Tiktok video: https://www.tiktok.com/@cattlemenfamilyfarms/video/7467698017559170350

Bsky post: https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3lhrdl5nt222s

Articles:

spoiler

ft.com US farmers ‘prepare for the worst’ in new Trump trade war Guy Chazan 7–9 minutes

Aaron Lehman’s soyabean farm in the heartland of Iowa feels like an oasis of calm in the turbulence and tumult of President Donald Trump’s second term. Yet all that could change in a matter of weeks.

Lehman is bracing himself for the impact of a potential trade war hatched in Washington that he says could lay low the US corn belt and irreparably harm America’s standing with its neighbours.

“Farmers understand that trading relationships go up on a stairway, where you work hard to build them up, but go down on an elevator — very, very fast,” Lehman said in the living room of his farmhouse about 20 miles north of Iowa’s capital Des Moines.

“The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner.”

It has been a turbulent week in US trade policy. Trump announced last weekend that he would impose 25 per cent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, saying they were not doing enough to stem the flow of migrants and the illicit drug fentanyl into the US. Then after last-minute talks with the two countries’ leaders, he agreed to give them both a 30-day reprieve.

The same was not the case for China. The 10 per cent levy he imposed on all Chinese imports still stands. And many in Iowa believe it is only a matter of time before the tariffs on America’s northern and southern neighbours are reinstated.

The opening salvo of a new trade war has sent a chill through the Midwest. Canada, Mexico and China together account for half of all American agricultural exports. Just last year, the US sold more than $30bn in farm products to Mexico, $29bn to Canada and $26bn to China, according to American Farm Bureau statistics.

Suddenly, farmers were facing the spectre of retaliatory tariffs and the prospect of a full-scale conflict that some fear could decimate America’s rural heartland. Two large grain silos and an old shed sit on a dry, grassy area with expansive flat fields in the background under a partly cloudy sky Farmers fear a full-scale trade war could decimate America’s rural heartland © Amir Prellberg/FT

Farmers in an area of the country that has become a bedrock of support for Trump now worry that the president’s tariffs, though suspended at the last minute, have permanently damaged the image of the US in the eyes of its most important trading partners.

“We’ve gone from being a seller of choice to a seller of last resort,” said Mark Mueller, a farmer from near Waterloo in north-east Iowa.

Few US states better embody the agricultural wealth of the Midwest than Iowa. It is a land of vast corn fields stretching as far as the eye can see, the landscape broken by the occasional grain silo, hay bale or low-slung barn. Hogs outnumber people more than seven to one.

It is also Trump country. Although Iowa voted for Democratic presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, it backed Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 in ever greater numbers.

More than a fifth of Iowa’s economy — or $53.1bn — is tied to agriculture, from crop and livestock production to food processing and manufacturing. It is the country’s largest producer of corn, hogs, eggs and ethanol and a top-three grower of soyabeans. That makes it particularly vulnerable to any downturn in agricultural exports.

“Free trade is the backbone of the economy in the Midwest,” said Ernie Goss, an economist at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. “What we have here is some of the most productive agriculture on the face of the Earth, and the domestic market is not even close to being big enough to absorb all the commodities produced here. You have to have international markets.” Aaron Lehman is seated near a window inside a room, wearing glasses and a checkered shirt ‘The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner,’ said Aaron Lehman © Amir Prellberg/FT

The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Trump in his first term. Among the most striking moves was Trump imposing duties on $300bn of Chinese goods. Beijing responded in 2018 by slapping 25 per cent tariffs on imports of US soyabeans, beef, pork, wheat, corn and sorghum.

The skirmish ended with the countries signing a trade deal in 2020 under which Beijing pledged to increase its purchases of US goods and services. But since then, it has been buying more grain from countries such as Argentina and Brazil, which overtook the US as China’s top supplier of corn in 2023.

In the last trade war, “a lot of our Asian buyers started developing relationships with soyabean producers in South America, and they’ve taken more and more of our market”, said Lehman, who is also president of the Iowa Farmers Union. “And we haven’t got it back.”

Not all of Iowa’s farmers oppose the way Trump has used the threat of tariffs to achieve a key policy objective — stemming illegal immigration.

“It was a strategy he needed to use to . . . get those countries to the negotiating table,” said Steve Kuiper, a fourth-generation Iowa farmer who grows corn and soyabeans in Marion County, south-east of Des Moines. After all, “a president has just four years to accomplish all he’s promised to do, so he’s got to get things going immediately to gain traction”.

