• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      For what it’s worth, the majority of the nation doesn’t worship guns. But the very small minority that does, like… They worship them a lot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This one is far more complicated than non-americans think. I’ve spoken to people outside the country, and they tend to only listen to the really dumb democrats when it comes to this issue.

      You can’t close Pandora’s box. There are 393 million guns in the hands of civilians here. If you have a crazy neighbor with a gun, you kind of have to go get one yourself. That, or devise another method of viable self defense. The cops won’t help you, not in virtually any situation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          The other realistic option is that he shoots me empty handed. No one is going to take his gun and no one is going to save me in time.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Well I can’t go back in time to preemptively stop them from getting a gun in the first place, I’d love to hear any suggestions you have for that situation.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                15 months ago

                Amend your holy constitution.

                Won’t happen until you stop worshiping guns and the 2nd amendment.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  “Just do something a large portion of the country would kill to stop from happening” isn’t a good solution, but you know that. If reason was going to work, we would have used it decades ago.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        Funny, though, that there have been working methods of reducing the number of guns in civilized countries in the past.

        But somehow every gun-toting American is totally convinced that reducing the amount of guns on the road is technically impossible,

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The irony of euros unloading in a thread that the people who most need to see it will never see, just to feel better about having unloaded, is peak self-serving uselessness.

    Get the fuck off of Lemmy and go unload in conservative and Republican cesspits like the fox news vomment section, xhitter, OANN, not here where the vast fucking majority already fucking agree with you.

    But you know you can’t do that because that would actually mean going for a swim in political sewage, which means doing actual work for your personal beliefs, and which also means you’re most definitely going to get backlash that you know you won’t get here.

    TL;DR: non-US bitching about the US on Lemmy, where nearly all lemmy Americans already agree with them, are as functionally idiotic as the conservative white Americans they’re bitching about.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2585 months ago

    Gasoline prices are heavily subsidized in the US, the gas price you complain about is cheap compared to other countries.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      445 months ago

      The commodity price for gasoline right now looks to be about 2 USD per gallon. Retail gasoline in the USA is at least a dollar more due to taxes and markup.

      Subsidies may play a role as well, but the taxes in some countries are extreme by American standards. My take on it is that a fuel tax is effectively neutral if it brings in enough revenue to pay for the road system.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        What state do you live in that the road system is funded adequately? I never hear someone comment positively about the general state of road conditions.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          Florida, with the tourist money and gas taxes all our roads and highways are solid. The great weather year round means they can maintain and build roads all the time non stop.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          Adequately is a difficult determination.

          Is it adequate if there are state maintained dirt roads? In some states, the state or county chooses not to pave all of their roads.

          Is it adequately funded if they have potholes? Due to weather conditions, some states are notorious for potholes.

          Is it adequately funded if the road gets washed out or carried away by flooding? California gets mudslides that take out sections of roads, other states get sinkholes or hurricanes/tornados destroying their roads

          How long can one of these issues plague a road before we consider them underfunded?

          My opinion is that the US has too many roads. Most roads are maintained by county or municipalities, and are funded through infinite growth model.

          When a developer creates a new subdivision, they pave the roads. Once done, they usually relinquish these roads to the county/city who are responsible for maintaining the roads.

          Typically maintenance is low until they require replacing. The cities and counties don’t save money or plan well for replacing these roads and rely on new tax revenue to fund replacing them.

          It builds a slowly ballooning road maintenance cost that someone will have to pay. I believe someone made a video about this very fact. I don’t have the link handy

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        145 months ago

        Any price lower than that required to compensate for all the negative externalities of both driving and using fossil fuels to do it still counts as subsidized.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          A failure to set an excise tax on a product or service that offsets its externalities is not a subsidy. A lower tax rate than a competing product is arguably a subsidy.

          I’m not aware of any modern societies that make a credible attempt to adjust the price of all or most goods and services to include their externalities. That sounds like a good idea in theory, but very difficult to implement in practice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        175 months ago

        In NZ it’s roughly $2.50NZD per litre minimum, or $5.31USD per gallon. This is roughly 50% tax (it’s how we pay for roads, plus is subject to sales tax), so a bit over $2USD per gallon at the moment excluding tax.

        Is it really $3 a gallon plus tax in the US right now?

        I compare it to how I thought mobile phone calls in the US were super cheap, then found out people pay to receive calls, which was super weird to me. Where I live, my whole life it has never been the case that a normal residential connection would pay to receive a call, mobile or not.

        Differences in how we do things make differences appear more than they are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          105 months ago

          It’s $3/gal total including taxes here in Illinois right now.

          I was in California last week and it was $4.50/gam total

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              7
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I don’t know if anyone can really get you that number, because the tax isn’t clearly disclosed when you buy gasoline, it’s just included in the price; the taxes also vary widely between different states/counties/maybe cities too?

              Edit: the federal tax is $0.184 per gallon

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Huh, the US gets another layer more confusing. Tax is included in gas prices but not in anything else? How do the arguments for not including that tax in the price stack up when gas stations are already including it?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  45 months ago

                  Even more annoying, the gas price really has 99/100ths tacked on, so the price is a cent more expensive because no one thinks of it.

                  Ie: $3/gal is really charged as $3.0099/gal

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  45 months ago

                  Tradition.

