Weird how we have to pay more money every single year, and insurance somehow provides us less and less for our greater and greater spend
Oh, but
if you’re rich,we have the best healthcare system in the world!Richpeople from all over the globe come to America for medical care!And ironically, rich Americans travel the globe for the best healthcare.
As a non-rich American who got fucked over by The Mayo Clinic last year who were not only no help, but the patient advocate got me a full refund including for the AirBnB, I don’t blame them.
Me neither, to be honest. I just find it funny that they brag about the US having the best healthcare in the world and then go to Canada for anything that requires a stay in a hospital, Mexico for dental, and Thailand for cosmetic surgeries.
They’re the ones practicing medicine now
It is actually kinda incredible. I remember seeing a comic in Mad Magazine back in the 90s that satirized insurance companies by cutting ‘expensive’ healthcare and the cartoon showed an emaciated patient on IV and the insurance guy about to cut the tube with scissors.
Or, with car insurance, you get punished for actually using the service you pay for.
A service you are legally required to pay for, no less.
Isn’t the required car insurance the part that covers the OTHER cars, property and people you might harm with your car?
I don’t think it’s required that you carry enough insurance to be able to replace your own car. Might depend on your state, though?
Yeah, you’re right.
Usually if there is a lien against the title, you’re required to carry full coverage, and liability only when you own the title.
That’s usually a policy of the lender, though, not a law.
That makes sense. I never put any thought into it other than knowing I had to carry it.
Oh I guess that makes sense, since the vehicle is the collateral on the loan. Hard to repo a wreck.
Its actually very easy to repo a wreck, but its not worth anything.
Okay, I can spell out the “medical necessity” for you insurance companies in a way you’ll understand: mental health is important for physical health. You do things to improve mental health and you also improve physical health. So if you improve someone’s mental health now, you won’t be paying out for all of the later physical problems brought on by the stress and the knowledge that their life would be better if only some more miserly than Scrooge insurance company would let them have a fucking leg.
And having a prosthetic limb is important for physical health anyways. Helps you be more active, massively increases productivity (that’s what capitalists want right?), decreases wheelchair/caregiver costs, etc.
It’s simply an all around win.
Excellent points. The increased physical activity part would also save these idiot insurance companies money, but they would have to think beyond the next quarter.
Someone needs some adjusting.
Wow. This means that now, someone can say that medical bills literally cost them an arm & a leg.
“I mean technically any medical service is not truly medically necessary, right? You could just die*”
*Funeral services are not covered under your current plan.
Tbh I was expecting the first comment to contain the name Luigi…
Up you go, and soon it will.
I have a friend who has a prosthetic. Sure they could live their life in a wheelchair. But this guy goes hiking, and acts like a fully capable walking person. The quality of life is huge. It really gives back their life.
They are saying it’s not “medically necessary” to have any quality of life. As long as you’re breathing, you’re A-okay in their book.
This is what insurance in the US has come to mean.
Like how they still consider dental care to be “cosmetic.” They’ll rip them out of your head free of charge, but putting new ones in? No sir… You can eat mush!
But God forbid anyone mentions a solution that includes socialized healthcare…
Yep. It’s absolutely insane they wouldn’t cover it.
It’s honestly unethical as shit.
It’s absolutely insane that people should be expected to either buy insurance or pay for medical care out of their own pocket. And the insurance is never enough.
Won’t somebody thinking about the profiteers?
Those guys can go to hell
Unethical and counterproductive. Having a prosthetic limb would almost invariably lead to a less sedentary lifestyle, which is strongly correlated with better health. Paying for a prosthetic today has to be cheaper than paying for a heart attack or diabeties later.
Yes, but who cares about later if there are quarterly and yearly profits to get.
What makes you think they will pay for heart surgery or diabetes later.
But being unwell is profitable
Depends on how you measure productivity. The hope is that by the time long term care is required for things like diabetes or heart disease, the patient would be eligible for Medicare.
That or the sedimentary lifestyle will so negatively affect the more than likely diabetic patient, that they go into renal failure and qualify for disability through social security. Effectively removing their cost onto a socialized network.
