• DudeImMacGyver
    link
    fedilink
    384 months ago

    This sort of shit is why I don’t mind spending tons of money with Valve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        I get weird replies when I mentioned this on reddit in the past, but it’s true. He’s the only one worth trusting at the place. The moment his inheritors sell out is the moment steam dies taking all our libraries with it.

  • Sibbo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    234 months ago

    That’s awesome! Good that they keep a bar of minimum quality.

    • Sibbo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      184 months ago

      Well, they could just require publishers to share the ad revenue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        They could. That takes a lot more employees than they have and would mean that they were the place with all the shitty free games.

    • MudMan
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      Damn, I was coming here to say this is a meaningful curation step and I couldn’t give Steam my usual cynical reality check, but you found the angle and now I can’t unsee it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        264 months ago

        It can be both. Steam wants their cut, but they also don’t want consumers seeing a free game on Steam, downloading it, and then complaining to Steam because it’s not actually free, it’s just riddled with ads.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t think it’s cynical. Their review model would make it very hard to make payment fair (we can always argue about whether Steam overcharges for its services) since it would be a pain in the butt to track income from advertisement.

        But the advertisement business model makes for worse games. I think it makes great sense for Steam to ban them. And if games on Steam are better then that’s good for game developers that use their platform.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Valve is such a weird company, on one hand they do things like this, on the other hand there is CS gambling.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I just don’t see how they are responsible for CS gambling.

      They created an open market, where people can trade and sell their items. Just like people want, instead of being locked down in the game you play at the time.

      Of course people are going to gamble with the items, just like they do with anything else you can trade. but how is that not a regulatory issue and instead paved on valve?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        Lootboxes.

        Players have a random chance of getting crate while playing the game. Each crate is a pool of item cosmetics with various levels of rarity. To acquire one of them the player must purchase a one-use key with real money. Expending the key on a crate initiates a die roll that determines which cosmetic is unlocked.

        That’s the gambling they’re responsible for. What gambling players may of afterward is not the same conversation.