Every so often I give a few bucks(far less than the worth of knowledge I got from it)

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    It has an abominable political slant, so absolutely not. If there was a way to split the science/math/etc. segment from the rest of it, that one would totally be worth donating to.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        That can be a touchy subject because the slant of Wikipedia and the slant of Reddit are very similar, but with Reddit leaning more towards chasing frivolous headlines and Wikipedia leaning more towards, like, rehabilitating Nazis and the like. The short version is that Wikipedia is far to the right of consensus among even neoliberal historians on many subjects and you will see things treated as plain there that are relatively fringe views academically.

    • davel [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Organizationally it’s had leadership with abominable politics. Jimmy Wales is a self-proclaimed libertarian. Katherine Maher was CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation, then joined The Atlantic Council, and currently serves on the US Department of State’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board. [edit: apostrophe’s]

  • TheEntity
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    I can’t realistically afford it due to various factors but if I had a proper “western” wage, I surely would donate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    222 years ago

    I think once a year they show the donation banner, then I donate something like 10 dollars. I use Wikipedia almost daily, so I’m glad to contribute something.

  • Freeman
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    I heard that the wiki foundation is pretty well off and the saleries they pay the executives are rising pretty fast. Havent donated myself but in principle I should, eventho the higher ups are earning this much.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    I do, at least once a year (nothing excessive), mainly because I use the website occasionally. It’s the same reason I bought ‘reddit coins’ or whatever that used to be. I just wanted to contribute to a useful service, especially given that there is so much garbage out there

  • Chaphasilor [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    332 years ago

    Giving 10 bucks a year, even though I use it very little. But sometimes it’s just easy and quick to look something up or read an interesting article, and I know that there are many people (students, etc.) who rely on it more than I do and have less money to spend

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    I think Wikipedia is a valuable common good and should be maintained. Because I can afford it, I donate monthly, even if I only use it a few times each month.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Same here. I believe it’s worth it, I can afford it.

    I support not only Wikipedia, but also Signal and my local Mastodon-instance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    632 years ago

    Yes, every month. Why? Because in my opinion it is one of the greatest collective projects of mankind (even with the flaws it has).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      I’ve never seen it like that. And I’ve never paid anything for it because I don’t use it enough. I might change my mind now. Thanks!

  • Lettuce eat lettuce
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Absolutely, I’ve been using it since my teens and it’s been an invaluable resource to me.

    I am planning on giving more monthly in the future once my finacial situation changes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      You should consider giving a tiny amount that you can afford. Some people think that establishing outflows to charity reinforces a frame of abundance.

      Maybe you could do $1/mo

      (though I understand if your situation is such that the $1 might become $35 when it hits a negative account — in that case you gotta solve that first)