• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There are physicist, respected ones, that believe the universe is deterministic. That we don’t have free will.

    And psychologists that believe that feeling of consciousness is a result of the brain developing a self-supervising function for higher order thinking.

    Essentially free will is just an illusion.

    • WtfEvenIsExistence3️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      392 years ago

      Lol you posting this is what was always meant to happen, same as how I am here and read your comment and replied.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Of the 2 compatible explanations, I really like the many worlds theory over hidden variables. Many worlds explains this unexplainable randomness, the probabilistic nature of subatomic particle movements, by saying all possible movements happen…. The probabilities just indicate the likelihood that our reality is the one that movement X happens in.

        And then you throw the block universe in, and it’s just all the more beautiful.

        All possible combinations of atomic interactions all happen. Well “happen” is so linear time thinking, they all just exist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Well, if true, it doesn’t make any difference. Because it always was and always will be. Nothing makes any difference.

        But in another way, it’s kinda neat. I guess it’s simultaneously a not fun fact, and a fun fact.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Some of the top scientists believe in a higher power god. NdGT makes the argument in one of his lectures that until that number is zero you have no right to look down on them for believing in a higher power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I want saying you you but instead the royal you. That’s where a lot of the determinism their cones from. God doesn’t play dice with the universe and all that. Which is entirely taken out of context from Einstein and a lot of people wrongly think Einstein was religious but he wasn’t. Still the quote remains and have kept scientists religious for decades.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            I like Sabine Hossenfelders way of explaining things, she disregards god altogether. It’s not necessary for these explanations.

            I saw some other scientists basically throwing a hissy fit about determinism, and how they wouldn’t get credit for being so smart and making the discoveries and stuff if determinism was true. Like obviously I’m so smart, I’m making hypotheses so I’ve got free will.

            It was utterly embarrassing, I was looking for a legit counter view to see what the other side said. And the first two videos I found were PhDs throwing tantrums on podcasts.

            But to those that believe in a god generally, sure, with our current knowledge anything is a possibility… just some theories have more standing than others… but some also are nicer to believe in, and just make sense for a being to want to believe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      There are physicist, respected ones, that believe the universe is deterministic.

      Quantum mechanics involves true randomness, so it is already proven that the universe is not deterministic.

      That doesn’t mean we have free will, though. Random actions are no more free than predetermined ones.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Of the 2 compatible explanations, I really like the many worlds theory over hidden variables. Many worlds explains this unexplainable randomness, the probabilistic nature of subatomic particle movements, by saying all possible movements happen…. The probabilities just indicate the likelihood that our reality is the one that movement X happens in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I think the argument they make is that quantum randomness doesn’t have any way of influencing our choices, the scales are too different. I disagree, I think quantum randomness is free will, and there’s some sort of quantum amplifier, for lack of a better word, that bridges the gap between particle interactions and consciousness. But since there is no way to prove or disprove such a thing, since it is by definition indistinguishable from chance, it’s basically naval gazing…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    452 years ago

    Fanta’s creation was a result of American companies cutting off business with Germany during WWII. Coca Cola stopped sending ingredients to the local bottling plant in Germany but the ones there still wanted to work and make money. They took the ingredients they still had access to and made a new drink, Fanta! Once the war was over and Coca Cola made contact with them again they liked the new drink and just made it part of their brand.

    I had to stop telling this normally as it tends to make people hate me for making them feel bad about drinking Fanta. I tell them it’s fine. I drive a Volkswagen. But they still feel gross about it so I stopped telling people or at least tell them that they may not want to drink Fanta anymore and give them the choice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Coca-Cola never gave up thier german subsidiary Coca-Cola GmbH and they never willingly stopped sending syrup.

      Syrup was stopped by the allied blockades. They ran out of stockpiles in 1943 and so the owner created Fanta with apple cider scraps.

      The Dutch Coca-Cola plant had similar supply issues and they sent the Fanta branding up there as well but used elderberry.

