• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      195 months ago

      I had to looks this one up, but missed the “galaxy” vs “universe”. There are an estimated 3 trillion trees, 100-400 billion stars in the milky way galaxy, but potentially 1 septilliom stars in the universe.

      However all three of these are estimates, so who actually knows.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        I’m not sure where these numbers are from, but my guess is that you mean the Observable Universe, which is just the part of the universe that we can see.

        We don’t know how big the full universe is, it could be infinite with an infinite number of stars.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          Just some quick Google searches so not sure how reputable, but didn’t feel like copying random links.

          But yeah, that’s why I called them out as estimates as I suspect there is a lot of room for error in those numbers.

  • TankieTanuki [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The Allies avoided bombing specific factories in Nazi Germany in which US oligarchs owned equity.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      115 months ago

      The electric field one is also interesting, because the cable length doesn’t actually determine how long it takes to turn on. All that matters is the distance between the power source and the device. Electricity travels at the speed of light, which means we can measure how long it should take to travel down the wire.

      But let’s say you have a 1 light year long power cable, made out of a perfect conductor (so we don’t need to worry about power loss from things like wire resistance or heat). Then you set the power source right next to the device and turn it on. The logical person may say that the device would take a full year to turn on, because the cable is one light year long. Others may say that it will take two light years to turn on; Long enough for the electricity to make a full circuit down the cable and back to the power source again.

      But instead, the device turns on (nearly) instantly. Because the wire isn’t actually what causes the device to turn on. The device turns on because of an EM field between itself and the power source. The wire is simply facilitating the creation of that field. The only thing that matters is the distance between the source of power and the device. That distance, divided by the speed of light, is how long the device will take to turn on. If the device was a full light year away from the power source, it would take a full year to turn on. But since the device is sitting right next to the power source, it turns on right away.

      • bountygiver [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        wait so if you have another person travel to the other end of the wire, and do a time sync with consideration of time dilation to tell them to cut the wire 1hr after you turn on the power, will the device turn off after 1 year since it wouldn’t “know” the wire is cut until a year has passed?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        But instead, the device turns on (nearly) instantly. Because the wire isn’t actually what causes the device to turn on

        That’s not exactly true. In this case, the energy transmission would go like this: (change of electric field in the little bit of wire next to the power source) -> (change of magnetic field in the air between the wires) -> (change of electric field in the wire next to the load). This limits the amount of energy transmitted significantly and incurs a lot of losses, meaning if you had something like a lamp plugged in it would start glowing extremely dimly at first (think about how some cheap LED lights keep glowing even with the switch off - it’s similar, albeit it happens due to inter-wire capacitance and not induction). It would then slowly ramp up to full power over a course of a year.

        Here’s a video from the same person about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Vrhk5OjBP8 (although I haven’t watched this yet)

        Edit: after watching the video, I think I was actually wrong in a couple of my assumptions. First of all, it looks like the reason for the initial energy transmission is wire capacitance and not induction, so (electric field in wire) -> (electric field in air) -> (electric field in wire, in the “opposite direction”, but because the wire goes back and forth it’s the same current direction). This means that my LED example is even more potent. And the second one is that because it’s capacitance and not induction, this means that there’s no slow ramp-up, it just makes the light glow very dimly all the way until the electric field makes it through the wire, and then it ramps up very quickly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        Can you help me understand why the distance between the power source and the load impacts how long it would take to turn on? I remember a video a while back (veritasium maybe?) that explained it like metaphorically pushing/pulling a chain inside the wire, but why would distance to the source impact this?

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      That British guy, Jack “That guy who fought World War 2 with a claymore and bagpipes” Churchill, was also an early pioneer of surfing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    255 months ago

    James Blunt possibly prevented the start of World War 3. (But became best known for the song You’re Beautiful. Reality is weird.)

    • Berttheduck
      link
      fedilink
      175 months ago

      Care to expand on that one? I know he’s ex military but haven’t heard anything like that before.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        365 months ago

        It’s explained on his Wikipedia page. He was an Army captain in the Kosovo War, when a NATO commander (Wesley Clark, who later ran for President) ordered his unit to secure Pristina Airport, which Russian troops had already occupied. Blunt refused to engage them, long enough for the British general get involved to countermand the order, on the grounds that he didn’t want his men to start WW3.

        • Berttheduck
          link
          fedilink
          145 months ago

          Well damn. That’s a pretty cool thing to do. Thanks for sharing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      “Wow you signed the document in blood, you must be really hardcore.”

      “No I’m just cheap.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s actually 0.06 microseconds (0.00000006 seconds) per day, or ~22 μs (0.000021915 s) per year.

