• zanyllama52
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I voted, that should be enough, same as anyone.

    Also, both sides are bad, in different ways.

  • @usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    166 months ago

    Find your polling location. Go vote!

    Your ballot will be deciding much more than just the president. Even if you did theoretically think both presidential canidates were equal in all regards (they aren’t), then vote for the down ballot races!

    Keep your local school boards from having insane people on it that will ban books and harm your kids or your neighbors’s.

    Vote for the constitutional ammendment questions and ballot initiatives. For instance, many states have either pro and anti abortion questions on their ballot.

  • Sunshine (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    376 months ago

    Yup, they know they’re outnumbered so they try every trick in the book to stop the Democrat bloc surplus from voting.

  • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The destruction of the republican party via increased voter and representation rights represents the single greatest possible “progressive” leftward shift of the US political window. Emphasis on “possible”. Conservatives are a minority party and their extreme views do not represent modern America.

    The road to a more progressive, equitable future is through the democrats. It doesn’t end there.

    Republicans winning offices means more long lasting legislation to clear, more conservative judicial appointments, etc.

    Teaching THIS (2024) democratic party a lesson is worthless if it comes with 30+ years of conservative judicial backsliding.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The destruction of the republican party via increased voter and representation rights represents the single greatest possible “progressive” leftward shift of the US political window.

      Absolute pipe dream. They aren’t even going to lose control of the Senate. They’ll have dozens of governorships and legislative majorities when this election is over.

      Liberals are fucking delusional if they think this election changes any of that.

      • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        My guy I’m saying it’s the goal in general not this election. It is the existential goal of anyone left of maga.

        You should review the electoral college maps compared to population, in addition to gerrymandering. Democrats actively seek to improve voter access, proper districting and so on. If those topics are continued and eventually successful, the republican party is exposed for the minority population that is is. Republicans cannot win in a “fair” fight.

        Lastly my point regarding judicial appointments is critical here: redistricting and voter access issues are won in the courtroom. Reducing conservative appointments is absolutely possible with a Harris win.

        Delusional is thinking all this happens in one term, while ignoring the backslide of progress a trump term would mean.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          it’s the goal in general not this election.

          One Party Rule is the goal of both parties, and equally unattainable for similar reasons.

          Democrats actively seek to improve voter access, proper districting and so on

          They do not, as evidenced by the failure to advance DC Statehood when they had a majority.

          my point regarding judicial appointments is critical here

          Republicans will control the Senate at the end of this election. Harris will not shift the balance of power under these conditions.

          thinking all this happens in one term

          Do you think this is the first term Dems and GOPers have been struggling for power?

          • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I do not. Why would I?

            Trump has made judicial appointments a key goal of his first term, so it stands to reason he’d do the same now. Avoiding that is progress, even if Harris gets zero.

            Edit: to avoid playing nickel and dime debate club:

            The democratic party is wildly imperfect and often ineffectual. I’m not satisfied, and I’m not cheerleading for them.

            Harris may also be wildly imperfect and often ineffectual. That’s still better than the massive equality, stability and integrity sink trump represents and that’s what I’m arguing for.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              Trump has made judicial appointments a key goal of his first term

              McConnell made it a key goal. That’s why he blocked Garland for 10 months under Obama.

              Schumer has not. That’s why he let a SCOTUS nomination fall into Trump’s hands a mere 10 weeks before Biden took office.

              • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                Please note I had a late edit that should head off this back and forth on specifics.

    • @UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      With election reform we don’t need for the Republican party to stop existing to get more viable options in the voting booth.

      • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Very true, my point is the current republican party is trumped up by systemic inertia. They are a minority position.

    • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 months ago

      Teaching THIS (2024) democratic party a lesson is worthless if it comes with 30+ years of conservative judicial backsliding.

      And on top of that, when has “teaching the party a lesson” actually worked out in the peoples’ favor?

  • masterofn001
    link
    fedilink
    21
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    For anyone who already knows the truth of this meme, or who would like to know more about the vast methods of deception and how to spot and counter them, this DEFCON 32 talk is incredible.

    DEF CON 32 - Counter Deception: Defending Yourself in a World Full of Lies - Tom Cross, Greg Conti

    The Internet was supposed to give us access to the world’s information, so that people, everywhere, would be able to know the truth. But that’s not how things worked out. Instead, we have a digital deception engine of global proportions. Nothing that comes through the screen can be trusted, and even the things that are technically true have been selected, massaged, and amplified in support of someone’s messaging strategy.

