Right now, on Stack Overflow, Luigi Magione’s account has been renamed. Despite having fruitfully contributed to the network he is stripped of his name and his account is now known as “user4616250”.

This appears to violate the creative commons license under which Stack Overflow content is posted.

When the author asked about this:

As of yet, Stack Exchange has not replied to the above post, but they did promptly and within hours gave me a year-long ban for merely raising the question. Of course, they did draft a letter which credited the action to other events that occurred weeks before where I merely upvoted contributions from Luigi and bountied a few of his questions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    LM Dec 09, 2024

    The second amendment means I am my own chief executive and commander in chief of my own military. I authorize my own act of self-defense in response to a hostile entity making war on me and my family.

    Nelson Mandela says no form of violence can be excused. Camus says it’s all the same, whether you live or die or have a cup of coffee. MLK says violence never brings permanent peace. Gandhi says that non-violence is the mightiest power available to mankind.

    That’s who they tell you are heroes. That’s who our revolutionaries are. Yet is that not capitalistic? Non-violence keeps the system working at full speed ahead. What did it get us. Look in the mirror.

    They want us to be non-violent, so that they can grow fat off the blood they take from us. The only way out is through. Not all of us will make it. Each of us is our own chief executive. You have to decide what you will tolerate.

    In Gladiator 1 Maximus cuts into the military tattoo that identifies him as part of the roman legion. His friend asks “Is that the sign of your god?” As Maximus carves deeper into his own flesh, as his own blood drips down his skin, Maximus smiles and nods yes. The tattoo represents the emperor, who is god. The god emperor has made himself part of Maximus’s own flesh. The only way to destroy the emperor is to destroy himself. Maximus smiles through the pain because he knows it is worth it.

    These might be my last words. I don’t know when they will come for me. I will resist them at any cost. That’s why I smile through the pain. They diagnosed my mother with severe neuropathy when she was forty-one years old.

    She said it started ten years before that with burning sensations in her feet and occasional sharp stabbing pains. At first the pain would last a few moments, then fade to tingling, then numbness, then fade to nothing a few days later. The first time the pain came she ignored it. Then it came a couple times a year and she ignored it. Then every couple months. Then a couple times a month. Then a couple times a week. At that point by the time the tingling faded to numbness, the pain would start, and the discomfort was constant.

    At that point even going from the couch to the kitchen to make her own lunch became a major endeavor

    She started with ibuprofen, until the stomach aches and acid reflux made her switch to acetaminophen. Then the headaches and barely sleeping made her switch back to ibuprofen. The first doctor said it was psychosomatic. Nothing was wrong. She needed to relax, destress, sleep more.

    The second doctor said it was a compressed nerve in her spine. She needed back surgery. It would cost $180,000. Recovery would be six months minimum before walking again. Twelve months for full potential recovery, and she would never lift more than ten pounds of weight again.

    The third doctor performed a Nerve Conduction Study, Electromyography, MRI, and blood tests. Each test cost $800 to $1200. She hit the $6000 deductible of her UnitedHealthcare plan in October. Then the doctor went on vacation, and my mother wasn’t able to resume tests until January when her deductible reset.

    The tests showed severe neuropathy. The $180,000 surgery would have had no effect. They prescribed opioids for the pain. At first the pain relief was worth the price of constant mental fog and constipation. She didn’t tell me about that until later. All I remember is we took a trip for the first time in years, when she drove me to Monterey to go to the aquarium. I saw an otter in real life, swimming on its back. We left at 7am and listened to Green Day on the four-hour car ride. Over time, the opioids stopped working. They made her MORE sensitive to pain, and she felt withdrawal symptoms after just two or three hours.

    Then gabapentin. By now the pain was so bad she couldn’t exercise, which compounded the weight gain from the slowed metabolic rate and hormonal shifts. And it barely helped the pain, and made her so fatigued she would go an entire day without getting out of bed.

    Then Corticosteroids. Which didn’t even work. The pain was so bad I would hear my mother wake up in the night screaming in pain. I would run into her room, asking if she’s OK. Eventually I stopped getting up. She’d yell out anguished shrieks of wordless pain or the word “fuck” stretched and distended to its limits. I’d turn over and go back to sleep.