      Also, technically, anything moving up or down in Earth’s gravitational field while physically connected to it is having an effect, however it’s usually to small to be reasonably measurable.

      (I wonder what would happen if the rotation speed was changed by 0.06 seconds per day - that feels like a lot, adding up to 22 seconds per year, but would anyone except timekeeping nerds actually notice? I don’t even know how to begin figuring something like that out.)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    475 months ago

    Due to two facts:

    1. The samurai class in Japan officially lasted way later than you probably think

    2. The earliest primitive fax machine existed much earlier than you probably think.

    It is technically possible for Abraham Lincoln to have received a fax from a samurai.

    There’s no evidence it ever happened, but it technically could have happened.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 months ago

      For some reason that reminds me of how the first member of the Wampanoag tribe to greet the Pilgrims at Plymouth Colony, named Samoset, spoke to them in English. Then he came back later with another tribe member, Squanto, who also spoke English.

      • SeaJ
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        There are a few different ones by that point.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 months ago

        1840s, actually. The patent was granted to a Scottish man named Alexander Bain.

        First thing’s first, the telegraph. An electric circuit which can be energized or not energized at the push of a button called a telegraph key. At the other end is a solenoid which is spring loaded up, and an electromagnet on the circuit pulls down when the line is energized. Originally this was supposed to cut into paper tape to “print” the morse code message, but telegraphers quickly learned how to hear the letters in the clicks, a good telegrapher just…hears words. So they did away with the tape.

        Morse code telegraphs require a single circuit to transmit an on/off keying message, the following aparatus uses five:

        If I understand this right, the message would be written on non-conductive paper with conductive ink, and then wound around a cylinder that featured a whole bunch of insulated conductive pins, each kind of forming a “pixel.” A mechanical probe would check each one of those pins in turn, each pin in a row, and then shifting to the next row at the end. if it was conductive it meant there was ink there so click. So it would perform a raster scan. At the other end was paper that was coated with an electrosensitive material that would darken with the application of current, so at each pixel if the conductive ink on the original completed a circuit, current would be applied at that pixel on the copy, producing a low quality probably unusable copy. It was difficult to get them truly in sync plus it would have been hilariously low resolution. But it did somewhat function.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    385 months ago

    A few of my favorite fun facts are geography related.

    The pacific side of the Panama canal is further east than the Atlantic side.

    If you head south from Detroit the first foreign country you’ll hit is Canada.

    Lake Tahoe is further west than Los Angeles

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 months ago

      If you head south from Detroit the first foreign country you’ll hit is Canada.

      There’s also Angle Inlet, Minnesota which is the only place in the contiguous United States north of the 49th parallel. To travel to Angle Inlet by road from other parts of Minnesota, or from anywhere in the United States, requires driving through Manitoba, Canada. It’s a really weird border.

      • davel [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 months ago

        Due to its high latitude and being in the middle of a continent, it is a contender for the most extreme winters in the contiguous United States.

        Two square miles & 54 residents in North Bumblefuck, separated from the rest of the US by 60 miles. It’s an affront to reason.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    185 months ago

    A somewhat political fact, but one that made some of my friends dumbfounded:

    When a bank issues a loan, it generates that money literally out of thin air and credits that money to the loan account rather than using deposits they already had. For example, if you want to borrow $100,000, the banker approves the loan and doesn’t hand over cash or move existing money around - instead, they just go on their system and credit your account with the sum, that’s it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 months ago

      While I think your point is true that its much more abstract than people realize. When I worked at a bank and we disbursed loans and credited/debited fees it was from “GLs” (General Ledger?) which were basically just separate accounts to help keep track. Like we had a “member service” one which was for basically anything with good reason. One time someone did a very large amount but he just basically got told to do it a different way.

      Its all just in a computer. I could’ve accidentally credited someone a million dollars but it would’ve been realized when I tried to close my drawer and balance everything out. And the branch would have to be balanced at the end of the day so I assume the bank did as well.

      On a related note banks take out loans from other banks. I think a lot of people don’t realize that banks have savings accounts so they have money to lend.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          The Fed Board, apparently: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/reservereq.htm

          After reading through that page and the FAQ, I think it’s because the banks should now be compelled to held reserves because Fed pays them a reasonable interest (close to what they would get if they give a very low-risk loan) on them, rather than it being a strict requirement. I don’t know enough about economics to have an opinion on whether it’s a good idea, but I feel like it’s not too horrible? Like, maybe it makes some shitty banks even more susceptible to bank runs, but that’s the reality of fractional reserve banking in general.

  • Elise
    link
    fedilink
    155 months ago

    Bees kill invaders in their nest by climbing all over them and shaking their bodies.