    Deception isn’t just about narratives - we see deception at every layer of the network stack, from spoofed electromagnetic signatures, to false flags in malware, to phony personas used to access networks and spread influence. They hide in our blindspots, exploit our biases, and fill our egos while manipulating our perceptions.

    How do we decide what is real? This talk examines time-tested maxims that teach the craft of effective deception, and then inverts those offensive principles to provide defensive strategies. We’ll explore ways to counter biases, triangulate information sources, detect narratives, and how hackers can build tools that can change the game.

  • @boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    96 months ago

    Don’t worry, the communists of Lemmy are already celebrating the Trump victory.

    They were never leftists, or if they are, then they’re extremely anti-American leftists who want to see the US burn, not improve.

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      Are you even federated with Lemmygrad and Hexbear? Because they’re not celebrating. You’re like the Republicans who blame immigrants because you want an easy excuse to hide the fact the party is dogshit.

      • @boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        I am federated with the bear, but not grad. What’s going on is thinly veiled celebrations. Plus never have I heard a single one of those people have a bad thing to say about Trump or conservatism.

        I’m not too sure most of the people on Hexbear are leftists tbh, I reckon they’re fans of authoritarianism more than anything. I even got banned for saying that voting third party (aka not voting against Trump) is pretty much voting for genocide. Of course, they don’t see it that way - Biden and Harris are personally killing Palestinians and under Trump this would surely be stopped.

  • @bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    196 months ago

    And thus, instead of fighting the actual enemy, the republicans, you’re antagonising the people who are more reasonable. Next time you can do it like France and call leftist crazy extremists so you’ll seem less hypocritical about it.

    • @Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      176 months ago

      Been saying this the whole time. Libs were shaming and harassing undecided voters for weeks instead of acknowledging that the dems were running a god awful campaign and pivoting towards nazi policies.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        please explain to me in what world, not voting for dems who are “tending towards nazi ideology” compared to someone who openly espouses nazi ideology is somehow the better choice.

        I fail to see how, maybe i’m too intelligent and smart, but to me it seems like a really fucking simple choice.

        • @Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          I’m not commenting on the ethics of voting for Harris. I’m commenting on the hordes of people on lemmy and other social networks who were actively insulting anyone who expressed uncertainty in voting for Kamala. Actively insulting people who want to be on your side but are finding it difficult to support someone who is part of an administration that is actively funding a genocide.

          Those people, in my opinion, pushed voters away by completely ignoring their concerns and telling them they are fucking stupid if they don’t vote democrat. It’s a brain dead strategy and mirrors the democrats campaign strategy, which categorically failed.

        • @MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          When you run to the right, and the people who like right-wing policies already have a party giving them the policies they want, they’re not gonna switch parties, and you’re just going to alienate the parts of your base/coalition that are affected by those policies.

          Campaigning primarily on being the lesser evil and maintaining status quo failed, you can tell people 1 choice is slightly better all you want but on election day we found out that you can’t win that way. If the dem politicians actually want to win they’ll try a different strategy next time

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            06 months ago

            When you run to the right, and the people who like right-wing policies already have a party giving them the policies they want, they’re not gonna switch parties, and you’re just going to alienate the parts of your base/coalition that are affected by those policies.

            the harris campaign was not right wing, idk why you’re just making this shit up, there are more political ideologies aside from socialism and communism you know this right?

      • @BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        136 months ago

        What are you talking about?!?! The Dems ran a flawless campaign, it’s all the voters who are wrong!!! Don’t know they know what the Dems tell them is right is right?!? Don’t you know you’re fucking stupid if you have any qualms about not voting for Harris?!?

        • 90% of Lemmy users right now trying to find any reason to blame anyone but the DNC for their hubris and entitlement
    • @pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      126 months ago

      Third parties run at all levels of government and they would actually benefit from eliminating first past the post polling far more than the major parties.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        The bitter fact is that a winning candidate has no incentive to reform the voting system that put them in power.

        Why would a dominant party want to give any competitor an advantage?

        • @Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I hate to say it, but the only way I could see it happen is if both parties simultaneously see significant 3rd/4th party challengers acting as spoilers. In that situation, RCV would be the short term solution to remove the effect of spoiler votes. Basically the situation the UK is in right now with both the Lib Dems and Reform.

        • @JaymesRS@literature.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Because they care about maintaining their voters far more than enticing non-voters. If you listen to legislators and their staff for example, the way they perceive it is that non-voters may as well not exist in their minds, but eroding voters get attention.

