I’m spinning up a new seedbox and wanted to know what is everyone using nowadays? I was using deluge via the thick client and rutorrent previously. Are they still king? edit: I should have also mentioned that I plan on running this server headless so I will need to be able to access it via a thin client or a web browser

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86 months ago

    Random semi-related thought. I’m going through the comparison of BitTorrent clients page on Wikipedia and it’s amazing how many clients end up as Adware.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    106 months ago

    qBittorrent. With a quick UI switch to vuetorrent for the tablet. LXC bound to a bridge thats VPN connected.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      Not sure why it’s not more popular. I use and donate. I’ve had better performance with this than qbittorrent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        106 months ago

        Closed source, and their prominent “contains NO Spyware” disclaimer doesn’t quite instill confidence. I have also never even heard about it until now.

        • Brickfrog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I don’t use that client either - But to be fair the dev (Kevin Hearn) has a long history with P2P software e.g. depending how old you are you may have used his WinMX software back in the day. He isn’t known for sticking spyware/malware into his software so I sort of trust the software he puts out in that sense. He also maintains other non-torrent P2P file sharing software outside of Tixati.

          Of course it would be better if it was open source but he’s never been an open source coder AFAIK.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          I’ve had email communication with the devs and again, I’m a biased donor. They are just starting afloat on donations. Respect your closed source concerns completely, but it’s a superior piece of software imo and I see no signs of malificence. If you are an open source purist I get it, there are other options. If you are using any closed source software at all though, it would seem to me hypocritical to show a bias against this particular app.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 months ago

    I hear people use the search function of QBitTorrent tied to VPN tunnel. Basic, but it works

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46 months ago

    I used transmission for years, but the larger my library got the more issues I had. Currently using Qbit and loving the categories for easier management, especially with the *arr suite.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    rTorrent with Flood front end.

    My only complaint so far is being unable to reach the rTorrent TUI when it’s running headless. It otherwise works great.

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      I use almost the same setup, except I don’t use Windows on Desktop.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      +1 for qBittorrent. I used to be a Deluge fan, but qBittorrent seems more performant and feature-packed.

  • Brickfrog
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46 months ago

    On a headless seedbox Deluge/ruTorrent/Transmission are still reliable, most of the paid seedbox services still default with those.

    qBittorrent is hugely popular on the desktop front and has been getting more popular as a headless client now that the web ui has improved, also look into qbittorrent-nox if you don’t have a gui to do initial setup with.