      After the war Coca-Cola regained their subsidiaries and the Fanta branding.

      Fanta would be discontinued in 1949.

      The current Fanta we know today was created in Italy in 1955 to complete with an unknown Italian PepsiCo product.

    • CaptainBlagbird
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This makes me want to drink Fanta more than Cola though.

      I don’t blame the workers for wanting to continue earning their money. I wonder whether they provided the new drink freely to Coke once the contact came back, or if Coke just took it…

  • NickwithaC
    link
    fedilink
    English
    842 years ago

    “Stranger Danger” is largely a myth as the most likely place for a child to be abused is in their own home and the most likely culprit is a trusted family member.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        28
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t trust myself with my kids either since I’m a close relative, I exclusively only entrust my kids to totally random strangers off the Internet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      The number of transgender people that have been credibly accused of molesting children is minuscule. There are nearly 10,000 Catholic priests and church employees that have been credibly accused of child molestation. Catholic priests and Catholic church employees are more likely to assault children than school teachers (more priests etc. have been credibly accused than school teachers, and there are fa, far more school teachers than priests et al.)

      And that’s not even getting into the “youth pastor that rapes teen girls” trope.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Factually incorrect.

      Judith Barsi (and her mother) was killed by her biological father before he killed himself.

      There is no evidence pointing to any anger of fame. Both of her major roles (The Land Before Time and All Dogs Go To Heaven)were released after her death.

      The father was an abusive drunk that threated to kill the family and himself multiple times.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 years ago

    I once, out of curiosity, mounted an expedition to the darkest regions of the internet, aka The Dark Web.

    There’s some shit there that can scar you for life. Don’t ever go there, seriously.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I highly doubt it, my mind was s very strong and I have seen many thing in my life, gruesome death, abuse you name it. Nothing disturbs me. In comparison, the average person is too sensitive

      • AstralWeekends
        link
        fedilink
        262 years ago

        Thinking of it a bit differently, have you considered you might not be sensitive enough? There’s some real benefits to living with a healthy dose of sensitivity; for one, it is part of a healthy response to situations that could be physically harmful to you. Best of luck out there :)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        I’m actively avoiding growing insensitive to stuff like this

        My sense of normalcy kinda depends on not being apathetic to abuse

    • Corroded
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      There are some useful websites out there if by darknet you mean the Tor network. BBC, Debian, Reddit, and Z-Library (an eBook download site that had its content availability reduced after legal pressure) for example have onion domains.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 years ago

        Ahh the days of orgish, rotten, thisisacryforhelp, stile project, theync

        Why, when I saw.my first decapitation video I was merely a boy!

        Yeah, the internet used to be fucked. There were noooo rules. It was kinda like paradise but with landmines. Lots of landmines.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It still is very fucked especially sites like reddit sometimes

          Edit: maybe i underestimated the internet a bit

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            212 years ago

            Oh you sweet summer child. Reddit has moderation, administration, …rules? Policies, terms of use?

            Reddit is the Disney Channel.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              The moderation took way too long but I understand that it could be even worse but the internet is still a fucked up place maybe less than before but still bad

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It’s not “oops, I accidentally stumbled upon a cache of child porn” fucked, like back in the early days of the WWW.

            You’ll run into fucked up people; but the content is like Sesame Street levels of fucked by comparison.

  • Skull giver
    link
    fedilink
    562 years ago

    According to quantum physics, it’s possible that the Higgs field, which gives matter its mass, isn’t as stable as it seems and could be in a false vacuum. In theory it could collapse to a lower energy state releasing massive amounts of energy while turning surrounding matter into a different kind of matter with theoretically completely different laws of physics… If just one particle manages to reach this true vacuum state (through quantum tunneling fore example), the effect will be a collapse of the universe around it, expanding at light speed.

    Some interpretations state that stars and even life will survive such an event. Others state that nothing most people think of as “matter” will survive. Either way, unless we can prove that our current understanding of physics is wrong, devastation at a universal scale could happen any time, anywhere.