    All of this while they bled us dry with follow-up appointment after follow-up appointment, specialist consultations, and more imagine scans. Each appointment was promised to be fully covered, until the insurance claims were delayed and denied. Allopathic medicine did nothing to help my mother’s suffering. Yet it is the foundation of our entire society.

    My mother told me that on a good day the nerve pain was like her legs were immersed in ice water. On a bad day it felt like her legs were clamped in a machine shop vice, screwed down to where the cranks stopped turning, then crushed further until her ankle bones sprintered and cracked to accommodate the tightening clamp. She had more bad days than good. My mother crawled to the bathroom on her hands and knees. I slept in the living room to create more distance from her cries in the night. I still woke up, and still went back to sleep. Back then I thought there was nothing I could do.

    The high copays made consistent treatment impossible. New treatments were denied as “not medically necessary.” Old treatments didn’t work, and still put us out for thousands of dollars.

    UnitedHealthcare limited specialist consultations to twice a year. Then they refused to cover advanced imaging, which the specialists required for an appointment.

    Prior authorizations took weeks, then months. UnitedHealthcare constantly changed their claim filing procedure. They said my mother’s doctor needed to fax his notes. Then UnitedHealthcare said they did not save faxed patient correspondence, and required a hardcopy of the doctor’s typed notes to be mailed. Then they said they never received the notes. They were unable to approve the claim until they had received and filed the notes. They promised coverage, and broke their word to my mother.

    With every delay, my anger surged. With every denial, I wanted to throw the doctor through the glass wall of their hospital waiting room. But it wasn’t them. It wasn’t the doctors, the receptionists, administrators, pharmacists, imaging technicians, or anyone we ever met. It was UnitedHealthcare.

    People are dying. Evil has become institutionalized. Corporations make billions of dollars off the pain, suffering, death, and anguished cries in the night of millions of Americans.

    We entered into an agreement for healthcare with a legally binding contract that promised care commensurate with our insurance payments and medical needs. Then UnitedHealthcare changes the rules to suit their own profits. They think they make the rules, and think that because it’s legal that no one can punish them.

    They think there’s no one out there who will stop them.

    Now my own chronic back pain wakes me in the night, screaming in pain. I sought out another type of healing that showed me the real antidote to what ails us.

    I bide my time, saving the last of my strength to strike my final blows. All extractors must be forced to swallow the bitter pain they deal out to millions.

    As our own chief executives, it’s our obligation to make our own lives better. First and foremost, we must seek to improve our own circumstances and defend ourselves. As we do so, our actions have ripple effects that can improve the lives of others.

    Rules exist between two individuals, in a network that covers the entire earth. Some of these rules are written down. Some of these rules emerge from natural respect between two individuals. Some of these rules are defined in physical laws, like the properties of gravity, magnetism or the potential energy stored in the chemical bonds of potassium nitrate. No single document better encapsulates the belief that all people are equal in fundamental worth and moral status and the frameworks for fostering collective well-being than the US constitution.

    Writing a rule down makes it into a law. I don’t give a fuck about the law. Law means nothing. What does matter is following the guidance of our own logic and what we learn from those before us to maximize our own well-being, which will then maximize the well-being of our loved ones and community.

    That’s where UnitedHealthcare went wrong. They violated their contract with my mother, with me, and tens of millions of other Americans. This threat to my own health, my family’s health, and the health of our country’s people requires me to respond with an act of war. END

    Edit: Paragraph spacing may not be original from the Subtack post.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        I was aware claims have been made against it. But there is so much conflicting information, that I will leave it up.

        Last time I read this from Klippenstein it was from someone disregarding another “manifesto” that had been circulating around. So much confusion to be had.

        • xapr [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Interesting, I haven’t seen that much conflicting information about them. All the confirmation I’ve seen has been for the version that Klippenstein had published, including for the reason that certain phrases in it matched some descriptions from the media before it had been published.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That is the one he had on his person when he was arrested. The Stack Overflow one is not so much a manifesto as a testament, a recounting of his experience. And an understandable motivation for his actions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1295 months ago

    By this logic, everyone charged (not convicted, just charged) should have their accounts and submissions changed in the same manner as Luigi’s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        295 months ago

        The presumption or admission of guilt does not and should not justify violating the Creative Commons License, nor perpetrating any illegal behavior agains any individual(s).