Paying for a prosthetic is much cheaper in the long run, but not for private insurance. The vast majority of the cost of not providing a prosthetic will be absorbed by Medicare.
You’re making the assumption that they’ll pay out for a heart attack or diabetes later. You just said that they were caused by the pre-existing condition of not having a prosthetic limb.
I mean it’s not really. They don’t cover hearing aids or even implant surgery. “Not necessary” is what my sister gets told. Yeah, trying living deaf you asshats!
From a purely “medical necessity” viewpoint even, having a properly-functioning prosthetic helps him keep the rest of his body healthy! (Although I suppose they’d figure on denying claims for hospital treatment when his unhealthy heart caved in!)
(Although I suppose they’d figure on denying claims for hospital treatment when his unhealthy heart caved in!)
The long term goal of this type of policy is to not only reduce immediate cost, but to offload the cost of long term care onto a socialized network like social security.
The majority of amputees are already diabetics, if you remove their ability to remain active and mobile, you substantially increase the chance of renal failure. Patients who require dialysis because of renal failure get enrolled for disability through social security.
removed by mod
Noooo heckin’ killing CEOs is violent and bad
Then this fucking headline pops up.
They’re basically crippling people, who could have at least some kind of limb use, by denying them limbs that THEY ALREADY PAID FOR AS PART OF INSURANCE PAYMENTS.
Maybe you’re being a little unreasonable. Have you stopped to think about what the money might want? Maybe your money wants to be with the CEO without partaking in some nasty exchange of goods or services.
The money wants to be with the CEOs and thus have the chance to be spent on private jet rentals and lavish vacations in exotic places with influential people. It wants the chance to be spent on expensive tuition at old-money, name-brand universities and third and fourth homes in the country and on post-apocalypse survival compounds in expensive, English-speaking island nations. If you were a dollar, wouldn’t you want this too? Or would you want to spend your days going in and out of tills at Walmart and Dollar General or forked over to some prole delivery driver as a tip, a driver who’ll just spend you on fuel or fries at some greasy drive-up. Money wants to be free, free to live the good life, and to live it with the people who care about it more than anything else under the sun.
Or would you want to spend your days going in and out of tills at Walmart and Dollar General or forked over to some prole delivery driver as a tip, a driver who’ll just spend you on fuel or fries at some greasy drive-up.
Holy shit, this part reminds me of constantly being taught to not give cash to homeless people because they’ll only spend it on alcohol or drugs.
My mom recently saw me give $2 to a man at an intersection. It was a relatively cool day for this part of Texas at that time of year: mid-90s. She admonished me going on about how that guy was going to spend it on booze or drugs. I told her that very few people are homeless by choice and that he was just a guy trying to survive one more hot day. If my $2 bought him a bottle of water or a drug-assisted escape from reality, then it’s still making his day $2 better. Then I asked her how much drugs she thought $2 could purchase.
This is exactly the type of shit that radicalizes people into violent action.
It’s almost like they’re trying to force people to be violent. I don’t get it.
I’ve been in corporations being driven unto the ground to extract as much money as humanly possible in the shortest amount of time. They are sociopaths, they are physically incapable of stopping. They want ALL the money and they want it NOW. They can not help themselves, and they won’t stop unless they are forced to stop by regulations, you know, in a well regulated capitalist society that puts limits on greed that costs people’s lives or happiness on an undue scale. If you don’t have those regulations… we’ll that’s how you get a forced reset of the country by people who can’t manage to swallow that much bullshit
Violence is NEVER the answer! Can you imagine how horrible it would be if some degenerate insurance needer walked into a board meeting and pewpew’d all the poor shareholders? Who would make the hard decisions and demands that costs be dramatically cut and value dramatically increased? What if some horrible psychopath threw a maltov into an executive office? Or some villainous cloak and dagger type of scum rigged car bombs in some poor wealthy persons gated drive way? What would we do then! We’d live in terror of extracting value out of a system that is ment to provide service instead of just freely taking that value without consequences! Can’t you even image how bad that would be! Think of the CEOs people!
This comment was reported.
