The title pretty much says it! I’d like to explore that idea a little and would love to hear y’all’s recommendations. This thought was originally inspired by lord of the rings, but I’m also currently on a little nostalgia trip by reading The Sea of Trolls and the soft magic system in that is pretty fun

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    124 months ago

    Not exactly an answer to your question, but I wanted to put in a pitch for one of my favorite talks about magic in fiction:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jeb_mSOgrVg

    The Lord of the Rings and “The Last Unicorn” are the only works of fiction I’m aware of that have magic that works the way TF is describing it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    A bit unconventional, and certainly not high fantasy, but: John Dies At The End by David Wong.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    84 months ago

    what makes a magic system soft. just not a lot of it like lotr?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      https://habitwriting.com/hard-magic-vs-soft-magic/

      Hard Magic System: A type of magic that has specific rules that the reader understands and which limit a magic user in what they can do.

      Soft Magic System: A type of magic that–though rules may apply to it–does not have specific limits that are expressed to or known by the reader or audience.

      Basically how much readers are exposed to the mechanics of the magic system, and thus how realistic or constrained-to-reality the magic seems. Harry Potter and LotR are probably more in the soft magic category, whereas Brandon Sanderson’s novels have good examples of hard magic.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        144 months ago

        Sanderson, who coined the terms, describes Potter as being a pretty good example of a mixed magic system.

        Which makes sense to me. The spells they learn at school are a pretty hard magic system. But then things like “the power of love” are more reminiscent of a soft system.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Thank you, I do think this was mentioned in the article I linked, and it does seem like Harry Potter is a good example of a mixed system. In my mind what makes it a soft system more fundamentally is how the author is inconsistent and the way magic is never really restricted by rules, even if there is a lot of focus on classes and how the spells are conjured, etc.

  • Sas [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    The Priory of the Orange Tree might fit what you are looking for. I’ve only learned the term soft magic just now so I might be wrong but magic in that world is mysterious and feels similar to Lord of the Rings. However there’s multiple types of magic and one of the main characters understands a bit more about one of those types and thus knows a bit about its limitations iirc so we as the reader are introduced to those a bit. Overall I’d say it probably fits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Howl’s Moving Castle - the book showcases it a lot better than the movie. Kind of kiddish but that makes it a fast read, and I really appreciated the magic system.

  • 73ʞk13
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    Might be worth taking a look at David Zindell’s “The Ea Cycle”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    Honestly Throne of Glass by Sarah J. Maas fits. It’s more a medium magic system, if that makes sense. Instead of not clearly defined rules it more just has ever changing, very simplified, rules.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    04 months ago

    Did someone say The Wheel of Time? I recently read the first two books and it seriously has me hooked. Definitely has a softer magic system similar to LotR, at least so far! I definitely recommend.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Because you are willing to die on that hill of the greatest series. The women in that book are not well written and most of them are kinda shit. The greatest fantasy series of all time should be better than that and you must hate women if you can ignore that to die on your hill

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Can you perhaps provide an example? The vast majority of the women in WoT are strong, independent, and capable. The main female characters that start out timid or “weak” experience amazing growth over the series. Are there shitty women in the series? Yes. There are also shitty men in the series. There are over 1000 named characters throughout the series and (in my opinion) Jordan did an amazing job in the sheer diversity of types of characters portrayed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    The Riftwar Cycle might fit. The magic system starts off with the users having a hard understanding of how magic works only to learn how soft and pliable it really is.

    That said, this series is like 30+ books and is put it at half of them being really good and half being a grind while nearly all of them are dated in fantasy style.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    A serial web story by Wildbow named “Pact” has a pretty interesting soft magic system with a decent amount of depth.

    Description of Magic System

    All characters who can use magic in the story are not able to lie on penalty of their magic power being greatly reduced. The magic system is based around tiny spirits who listen to and judge people. There are powers in 3s, power in performance, powers in name, yet despite this the magic system still feels ad hoc, like you can make magic happen that you would not normally be capable of if you are just smart enough, poetic enough, and persuasive enough to the spirits…

    Magical beings feel Eldritch, actively dangerous, and typically very clever. The ones who are clever typically have very good mental models of what makes humans tick, yet clearly do not fall under the same rules.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 months ago

    Hmmm.

    • „The dark is rising“ Series by Susan Cooper
    • „The Moon of Gomrath“ by Alan Garner
    • „The Innkeepers Song“ by Peter S. Beagle
    • „Stardust“ by Neil Gaiman
    • „The Night Circus“ by Erin Morgenstern
    • „Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrel by Susanna Clarke

    Those were on top of my head. There are probably many many more. Also check out other books by the authors I mentioned.

  • murmelade
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    I’m more of a sci-fi guy but I listened to Joe Abercrombies The First Law trilogy as audio books and holy shit was it great. Ended up devouring the 3 standalone books and the following Age of Madness trilogy that plays out in the same world. Very dark stuff and I believe fits within the requested “soft magic” setting.