Still, he is pessimistic that Mexico and Canada will be able to deliver on their pledges to Trump to strengthen border security in time. “It takes forever for these things to happen, and they’ve only got 30 days,” he said. A view through a window shows a barren soybean field The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Donald Trump in his first term © Amir Prellberg/FT

The prospect of another round of trade tensions comes with American farmers already in a tight spot, hit by a fall in crop prices and higher costs. Net farm income, a broad measure of profits, was $181.9bn in 2022 but is projected to have been $140.7bn in 2024, according to data from the US Department of Agriculture — a 23 per cent slump.

“This [trade war] isn’t coming at a good time,” said Rick Juchems, a farmer from near Plainfield in north-east Iowa. “Commodity prices are low and the price of inputs like seed and fertiliser is going up.” Sources from the Iowa Corn Growers Association said many farmers had been producing at a $100 per acre loss.

Investments in new equipment are down, reflecting the wider downturn, said Juchems. “I’ve got friends who’ve lost their jobs selling agricultural machinery because of reduced demand. The lots are full of unsold tractors.”

Makers of farm equipment such as Deere, Kinze Manufacturing and Bridgestone/Firestone have shed hundreds of jobs in Iowa since last year.

Yet the prospects for farm finances could get even gloomier if Trump makes good on his threat of import levies. Fertiliser, for example, could become much more expensive, since more than 80 per cent of the US’s supply of potash — a key ingredient — comes from Canada.

But perhaps the most destructive effect of the tariff debate is the uncertainty it has triggered, just ahead of the crucial spring planting season.

“We’ll get by as long as we know what’s coming,” said Juchems. “But things are changing all the time. I’m sure the whole world is laughing at us.”

Lehman said farmers were trying to stay optimistic. “They tell me they’re hopeful cooler heads will prevail and this dispute will result in good trade agreements,” said Lehman. “But they’re also preparing for the worst.”

  • ajsg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 months ago

    Man, fuged every stupid people.

  • Doug Holland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    945 months ago

    Dude doesn’t quite connect the dots. The government — under Biden — had a deal to save his farm. The government — under Trump — is changing all the rules, reneging on the contract. If all he groks from this is “government bad,” then game over. Except it’s not a game.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      365 months ago

      My impression from the video is that all he is taking from this situation is “government bad.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 months ago

        I mean, it is sort of the lesson. The government sort of exists to be stable and a stabilizing force.

        We’ve concentrated power in the executive branch for years, throughout several administrations. If one election can cause this much chaos in a month (really a few weeks). Than the government isn’t performing it’s primary function.

        At this point I’m not sure how much it matters that one party is mostly responsible. The state is looming on failure. These radical position shifts every few years are a bad thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Most (none of them, probably) governments aren’t designed to deal with this level of intentional destruction of infrastructure. They expect officials to govern the country, not set it on fire.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Yes, there is literally no governmental system that can function while operated by bad faith actors (outside of sci-fi).

            The strength of a system over time is ultimately based on how well it encourages the participants to act honestly and humanely.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      Commodity crops prices often trend the inverse of the economy. The reason is simple; It is highly dependent on the export market.

      When overall economy is strong, the dollar is strong versus other currencies. This makes importing easier and exporting harder. So prices for commodities in the U.S. fall.

      When the overall economy is weak the dollar falls in value. This makes importing harder but exporting much easier. Prices for commodities rise rapidly and farmers make more gross money.

      Even through they are making more gross income their cost skyrocket so their net returns are in general pretty average.

      Farmers tend to make the most money when the economy is in recovery mode and commodity prices are still higher but input costs fall.

      So here is the vicious cycle we have fallen into. Republicans get into power and crash the economy. When it crashes, farmers get high prices but low returns. Democrats come in, repair the economy but by the time elections come around, farmers have not made any money for a year or two. Rinse and repeat.

      Now the orange moron adds a bit of a twist to it. Trade war: This can fuck the farmer up really bad as buyers are willing to pay a modest premium to minimize the impact of an unreliable trading partner. It reduces both the volume moved and prices offered from other countries for years.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 months ago

    “But a billionaire is already rich, why would they need to steal from us?”

    What so many people fail to realize is that you only become a billionaire if there is something broken in your soul. Sane people retire to live very comfortable private lives, to enjoy the remainder of their finite time on this Earth with their family, friends, and hobbies. Sane people stop earning money and retire long before they reach anywhere near even a single billion in wealth. The one exception to this are those who create a product while of modest means and see it explode in profitability; see someone like Notch. But even Notch sold Minecraft off and now spends his time pursuing passion projects, rather than tirelessly working to wring more dollars out of his golden goose.

