• Tankiedesantski [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    China should declare a policy that they will sell to Russia whatever the US or NATO sells to the separatists on Taiwan Island.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Not according to Taiwan. Taiwan sees itself as the legitimate China, with territorial claims on the mainland.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Taiwan (Republic of China) and China (People’s Republic of China) are different governments that both lay claim to the same territory.

        The TL;DR is that in 1949 the communists won the Chinese civil war and the remaining nationalist opposition retreated to Taiwan, beginning the state of affairs that we have today.

        PRC considers Taiwan part of its core territory and will not renounce its claims. RoC has, since 1991, officially recognised that they can’t retake the mainland, but there’s ongoing debate about whether or not Taiwanese reunification or an independent Taiwan is the end state.

  • mar_k [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    592 years ago

    The Telegraph is the only one reporting this, we’re supposed to believe a sensationalist conservative tabloid?

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      It looks like the data is from Malfar Group which dubs itself as open source intelligence (whatever that means). Looking at their website, it is all Ukraine related. That’s fine in and of itself but it should be noted by them or The Telegraph. But The Telegraph is not exactly a paragon of journalistic integrity.

    • Dolores [love/loves]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      302 years ago

      well if you trade metal to Russia, and metal goes in weapons, you are basically handing them weapons of mass destruction if you think about it smuglord

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      Does reporting on it mean they are upset?

      • MultigrainCerealista [he/him, comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They exercise editorial control and they exercise it vigorously, so when they report on something it’s for a reason.

        Does your comment intend to imply they’re just presenting some economic data points or something? It seems kind of inane to pretend that they don’t have a lens where this is a bad thing. That China bad etc etc.

      • trudge [comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 years ago

        One Chinese company sent 1,000 drones to Russia in the two months before the war, according to figures compiled by Molfar Global, an open source research organisation. That firm, Shantou Honghu Plastics, describes itself as a wholesaler of children’s toys on its website and social media profiles.

        They are toy drones lmao. Yeah they seem upset alright.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    452 years ago

    China is widely suspected of supplying Russia with equipment and materials to support their war, however no-one has adduced anything concrete to support that theory so far.

    The article itself doesn’t cite much in the way of sources or evidence, other than mentioning a report by Molfar, the open source intelligence agency. Molfar has published reports on the same topic in the past, but there hasn’t been anything recently.

    If the Telegraph had new information or evidence they would be shouting a lot louder than this. This is most likely them covering up for a quiet day by dredging up some old rumours and repackaging them as news.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      In other news, China is also widely suspected of supplying Ukraine with equipment and materials to support their war.

      Turns out, China isn’t a single entity but a bunch of companies that want to make a whole ton of money by profiteering off of war.

      The CCP doesn’t care about the conflict so long as they can claim neutrality.

  • interolivary
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    I wonder if this’ll lead to any sort of action against China. Generally people have thought that China wouldn’t outright support Russia with war materials because they can’t afford to be sanctioned by “the West”, as they’re much more reliant on trade with the EU and US

  • CloutAtlas [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    682 years ago

    Focusing on Chinese drones that end up in Russia while completely ignoring the Chinese drones that end up in the Ukraine is some cherry picking I expected from the Telegraph. Products and components are made in China, which shouldn’t come as a surprise.

      • GaveUp [she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 years ago

        Ukraine only has consumer drones, I don’t think they have any military drones

        • Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          342 years ago

          I thought they had some for some reason

          People need to start distinguishing between the little quadcopters you can buy at walmart, and fucking reaper drones. Headlines like “China is selling drones to Russia” makes it seem like it isn’t a $150 drone bought off fucking aliexpress

          • GaveUp [she/her]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            392 years ago

            That lack of distinction is 100% on purpose since China dominates the consumer drones market and they’re so versatile and capable that countries all over the world including the US buy DJI drones for military operations

            Can blame China for giving every country “drones”

            • Redcat [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              202 years ago

              china dominates the consumer goods market, period. by these standards the chinese have been supplying every NATO war for the past 20 years.

              • s0ykaf [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                132 years ago

                the chinese have been supplying every NATO war for the past 20 years.

                smh revisionism has really gone too far

          • SeaJ
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            They do. They have Bayraktar drones.

            I do agree that the lack of distinction is kind of stupid.

        • SeaJ
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I don’t think you can buy Bayraktar drones from your local general store…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    832 years ago

    Whaaat? But China said they weren’t doing that. China wouldn’t just lie like that, would it?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Probably not for long given the state of the Rouble and the economy. Tech-wise Russia has nothing to offer and when it comes to the stuff China might be interested in, such as ores and oil, well you’d have to not send miners to the front to continue producing them. That Russia of all countries is importing metals should make you stop and think.

