• Ben Matthews
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Wasn’t this last week’s news?
    So, if it reopens, here’s a longterm-scenario: suppose US and Canada both split into oceanic versus central, meanwhile Russia is weakened and blocked from europe, but these fossil-fuelled conservative autocratic mid-continentals want to forge a new empire across the arctic, where’s their strategic hub half-way between Texas and Muscovy - Greenland of course !
    ( Prefer a simpler explanation? - maybe it’s just punishment for sending F16s to Ukraine, hey you might need those ? )

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      I was hoping Biden would send every gun, bullet, bomb and vehicle to Ukraine, to take the teeth out of Trump’s threats for a couple years at least. Obviously that wasn’t going to happen, but it was a nice thing to think.

  • Arghblarg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    295 months ago

    Sounds like it is truly time to station troops in Greenland to defend against the US. The issue will need to be forced, so Drumpf either backs down, or crosses the line into hostility so the world will wake up from its denial of the danger.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 months ago

      No, Greenland is in the Nato. When the US attacks then half of the us army will be on the offence, the other half on the defence to keep the us army out.

    • Orbituary
      link
      fedilink
      English
      325 months ago

      As a US citizen, I approve of this position. Fuck this place.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
        link
        fedilink
        English
        255 months ago

        Last time it was targeted to specific red state exports like Kentucky whiskey too.

    • JokeDeity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      As an American, honestly just take us back under control, we fucked the whole thing up, we couldn’t do it.

  • Nora
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55 months ago

    Maybe don’t link an article with a paywall. thanks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      Either learn to bypass them, read the comments to find someone who has, or consume only the free, heavily biased rage-bait media

      None of these options include telling people not to post real journalism

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      Put them on hold for half an hour with the lady saying that the call is very important to them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    185 months ago

    Greenland, home to just 57,000 people, is an entry point to new shipping routes gradually opening up through the Arctic; it also boasts abundant but hard to access minerals.

    Am I reading it wrong or is “gradually opening up through the arctic” a euphemism for climate crisis effects?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      It’s exactly that. Carriers can’t wait for the arctic to thaw, it is a much shorter and quicker route between the hemishperes. China has been sending containerships through there for a while now.

      • federal reverseM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        China has also been buying up land and small harbors to expand in Scandinavia.

  • poVoqM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95 months ago

    Trump should rather talk to Múte Egede the prime minister of Greenland 🤷‍♂️

  • kbal
    link
    fedilink
    205 months ago

    The Farce Reich will never conquer Greenland.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Do you want to put money on that? Because I wouldn’t.

      Trump is crazy enough to do it - or rather the Project 2025 sumbitches who are remote-controlling him in the background, because he sure as hell ain’t the one coming up with all those executive orders he’s signing.

      And while the whole world would scream and shout in outrage, nobody would be able to do a damn thing about it.

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Do you imagine the amount of backlash that would cause?

          • qyron
            link
            fedilink
            English
            75 months ago

            I couldn’t disagree more.

            As the orange myna bird rethoric escalates, so does the willingness of other actors to bite back.

            Having a nazi as a focus point of all the frustration and hatred is a good way to shift attention from internal issues.

            Nobody really wants to be called to pick up arms but the US don’t have the monopoly of war in the world.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Just as much as the US pulling out of the WHO, ordering other nations to up their military spendings, threatening other nations with insane tariffs, threatening to invade or annex them or dropping military support unexpectedly: not very much…

          • qyron
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Just as much:

            as the US pulling out of the WHO

            To the degree of what I know, the WHO is not a mandatory organization to which countries are bound to.

            It is benefitial to adhere to it but…

            ordering other nations to up their military spendings

            All nations vinculated by the NATO treaty have agreed to invest, yearly, a given percentage of their budget towards defence. Something most didn’t do it… hate to admit it but the guy had a point to pick there

            threatening other nations with insane tariffs

            Economic warfare is poised to wreck the US economy faster. The consumerist culture is too strong.

            threatening to invade or annex them

            Everyone us trembling in fear. More about to foam at the mouth of rage.

            dropping military support unexpectedly

            Hardly anything coming from that mouth is unexpected.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        215 months ago

        He can try, but that would be an attack on the rest of NATO and it would definitely grab the attention of Russia and China that don’t want the US monopolizing the Arctic. And there’s nothing that puts all existing grievances on pause like a nazi lunatic doing land grabs.

        • JokeDeity
          link
          fedilink
          English
          95 months ago

          Imagine what kind of scumbag you have to be to even follow the order to invade a place like that? They don’t even enter our lexicon most of the time. This is purely imperialism and blatantly so. In this century, to follow orders to invade like that is lunacy, cowardice, and ignorance all in one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          Lol, Russia wants him to do this. Both to foment discontent and to alter the Arctic shipping routes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            You are forgetting that Russia and the US already have territorial conflicts in the Artic, because both claim most of the sea for themselves, and that neither country wants the oil reserves in the hands of the other.

            If Trump controlled Canada and Greenland it would bolster the US claim and make it viable for the US to enforce it.

            As for China, they benefit from a trade route being divided between several countries, as it’s more likely that the international community will end up pressuring Canada to accept an international strait regime if the entire sea is not in the hands of the US.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        If there’s an invasion NATO will have to intervene. No choice. And it’s they don’t it’s WW3 for sure. Because all the structure that keep a relative peace will fall down.

        • poVoqM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          145 months ago

          I am no expert in the exact NATO regulation, but I think in a recent spat between Greece and Türkiye NATO said that inter-NATO fights do not trigger any mandatory aid from other NATO members.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        The UK would probably broker the deal behind the scenes, in public professing calm but, behind closed doors, putting pressure on Denmark to accept and buttering Trump up to compensate them generously for it. Outside the EU, Britain is weak except for its NATO membership, and that won’t be of any help here, so it’s in Britain’s interest that this is resolved as smoothly as possible, and that they remain in Trump’s good books.

  • Secret Music
    link
    fedilink
    English
    155 months ago

    “I AM YELLING AND OBNOXIOUS THEREFORE I AM A STRONG MAN WITH REGULAR SIZED HANDS. LARGE HANDS, EVEN.”