• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 months ago

    50 l 50 he’s looking at memory of “that one time with Epstein and those girls”, or in a Big Mac coma.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 months ago

    I mean, he’s obviously just staring at his phone, but if this had been Biden then they’d have been calling him Sleepy Joe in all the headlines. :|

    • JollyBrancher
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Obviously? No. There is no possible way his hands could be holding that phone. And we all know he is absolutely a 2-handing smart phone user. *Yes to the rest

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 months ago

    OT, but what do you mean “Sign-in Required” when trying to read the post on bluesky, weren’t they supposed to be better than twitter?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      This user has requested that their content only be shown to signed-in users.

      Huh. I guess that’s a feature Bluesky offers. TIL.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        182 months ago

        It was just added recently, like within a week or so. At least it’s the users choice unlike Twitter.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 months ago

          Correct, I noticed the feature recently too. I’d imagine it’s anti-spam (or at least anti-lurk?) but it’s not like you can comment without an account.

          I don’t see a good enough reason to toggle that unless you’re expecting a non-user to leak it to another platform to make fun of you (e.g. Lemmy) and obviously we’re proof enough that it isn’t much of a deterrent, lol.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        So the enshittification begins… I can’t think of a single valid reason for wanting only account-havers to view your post.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          This is a way to slightly make a block work better to keep away from stalkers. Yes, a stalker can create another account. But it does add an additional small speed bump.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      It’s a way to dip their toe into being closed off. Right now it’s a “user choice” so some people can slowly build the wall while feeling good about “blocking AI scrapers” (they’ll get around it no problem) or “blocking stalkers” (they’ll get around it no problem) or “blocking [next week’s bogeyman]” and all of a sudden everyone has to make an account to interact with the website but it was oRgAnIc™

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    97
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    He is really old, he’ll be 79 in june. How many people that are that age, you hear they die, and you’re like, “mmhmm, they had a long life.” He should be at his country clubs being racist and assaulting women like all the other republicans. Retire, it’s just a job man.

  • Baggins
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1312 months ago

    Why is a) He even in there? b) still wearing that stupid hat?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 months ago

          Nah, the kid isn’t a hat, he’s a human shield.

          People are far less likely to shoot evil billionaires (and infinitely less likely to do so and gain public sympathy) if they do it near their spawn, so he’s been bringing his 4yo everywhere he thinks he might otherwise be shot ever since people started celebrating Luigi.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    It’s fucking weird that there are people in this comment section acting like Trump is a naughty schoolboy texting his crush under the desk.

    He’s Trump. If he was shitposting it’d be on the table and any sycophant that had a problem with it would get told to shut up and get him a hamburger.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      Unless he’s talking to his FSB handler on his second phone and doesn’t want anyone to see

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        The FSB handler that told gim to stop all aid and make an exception for ukraine?
        That told him to unlilaterally break the missile treaties?
        Is he in the room with us right now?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          Is your argument here that Trump couldn’t possibly be a Russian asset? Because I’ve got news for you, the evidence is pretty overwhelming that he is, at the very least, helping Putin with everything he needs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I just gave you facts to the contrary, then simply show me your ‘evidence’

              Yeah, I think maybe you don’t know what the word “facts” actually means, because you did no such thing.

              Have you tried, I don’t know, googling it?

              Try adding “Krasnov” to your queries.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 months ago

                LOL Imagine being this confidently wrong .
                I did give you 2 important decisions Trump made that were very hostile to Russia. Or do you want to deny this happened or that he during his first time already fully supported them 4 years long.
                Maybe you do, there’s a possibility of you being ‘special’ in the head.

                Especially when I do Google what you have to offer as ‘facts’. Slop I normally wouldn’t waste time with and read:

                According to a Facebook post…”
                “a former Soviet and Kazakh security official, claimed…”
                "a rumor circulated online that… "

                You see, when they use these little words it means they pulled them from their ass and have nothing to back it up.
                Exactly the opposite of a fact (a thing that is known or proved to be true.)
                Only dumb or very gullible specimens would believe that, or worse double down on them.
                I don’t waste time on them Like I don’t waste on those ‘articles’.
                At best I ridicule them, then say goodbye.
                So bye

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 months ago

                  What a weird comment… FYI, the Krasnov thing is a very recent development, so it’s not confirmed.

                  But let’s not pretend that’s the only evidence. Clearly you have no interest in actually understanding this, as you’ve clearly already made up your mind before anyone was ever able to even present a case.

                  It’s undeniable that, at the very least, Trump’s actions are ALWAYS in line with Russia and Putin. Including decisions he’s made that have literally no possible explanation beyond that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Why would his FSB handler talk to him on the phone if she were in the same room with him?