        If JK Rowling went out and robbed a bank, or murdered an ex-Husband, in no world or timeline would that give a member of her publishing company the right to scratch out her name from any of her books and replace it with their own or someone else’s.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          should not justify violating the Creative Commons License

          Absolutely. Even a guilty verdict shouldn’t justify violating the Creative Commons License. It should either be completely taken down/hidden, or left in-tact.

          That’s not at all what I’m saying though though, I’m saying that it’s reasonable for the site to take action to hide the account. He’s a public figure with an apparent confession, which is going to attract a lot of attention to that account that otherwise wouldn’t be there. They shouldn’t have done it this way since it violates the Creative Commons License, but I am saying that action to hide/disable the account is warranted.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Another comment way down claims it’s standard operating procedure for social media sites to disable/hide and account of a highly publicized murderer, particularly during investigations. However, the provided no examples nor sources or technical documents that detail this as something that is genuinely done as a standard procedure.

            I’m kinda gonna do my own research on that, but I feel the validity of Stack’s actions would to some degree depend on the results of researching that claim, and whether or not that is true.

            It’s kinda difficult to research something like that though when most highly publicized murders predated social media in its current form, so it would be hard to have a lot of examples despite there being a decent number of people who fit the bill, ironically.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 months ago

            So far, all I’ve found is a 2018 publication by the Police Executive Research Forum, entitled “The Changing Nature of Crime And Criminal Investigations”. It’s a 67 page document, and I’m curious to see if it discusses how their investigation tactics may have changed, and if so, whether the aforementioned tactic is mentioned as being included.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              I didn’t find anything. But I also work 40 plus hours a week, so that doesn’t necessarily mean there’s not something out there. But it’s more likely the case that this might not be true, from what I know.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Pretty much everyone pleads not guilty, especially in a politically motivated murder charge (there’s always a chance of a hung jury or jury nullification). That said, his manifesto could be considered a form of confession and will certainly be used as evidence to that effect.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              35 months ago

              I never said he was guilty, I said he confessed. A plead of “not guilty” doesn’t necessarily mean you think you’re innocent (i.e. you perjure yourself; the 5th amendment protects against that), it just means you want to go through a trial. You can confess and still choose to go through trial proceedings.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                45 months ago

                I was not aware he confessed and can’t find anything saying he did. Do you have a source confirming he’s confessed?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                85 months ago

                To add, plenty of innocent people give false confessions of guilt. It’s a known pattern in human behavior especially under stress and duress.

                I have no information to say whether this case is an example of that one way or the other, but just putting that out there.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  I’m just saying that there’s probably enough evidence that it’s reasonable for a social media site to pull/hide his profile despite not being sentenced. He’s obviously innocent until proven guilty, but that doesn’t mean his profiles are immune from vandalism and whatnot.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      625 months ago

      Man I sure wish this’d mean all Trump-generated content and speeches got deleted. That’d be genuinely helpful to the world at least…

  • Sunshine (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    525 months ago

    Assigning to a number like they do prisoners.

    Disgusting behaviour from Stack Overflow and the perpetrators.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      we are all numbers. lemmy.ca has a user number for you, your government has a number for you, your local library has a number for you.

      that is just how a digital world works.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        What if I told you that television shows were dangerous? It’s true. In the year 2000, four out of every five injuries occurred in a home that owned a VHS copy of Robocop III. Someone might say, “That’s compelling Robocorrelation, but that data alone does not suggest Robocausation.” Fine. But maybe your first instinct was to say, “Robocop III is a movie, not a TV show, you fucking dumbass.” If so, then congratulations, idiot, you’re a Technical Genius. You’re smart enough to spot a technicality, but too dumb to know everyone else did too and it was light years away from the point. You’re the kind of person who tells your doctor, “Um, it’s Chief Chirpa?” when he tells you that getting the Wicket doll out of your asshole will require surgery. “And, um,” you’ll add, “it’s an action figure? Maybe you should have gone to a non-stupid medical school.”

        The nice thing about being a Technical Genius is that it feels like proof you’re smarter than everyone. They can say you don’t “get it” all day, but they’re the imbeciles who think Robocop III is a TV show. Look at it like this: You are the only one in the history of Koala Times Bus Tours to contract syphilis from a koala bite. You might be embarrassed, but at least you aren’t like those other fools screaming “Don’t touch the koala bears!” when they are in fact marsupials. I mean, if koalas were actual bears, your whole face would be missing, not still here and covered in pulsing chancres.

