we have eyes? In some sense, there is no reason, just a sequence of random coincidences, combined with a slightly non-randon bias refered to as “survival of the fittest” (itself an incorrect model).

      However, saying that we have eyes to see has incredible explanatory power, which makes it a useful model. Just like Newton’s law of Universal gravity. We’ve known it that is wrong for a century at this point, but most of the time still talk as if it’s true, because it is useful.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    186 months ago

    Wild tigers, as apex predators, have few natural threats. Their primary competitors include Asiatic wild dogs (dholes), which can harass tigers in packs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    516 months ago

    Probably humans, given they went from 100k to 5.6k in population in 100 years and are still in decline.

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      276 months ago

      That’s not long enough to evolve something like this, though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Even arrows or spears wouldn’t have been long enough to develop such a trait. And with those tools, still I don’t think Tiger would have been a primary target for humans. Seems like for most societies felines and canines were just not things we eat. Though maybe hunted for the pelt? In which case maybe they do eat the meat?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          Considering evolutionary time scales, this trait may have been a response to something large and dangerous that’s extinct now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 months ago

          Also statistically (since we’re talking evolution) it wouldn’t help much against humans, we’ve got good vision and intellect, the chances to fool us enough times for this adaptation to arise are slim.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Eating a tiger liver would probably kill you with Vitamin A poisoning, a particularly painful affliction.

          Easy to just avoid eating entirely, even if the rest of it is safe enough.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        Very good point, I didn’t mean to conflate it happened in the last 100 years, more so the data of their deaths that I had access to had that timeliness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      i mean i’ll concede that it’s not entirely ineffective, but i very much question that it would significantly affect their survival.

      If a human sees a tiger which they know may well kill another human, they’re not going to give a toss about where the tiger is looking, they’re going to have 5 friends with them who all carry the best weapons they have available to turn that tiger into a rug.

  • Tarquinn2049
    link
    fedilink
    English
    76 months ago

    Do they have them when they are little too? Or maybe it worked out that it was less likely predators would yoink their babies because it seemed like they were always watching. Can’t sneak up on someone with eyes on the back of their heads, that never close, even while sleeping.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    236 months ago

    Fun fact the South American short face bear is the only Ice aged giant that is thought not to be driven extinct by humans and fact humans could not hunt it, Tigers would be a pleasant snack for them.