    Sane people work to live. You do not become a billionaire unless your greed is insatiable.

    Most people say that Elon Musk is the richest person on Earth. But they are wrong. I don’t know who the richest person on Earth is. But I know for a fact that I am wealthier than Elon Musk. He is a pauper before me. I have something Elon Musk has never had, does not have, will never have, and is utterly incapable of ever having.

    Enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      I was speaking to my grandparents, who are from Iowa, about Elon Musk a short time before the elections. We were discussing how he isn’t a good person and how the levels of greed it takes to become someone in his position prove that. They said something similar that opening quote, to which I responded, “It really makes you wonder why he always needs more, doesn’t it?”.

      The discussion ended here.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    875 months ago

    we can only hope this is the rock bottom that people need in order to see their way out of the fox news pit of lies.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      645 months ago

      I sadly suspect that this is the type of voter who will continue to blame anyone and everyone else for the problems they triggered themselves.

      Cognitive dissonance has well and truly set in.

      I think fundamentally this is the underlying issue with the current situation in the USA. I’m not sure what fixing it looks like.

      This isn’t something that started in November last year, it’s been brewing for decades, perhaps even longer, it’s that right now it’s burst out like an infected boil and become visible for the whole planet to see. It’s why I used triggered, not caused. I think it’s much, much deeper than the latest election.

      Don’t get me wrong, there’s plenty of people left who don’t think like this, but they are losing ground fast as their democracy is demolished bit by bit by the billionaires.

      Organising, protesting and actively fighting this appears to be where it’s now at.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 months ago

      HA HA HA

      These assholes would be living under a bridge because of GOP policies and they would still blame it on Dems, immigrants and gays.

      Fuck them and their primitive ability to understand reality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      395 months ago

      This is nothing new for Americans. This will go on for many more years, it might not change at all until the corpos do it for them.

    • Riskable
      link
      fedilink
      English
      305 months ago

      Even after he loses his farm. Even after his friends and family cut him out of their lives. Even after he goes bankrupt from medical debt.

      He will still vote exactly the same as he always does. It’s the definition of a conservative: They don’t change. Consequences be damned!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      155 months ago

      I wouldn’t bet anything important on it. The lack of empathy endemic to the right means that every voter will have to experience their own life-changing betrayal directly affecting them.

      For most of these people, there is no way to convince themselves to dig themselves out, we just have to wait until they keep digging and tunnel to the other side. A better wager would be that’s going to take more time than Trump & Musk will need to gut the government and dismantle democracy.

      • peto (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 months ago

        Even then it’s not for certain. If their politics is grounded in hatred rather than self-interest they have no reason to stop as long as the outgroups can be punished as well.

        You can move self-interest to mutualism more easily than you can move hate to compassion.

  • The Quuuuuill
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2765 months ago

    reagan bankrupted thousands of farmers too. conservatives are horrible for the rural voters who always hit that button

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      George W was awful to the military and veterans get screwed by republicans all the time. Yet they love republicans and vote for them in droves. People don’t make sense.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        265 months ago

        People don’t make sense.

        Sure they do. Stupid people fall for propaganda and these losers are stuuuuuuuupid.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          145 months ago

          You can fool some of the people all of the time. They’re mostly called conservatives.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 months ago

          Except it’s not just very stupid people. It’s a big demographic swath. Some folks know what psychological buttons to consistently push and keep pushing those very reliable buttons. These are old tricks, but they’re now amplified by the technology of new media -and these dillweeds have great feedback now thanks to social media to know if this week’s shenanigans are playing well so they can adjust accordingly. A mess. Humankind’s evolutionary biology weaponized to the benefit of a few. It’s where we are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        When I was in, the bs spewed was that you should vote Republican to get pay increases because the Dems won’t do it. Of course the GOP also likes to chip away at the VA and other veteran aftercare. We also had personnel equipment shortages like armor during OEF/OIF and Congress just shrugged.

        Unfortunately there are a lot of impressionable kids and they pass the same dumbassery on when they are old timers. It is effective because you’re basically indoctrinated to trust senior leaders.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          It’s a shame when somebody comes home from a republican war with PTSD, injuries, lost friends, etc, and still don’t connect that war with the Republican Party.

          And people think Trump wouldn’t start a war the way George W did, but I would not be surprised if he did. 2020 began with him assassinating an Iranian general. Also, he is already instigating the entire Middle East with his comments and threats about Palestine.