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      296 months ago

      The fact that you only ever hear of third parties every four years really illustrates what their true objectives are.

      • @pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        166 months ago

        The fact that you only ever hear about ranked choice voting when you tell Democrat you’re thinking of voting third part illustrates what their true objectives are.

        (Also, I see third candidate parties in every midterm and local election I vote in at all levels of government. I have no idea what you’re talking about).

        (Also also, anyone reading this who lives in a swing state and hasn’t voted yet, please, just votes for Harris. She sucks, but Trump is even more dangerous now that he has a staff full of enablers and an actual plan. We have to beat him.)

        • Billiam
          link
          fedilink
          166 months ago

          Not having RCV doesn’t make anything worse.

          Promoting third-parties without RCV in place does.

          • @pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            116 months ago

            Well, third parties have always existed and will always exist, so it sounds like the Democrats need to get cracking on RCV. That is, unless they don’t actually want RCV because it might disrupt the duopoly that empowers them, and they’d prefer that third-parties remain a boogeyman they can use to bully people I to voting for them (or a scapegoat for their losses).

              • @pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                26 months ago

                Statewide, sure, but there’s no broad discussion of abolishing FPTP polling like there is eliminating the Electoral College.

                • Don Beyer(D) proposed the Fair Representation Act in 2017 that included implementing RCV for electing representatives to the House.

                  It’s much easier to sell a national popular vote, since people are used to popular votes already. RCV will be much easier to push federally when there are plenty of states that use it locally. Until then it’s largely a non-starter.

      • @Wiz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        I see no Green party members on the local ballot to enact this. They are starting at the top, which doesn’t help.

        • @wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The greens internal voting is literally done by RCV, they have it both in practice and in platform all the way down the line. AFAIK, so does the DSA.

          But whatever dude, keep doing what you’re doing, it’s working out great, clearly!

      • Queue
        link
        fedilink
        66 months ago

        Shhh, they need someone to blame for their horrible run.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          96 months ago

          it’s absolutely not politicians, it’s the people.

          This is like being presented with “would you rather stick a nail in your arm, or in your eye” and then doing nothing, only to have the nail get stuck in your eye by a third party.

        • @freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The fault lies squarely with people who make assinine claims without any evidence, pretending they hold some deep wisdom when they really don’t know shit.

          You are the evidence to support my claim, Poopster, in case that wasn’t obvious.

            • KillingTimeItself
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              and it’s the peoples job to vote for the best candidate…

              Weird that donald trump WON the election, that’s real curious.

              • @BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                When did voting become mandatory?

                The only obligation to voting is your right to exercise it how you choose, full stop. It is not anyone’s “job” to vote any specific way, this is the entitlement Democratic voters need to get over.

                Yeah, Trump won because he convinced his base he was worth voting for. Harris couldn’t convince her base that he was a threat and that she was worth voting for.

                She did try to win over Republican voters instead of her own, though. 94% of them voted Republican anyway, just like they did in 2020.

                But I’m sure you’ll tell me that was the voter’s fault too. 🙄

                Edit: I brought up mandatory voting because it could be legislated that way, just as voting day could be made a federal holiday. And laws could be passed to mandate paid time off to allow essential workers to vote on voting day if absentee/early voting are unavailable. Or what if you were automatically registered to vote on your 18th birthday, none of this registering nonsense.

                Damn, those are all great policy ideas that the Democrats could run on, or even implement, since they have been outwardly more supportive of people voting. Funny that they haven’t done that in the last couple decades…

                … It’s almost like the Dems don’t want that roughly 60% of people who don’t vote to start voting. Wonder why that is…

                • KillingTimeItself
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  46 months ago

                  When did voting become mandatory?

                  i didn’t say it did.

                  Fact of the matter is, if you don’t exercise your vote, and the result is worse, you exercised your vote badly. There is no difference between not voting, and having a bad outcome, and voting (for the wrong thing) and having a bad outcome. They are the same.

                  It is not anyone’s “job” to vote any specific way, this is the entitlement Democratic voters need to get over.

                  i don’t disagree, and in fact, i agree, this is an entitlement that democrats need to get over, because if they did get over it, we would start fucking winning. The republicans are literally an abusive partner right now, and we’re just sitting here like “well maybe if i close my eyes he won’t hit me” and then being really fucking confused when it doesn’t do anything.

