Context: I noticed I have some clothes from 10 years ago that are still good to wear, and some newer things I have barely worn yet. I wondered if I reached a point where all the clothes I own would be enough to last for the rest of my life. There is a dresser and a closet worth of things.

For the sake of this question, let’s say you can’t buy, borrow, steal, receive as a gift, find, or make anything new to wear. All you get is what you have now. Is it enough?

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    43 months ago

    Hard to say for sure.

    I have jeans that are still wearable from the 90s. Maybe need some patching here and there, but the important parts are solid. New jeans, however, have turned shitty. The fabric new is thinner than the heavily worn stuff that’s decades old.

    Shirts are too variable to begin with. But, I tend to wear mostly tees and tanks day-to-day, so my nicer shirts last ages. I still have a shirt my barometer grandmother bought me in 1994 that’s in great shape, though too tight nowadays. In fairness, there was about five years I couldn’t wear it because it wouldn’t fit my shoulders or chest at all. But I then stopped lifting big and dropped mass.

    Thing is, I have a fubu tee that’s from the late nineties or early naughties that I wore the hell out of, and still do. That sucker has zero holes in it, and almost mo stretching in the collar. The only problem with it is some stains and the thicker printing on it is crackly.

    I have tees and tanks I bought in the last three years that are in worse shape despite being worn less.

    So, the stuff that’s made well, I could probably be buried in in 20 years and it would still be presentable.

    Other stuff, particularly the newer jeans, I don’t see lasting five years.

    But it’s also true that the more clothes you have, the longer each piece will last. And I have amassed several boxes of clothing that I don’t wear regularly because I don’t like the fit, or they aren’t comfy material, or whatever. So, rough guesstimate, I could go months without recycling outerwear. It’s undies that take a beating in comparison because they get worn at a faster rotation.

    Socks, I’d be screwed. I have massive fucking feet, and while I’m barefoot at home, they wear out fast. I can’t keep even hard wear socks more than maybe two years or so.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    33 months ago

    How much weight am I planning on gaining?

    My wardrobe is pretty minimal, but it’s mostly duplicates. So I feel like with my crappy hand backstitch abilities I can mend and patchwork things together for a while.

    For whatever reason I wear two pairs of socks layered, and the outer wool ones do get holes that I probably can’t fix. So those socks would potentially be my limitation.

    TLDR: I think I’m good until death - might only be wearing sandals in retirement.

  • Vanth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    Pants wouldn’t last too long. I have enough free t-shirts I could Donald Duck it for at least a century.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The last clothing I purchased was two packs of white socks and some boxer briefs this past year. Outside of that all my clothing is a decade or more old. I’m in my mid forties and still have three shirts from when I was in high school that I wear occasionally.

    I currently need to get some new undershirts and will need more dress socks in the next year or two but for outer wear I have four pairs of Levi’s, six slacks, twelve button up shirts, three belts, three blazers, four pairs of dress shoes, two pairs of sneakers, and I think seven ties that are all 10-20+ years old and showing no wear. I can’t imagine a reason I would need to buy clothes ever again except for boxer briefs, socks, and under shirts and my last purchase of those lasted for just at 10 years with the first replacements being the new socks I bought.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    93 months ago

    Surplus clothes.

    In highschool I liked having a lot of storage. So I liked things with pockets. Cargo pants were my jam! Turns out, military surplus BDU pants are somewhat cheap and VERY durable for around $30-$45 a pair. They can survive a tumble or two, can be repaired, wash easy, and breathe well depending on the blend.

    Outdated or impractical camo is a fun aesthetic (can be punk as heck) and olive drab is a lovely color. (Thankfully I was never cringey enough to strut around in actively deployed uniform patterns unless it was on an airsoft field haha.)

    Oh yeah, I have one of those funny tall-lanky bodies that you can’t department shop for pants for. Tac-pants come in a huge variety of fits.

    I also hated shoe shopping. So a sturdy pair of combat boots lasted me ages without falling apart, were all-terrain, and supported the ankles! These boots were made for wear, so I never had to be upset over scuffs.

    The BEST part? No (visible) brand names.

    I still have some of those pants I wear since I graduated in the early 00’s. The ones with more cotton are a little threadbare now though. I just need some basic colors and my everday casual wardrobe is filled out. Acquiring replacements doesn’t break the bank either.

    Form and function. Durability and mobility. Picking up some groceries or hiking the mountains. Incredibly versatile.

    I don’t understand how the fashion industry continues to con people into expensive sweatshopped single-ply polyester that turns the wearer into a walking douchey billboard.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    Considering I buy clothes every few years at most, still have clothes from middle school and I’m almost 40, generally don’t throw stuff out when it starts getting worn just repurpose it, and recently started buying almost exclusively athletic clothing due to build and material quality, probably a really long time tbh.

    I also don’t usually wear clothes at home, which helps. Bathrobe. I have five of those.