    Lenin is rotating in his mausoleum.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      Russia provides a buffer, it’s the same thing as North Korea. China aids NK to keep US allies as far away from themselves as possible.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      The funniest part of this comment is the idea that Russia will get so desperate for troops that they’ll be unable to operate mines

      Soviet industrial capacity greatly increased over the course of WWII

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        182 years ago

        Yeah, but that was the Soviets. These are capitalists. Capitalists suck at war economics and I’m not even sure it’s plausible under modern finance capitalism. I agree they’re not likely to run out of troops any time soon, but I don’t think we’re likely to see economic gains like WWII.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          I also don’t think we’re going to see industrial development on par with WWII. My point is that during WWII:

          • The USSR suffered something like 25 million deaths, orders of magnitude above even the wildest propaganda about current Russian losses
          • They still had the labor power to not only run their industrial base, but to build much of it from scratch

          It’s a country of around 143 million, and I saw an (undoubtedly cautious) estimates of 11 million+ military age men. They had something like 1.2 million military personnel before the war.

          Just a basic understanding of demographics and even one historical example should tell anyone that “they are so short on people they can’t even run their industry” is absurd.

    • Fuckass [none/use name]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      They provide a large country with a large nuclear arsenal and military that’s friendly to the Chinese government

    • KurtVonnegut [comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 years ago

      Tech-wise Russia has nothing to offer

      Oh no, their Twitter and Facebook exports are too low. They’ll have to scrape by on checks notes one of the world’s largest supplies of oil, precious metals, and other natural resources. Surely, the Russian economy will collapse any second now!

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 years ago

        Plus their weapon systems are probably looking pretty good after surviving a sustained assault from a NATO trained, led, and supplied army.

  • Fuckass [none/use name]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ukrainians also get shipped Chinese consumer drones to configure into weapons and Holosuns, so I think it evens out

    Telegraph: “One Chinese company sent 1,000 drones to Russia in the two months before the war, according to figures compiled by Molfar Global, an open source research organisation. That firm, Shantou Honghu Plastics, describes itself as a wholesaler of children’s toys on its website and social media profiles.”

    https://www.npr.org/2023/03/21/1164977056/a-chinese-drone-for-hobbyists-plays-a-crucial-role-in-the-russia-ukraine-war

    “The Ukrainians, and the Russians too, have figured out ways to modify these devices they’ve purchased online to make more and more creative ways to drop explosives from these small consumer drones,”

    Telegraph: “Chinese firms have also sent optical sights to more than 50 Russian companies from the start of 2022 through the first quarter of this year. Imports of these products nearly doubled to $2.5 million last year, compared to the one prior.”

    https://news.yahoo.com/budget-optics-becoming-combat-proven-212202739.html (it’s yahoo citing Reddit sources and just doing trust me bro, but if Ukraine bought Chinese drones, buying Holosuns isn’t exactly hard to believe)

    More informative source: https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/07/25/holosun-optics-on-ukranian-aks/ (lol, a crowdfunding project funding a country’s military is sad, and the fact they could only upgrade 30 guns is even more sad. In 2014 too during the coup)

    However, large numbers of Holosun optics have been fielded during the defense of Ukraine. During the war, they have been seen on AK-style rifles, AR-style rifles and even machine guns. While the battlefield performance of the optics is difficult to verify, Ukrainian troops continue to field them. Even bodyguards for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have been seen using Holosun optics. Outside of Ukraine, the Estonian Defence Forces use Holosun optics on their LMT R-20 assault rifles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      Oh no! Not the DJI Mavic Pro! Whatever will they do without

      *4/3 CMOS Hasselblad Camera *Dual Tele Cameras *Cine Only Tri-Camera Apple ProRes Support

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It:s a shame because supplying that gear to Ukraine would have helped China’s reputation on the international stage and bolstered trade. It would have not been well received by the Kremlin but a losing army can’t invade anyone else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Politically it’s better. Ukraine has 16 countries that committed over a billion Euros. We’re not how many countries would back Taiwan.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          the difference is in Taiwan’s case america would be directly involved and have already committed to this, it is likely Japan would also and some other countries are likely to contribute to. china wouldn’t have a hope

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          I mean over a billion Euros is technically correct, the actual number however is more like 150 to 200 billion Euros

          • mihor
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Of our hard-earned money, those degenerate warmongers (I’m looking at you, Urszula)!

    • somename [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      382 years ago

      Hopefully the United States doesn’t continue to escalate tensions in regards to the island.

    • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      282 years ago

      Helicopters, drones, and metals they won’t be able to use at Taiwan.

      Because their plan for reunification is peaceful, which a military invasion would make more difficult.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Here’s hoping. How do you think they will solve their naval border disputes with neighboring countries?