        Technical Geniuses reach maximum annoying when they decide that pointing out technicalities is a sense of humor. For instance, if you announced, “My wife is pregnant and we’re having a boy,” a Technical Genius might quip, “Well, technically only women can have babies. Unless you count the Chief Chirpa action figure currently breaching my anus – um, which you should, since it is the dictionary definition. Heard of it? Hey, everyone! This idiot with no dictionary is watching me shit out a Chief Chirpa, and he doesn’t even know which gender gives birth!”

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1625 months ago

      Headquarters seems to be:

      70 White Lion Street, London, England, N1 9PP

      To send all your angry letters too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        275 months ago

        I used to live in that neighborhood. That must just be one of those places that gives people an address that looks fancy methinks

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          305 months ago

          It’s a place called “Spaces” seems like companies rent a small room or so as a physical presence.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 months ago

        Definitely not any kind of HQ. I’d be surprised if more than one or two people go there for Stack Exchange. Mostly remote employees?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    205 months ago

    Reducing someone to a number has never backfired in a revolutionary way. Just ask prisoner 24601

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      555 months ago

      “Trickle down economics only occurs when the wealthy bleed.”

      Similar, and appropriate. The working class will only benefit once the wealthy are no longer wealthy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    195
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I cross posted this to Hacker News (which is very pro-CEO and big corpo) and it’s now rank 1 on the front page, lmao. People really support this guy

    (And it’s funny because in the comments, people are seething “Nooooo he’s not popular, look at these polls that show he has 13% approval!!”)

    (Not sharing link to avoid brigade)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      Lmao it has 3x as many votes as anything else on HN but the moderated pushed it all the way down to page 3 (position 60-something when I just checked).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      265 months ago

      Even if the 13% number were accurate - that’s a pretty damning number. 13% of people supporting someone for gunning down a CEO in cold blood is terrifying to CEOs.

      That’s not 13% hating them. That’s 13% of people celebrating someone for killing them. No lawsuits. No trials. Just gunning them down in the streets. Things have gotten really bad when you have that much of the population actively supporting your murder.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        That 13% would also be people who would openly admit to supporting his actions. There are a lot of people who condemn his actions publicly but in their own minds…?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        This is the only solution to modern world problems. Imagine how many problems we would solve right away if we started gunning down powerful people, CEOs, politicians.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        225 months ago

        If billionaires were protected as we protect children in schools, we’d literally run out billionaires in a month.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 months ago

      Wait, seriously? WTF is it named hacker news? Hackers are the least corporate people out there…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Yuppies are weird because it was originally just a way to keep them in the news (“new movement! new group! news at 11!”) and be ridiculous. They got the DoD to sign a contract about exactly how high they were permitted to levitate the Pentagon.

          And then it had it’s own Eternal September moment. But everything seems to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Most American hackers need a security clearance to work, you won’t find them supporting Saint Luigi online

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      What kind of world have we come into where Hacker News is a pro corporation website?

      Hackers used to be the antithesis of big corporations and capitalist overreach.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1135 months ago

      The submission has been clearly penalized by hn moderators: Posted 3h ago, upvoted >600 times with almost 500 comments, ranking 23rd on the front page. Ranking first currently is a submission with 80 upvotes, posted 1h ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      605 months ago

      Can’t have a “terrorist” demonstrating his competence and productivity after all.

      The overlords know they’ve really fucked up when the competent, productive people start getting resentful and side-eyeing the system.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        True, although it may also be “good things” done by person do not outweigh “bad thing” done by person. I’m sure there’s a name for that.
        Like human experimentation. Yes, bad, shouldn’t be done, outright illegal, immoral, inhumane, but has been done. Should we discard the scientific results?

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Obviously no… We hired these criminals so they can keep doing these experiments in the US!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          There should be efforts to duplicate the results in an ethical way, the lack of rigorous ethics indicates biases. If you tortured a guy for research, did you also do less bad things like falsify results?

          The Stanford prison experiment is a good example, afaik they published in several journals and I don’t believe any of them have printed retractions. There are huge problems with the methodology that are still being discussed, and the results are still being referenced.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        255 months ago

        Don’t worry everyone, the new President is going to rename the Gulf of Mexico and annex Greenland, so that will take care of it!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Righteous censorship is only “righteous” because everyone else is prevented from saying otherwise.

