I would imagine it was harder to get information on topics as you would’ve had to buy/borrow encyclopedias to do.

Were there proprietary predecessor websites?

Tell me about the dark ages!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Just random webpages that you took at face value because there’s no way someone can publish misinformation on something as big and sophisticated as this internet thing.

  • Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I grew up in the 90s, so we had Encarta for most of the time I needed an encyclopedia.

    It also wasn’t uncommon to have a (partial) set of encyclopedias at home. You could buy them, one or more volumes at a time, over the phone or occasionally from door-to-door salespeople. We also had an old set from the 60s that we inherited from my grandmother.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      We also had a world book encyclopedia from the 1950s that I used for my elementary school projects in the 90’s. Very occasionally I’d notice something or of date, but overall it was fine.

      I re read the entry on “lightning” and the half-page about “tornadoes” I don’t know how many times. And it was fun to flip through a random volume looking for good pictures.

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        I don’t remember what publisher made the ones we inherited from grandma. I recognize World Book, but I can’t say that’s what they were. I’m not sure if those old encyclopedias are still floating around somewhere in the family or if whoever had them last finally got rid of them.

        A lot of the info in them was definitely still solid, agree.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      74 months ago

      It also wasn’t uncommon to have a (partial) set of encyclopedias

      “The big book of answers” as it was (jokingly) referred to in my childhood home. It was kept near the dinner table to settle arguments. It never settled them

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    254 months ago

    You could argue about who was right about some obscure fact all night long, or come up with your own creative theories.
    Nowadays, in less than a minute, someone will look it up, killing the conversation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      My father and his wife still do this. I enjoy letting them bicker about dumb shit for five minutes before pulling out my phone and saying “OK, Google…” so they can hear the results and then get mad at each other and the internet for the answer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 months ago

      You say that like it’s a bad thing but I LOVE to kill conversations with citations. “Here’s an article from the 90s where Trump talks up Epstein. Sounds like they were buds after all!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    254 months ago

    You parents would just tell you something and you assumed it was true until you learned years later they where just winging it with bullshit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I had a Microsoft Encarta on a cd that I used for projects when I was young, Wikipedia launched midway through my grade 5 and by grade 6 I was using it for research (despite the “you can’t trust Wikipedia, anyone can edit it!” that was still a thing into grade 12 from my teachers) for any school project. My parents also had a copy of the Oxford’s Canadian English dictionary that was an absolute time, used that a heck of a lot too.

    I use Wikipedia as a jumping off point, good to get information, get the details from citations. I wasn’t old enough to do complex work pretty wikipedia, but I’d imagine it’d be the same thing, encyclopaedia to lookup a topic, dive into reference materials for details from there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      I remember being amazed by that disc, and how it seemed to contain the summation of all human knowledge at the time.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        I think Wikipedia without media files and only text and formatting can fit on a lot a single USB drive

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’ll be honest man: it sucked.

    Imagine a time where you had a question, and you just… didn’t get to know the answer. Like, literally every time you just had to hope someone in your general area had some level of confidence in their answer to satisfy your curiosity until you could confirm it later. Or you’d just go around repeating it to people with out confirming. Whatever.

    If something was important enough, you’d go track down an answer. Remember to look it up when you got home using your parent’s encyclopedias. Or make a trip to the library.

    In a way, we kind of lost something: conversation and discussion. Before I feel like people really picked apart an issue where you’d all come up with a consensus over a few hours of discussion about a topic at a party or something. Then someone would come back with the answer another day, and bring in some more stuff they learned while looking it up, and it would start a whole new conversation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 months ago

    Mostly you either went without knowing stuff, or you had to go to the library. I knew a couple of wealthy folks who had their own sets of encyclopedia at home which could cost thousands of dollars.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      lol all these other replies in the thread talking about having encyclopedias at home. That was some rich family stuff.

      Most people went to the library or just listened to whomever said what they remembered most confidently.

      Encarta for the computer was a thing but, from what I remember, it was barely helpful. I guess it’s possible that my family had a cheap version. In my experience the best I could hope from it was to start where I should research at the library.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    54 months ago

    Back in the days before the interwebs and pocket computers with access to all the knowledge and history of mankind, there were the outdated encyclopedia at home that you’d pop out occasionally, the up to date encyclopedia at the library that you never got around to check out anything casual and then there was the truth by the person arguing the most insistent that they were right.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    84 months ago

    I remember a time when people got into arguments over who played a roll in a movie. one time we drove to a video rental store to settle it.

  • oshu
    link
    fedilink
    94 months ago

    People used to call the Reference Desk at their local public library to ask a question and get an answer.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Instead of a webpage, you had a whole shelf of books laid out in more or less the same fashion as Wikipedia.

    Fun fact: I learned about the Internet from the encyclopedia and begged my parents to get online. I used to just read those things like regular books. I only learned recently that when I first went online in 1993, the World Wide Web was literally only months old.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    344 months ago

    Everybody’s like “Encarta” but before CD-ROMs etc, we had massive ass sets of encyclopedias. You’d actually have an encyclopedia subscription so they could send you errata for stuff that changed over time. Sort of like paper DLC for reality.

    It sucked.

    But pre-Internet it was fun to sit around and flip through the encyclopedias/dictionaries and read stuff. If you were lucky you’d find something sex-related.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      This unlocked a childhood memory! I forgot that my parents once randomly let door to door salemen in to sell us this crazy large set of books. I think my parents were desperate because I was awful at school and somehow thought someone who didn’t try would now do so because I have all the information I needed… I feel bad, but I never used them once, a giant waste of money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Lol. We had a giant set of kids Britannica’s that my folks got from a door to door salesman. I wonder if that was the primary vector for encyclopedias.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        I enjoy the “firestorm of criticism” bit. And

        On 9 March 1976 the US Federal Trade Commission entered an opinion and order enjoining Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. from using: a) deceptive advertising practices in recruiting sales agents and obtaining sales leads, and b) deceptive sales practices in the door-to-door presentations of its sales agents