I get the anger, and there’s no direct threat of violence, so I’m leaving it up.
Looks like a clever ruse to encourage the next mario bros to shoot them in the leg instead of killing them outright
They can afford the prosthetic out of pocket.
Man, I wish I could serve on that Luigi jury.
So say we all.
For idiots who would like the UK to adopt American system instead:
“NHS covers the cost of prosthetic limbs for those who need them. In the UK, there are around 55,000 to 60,000 patients who require prosthetic limbs due to amputation or congenital limb deficiencies, and NHS England allocates about £60 million annually for these services.”
If you read the article though, it appears as though a more basic prosthetic would be covered, but the one with electronics to provide greatly enhanced stability will not be.
I’m in no way siding with the insurance company, but they’re not flat out refusing to cover the prosthetic.
This just feeds into my disillusionment with science and technology. What is the point of having developed these incredible things to then not go and use them. I just have to spell it out now. What. The. Fuck. You know I was born into a modern age but looks like im going to die in the dark ages.
I’m not clear on the issue, in this case, with science and technology. Seems to me to be a problem with societies not caring for all their people.
It has to do with the motivation of folks to expand the limits of science and technology. Many folks who do that stuff genuinely are looking to improve life for all mankind.
That’s capitalism
Science and technology become magic, accessible only by the Fair Folk while we toil away in the dirt.
01010100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100001 01110011 01110011 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110101 01101110 01110111 01101111 01110010 01110100 01101000 01111001 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110101 01101110 01100100 01100101 01110010 01110011 01110100 01100001 01101110 01100100 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01001111 01101101 01101110 01101001 01110011 01101001 01100001 01101000 01110011 00100000 01100010 01101100 01100101 01110011 01110011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110010 01110010 01100101 01101100 01100101 01110110 01100001 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110011 01110100 00100000 01110101 01101110 01100100 01100101 01110010 01110011 01110100 01100001 01101110 01100100 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100011 01101111 01110010 01110010 01100101 01100011 01110100 00100000 01110010 01101001 01110100 01100101 01110011
It’s not a Sci/Tech issue.
It’s a dystopian capitalism issue. When products that don’t have adequate profit margin and volume to make notable contributions to the bottom line, or worse yet, negativley affect the bottom line in a high per-unit cost, they are a liability. Profits direct research, too, unfortunately.
Humanity, quality of life, and all that medical shit is secondary or even further down the priority list for the corporations thinking about their profits first and the “service” last.
Capitalism is not the issue in this case. I’m certain that prostetics have adequate profit margins. It’s a lucrative business.
The issue here is that the insurance company just doesn’t want to pay for it.
It’s the insurance company that doesn’t have an adequate profit margin without screwing their customers over.
Profit margin for who…? They already have your premium payments so actually covering your care gives them nothing, as far as they’re concerned you can do one. That’s why claim denial is the primary role of an insurance provider and all of its metrics, not coverage, the goal is to keep as much of your money as possible.
The issue here is that the insurance company just doesn’t want to pay for it.
That’s part of capitalism, too.
That’s just greed. I hate capitalism as much as anyone else here, but there’s no need to pin plain theft on any -ism.
That’s capitalism. That’s all it is.
Capitalism drives the health insurance company too. Greedy investors fund the health insurance decisions. All insurance companies, actually, with the possible exception of mutuals.
Capitalism is not the issue? Yet everything you just said the reason is for adequate profit margin is indeed capitalism.
In capitalism, EVERYTHING only exists for profit. If there isn’t money to be drained, it’s tossed to the landfill
Including science.
We research profitable fields and defund unprofitable ones.
At an old job of mine, a co-worker with a congential heart condition told me that he had to provide papers to his insurance company to prove he needed heart medication. Then the company constantly pesters him to go back to the doctor to ask if his condition has improved.
It is congential… he was born with it. He CAN’T get rid of it. Even if medical technology advanced to the point where he could have it cured, they would still spend years delaying for it to be done because they need to know if it is medically necessary.
removed by mod
It would be hilarious if this happened again and the guy was called Mario.
Your comment to gods ears!
