Will we know why had universe began, why there is something instead of nothing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    86 months ago

    Ultimately, it is extremely rare in nature for there to be just one of anything. Phenomena rarely occur alone. Why should this not extend to the very existence of Universes, independent Big Bangs? Maybe the Big Bang is some incredibly rare quantum fluctuation in the vacuum that occurs by odd chance once every “ten to the ten to the ten to the ten…” years. Some freakishly long length of time. But who cares? There’s no one around to count the empty years. But once in a very blue moon, in some random patch of the vast infinite, infinitely expanding space time, a Big Bang occurs. It has its course and eventually decays down to nothing, returning to the quantum foam from which it sprung. In time, everything decays down to photons, those photons are stretched beyond the cosmic horizon. A Big Bang happens, a Universe thrives, and it decays to nothing. Awhile later, another Big Bang, etc.

    So while a Universe is a rare thing, it is not unique. But in turn, it does give a sense of meaning. Suddenly we are now a part of a grand infinity of time and space. The concept of the Wheel of Time is made literal! And that is the thing that whole religions are built on. There are ways to find meaning in an infinite circle.

  • Snailpope
    link
    fedilink
    856 months ago

    "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

    There is another theory which states that this has already happened."

    • Douglas Adams
  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    26 months ago

    Sort of. Yes we will, but the answer will invariably be a paradox of sorts.

    The good news is, you don’t have to do anything special and everyone gets to find out.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    326 months ago

    There is no reason, it’s just random shit causing random shit. If random shit happens on the universes timescales of billions and trillions of years then cool stuff is bound to happen eventually. There’s no rhyme or reason for it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    126 months ago

    It has been said here already but I will say it again, there is no why. Why is a human thing, perhaps an animal thing, at least it is connected to conscious thought. When it rains you do not ask why you can only research how. This is a difficult lesson, we live in a human culture and so feel comfort in being able to ask why people do things as well as how. Not having the why attribute for the physical universe feels cold and inhuman, but the universe is inhuman, even if it’s difficult that is the deal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      Wait, is the big “Why,” with a capital W, just us personifying nature? We’re such social animals that we need to personify everything. People looking for a WHY are ultimately just expecting nature to act like a human being! We’ve evolved as social animals. We need to be used to thinking of actions having causes. Nothing just happens in a social community. If your food stores are suddenly and unexpectedly low, someone stole them. Oh, that nice tool/weapon? You got it from your brother-in-law. You owe him. We have evolved in environments where we need to keep social scores and disperse responsibilities. It’s in our literal, social, and cultural DNA to attribute actions in our environment to people.

      But then we also end up applying that to nature. It’s pareidolia at a cultural level. And so we ask Why, with a capital W. Some might make fun of the ancients for personifying forces of nature and raisin them up as Gods. But we’re no different. We do the same damn thing. We’ve just replaced the Gods with “Why.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    56 months ago

    We don’t even know if there is a reason or not. If stuff like cause and effect are properties of the universe itself, they they don’t necessarily have to apply to it coming into existence (and if time and space are merely a part of the universe with no equivalent beyond, then the concept of it being caused by something runs into the issue of there being no time before it for a cause to occur and no place before it for that event to happen in).

    There could be some equivalent of all those things of course, that the universe exists within, but we can’t just assume that.

  • Zloubida
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    46 months ago

    No. There is a range of hypotheses, from “none” to “because a supernatural creator willed so”, but they’ll stay hypotheses. You can study them and find which one makes more sense for you, but there will never be certainties.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    146 months ago

    Asking “why” only makes sense in the context of a conscious decision, unless you accept something like “because the Big Bang happened” as an answer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36 months ago

    We’re entirely too removed from the start to know with 100% certainty. The best we can hope for is a plausible theory.

  • Cid Vicious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216 months ago

    Empirical observation can get you the what and the how, but I don’t think it will ever tell you the why. Who says there even is a why?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      The difference between “how” and “why” doesn’t seem very meaningful to me. For example- why does water boil? It boils because molecules gain enough energy through heat to transition states.

      In that same sense, OP’s question

      why there is something instead of nothing.?

      There’s a non zero chance that we eventually understand the mechanisms behind the big bang and can explain how nothing turned into something. Therefore we will be able to explain the why, no?

      • Cid Vicious
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        The problem with the question of why is that you can always ask why again. Say we do understand the mechanism of the big bang. You can still ask “why” about why things are that way. Which is why in my view that’s still more of a “how?” “Why” is more of a question for philosophers than scientists imo.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          But is that not the same way with “how”?

          How do objects fall to the ground? → the Earth exerts a gravitational force on them

          How does Earth exert a gravitational force? → All objects with mass create a gravitational field that attracts other masses

          How do objects create a gravitation field? → Mass warps spacetime and this curvature directs objects to follow paths towards the source of the mass

          and so on, etc

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            I think the “why” exists only with the idea that the universe is directed in some way. e.g. “How can I see around my room”? Photons. “Why”? Because I turned on the light.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36 months ago

    Why?
    No
    How?
    Maybe

    Science doesn’t answer the Why?* questions. Philosophy does.

    Are we a brain in a jar living in a simulation? Are we creation of God? There isn’t an experiment that can test those hypothesizes.


    * Why? has different meanings and science does answer some of them and the one that I assume you are asking is one of them that it doesn’t.