Especially for personal accounts.
I get why a corporation would require it for employees…
But I hate it when Apple, Samsung, etc. are forcing you to have 2fa, especially by requiring a phone number.
Side note: Bitwarden will be requiring email verification codes starting in February 2025, for those who haven’t enabled 2fa yet (see my Post in YSK). Most people store their email credentials in their password vault… so a lot of people are gonna get locked out of their bitwarden vaults. I kinda hate it, especially on such sort notice (less than 10 days).
You must log in or register to comment.
I don’t have any issues with them. What I do take issue with is companies enforcing them with the assumption being you will use your own mobile device to authenticate for them. I feel like it’s not worth the stink to complain but both places I work for require 2fa now and I need the authenticator app or get a message to my phone.
I think its great, but only when it’s actual 2FA with a TOTP code. SMS/Email 2FA is annoying to deal with.
I hate it. It should be my choice. Not all of my accounts need to be super secure. It sucks enough already when my phone breaks or something I don’t need to be locked out of everything
This is something thats actually scary. Phones are so necessary now that when it breaks you could be digitially stranded, unable to log in to anything
2FA has backup codes, plus you can keep TOTP on your other devices too.
I remember reading of a privacy-aware couple who were each others’ “backups” in case one lost access. Well, they lost their house in a fire, along with their personal backups, and their “backup person” couldn’t access their cloud backups either.
I’m an old-fashioned believer in the 3-2-1 -rule. Three copies of important data, two of them on different media, and one offsite. And make sure you can access all of them without the other two.
So like one password database on phone (even if it’s offline, like most password apps have); one on the computer (like you probably want for use too?), and one in the cloud without need of either device or anything onsite to unlock (in my case, I’ve set up Bitwarden emergency access to someone in another country, and have a second Yubikey with a more local friend).
In today’s world, MFA (multifactor authentication) is a necessity for literally any account in which you store information you don’t want to be stolen by someone. I’m more upset that several services I use still don’t support it, or only support MFA via text or email, neither of which is secure enough to be of much use.
You don’t want the place where you store your passwords, likely including your bank account, health insurance, social media accounts, etc. to be more difficult to hack? You live in a post-quantum world. Passwords aren’t enough.
100% agree with the exception that 2FA over SMS or email needs to die, along with the “magic link” style of signing in.
Why is everyone so slow to implement FIDO2?
Agreed. But I think it’s evident even in these threads why companies are slow to adopt. Lemmy is still a niche corner of the internet predominantly used by technology savvy people, and yet you see folks here saying that they hate the inconvenience of it. Less tech adept users are more likely to dislike the additional friction.
Maybe I’ve been in the Apple garden too long but Passkeys make this easy enough for any idiot.
Now if websites would stop prompting for a password and just use passwordless authentication I’d be happy.
In fact I did this for my own business in one day using Authentik as SSO like three years ago. What’s the holdup?
This is the correct answer. MFA should be enforced for literally every account you have, and the method should be app-based or a hardware token.
It turns out that people en masse are lazy and will use the same simple password for all their accounts and then wonder how they got hacked. People in tech for the past 30 years or so struggled with the difference between theory and practice when it came to user psychology, and I am happy that we are finally starting to realize the user psychology aspect and just force them to be secure.
I don’t have any intrinsic issue with 2FA, but via something like storing an OTP on a store I decide on, not if it involves needing to install Random Company’s app on a phone or provide a phone number.
I think it’s absolutely wild how archaic some systems are. And the worst offenders are those regulated by financial and medical industry laws. I have an account with one financial account that is protected only by password that is 12 characters max with special characters limited to just a few. I don’t know how they haven’t been breached and then sued into oblivion.
I’m fine with companies enforcing 2FA. Bitwarden is addressing the current weakest link in the chain: users.
Most of those banks just… pay the damages
Phone/SMS 2FA is a joke. You can tell which organizations need to be ditched.
Sure its deeply flawed in a bunch of ways, but it is miles better than nothing
deleted by creator
My small credit union with nine branches offers TOTP 2FA
Depending on the implementation, it’s better than nothing
2fa is like mandatory nowadays for security purpose. just use TOTP like lemmy with ente or standardnotes as an app. it is easy to just copy and paste TOTP to access your password manager.
Disagree. So much money is lost because of simple password auth. Mandatory mfa fixes nearly all of it.
deleted by creator
Absolutely necessary.
deleted by creator
* with the right implementation. Phone numbers or security questions suck
Bitwarden will only ask for 2fa when signing in from a new device.
deleted by creator
It should be required everywhere.
Username+password alone is not safe.deleted by creator
It still protects against sites getting breached and the password leaked which is very common.
You don’t have to store 2fa in your password vault, and even then, you can enable 2fa for the vault. It’s just more secure. Be confident that your login info will be leaked sometime, somewhere. With 2fa you’re still safe.
While they are annoying unfortunately we live in a world where username+password is not enough for anything that has to be remotely secure.
I’m guilty of password reuse. I’m guilty of choosing weak passwords, my desktop computer has the password “1” because I had to set something.
I hate it. I already agreed to use unique unmemorizable password for every account and store them all in Bitwarden and now this is not enough? Yeah, I store my email password in Bitwarden too. With phones it’s even worse, since it’s way more probable to lose your phone than to lose your money due to database password breach. I don’t understand why those probabilities are not estimated when introducing practices like this. Also, I don’t remember the details but in the past I lost some accounts and passwords just by factory resetting the phone which had password manager app installed (probably forgot to transfer passphrases from the phone before wiping it).