    I’d bet I could survive the bulk of my remaining life without getting new clothes, but they’d be in rough shape by then.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      You sound like me. Shirts at the end of their life go for sleeping. Is went the athletic route, but have switched back after realizing the plastic materials start smelling and get discolored easily (deodorant culprit likely).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I guess I haven’t really had the smelly problem (or at least nobody has mentioned it…). I have to use unscented detergents due to fragrance allergy, and I think thats a big part of why I don’t have that problem. The scented detergents leave so many residues to hold the scent that your own scent tends to stick more. Or maybe you just notice it more as it mingles with a scent you are used to. Not sure, but the unscented stuff at worst smells a bit musty.

        When I get deodorant buildup or the musty smell, I do a warm cycle with enzyme detergent (usually wash on tap cold, but when I do a warm cycle I use dirty labs unscented enzyme detergent. I’ve tried others, including scented, before I found that and they worked decently too) and it clears right up.

        If you have the smelly problem with bedsheets or towels or anything, look into laundry stripping. You can do it with natural cotton and whatever clothing as well, but it requires super hot water so it does cause some damage to the fabric.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    I have like 3 full wardrobes full of different sizes of clothes. I got my skinny normal and fat clothes so all id have to do is change weight to get access to new(ish) clothes to wear. That being said, probably not long.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    83 months ago

    To clothe myself for an office, maybe 2 years until my work shirts are too ratty.

    To clothe myself for going out in public, maybe 5-10 years until my pants are all worn out. Underwear would be pretty horrible by this point.

    After 10 years I’m just sitting at home in raggedy t-shirts and sweatpants.

  • wuphysics87
    link
    fedilink
    33 months ago

    Depends if you know. You can get some extra miles if you don’t wash them

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    I still wear clothes that I got 12-15 years ago. So I would say at least a decade at the minimum.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    Clothes are expensive, I don’t throw anything out until it’s unwearable.

    Only thing I’m worried about is pants. I shop for people for a living, so I basically power walk 7 hours a day. My thighs are constantly rubbing down to nothingness and patches don’t last long enough to justify the effort.

    If I quit my job I can probably make it another ten years though.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I personally think spending enough money to get boots that can be re-soled is worth it, but then I have a local shop that does that sort of thing. If you don’t have a local bootshop, kind of a moot point, for sure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        83 months ago

        It’s down to finding a pair that I like enough. I’ve got wide feet and fit is important, and really only need winter boots, so it comes up late December and by the time I get off my lazy butt, it’s spring and I don’t care anymore.

        Maybe this year.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          I have wide feet, and I can’t stand having my toes squeezed. What you want to look for is a boot with stitchdown construction. Your most common decent boots have either a storm welt or a Goodyear welt (basically the same thing, but storm welt is better in wet conditions). This involves the upper material wrapping most of the way around your foot and stitching it to the welt (a strip of material around the perimeter of the boot) and the midsole. The welt is then stitched to the outsole. Replacing the outsole then just involves popping those stitches. A cross section of the boot turned sideways looks like a “þ”.

          Stitchdown, on the other hand, rather than wrapping in on your feet, turns outward before being stitched down to the midsole and outsole. This results in more of a “D” shape, which is nicer for wide feet.

          Not to shill a particular brand, but Jim Green has a lot of good boots (of the work and casual variety) as well as shoes that have a nice, wide toe box, and would be repairable/resolable by any cobbler.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      173 months ago

      Yeah, socks and undies tend to disintegrate over time, so perhaps 4 years for socks, 6 for undies?

      The rest of the wardrobe could (and has!) last decades.

      • Ziglin (it/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        My socks tend to last a little longer but I have noticed small holes in some older shirts. My shoes are probably a limiting factor though I normally wouldn’t count them as part of my wardrobe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      I think underwear and socks are some of the worst culprits for poor quality nowadays. socks especially seem to get threadbare so quickly

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        As I posited elsewhere in the thread (source: I’m old), a big part of that isn’t even reduction in quality of materials but rather change in type of materials as new textiles have been invented.

        I can tell you, my socks and drawers may not last as long as they used to, but god damn it, they’re the most comfortable sets of them I’ve had in my entire life.

        You don’t want to know how it was wearing boxers, briefs, and socks in the 80’s/90’s, because it was bad and uncomfortable. I remember being embarrassed because I felt like I was endlessly adjusting my dick in them due to discomfort.

        Modern socks and underwear are made from much lighter and more comfortable material, which in turn means that they simply don’t last as long because the material just isn’t as sturdy.

        I can tell you when I’m underwear shopping I aim for comfort over longevity of material, because I prioritize basic comfort over the underwear lasting forever. I’m sure I’m not the only person who approaches it this way, I’d wager the majority of folks prioritize comfort of undergarments over longevity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          The biggest improvement in socks since the '80s was when they moved the seam from the end of the toe to the top of the toe. That seam was the bane of my existence.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          It’s okay for some items to be “wear items” while others are held to a different standard.

          I think there has definitely been a huge increase in the use of merino wool. It’s nice and soft, doesn’t stink, and handles moisture well, but the fibers are so much smaller than most other types of wool, that they aren’t nearly as durable or warm.