• circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    295 months ago

    One cool thing about these leaks is: if you weren’t saying batshit crazy stuff, no one would care.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      the thing is he thinks he knows better than the rest of us. because he’s a billionaire.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      Zuckerburg says “Today I ate a sandwich!”

      Nobody cares.

      But wait…the full quote was “Today I ate a sandwich…of babys!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 months ago

    Honestly, it looks like the mall ninja tried the skin bronzer and then tried to get rid of it after. The thing is he’s going to have to wait for the dyed skin cells to shed off to replace themselves, as they do. The face itself sheds at different rates in different areas.

    This is a disturbing thought, that he is so keen on cozying up Trump he tried the look. Has he changed his hair too? I don’t keep track.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 months ago

    I’m reminded of this:

    The king himself rode a horse and shot arrows at a deer. However, the horse stumbled, causing him to fall off, but he was not injured. Looking around, he said, “Do not let the historians know about this.”

    — The Veritable Records of Taejong, Vol. 7, article 4

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      ZuckFuck doesn’t make his net worth each year. So let’s compare it against US citizen net worth. I have stats from 2022

      Average American new worth is ~$1,050,000 Median American net worth is ~$192,000

      I hate zuck as much as you but it’s important to be accurate and fair as possible when comparing statistics.

      So it’s like a fine of $19 if using median and $105 if using average. Still peanuts for a fine

      Source: https://dqydj.com/net-worth-percentiles/

    • MrScottyTay
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      300 would be 1% wouldn’t it? It’d be like paying a fine of 3

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    107
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    “There are a bunch of things that I think are value-destroying for me to talk about, so I’m not going to talk about those…”

    Well have you thought about not being a piece of shit 😂

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2665 months ago

    That’s what it feels like when you steal other people’s personal information …

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      To be fair, if it’s personal and you don’t want it out there, don’t put it on anything on the internet.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I hate Facebook and that they will ban people, without notice, unless they record a video selfie from multiple angles, and then still sometimes permanently ban people even then, without a way to pay to prove the person is real or talk to someone or even get a reason for the ban. I also think Facebook is an arm of the government and is not really a company (quasi-governmental) and is basically a corporate rebranding of LifeLog and Zuckerberg probably got a 1600 on his SATs and was recruited to join the government while in high school.

    So that all being said, despite my hatred of Facebook, what he is saying isn’t that illogical.

    Let’s say Zuckerberg personally supports trans rights and thinks Trump is an idiot. He can’t say that in a meeting that will obviously have leaks. It would be “value-destroying.” Say what you want about Zuckerberg, but most people with enough intelligence don’t hate trans people because they understand science and how prenatal hormone conditions and epigenetic conditions means that sometimes internal senses of gender don’t match biological at birth sex. (Musk is the rare exception to this and it seems like his reaction comes from ego and anger about being estranged from his daughter and autism/lack of empathy, and so he’s a weird data point that doesn’t neatly fit if we take his reaction at face value.)

    So let’s say Zuckerberg wants to say “We support trans and gay people, we have to do this so Trump doesn’t go after us to remain profitable and not end up needing to decrease our head count, I hate Trump.” If he said that, someone would immediately leak it, Trump would go Ape Shit, and the company would lose value.

    It’s hard to know for certain if this is what he’s talking about, but if he is, this isn’t really something to fault him on.

    Facebook labeling linux as somehow evil, on the other hand, is a bizarre and shitty thing to do, so fuck Facebook and fuck this asshole who is letting linux be labeled as a cybersecurity threat. I also think Facebook doing this is because government, which has backdoors in Microsoft and Apple OSes, doesn’t like linux and sees it growing in popularity and so I believe the government requested Facebook do this. I can’t fathom a social media company would do this for no reason on their own, it makes no sense, but if Facebook is Lifelog and always has been Lifelog and Zuckerberg gets his orders from someone else, then it would make sense that they implement policies regarding labeling linux as bad to try to keep their backdoors in as many users’ OSes as possible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      well that is what he’s saying. what he should try is thinking about why the things he says are so “value-destroying”.