• MasterOBee Master/King
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s weird that this song has gotten so much hate from the left. And the critique is always the same line about welfare, but you don’t hear them quote the rest of the words of the song.

    First off, right before the welfare line, he mentions there are too many Americans starving, he’s saying that the welfare isn’t being allocated properly. If you’ve walked through the south, you’ve seen this. Trashing the whole concept of the song because one line, that in a vacuum, some people on the right use to discredit welfare shouldn’t be the goal.

    I see so many comments saying we need to unite against the rich, and when a song goes viral saying to do that, he gets trashed because he looks like a republican. This song talks about:

    Working overtime and getting shitty pay Feeling like the life is being wasted paying bills, and the little bit of joy we get is through substance abuse Politicians enriching themselves by screwing Americans over Inflation being too high and what money that we do get in our paychecks having 30% taken out by the government. Politicians not looking out for the working class, but befriending and partying with Epstein trafficking minors. Young men dying at absurd rates due to suicide

    Are these partisan issues? They seem like working class issues. Yeah, that welfare line I think is out of place, even if there may be some merit. But don’t lose the forest staring at a tree. This is a protest song against how the politicians have treated the working class.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      Working overtime and getting shitty pay

      And then redirecting anger that should go to the overclass to the underclass. The bottom line is that his song will help trick people into giving rich people get more gigantic GOP tax cuts and increase wealth inequality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      The song is undermined by those lines; if they aren’t dog whistles, they may as well be.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    A friend shared the music with me and right off the rip I thought the song was a banger. It immediately fills a void left open by modern country. I didn’t read into it nearly as much as some folks here are . .which is somewhat puzzling to me. It’s country music it’s always going to be a woe is me story. I’ll listen to the words more closely next time.

    I’m new to Lemmy so I’m not sure yet how to tag users but Bee is getting beat up a bit in this thread. I think part of the reason why this is getting so much traction is because it is good music. The debate is the message. Misplaced frustration isn’t uncommon regardless of political belief. I think where exception is to be taken is when it pushes or promotes violence. The same debate was had about gangster rap and other forms of music years ago.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    An excellent take-down of the song’s philosophical underpinnings.

    I disagree with the author’s skepticism about how this went viral though. As other commenters have indicated, it feels like the release was a little too well coordinated for some random YouTuber.

    • Total astroturfing.

      The right wingers all have daily emails and faxes of talking points, memes, videos, posts, and whatever the outrage of the day is, and they share the shit in unison. That’s their MO.

      The memo went out: “co-tweet links to this song.” Suddenly it was everywhere.

      Then they pretend is not astroturfed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      According to the Citations Needed podcast, it was an obscure video that was plucked up by a rightwing organization and promoted to be in everyone’s feeds

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    37
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The pain is coherent. They blame politicians which is correct. But they fail to see it’s the system that perpetuates the problems. Then project their misery on minority groups and the disadvantaged. Oliver sings-

    “So they think you don’t know. But I think that you do.”

    But they don’t. And that’s the problem.

    • But I said a bunch of stupid uniformed shit about politics on Facebook even though I have no education or experience in policy or law, and got a bunch of likes!

      That’s the same as being an expert! /s

      Dunning-Kruger needs an update to account for social media. Like, above the “peak of Mt. Stupid” there is a “summit of dumbasses” who get all their validation and education from social media engagement.

      • MasterOBee Master/King
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        He says we have a bunch of people starving, and we have programs to help, but instead of helping, he sees the programs being abused.

        Do you not think these programs are being abused? Have you been to the south where poverty and obesity are at insane rates?

        Also, it’s hilarious how he can touch on 20 issues that every one of us agree with, but the left hyper-focuses on one line they don’t like, because he just looks like a hillbilly trump supporter to y’all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          I listened to his song before I knew anything about him, and I was into it until that point, but yeah, when you make a song about rich people exploiting you, but then spend half the song talking about the much less impactful issue of poor people wasting their government-issued money on junk food, your message stops being effective.

          It’s like stubbing your toe and breaking your arm at the same time, and complaining just as much about both.

          • MasterOBee Master/King
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            but then spend half the song

            Once again, hyperfocusing on one line is not ‘half the song’ and when you put it in context, he’s simply saying that those people that need welfare aren’t getting it, while others are abusing the system. It’s not just about making laws to help poor people, it’s about ensuring that it gets to the people that need it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Education folks… education. Prime example here why it is so, so important to be able to think critically.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    The title of the song is what got me. I immediately thought of Richmond’s history as the capitol of the Confederacy.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 years ago

      The whole thing with mysterious producers approaching him out of nowhere when he’s at his lowest point to get him to record a faux-populist song that really reinforces conservative power is very Black Mirror.

  • Franzia
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    Calling it Populism is already giving them ground. It’s Fake Populism. It’s manufactured and funded by the elite class, rather than advocated for and created by the working class.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Fake populism. What a bullshit statement. Populism is populism. The message either resonates or doesn’t. The fact that we’re discussing it suggests that it resonates. So what do we do about it? To agree with your argument is the reason why Trump became president. As a society we cannot discount discontent regardless of the ideology. There are a lot of pissed off people on this planet for various reasons. If the song or message didn’t resonate we wouldn’t be talking about it so it’s not fake. A rich man paid for a poor man song. So who is the sucker? The person who believes it or the person who argues against it? It is what it is but it’s not fake if you hold an opinion and that’s the point.

      I heard the song and like the beat and now I’m reading a thread where I feel like a bad person for enjoying a song for just being a song. Was in a thread earlier today about Sherman and the civil war. Has there ever been a war fought by the rich man on behalf of the poor man? The answer is no. At the extreme the question is are we willing to die for our beliefs?

      There is a large swathe of people who are disenfranchised maybe we should care. The root cause is what is important but we often fall into debates about ideology without addressing the systemic issues.

      My opinion is we have far more in common with the people around us than we care to or are capable of realizing. We all struggle so it’s important to first empathize and then determine from what root these opinions are derived. Granted, some are fake but many are genuine.

      EDIT: sorry, realize this became a wall of text and I’m half drunk and half-baked but I hope I made a coherent argument for both sides. If the discourse is civil it’s a healthy conversation to have and an argument worth having. Have a good evening folks.

  • MasterOBee Master/King
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Banger of a song. He’s right, we need to talk about these issues:

    1. Working overtime and getting shitty pay

    2. Feeling like the life is being wasted paying bills, and the little bit of joy we get is through substance abuse

    3. Politicians enriching themselves by screwing Americans over

    4. Inflation being too high and what money that we do get in our paychecks having 30% taken out by the government.

    5. Politicians not looking out for the working class, but befriending and partying with Epstein trafficking minors.

    6. Young men dying at absurd rates due to suicide