I’m thinking about upgrading my W-Fi and I was curious what wireless access points (WAP) people are using. I’m currently using a Netgear R7800 running OpenWRT.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    Omada APs, various versions. Really happy with them, their WiFi is great and unlike Ubiquity they also work without the controller as independent devices.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Last I tried a ubiquity AP (2019 or 2020) It could operate independently of a controller with limited features.

  • TheHolm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Get yourself some old cisco 3600 re-flash it with standalone firmware and get enterprise class WAP for cheap.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      That one seems to be WiFi 4 (and upgradable to WiFi 5) so probably not a good choice for someone with a half decent internet connection.

  • Pax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124 months ago

    Went all in with UniFi some time back. No regrets.

    Currently running a few U6s. No real motivation to upgrade to U7s.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      While expensive, UniFi hardware is just a huge step beyond the rest of the consumer market.

      I’ve had literally 10x the range (5x vs 50m), in congested environments, compared to ‘gaming’ hardware. I actually did a side by side to test. I was shocked at the difference.

      The bridging function is also a life saver. 2 LR units can get a reliable signal between each other, at ridiculous ranges.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 months ago

      +1 on this. Though i picked up 2 u7’s. VLAN support, easy to maintain and lets face it, superior function from most retail APs. If you’re a power user, this is the way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    144 months ago

    Fritzbox boxes.

    They tick all the checkboxes

    • good standards support (including dect protocol if you want to have an ip phone or even iot protocols)
    • fast wifi speeds
    • cheap (at least for the second hand in ebay)
    • super stable, never had a problem with them in 5 years or more
    • fast roaming support out of the box

    It is a well known brand in Germany but pretty unknown outside that country. Honestly it is the best bang for buck I was able to get.

    Honestly, I would spend 10 minutes checking on them

    • Elvith Ma'for
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84 months ago

      I really like them but they do have two downsides for “more advanced” users (or at least for me) - it is a home device as after all.

      1. No support for VLAN or VLAN tagging - you can set up you WiFi and a guest WiFi. You can also map the guest network to an Ethernet port. But that’s about it.
      2. There is no way to change the DNS suffix (*. fritz.box) to another value - I do own a domain that I use for the local services on my home server, etc. which then allows for Let’s Encrypt certificates, but I cannot use it “out of the box”.

      If you’re an advanced user, there’s plenty of ways around that, though. I just wished that these two thing were to exist in the firmware to have less work with my home infrastructure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Totally agree with the first point, it is a limitation, and the guest wifi sticking to a eth port is just a patch. One that works but still a patch.

        But I don’t see the point of the prefixes. What do you mean? I also have a custom domain and a local dns server y can use the domain even internally. I just simple ignore that…

        • Elvith Ma'for
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          Yeah, I’m also using a local resolver. But since I had some problems using another DHCP server (which was probably a problem on my end), so I’m current setting some devices in my FRITZ!box to a fixed IP and then enter that in my DNS server. If I could just skip the second part and tell the FRITZ!Box to just resolve printserver.example.com instead of printserver.fritz.box - that’d be nice. Maybe I should do another try with a DHCP server soon.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    I bought a Grandstream GWN7660 last year and it seems pretty good, it replaced a ubiquity WAP that I still have legacy devices connected to.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 months ago

    I have two TP-Link EAP610, one EAP245, and one EAP615-Wall. The Omada controller runs on my home server in an LXC. Three of the units are powered by PoE, and the garage one is meshed in. I needed three in my house because the walls have chicken wire in them which blocks and reflects WiFi. It took some trail and error to get the WAPs in suitable locations. The main one in the basement is under a wall, such that it has line of sight into 5 rooms of the house. I used iPerf to test performance at the edges of each room, until I could get at least 300 Mbit reliably. That was the only way I could ensure that I was getting a direct signal and not a reflection off a wall.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    I wanted cheap and OpenWRT, so I got some GLinet Shadows. It has it’s own GUI, but if you go into Advanced Settings, you get the usual OpenWRT Luci interface.

    You can set them up as APs or repeaters, and have failover connections. Pretty versatile and easy to use.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    I’m using a couple of TP-Link EAP225 ceiling-mounted PoE access points, and one EAP235-wall wall-mounted one, connected to my old TP-Link Archer C7 router (with the antennas disabled) running OpenWRT.

    I’d like to replace the router with something rack-mounted, but haven’t gotten around to it yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      I love that GL.iNet stuff ships with OpenWRT (or apparently FreeRTOS in the case of the Thread border router I’m eyeing right now), but I wish they would make stuff like ceiling or wall-mounted PoE access points and rack-mountable wired routers. The form-factor is what stops me from choosing them over TP-Link devices that I have to flash OpenWRT onto myself.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    I have 2x Tplink EAP 610 access points. Linking back to an Opnsense virtualized router. The APs are great and Omada is fantastic - I’m running it in a docker container with no cloud access required.

    I would go all Omada if I could but that would mean I’d need 3 POE Omada switches and I cant justify that cost at the moment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      And sadly Omada is years behind in their gateway/Firewall. OPNsense is far better in that regard, going back to a Omada gateway is like going back to a tricycle when you drive a car. Sadly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        I was meaning their switches. I didn’t know they did routers / firewalls. Interesting that they’re not as advanced as their other offerings which are really good. My opnsense setup has taken years to hone and I have no desire to start over with that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    EAP-615

    In my opinion look much nicer in a home compared to ceiling mounts. I also run TP-Link Omada router and switches and selfhost the controller.

  • Shimitar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 months ago

    I purchases a few Netgear R6220, and of course flashed OpenWRT on all of them!

    Great hardware, cheap, and perfectly supported. A few years old, so I could even find them used at an amazing price point.