President-elect Trump launched his own cryptocurrency overnight and swiftly appeared to make more than $25 billion on paper for himself and his companies.

Why it matters: The stunning launch of $TRUMP caught the entire industry off-guard, and speaks to both his personal influence and the ascendancy of cryptocurrency in his administration.

  • It also speaks to the nature of the crypto industry that someone could have $25 billion worth of something that literally did not exist 24 hours previously.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    105 months ago

    lol crypto is worth jack shit. I can just keep sending the same money to myself and it would cause the price to go up…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        This right here is the right answer. Trump just created the ultimate bribing machine for himself.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        it’s how crypto markets do. Since anonymity is a feature, any transactions will increase its value due to it being “used” more

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          No, because that would be an infinite money glitch, everyone would be rich… (that uses crypto).

          It’s actually very simple basic market-economics, and independently of anonymity, you buy, you’ll drive the price up, you’ll sell, you’ll drive the price down. It’s slightly more complicated, because it involves makers (they set the price at which to sell or buy) and takers (which take the offer by the maker) and psychology (e.g. promotion on youtube to drive the price up) and obviously increasingly algorithms. But in general it’s still demand and supply, anonymity doesn’t have anything to do here apart from being more prone to scams. Take Monero as example one of the most anonym cryptos but still fairly stable (in crypto terms).

          So to drive the price up, you either have to have some kind of good promotion (which at the end is just money from someone else), or a lot of money yourself.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            the value of a cryptocurrency is based on its perceived value. Perceived value is based on market activity. If I keep sending money to myself it just shows up as market activity, with nobody being able to tell i sent money to myself.

            gdp works this way too btw. I sell you $1 worth of stuff, you sell me $1 of stuff, nobody is any richer but gdp went up by $2. Except we can filter this kind of abuse out because it’s not anonymous.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              25 months ago

              But GDP is not the price of an asset, it’s a metric to measure the economic activity.

              Is it really that hard to understand? The price is dictated by markets… Like with stock and other speculative assets. It’s a little bit wilder, possibly due to anonymity and wild promotion on various platforms (like youtube) etc. But in it’s essence it’s still a market…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                the price of an asset (when the asset is the currency itself) is based on its economic activity. You said so yourself. The price is dictated by markets. By how much is bought and sold on markets. That is the definition of economic activity. Which part of that do you not understand?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  25 months ago

                  Well you brought GDP as argument, which just doesn’t have anything to do with the price of an asset. If you sell a lot and buy a lot GDP grows, but the price of that asset can still be the same at the end.

                  Getting back to your initial argument:

                  Since anonymity is a feature, any transactions will increase its value due to it being “used” more

                  This is just plain wrong, as I could just make myself rich according to that logic… I still need to have that FIAT-money, need to exchange it (in which case I have driven the price up), but now I have less FIAT, so either I have more FIAT to further drive the price, or well I need to cash out in which case I’ll drive the price down. If I just send crypto from one (anonymous) account to another it just does… nothing to the price…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        I just finished watching Chernobyl and comments like this are now going to remind me of the fact that the reactor could not have exploded because that’s not how RBMK reactors work.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Huh? Not sure how crypto-markets and reactors are related to each other…

          Former is “just” based demand and supply, which of course can still be quite chaotic, because well demand and supply is chaotic (due to all kinds of factors)…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    83
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Trump launches meme coin money laundering scheme, apparently makes launders more than $25 billion overnight

    Ftfy

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      The fact that fartcoins are 30 times as “valuable” as Trumps idiot-coins should be evidence enough.

      • slst
        link
        fedilink
        75 months ago

        To be fair the valuability of a coin is not that much related to its popularity, but to its difficulty of obtention through proof-of-work (of proof of stake)

  • NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Meanwhile, back in reality:

    The venture was co-ordinated by CIC Digital LLC - an affiliate of the Trump Organization - which has previously sold Trump-branded shoes and fragrances.

    Meme coins are used to build popularity for a viral internet trend or movement, but they lack intrinsic value and are extremely volatile investments.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9vmym2jvy9o.amp

    Just because you SAY something is “worth hundreds of billions” does not mean it is actually WORTH hundreds of billions.

    • arglebargle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Yes. Just seeing the words “market cap” should tell you something. It is a completely meaningless term when you are talking about crypto currency.

      The price means somethings, the amount held means something. The entity that sold them can mean something. But market cap isn’t it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        To be fair, “market cap” is also a bullshit metric for stocks. The market price only ever represents the price of the currently traded stocks. Just dump 20% of the stock of any large company on the market and see how well their “market cap” lasts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fuck, I just looked at this yesterday and thought why not put a few monies in. And then went to sleep without doing anything.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Not doing something to help Trump just to enrich yourself is the ethical option.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        There’s that, but then again if I would have had managed to exit before the crash (which apparently already somewhat happened) I would’ve been practically stealing money from some MAGAs. But probably only those MAGAs who least deserve to be stolen from. The actual demons know exactly when to exit and are only going to profit from this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      There is a lot more of this coming.

      Trump intends to leverage his office to make his family wealthier.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    25 months ago

    Having an ETF doesn’t make you real. Being Bitcoin makes you real.

    I wish there was a better metric at the moment, but there isn’t.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    $25 billion, in paper. The value will be down to zero way before he manages to sell off even $1 billion from it. And thats a generous guess. Meme coins don’t retain value.

    Making ANY money this way is outrageous, but we sooner solve world peace and world hunger than Trump being able to sell this off for the current paper value.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      Yeah I feel as though he won’t get that amount of money either and making any money is also outrageous.

      I feel like the biggest pressing issue here is that this is not meant to go to the moon and stay there. Instead I think the real motive is to make inflation. Look at it, it’s not meant to gain that amount of value, it’s meant to skew our perception of value. This way the current inflationary prices don’t look out of place when, in reality, everything is over valued. I guess it is also meant to make some people more complacent to inflation by giving them hope of “there being a chance” even though it clearly details how screwed over most of them will end up in the end compared to the house/dealer. Gambling is and will always be a big problem that adds more pressure to an otherwise unhealthy economy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        I don’t deny the possibility, but that sounds like a lot of foresight which I’m not ready to attribute to Trump or his team. Additionally I don’t think they care about “the people”. The voters served their purpose. They are meaningless to them now. They will continue to produce anger and outrage, and will extract as much money as possible while it’s still possible.

        I think it’s a simple money grab. Just not a $25 billion one.

      • Mubelotix
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        That’s how they got the number but it’s a big mistake to use total supply. Also it’s not because the market cap is 12G that Trump received 12G. It’s probably much much lower. He must have made only 50 to 100M in fees, if any. And the price he sold the coins at was much much lower than today

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      225 months ago

      I doubt they can hear much of anything with their heads lodged that far up Trump’s ascending colon.