  • partial_accumen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1985 months ago

    Mr. Farmer, when trump talks about finding fraud in government, he’s referring to USAID paying you for your farm products. You are the waste he is referring to.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        165 months ago

        Lots of reasons. Generally its not just corn but soybeans too. Essentially the USA has optimized its supply chain for producing massive amounts of corn and soybeans and bringing them to market. The subsidy is to ensure that USA capacity to produce enough food for its populace irrespective of geopolitics or world economies. We never want to be in a position where we aren’t ramped up to feed our population entirely. If you overproduce, you can always get rid of the excess. If you underproduce, at least a portion of your population goes hungry. That cannot be allowed to happen. The ancillary benefits are things like USAID that use the overproduction as expressions of Soft Power around the world in the form of nutritional aid.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            The majority of corn is eaten. A less than majority percent is used for industrial uses and ethanol production. Is that where you were going?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      635 months ago

      This dude doesn’t mention Trump or Republicans once during the entire video. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if somehow he blames this on the previous administration. I’ve already had multiple conversations blaming any adverse effects from Trump’s decisions on Biden and the Democrats in a similar fashion.

      • frozen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        165 months ago

        In the TikTok video, no, but in the BlueSky video, he mentions he voted for Trump. Although, your point most likely still stands, because he doesn’t place blame.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Why are half the posts here unverifiable screenshots and social media clips, often out of context, as opposed to something more substantial and provable? I don’t doubt this is happening but this hardly counts as a legitimate source showing this is some larger opinion/shift occurring.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      495 months ago

      The video link is helpful. Memes are not journalism. You’re right to hold on to skepticism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        145 months ago

        you’re right the video certainly is something, I’m not saying it’s worthless to be clear. But I don’t like feeling like I’m browsing conservative corners that just plaster screenshots and claim whatever they want. It’s hard not to compare this community to that sometimes (even if the content is generally way more accurate/truthful).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Yeah, to balance I sometimes check /r/conservative these days. They’re obviously full blown MAGA but boy are they not regretting a thing.

          And if you look at approval ratings he’s doing pretty fucking well

          By the numbers: 53% of Americans approve of Trump so far, according to a newly released CBS News/YouGov poll conducted Feb. 5 to 7, while 47% disapproved.

          https://www.axios.com/2025/02/09/trump-approval-ratings-poll

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          105 months ago

          Me either. I personally get some fulfillment by doing deep dives on the claims of rage bait screenshots. It’s a good habit to get into, because even if you don’t feel like doing the work for “this one,” you’re still primed to know that that work needs to be done before taking it seriously.

          Propaganda works by taking advantage of what people already want to hear.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      175 months ago

      Its leopardsatemyface, where do you expect the individuals having their faces eaten be found aside from social media? Most of those taking place on social media many on Lemmy would be unwilling to go to, and may even be blocked by the instance (x for example, depending on the instance of course).

      This community is not about large scale shifts so much as individuals having their faces eaten by the leopards eating faces party.

      So I’m not sure what you’re expecting to see instead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What do you expect

        The occasional report, study, article, interview, etc of substance? Is it some strange requirement that we’re not allowed to show something a bit…more? Are the rules of this community that it has to be out of context screenshots and social media clips?

        Why are you asking me something you can easily figure out yourself? You’re just being contrarian. Besides, how can you possibly claim to be showing “large scale shifts” with posts like this? Surely you’re joking.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          105 months ago

          Is it some strange requirement that we’re not allowed to show something a bit…more? Are the rules of this community that it has to be out of context screenshots and social media clips?

          No one said it wasn’t allowed. It absolutely would be, feel free to find one and post!

          Besides, how can you possibly claim to be showing “large scale shifts” with posts like this?

          Who is claiming “large scale shifts”? These are anecdotes that fit, nothing more.

          I honestly don’t understand why you’re surprised. I’m not being contrarian, I don’t understand why you’d think this would be some meta analysis community. Its a specific community with a simple topic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 months ago

          Not OP. I get what your asking for, but this isn’t supposed to be a news community. The whole point of this community is schadenfreude on the concept that people have completely voted against their own interests. Essentially, it highlights people get blindsided when the party they voted for enacts policy or actions that harm them…especially when they were told this exact thing would happen.

          There used to be absolutely tons of Brexit items up here as well (at least on the reddit side). We’re about to see 4 more years of it.

          It would be like if you went to an unboxing community and got frustrated at the fact that no one then did anything with the items after they were unboxed - they absolutely will…it’s just not the point of that community.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Meme communities and communities like this are actually very important disseminators of information. I personally would like to have a slightly higher floor than “I saw a screenshot with text” tbh. Maybe that’s just me though.

        • dream_weasel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          At the risk of being controversial, you MAY need to follow more communities than LAMF to get the big picture of trends in American political perceptions.