                  As a party, we’re literally cannibalizing ourselves over this issue. It’s not that deep, just vote for the least bad candidate, and get over it, go do local political lobbying, go vote in primaries, go vote in local elections, whatever the fuck, nobody cares, just do something

                  She did try to win over Republican voters instead of her own, though. 94% of them voted Republican anyway, just like they did in 2020.

                  she didn’t try to win over republican voters, she tried to win over moderate voters. I would say it worked to some degree. But obviously since we got like a 50% turnout, it’s really hard to say if anything worked, and frankly, i think the democratic institution is failing right now. If we don’t get up and do something about it in the next 4 years, the republicans are going to run uncontested.

                  it’s funny that the image says moderate republicans, and while that’s partially true, it’s also pushing for support from the moderate left. Which is the vast majority of the party. She was also appealing to the moderate left (most of the dem party)

                  Damn, those are all great policy ideas that the Democrats could run on, or even implement, since they have been outwardly more supportive of people voting. Funny that they haven’t done that in the last couple decades…

                  maybe they should, but in defense of them, running on voting policy, in a federal election is pretty fucking silly. You can’t really do much about it on a federal level.

                  It’s almost like the Dems don’t want that roughly 60% of people who don’t vote to start voting. Wonder why that is…

                  so they can lose repeatedly to the republican party? ok.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
              link
              fedilink
              English
              176 months ago

              If they could understand that you need to appeal to voters to win an election, they’d be very upset.

  • Rikudou_Sage
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 months ago

    You Americans are really weird in that regard. As a foreigner, both your parties are fucking horrible. To demonstrate what I mean: one party wants to ban abortions, the other party says that unless you vote for them, the bad guys will take away your abortions and then they proceed to do absolutely nothing about it.

    So yeah, one of your parties is almost cartoonishly evil, the other is plain old adult-level evil.

    It’s not that democrats are any better than republicans, they’re just smarter about pretending they’re not evil.

    • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      196 months ago

      This is not only incredibly reductionist, it’s just flatout wrong. How can people still tout this “both parties are the same” bullshit?

      It’s gonna get real hard to keep it up in a few months when we start to see the real world implications of a second Trump regime.

      • Rikudou_Sage
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Again, this is a foreigner view. Maybe it’s different when you actually live there, though I doubt it. But from my point of view, both parties suck extremely and unless you somehow manage to get a 3rd party to win, you’re fucked for eternity. Both parties have no reason to make anything better if they know you’ll vote for one of them anyway.

  • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    36 months ago

    I think I’ll do some data Analysis on how much this community shits.on third parties, non voters, and Republicans relative to how much they advertise what’s good about the Dems.

  • @doingthestuff@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    346 months ago

    Some of us are actually not Democrats or Republicans because we really think both sides are bad in different ways. I still voted though.

    • @JaymesRS@literature.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 months ago

      And some of us who are that way understand that in FPTP there can only be a winner from one of the major parties and we are choosing who we want to fight to push for changes.

    • rigatti
      link
      fedilink
      English
      196 months ago

      It’s still worth it to register for one of the major parties to vote in their primary and push them towards your actual politics. For example, I wouldn’t consider myself “a Democrat”, but I am registered to the party and I vote as progressive as I can in primaries.

      • @fdbryant3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        In a lot of places, you pretty much have to register for a party to have any say in the local elections. Where I live if there is a primary for an office it is guaranteed whoever wins the Republican primary is going to win the office, so if you want to have a vote in that election you have to register Republican.

        I think everyone should get a vote in every primary. If there is a Republican and Democratic primary then you should get to cast a vote for a Republican candidate and a Democrat candidate. I think this would result in a better selection of nominees for offices.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        186 months ago

        But then you don’t get to brag about your enlightened centrism.

      • @doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 months ago

        Not all states work the same. In Ohio I can just show up and tell them which one I want to vote in each time. I always vote in the Democrat or Republican primary, I get a voice without committing to one or the other.

      • @Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        66 months ago

        From what I’ve read, the two times Trump won, many Democrats felt that they were denied this choice, which left them disillusioned, and they didn’t vote. I don’t think that’s the main reason for Trump’s victory, but what you touched on was definitely a factor in the Democrats’ loss.

        • rigatti
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          I wonder how many times we need this to happen for people to learn that letting others make your choices for you will often lead to your worst possible option.

  • @Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    voter suppression and voting are not the same thing.

    a vote for third parties is as valid as a vote for a primary color.