  • beefbot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    425 months ago

    Jean Valjean was labelled prisoner number 24601, apropos of nothing

    • Omega
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Why the fuck did they turn the book into a musical I can never unfortunately understand

      • beefbot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Money. Like how the CEO who got shot turned people’s suffering into money

  • Dr. Moose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I had 40k points on SO though I no longer contribute. Stackexchange is basically dead because it’s a for-profit with very poor direction and LLMs basically made the entire thing obsolete relative to the monetary growths it needs to be sustainable. Understandably they can’t attract any attention like this as they’re 🤏 from going under.

    I feel a bit sad for stackexchange but they are stuck between a rock and a hard place. I think stackexchange has their days numbered tho so this is realy not all that relevant. Give them a year or two tops

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      It’s sad because Stack Exchange came out because Experts Exchange sucked. And now they also suck.

      In the day of AI, will we ever have a new alternative?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        In the day of AI, will we ever have a new alternative?

        perhaps we’ll see a resurgence of value added platforms that ensure it’s all human generated information. not an easy problem but… if there’s demand

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        How will AI learn without human posted questions and answers. Docs for most software are abysmal. In a few years, people dependent on AI to code will be in real trouble with anything new.

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Yeah I doubt it tbh. I loved my time with stackoverflow and it landed me jobs and friends but I’m quite bullish when it comes IT and AI. It’s not replacing devs yet but definitely replacing q&a, debugging tools, code reviews etc already/soon.

        I hope we’ll have some open social coding experience like SO but trends seem to point towards more private stuff like coaching, bookcamps, shitty discord servers etc. as that’s the only thing that can be funded sustainably.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    i have no love for brian thompson or ceos but the canonisation of a well off wealthy rich kid from a family of republicans is a bit disturbing.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        you got me; because i don’t like swooning over rich privileged people i’m defending ceos… /rolleyes

          • Gormadt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Very well said, I hope you don’t catch a ban for this comment.

          • katy ✨
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            comparing luigi to the civil rights movement and black civil rights leaders is wild… and grossly offensive.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              people being offended by comparisons is something that puzzles me every time i see it.

              One common trait between two things is enough to make an analogy. The differences between the objects being compared doesnt hinder the argument as it is based on the similarities alone.

              • katy ✨
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                the problem is more comparing a privileged rich white kid to black civil rights leaders

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  55 months ago

                  Pointing that A is like B regarding the aspect X is often treated as a “comparison” between A and B, but it doesnt imply that A is as great, as important, or as bad as B. It doesnt imply that A is like B in any way other than in the aspect X.

                  Why not focus on the point that is being made instead of freaking out over the angles from which the analogy breaks down. Every analogy breaks down from some angle.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              35 months ago

              The fact that OP took time to explain everything to you, and you choose to focus on such nonsense instead of seeing the whole picture presented to you shows you have no intention of learning or growing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 months ago

      He’s closer to you in class and status than Brian Thompson ever was. How fine a comb do you want to use to divide us? Where’s the line?

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        what does this have to do with dividing us? i mean they’re both not close to me. they’re both wealthy people from well off families. i think instead of donating a bunch of money to him, people should start donating to people facing vast sums of medical debt.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          People do - through tax but the rich divert the funds through policy using laws that they’ve shaped to benefit themselves rather than the nation.

          Honestly, if anyone has a chance of murdering the rich and setting a precedent of self defence over social murder, it’s another rich who can afford an excellent lawyer to see out the lengthy court case.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          You would be hard pressed to spend your money better than Luigi in regards to reducing medical debt. Anthem got scared and walked back rationing anesthesia during surgeries.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          85 months ago

          Instead of people paying for ridiculous amount of medical debt due to inflated amount of medical bill due insurance companies. Govt can pay for their own people medical coverage who are paying tax for them to run the govt.

          • katy ✨
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            sure but that’s not likely to happen with republicans in government.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              75 months ago

              If i have to say both are similar. They work for the ultra rich. They both don’t care about common people, you and I both. That’s why Luigi mangione did what he had to do. Making the rich know their place. Whether he is rich or not doesn’t matter. We needed to send the message across.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      He’s a good example of one can be a class traitor in a good way!

      Why not idolize the folks crossing over to the right side of history?