          You may also get upvotes for sharing here if you find something concrete though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      “(A farmer) votes for billionaires, (he) is surprised when they act like billionaires.”

      The OP’s post and headline doesn’t claim any larger opinion shift is occurring.

      Just that a farmer who voted for the LEFP is getting his face eaten by the LEFP.

      That’s the point of the instance.

      The water dump in the added links is definitely true, and has impacted mostly-republican farmers in the Central Valley for no useful purposes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You say this yet another comment actually claimed that this is exactly what you’re saying this isn’t (indicative of a larger shift).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Then your comment should have been a reply to them, not a top-level comment on the original post.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          75 months ago

          Ah. I see the issue, you misread. Allow me to quote myself with some emphasis added:

          This community is not about large scale shifts so much as individuals having their faces eaten by the leopards eating faces party.

          I think you missed the “not” on your first read.

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1105 months ago

    The “conservative” plan is and has always been to eliminate small businesses. That dipshit’s land will get gobbled up by a corporation.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s been interesting watching the schadenfreude.

    My parents have been borrowing my car for almost a year now so they can drive for DoorDash, because if they don’t, this country will sit by and let bloodsucking capitalists take their home and their lives. This didn’t happen to them under Trump. It happened under Biden, and Democrats shouldn’t be pointing and laughing. They should be having calm, measured conversations with these people and trying to garner their support instead.

    But for all their degrees and education, they lack empathy and don’t understand people at all.

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The impoverishment is very much a both-sides issue. That’s how Trump got elected. You and the other Democratic voters are only acting like you care because, at the moment, it’s politically convenient. You have no real values.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Spoken like a chump who hasn’t bothered to look up the voting history of both parties, so their opinion is worthless.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          75 months ago

          Just because the Ratchet Effect is true doesn’t mean that both sides are the same. You sound like a Republican. And the only value Republicans have is hate.

          You wanna improve things? Vote in leftists who will actually work to fix things. The presidential elections ain’t gonna do shit until we have a party actually willing to field candidates who want to fix things.

          • FlashMobOfOne
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I love that your response is: “You’re not wrong, but you’re wrong.” I sound like someone who isn’t looking through blue or red-eyed glasses, and to partisans, that makes me sound like the opposition, because somehow you’re constitutionally incapable of being objective.

            Thanks for your input.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Nah, you sound like leopards ate your face. Because this did happen under Trump as well. The programs that help protect people like your parents were created by leftists, slashed by Republicans for decades, and kept on life support by Democrats.

              Look at what Musk is doing now. All the issues that your parents have? About to get way worse, very quickly.

              You came into the “People who fucked around and found out” community to complain about people pointing out people who fucked around and found out, and called them the elitist Democrat stereotype that Republicans always pull out because they’re not trying to “reach across the aisle” to a group of people who repeatedly vote against their own interests, no matter how often you point it out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      It’s always good to blame the democrats when the felon slashes social security and doubles food prices.

      When the democrats have been warning about those consequences of voting for trump the whole of last year.

      And it’s funny that you mention the lack of empathy when that priest was just accused of “The sin of empathy”.

      The people you accuse of lack of empathy are in favour of increasing minimum wage and benefits for the poor.

      It’s sad to see a country give the reins to a madman that said he would be a dictator and follows through on project 2025.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      This didn’t happen to them

      What didn’t happen to them?

      Democrats shouldn’t be pointing and laughing

      Nobody’s pointing and laughing. Leopards Eating People’s Faces is about Justice-based Schadenfreude. It is the pleasure associated with seeing a person who wished ill on other people receive that ill themselves. The overriding emotion isn’t joy, it’s a mix of exasperation and relief. Exasperation because someone was stupid or cruel enough to wish those things for other people, and relief that there’s finally some justice because they’re suffering from the exact thing they wished on those other people.

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      When all we have is factory farmed, grabbing routinely pesticided* and routinely antibioticd food, will they? Like I’m really okay with vegan but plant* butter is still just transfat. Chemicals build up in our bodies, especially liver.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      This didn’t happen to them under Trump. It happened under Biden

      Weird, because by all available metrics, the economy was recovering under Biden.

      So your parents must have been doing something wrong.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95 months ago

    It’s probably too early to tell just how many people will be impacted and if those impacted will connect the dots to Trump and his cabinet’s actions. But I’ll ask as a precaution - is there a lethal dose for schadenfreude? My gut tells me we may experience quite a bit of it and I don’t want to overdose.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      245 months ago

      They’re eating shit so we have to smell their breath.

      They’re dragging us down with them.