                  Gas prices are also the only retail prices that include tenths of a penny - specifically 9/10, as in all gas prices look like $x.xx9 such as $3.059

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Ok apparently Illinois has a 39c per gallon gasoline tax, another 18c in federal, and another 6% or so on state sales tax, plus any regional sales tax. It’s unclear whether the sales tax applies to the gasoline tax (in NZ it does), but let’s assume it doesn’t. Then that’s $3 - 0.39 - 0.18 = $2.43 then remove 6% tax is 2.43/106*100 = $2.29

                We can probably knock a bit more off because there is probably some regional/city sales tax but it should be the right ballpark.

                It does seem we pay about the same for petrol, though from what I’ve been searching up, this is wildly different across states because states have much different ways of paying for roads (e.g. Hawai’i is mostly taxed at the pump where as Alaska has big taxes on oil extraction to keep taxes for residents low, including for roading).

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  45 months ago

                  Sales tax is either included already or not charged.

                  The posted price is the posted price, no additional taxes on top of it.

                  Although they add 99/100ths to the price, so $3.00/gal is really charged at $3.0099/gal.

                  Of course this gets rounded up 😒

              • Fushuan [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                65 months ago

                I can, Spain only has federal tax and it’s 21% for anything premium like gasoline.

                1.63€ per litre with taxes.
                So 6.169€ per gallon with taxes.
                Or 6.29$ per gallon post tax.
                Or 5.2$ per gallon without tax.

                Literally more than double their price, and they complain so hard LMAO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        Fuel tax in the U.S. doesn’t even come close to paying for the road system. The federal fuel tax covers less than half of federal transportation spending. I don’t know about all of the states, but Wisconsin’s fuel tax covers only about 2/3 of the road spending. And, local streets get built with local property and income taxes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          That’s probably not true, but hard to calculate.

          The previous time I looked, which was a while ago, federal fuel tax revenue in the USA and federal highway expenditures were about equal. Since then, fuel tax revenue has fallen behind highway spending; the required increase to even it out would be modest in absolute terms - something like 15 cents per gallon. States each have their own taxes and budgets, of course.

          As for the road damage each car causes, it increases (roughly) proportional to the fourth power of vehicle weight. Semi trucks and similar heavy commercial vehicles cause almost all of the traffic-induced road wear, and passenger cars contribute very little. It’s likely the fuel taxes paid for a passenger car (even a relatively large one) are several times its marginal impact on road maintenance.

      • pwnicholson
        link
        fedilink
        745 months ago

        The fuel tax isn’t enough to cover the damage to the environment and quality of life, though. That’s why taxes are that high in many other places. Same way cigarettes are taxed to help discourage use and to help cover the increased healthcare costs it puts on everyone

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          Fuel, and other car-related taxes (sometimes based on horsepower or engine displacement) in most countries in Europe were much higher than in the USA long before there was widespread concern about the environmental impact of cars.

          • pwnicholson
            link
            fedilink
            14
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Which is why I said “environment and quality of life” - they don’t want their cities dominated by cars (making life dangerous for pedestrians) and for cars to become a requirement for living. So taxes are added to discourage (not eliminate) driving and car ownership

            But also, the mess of smog from exhaust and other impacts beyond climate change have been known since the first automobiles. Concerns about the ‘environment’ is more than greenhouse gasses.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        The fuel tax in other countries primarily exists to make people use less fuel in order to save the world from global warming.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    615 months ago

    Yes, you really need to rewrite that constitution of yours and declaring something “unconstitutional” doesn’t win you an argument, it makes you look like a brainwashed idiot. Just saying.

  • Venia Silente
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115 months ago

    America is the whole continent. You guys just fenced the worst part of it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Drastically reduction of guns WILL save your kids lives at school. But not “muh outdated rights from centuries ago”.

    Btw I’m not against guns, military and officers should have “easy” access to them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This definitely won’t be a pile of horseshit from people never been there, believe everything they see on TV, and operate completely on stereotypes from various sources, sprinkled with the dumbest takes you ever heard, and a bunch of blaming capitalism like it’s the only nation that employs it.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    305 months ago

    In foreign countries, the people don’t always speak English or “American” and shouldn’t be expected to bow down to you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Kinda disappointed in this thread, was hoping to find things that Americans on Lemmy aren’t ready to hear. Everything here seems like the usual complains that most Americans on Lemmy and even Reddit already aware of.

  • Masterbaexunn
    link
    fedilink
    725 months ago

    For millions of United States Americans, the so called “American Dream” is achieved in Mexico. They’re often illegal immigrants. They often have mental health problems. They gentrify our cities and are entitled as fuck.

    Pot calling kettle and all, but I do wish they’d go back to their own shithole country. They have demonized my country for decades and have weaponized the cartels to feed their own addictions. Most of the problems here can be tied directly to their humongous drug problems.

    Yankee go home. The United Mexican States is tired of your shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      185 months ago

      I had no idea we had people illegally immigrating that much. Bet they’re the type to use the word “illegals” pejoratively.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      And half of them won’t even bother learning Spanish. I’ll never give someone who immigrates due to hardship a hard time about learning the language, but privileged fucks who go to exploit a lower cost of living or whatever often just end up in expat bubbles and don’t know more than a few words of the local language even after years despite having that privilege of time/money/resources to learn it.

      • Pandantic [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        So are there any good ones? Learning Spanish and giving back to the community? Just curious. That’s what I plan to do when I move out of here, learn the language and do volunteer work, etc.

    • Truffle
      link
      fedilink
      205 months ago

      Spot on about the gentrification bit. Entire town populations have shifted from local people to the self called expats and snowbirds. Just look at Chelém, Mérida, San Miguel de Allende, Tulúm, Cancún and many many more including most upitty neighborhoods in México City (Condesa, Roma, San Angel).