    • Fuckass [none/use name]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Lol, I highly doubt china will be desperate enough to use consumer level drones and scopes to take over Taiwan given how many soldiers they have with real military equipment.

      But even if they are desperate, what makes you think they won’t just seize the factories and pump out 20x the number being shipped to Russia and Ukraine, and the rest of the world? Not to mention, I don’t think China is dumb enough to go to war while Russia is busy at a completely different war, so I really don’t think a couple thousand shitty drones will make a difference 5-10 years from now

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Russia’s military strength has been degrading since the war began. How long do you wait with your ally losing strength? Sure, you could prop him up but then that’s a drain on your economy. If you postpone indefinitely, the situation may change to be even more unfavorable.

        • Fuckass [none/use name]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          252 years ago

          China has waited centuries to get Hong Kong back and decades for Taiwan. What’s another 10 years? Why would they do some reckless shit like invasion when they’re still in the process of courting neighbors? All the superpowers are observing this war right now to see each other’s abilities, and the war hasn’t been finished yet. There’s no material benefit to invading anyone right now

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Generally speaking, China benefits from stalling for as long as possible. The power of the imperial core is waning, so if China can navigate things such that the US – due to its own economic dependency on imperialism – crumbles to a much lower stature without the US launching nukes, then its influence in the world will become a shadow of what it was and reunification without firing a shot may be viable.

          • culpritus [any]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            without the US launching nukes

            I was just talking about this today. China is leading towards a multi-polar world very effectively, but the US is the only nation to have used nukes in history. Really puts things in stark relief.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              172 years ago

              Plus the leadership in DC are senile psychopaths who have at best a loose grasp on world affairs. And that’s just the Democrats. The GOP are increasingly all fascists completely divorced from reality. Real “Sick old man” hours, except unlike the Ottomans DC has enough nukes to flash-fry the planet if the wrong corpse-lich has a stroke at the right time.

  • anoncpc [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    762 years ago

    Yes, if you go to aliexpress, you could buy Chinese made helicopter, drones and metals. Thank you the telegraph for the basic info

    • Fuckass [none/use name]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you search for certain military equipment, you’ll often see reviews from Russian soldiers and Ukrainian soldiers right next to each other lol

      • anoncpc [comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Like, the yank was so mad at Ukrainian keep using Chinese drone, that they force them to stop buying it and use their expensive drone.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          332 years ago

          The Pentagon is mad that Congress forced them to stop buying Chinese drones. Apparently there are no available replacements in some categories and even where there are, they are many times more expensive.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            332 years ago

            I love watching Congress fuck over the Pentagon. Just the worst people in the world slapfighting over fake money. Probably a bad idea to let hundreds of lead huffing jet ski dealers whose only qualification is buying more TV add time than their opponents run a global empire.

          • Fuckass [none/use name]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            40
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Rural communities have been using Huawei equipment for internet because it’s cheap and fast. The federal government became upset and demanded they rip everything and replace it with American parts. I think it costs like $12 billion, but the US didn’t even give the communities 50% of the required amount to switch over

              • forcequit [she/her]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                202 years ago
                australia doing the same shit

                Banned from tendering in the National Broadband Network in 2012, banned from participating in the 5G network in 2018, called for removal of surveillance/security cameras in 2018, funded undersea cables in the pacific to block Huawei in 2018, purchased Digicel to prevent Chinese involvement in 2021

                US, UK, CAN & AU, 5eyes has been frothing over this for a while

                The $2.1 billion deal to acquire and run Digicel Pacific is being funded largely by the government, which will provide $1.9 billion toward the acquisition.

                Telstra said it would contribute $360 million and own 100 per cent of the company’s ordinary equity.

                “Australian officials were concerned about whether a Chinese company or potentially a Chinese state-owned entity might look to buy Digicel’s Pacific arm and there were some geopolitical and geostrategic concerns about a Chinese company owning a major telecommunication company in the Pacific region, which is of course so close to Australia,” said Amanda Watson, an expert in Pacific communications at the Australian National University.

                That’s especially since Digicel Pacific uses a 4,700km undersea cable from Sydney that was largely funded by the Australian government in 2018 in an effort to prevent PNG and the Solomon Islands from contracting Huawei for the project.

                Ahh my bad, that was 3 years earlier instead

                https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-25/telstra-digicel-pacific-telecommunications-deal-finalised/100564976

            • SexMachineStalin [comrade/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              20
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Somehow on my phone in :estonia-burning: I can access RT and came across this article where the US was coping at South Africa to abandon it’s partnerships with Huawei because “you need to use :lmayo::amerikkka: technologies”. Anyways, South Africa told :amerikkka: to :PIGPOOPBALLS:

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        322 years ago

        That’s gotta be in some cyberpunk book somewhere. Especially if they start giving different ratings to the equipment and flaming each other over it.