    The universe could be collapsing as we speak and we have no way to predict it, no way to prevent it and no way to even be sure this is it isn’t already happening. All it would take is a single particle in the entire universe to fuck up and we’d be doomed. What we know as the universe could disappear into nothingness at any point in time, leaving not even bones or a planet for theoretical future civilisations to find.

    Luckily, vacuum decay is limited by the speed of light, so it could take billions of years before the bubble of death hits us. It could also hit in five seconds.

    • TipRing
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Of all the big scary things in the universe, this one scares me the least. Even if it does happen and is the worst-case scenario you just cease to exist at the speed of light before you even know something is happening. No pain, no dread at your inevitable demise, you just are living your life normally and in a nanosecond you are gone. Not a bad way to go, imo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Either way, unless we can prove that our current understanding of physics is wrong, devastation at a universal scale could happen any time, anywhere.

      This is a disingenuous way to phrase this. Our current understanding of physics leads us to hypothesize that our universe could be metastable, there is no proof that we actually exist in such a state.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Once the expansion of the universe has accelerated enough we should be safe from this, right? My thinking is that if some galaxy starts collapsing as you described, but all surrounding galaxies are moving away at FTL speeds, it would never reach them.

      • Skull giver
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        If expansion does come close to or exceeds the speed of light we should be safe from far away galaxies, for sure. At the speed of light, it’ll take ages for such an event to ever reach us in the first place, so the only realistic danger is that vacuum decay has already happened and is coming right for us.

        However, if it can occur at all, it can occur a second time, closer to our home.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        That would reduce the chances, but this could happen to literally any particle. Kind of hard to avoid it when it’s in one of your spleen molecules.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Correction, it should be the entire observable universe not the entire universe since light outside the observable universe cannot reach us due to expansion thus anything that travels at speed of light can also not reach us.

  • Kes
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Every time you blink, your eyeballs roll up into the back of your eye socket and roll back to the original spot quickly

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    462 years ago

    That our memories are all we really know and have. They’re also volatile, and are usually changed to support a narrative.

    Be careful.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 years ago

      Hey remember when you promised to give me that $100? Don’t tell me your memory has changed to support the narrative that you’ve forgotten!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      “There are a group of people who believe that each day, when they sleep, they die,” the old man continued. “They believe that consciousness doesn’t continue—that if it is interrupted, a new soul is born when the body awakes.” The old man continued…

      “The thing about this philosophy is how difficult it is to disprove,” the old man said. “How do you know that you are the same you as yesterday? You would never know if a new soul came to inhabit your body, so long as it had the same memories. But then … if it acts the same, and thinks it is you, why would it matter? What is it to be you?"

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      We forget things but we remember people. As long as you take one life lesson from every person you meet you’ll never forget the important stuff.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    355/113 is the best fractional approximation of pi with less than 5 digits on both numerator and denominator, with 6 decimal digits of precision. It is constructed by taking the sequence of the first 3 odd numbers, each repeated exactly once, as such: “113355”, then splitting the resulting string in halves, taking the first half as denominator, and the second as numerator.

    A 4-set venn diagram can’t be constructed with circles because it wouldn’t show exclusive intersections between opposed sets.

    A talks to B, B talks to C; A is married, C is not married. Therefore, a married person is talking to a non-married person.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      for the third one because it stumped me a bit, there are 2 posibilites:

      • Am -> Bu -> Cu
      • Am -> Bm -> Cu

      Either way there is a married person talking to a non-married person.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Damn, that’s depressing. But considering the pandas sense of self preservation, it makes total sense.

  • raubarno
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    Most of the computer users think the Internet is a synonym for Facebook.

  • Rin
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That there’s notorious war criminals still alive such as Henry Kissinger that probably won’t face any repercussions for their atrocities in their lifetimes.

    Also there are billionaires and politicians in power that could easily at least start switching to clean energy and plastic alternatives but choose not to.