• Omega Cloud
    link
    fedilink
    25 months ago

    One of the most intelligent things you can do is to keep it simple, stupid.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    836 months ago

    Also, knowing who to shoot and when to kill them is kind of a big deal.

    The man who shot Don Vito thought he was untouchable because he was going to the meeting with a police captain.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      There is a movie called “The Godfather”, which depicts a fictional war between mafia families in the US. In the film, there is an older generation that operates on a kind of respect system, and attempt to keep each other reasonably balanced, in both power and money terms. A drug dealer enters the picture, and attempts to murder Michael Carleone’s father (who is the Godfather). In response, Michael plans to meet the drug dealer and a corrupt police captain, sneak a gun into the meeting, and shoot them both. That plan works.

      Later, the Godfather dies, Michael takes over as the head of the Carleone family, and plans assassinations of all of the older generation of every other family in a coordinated attack, during his father’s funeral. That plan works too, leaving him as the most powerful survivor.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1696 months ago

    That’s what machiavellian distills into - cold pragmatism and disregard of morality. So his turn from okay guy that wanted his family to stop with illegal shit into someone much worse than his father was portrays it perfectly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Unscrupulous is only one of the definitions.

        Cunning and scheming are the other two. The Prince detailed how to gain and hold power.

        It wasn’t a book that said immediately shoot everyone to solve all your problems.

        So the original author was expecting violence in Godfather 2 but with more planning.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          66 months ago

          You gain and hold power by killing people you don’t like, look at any dictator that ever dictatored. 🙃

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            Again, yes you kill people. You don’t just kill everyone immediately without a plan. Even Pol Pot had a plan.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The Machiavellian part was the fact he removed his rivals simultaneously without them gaining prior warning.

    He was cunning like a fox to avoid detection and dangerous like a lion when action was required.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    96 months ago

    The funny thing is that Machiavelli didn’t achieve shit apart from write a treatise bitching about the people in charge of where he lived.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    256 months ago

    Historically speaking, it tends to work.

    And for the record, Machiavelli didn’t exactly rule it out.

    • don
      link
      fedilink
      186 months ago

      Anon once heard someone’s opinions about a movie character, decided it must be so. Having a mind locked up tighter’n Fort Knox if it were located deep inside Area 51, he was badly disappointed when the character didn’t match the wild expectations he set for himself.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        176 months ago

        The expectations were set by someone else. For me, the memes hyped the hell out of Khan and one day I decided to watch the trek movies. Yeah, Khan did not live up to the hype. I had seen much more interesting scifi villains and space battles by then.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It insists upon itself

      It mean it’s trying to be deep, but is really just pretentious and shallow.